Recommended Posts

3 friends and myself played Horde/Private for a few hours, got to around Wave 30 with loads of cash stored up / fortification upgrades... we then went out for the night assuming we'd be able to continue where we left off. However, the only way seems to be to start a new Horde/Private match and choose to start on wave 30, but you start from scratch without any money/fortification upgrades putting you at a disadvantage. Is there no way to save a private local horde matches?

No, you dont keep your money or anything. Thats how it is. Yea, its a little harder...but you get more money faster since the enemies are harder and there are more of them . Plus, if you have any of the mutators...that helps A LOT. Like unlimited ammo and super reload. A few friends and I completed Horde on Insane easily with those mutators.

Rar! giant neck muscles! I got my copy today. Idiot in the store put a copy of the original GOW in the case and I had to go back. They changed it without issue, thankfully.

Well, off to kick some ass.

:angry: Well what a gang of ass-fu****g bandits EPIC are.

I love the game and bought the season pass thinking that any map pack releases would be a definite purchase for me.

I now hear the Map Packs are FREE and the "DLC" is already on the disc and I just download an unlock for a mode I never use!

Didn't save me 25% at all. I would never have bought a DLC for Horde mode. I simply don't play it. I tried it, and it is just inferior to TDM or Execution IMO.

Right that's that of my chest. B'stards! :angry:

:angry: Well what a gang of ass-fu****g bandits EPIC are.

I love the game and bought the season pass thinking that any map pack releases would be a definite purchase for me.

I now hear the Map Packs are FREE and the "DLC" is already on the disc and I just download an unlock for a mode I never use!

Didn't save me 25% at all. I would never have bought a DLC for Horde mode. I simply don't play it. I tried it, and it is just inferior to TDM or Execution IMO.

Right that's that of my chest. B'stards! :angry:

huh breath

:angry: Well what a gang of ass-fu****g bandits EPIC are.

I love the game and bought the season pass thinking that any map pack releases would be a definite purchase for me.

I now hear the Map Packs are FREE and the "DLC" is already on the disc and I just download an unlock for a mode I never use!

Didn't save me 25% at all. I would never have bought a DLC for Horde mode. I simply don't play it. I tried it, and it is just inferior to TDM or Execution IMO.

Right that's that of my chest. B'stards! :angry:

The maps for horde can only be selected by people with the paid DLC, but if you don't use it, it's worthless. Plus anyone can play the maps if someone else selects them. It's just silly, especially for on-disc "DLC."

The maps for horde can only be selected by people with the paid DLC, but if you don't use it, it's worthless. Plus anyone can play the maps if someone else selects them. It's just silly, especially for on-disc "DLC."

also ontop of that you also have the other 3 DLCs paid. Ontop of that you have more character and weapon skins.

Tbh, you know the risks of buying DLC in advance. You know they're going to screw you over somehow.

Is it bad that I've left my console running private bot matches nonstop since Saturday trying to unlock Chairman Prescott? <_< Only a few matches to go and I'll have him, seems like an awful lot of stuff to do to unlock him (Silver Allfathers medal = 300 matches in each game type).

Tbh, you know the risks of buying DLC in advance. You know they're going to screw you over somehow.

Is it bad that I've left my console running private bot matches nonstop since Saturday trying to unlock Chairman Prescott? <_< Only a few matches to go and I'll have him, seems like an awful lot of stuff to do to unlock him (Silver Allfathers medal = 300 matches in each game type).

Eh, I know tons of people that do that. Some people are going for Seriously 3.0. I doubt I'll ever play Gears of War 3 even near enough to get that achievement, but if I get close (again, doubtful), I'd do it. But it's a waste of your life trying to get that damn achievement. :laugh:

It's worthless for him if he doesn't play Horde. Gives no discount, and buying on-disc DLC is beyond lame.

I know, I'm just compounding the factors that he can also use in MP. Besides, there might not even be any more Horde DLCs. lol.

