I tried switching to Hotmail from Gmail...


Recommended Posts

Ever since Google changed their privacy policy, I've been thinking about moving to Microsoft's online offerings. I tried switching to Hotmail for a week and I must say, it hasn't been a good experience. Not that Hotmail is bad, but it's kinda like when I tried Android after having an iPhone for over a year, it's just not as good. Here's a short list of the main problems I have with Hotmail compared to Gmail:

Recieving Email from another Account

I've had my gmail account for several years and I'm currently using 56% of the storage space allotted. I setup Hotmail to pull in my emails from Google and at first it was going fine, but after an hour or so, it stopped pulling in additional ones. It may have pulled in about 1/10th of the total emails in my gmail account. Not only that, but new emails that come into my gmail inbox aren't being propogated in Hotmail at all.

User Interface

Hotmail feels like a work in progress rather than a complete email offering. They are trying to make Hotmail feel like Outlook and I think that's my biggest issue with it. Outlook's interface works fine for a desktop email program, but it doesn't translate so well to Hotmail's web interface. There are so many options above the email pane that could be combined into a drop down menu, such as Reply, Reply All, Forward, etc...

While sending an email isn't too bad, replying to an email is horrid compared to the experience on Gmail. Where Gmail has a reply box ready and waiting for you under the message, Hotmail makes you click Reply and then loads an entirely new page for you to type your reply in to. This may be a bit anal, but it's about the experience and the experience isn't as good.

Gmail has beautiful themes, I especially like the Mountain theme. Hotmail has very cheesy themes that seem like they added them only because they "had to