Tbh, you know the risks of buying DLC in advance. You know they're going to screw you over somehow.

:huh: No I don't. I have never bought DLC in advance before.

As always assumption is mother of all F**k ups. I assumed that like all the DLC before in this game and in other online MP, it would be centered round new MP vs MP maps. Not MP vs Bots! :|

This game is the sole reason I bought a brand new Xbox 360 and almost sold it within a month. I love Gears 1, Gears 2 was alright. Gears 3 is a great game but they are money hogs now and I'm sad to it like this.

The free DLC does look good though.

Eh, I know tons of people that do that. Some people are going for Seriously 3.0. I doubt I'll ever play Gears of War 3 even near enough to get that achievement, but if I get close (again, doubtful), I'd do it. But it's a waste of your life trying to get that damn achievement. :laugh:

Yeah, Seriously 3.0 is out of the question for me. I might be able to get the Embry Star one day but I'm not going to go out of my way to get it. I just wanted a character no one else had :p

:huh: No I don't. I have never bought DLC in advance before.

As always assumption is mother of all F**k ups. I assumed that like all the DLC before in this game and in other online MP, it would be centered round new MP vs MP maps. Not MP vs Bots! :|

You never understood the risks of laying down money for something you hadn't seen yet? You know there was no time limit on the season pass, you could have waited to see what was going to be included.

They already said before the game came out there'd be four packs: one for campaign, one for VS MP, one for Horde and one for Beast. There was nothing there about umpteen map packs for versus MP.

nice one complex, it's funny.

as for the events, not sure what's going on with the double XP, but the halloween event was hilarious, loved it. this is by far my favorite Gears game, love the MP, but it seems not so many people play it online. not overly interested in the DLC, they need to be more considerate of the user base and not charge too much for those things with so many big MP titles doing the rounds this season.

gotta say the SP campaign is really nice this time around, not just for the twists, but for the overall progression of it. i personally find it actually less emotional than Gears 2, but better written in terms of dialogue and logic.

gotta say the SP campaign is really nice this time around, not just for the twists, but for the overall progression of it. i personally find it actually less emotional than Gears 2, but better written in terms of dialogue and logic.

Even though I knew somethings were coming since they leaked and got ruined for me, I still cried. I had a few good laughs with the jokes from the awesome Baird and Sam. I think it was the best of the 3 in all departments.

gotta say the SP campaign is really nice this time around, not just for the twists, but for the overall progression of it. i personally find it actually less emotional than Gears 2, but better written in terms of dialogue and logic.

I finished it last night so can finally enter this thread safe in the knowledge I'm not going to see something I wish I hadn't.

Think it's a good solo campaign, though am sure it's easier than the previous two. Doesn't quite hit the same level as Gears 2 (Dom finding Maria is a fantastic scene in that game that nothing else has equalled in my eyes, yet) but am looking forward to blasting through it on co-op now.

The emotion in GoW2 and 3 is just too forced for me to take seriously. I ended up laughing when Dom put a damn Boltok to Maria's head in 2, and

his suicide

in 3 was a little OTT as well.

I'm glad that

it was Dom who died in this game and not someone else I cared about. If Cole had died as the rumours suggested I would have been devastated.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • The quantum search for Time's origin had an equally mind-boggling conclusion by Sayan Sen Image by Steve Johnson via Pexels A theoretical study from researchers at the University of Surrey suggested that the direction of time may not be fundamentally fixed in certain quantum systems. The work, published in Scientific Reports, examined how the “arrow of time” could emerge from microscopic physics and found that time-reversal symmetry can remain intact even in models used to describe processes such as energy loss and thermalisation. The arrow of time refers to the observed one-way direction from past to future in everyday life. In macroscopic processes, this is easy to see. Spilled milk spreads across a table and does not gather back into a glass, and heat flows from hotter objects to colder ones. These processes shape the common sense idea that time moves in a single direction. However, at the level of fundamental physics, many equations do not prefer a direction of time. Time-reversal symmetry means that the same physical laws can describe a system whether time moves forward or backward. This has made it difficult to explain why irreversible behaviour appears in the large-scale world even when the underlying rules do not require it. Dr Andrea Rocco, Associate Professor in Physics and Mathematical Biology at the University of Surrey, described this contrast: "One way to explain this is when you look at a process like spilt milk spreading across a table, it's clear that time is moving forward. But if you were to play that in reverse, like a movie, you'd immediately know something was wrong – it would be hard to believe milk could just gather back into a glass. However, there are processes, such as the motion of a pendulum, that look just as believable in reverse. The puzzle is that, at the most fundamental level, the laws of physics resemble the pendulum; they do not account for irreversible processes. Our findings suggest that while our common experience tells us that time only moves one way, we are just unaware that the opposite direction would have been equally possible." The study focused on open quantum systems, which are quantum systems that interact with a surrounding environment. This environment, often described as a heat bath, can exchange energy and information with the system. The researchers used this framework to study how a direction of time might appear even when the underlying physics does not enforce one. A key part of the analysis involved the Markov approximation. This is a simplification used in many models where the system is assumed not to retain memory of its past states. The idea is that changes depend only on the current state, not on earlier history. This is commonly used when studying thermalisation, which is the process where a system settles into equilibrium with its environment. The study also used concepts such as master equations, including the Lindblad and Pauli equations, which describe how probabilities of different quantum states change over time. Another related model discussed was quantum Brownian motion, which describes the random-like movement of a quantum particle interacting continuously with its environment. In these descriptions, a “memory kernel” can appear, which is a mathematical term that accounts for how past states influence current behaviour. The researchers found that applying the Markov approximation did not break time-reversal symmetry. Even when the system interacted with an effectively infinite heat bath, the resulting equations of motion remained symmetric in time. This meant that the same mathematical description could, in principle, run forward or backward in time without contradiction. The study further showed that standard frameworks used in open quantum systems, including quantum Brownian motion and master equations like the Lindblad and Pauli forms, could be written in a time-symmetric way. These equations are typically used to describe processes that look irreversible, such as dissipation and thermalisation, but the results suggested they can also be interpreted as allowing evolution in both time directions. Thomas Guff, Research Fellow in Quantum Thermodynamics, said: "The surprising part of this project was that even after making the standard simplifying assumption to our equations describing open quantum systems, the equations still behaved the same way whether the system was moving forwards or backwards in time. When we carefully worked through the maths, we found that this behaviour had to be the case because a key part of the equation, the "memory kernel," is symmetrical in time. We also found a small but important detail which is usually overlooked – a time discontinuous factor emerged that kept the time-symmetry property intact. It’s unusual to see such a mathematical mechanism in a physics equation because it's not continuous, and it was very surprising to see it appear so naturally." The researchers also noted that deriving a one-way arrow of time from time-reversal symmetric microscopic dynamics remains an open problem across fields such as thermodynamics, statistical mechanics, particle physics, and cosmology. Their results suggested that some standard descriptions of irreversible behaviour in open quantum systems may be better understood using a time-symmetric formulation of Markovianity. According to the study, processes such as thermalisation, which are usually treated as irreversible, could in theory be described in a way that allows evolution in either time direction under the same rules. This does not imply that time reversal occurs in everyday life, but rather that the underlying equations do not strictly enforce a single direction. Overall, the findings suggested that the perceived direction of time may emerge from how physical systems are modelled and approximated, rather than from a fundamental asymmetry in the laws themselves. The researchers noted that this perspective could have implications for ongoing work in quantum mechanics, thermodynamics, and cosmology on the origin of time’s arrow. Source: University of Surrey, Nature This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing
    • A bit premature... 100% Marketing. Bizarre.
    • A $300 price hike is insane! No one is going to want to pay that much!
    • Since the 1st one flopped, there is really no reason to make another one. It's just losing money left and right.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      581
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      75
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      73
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!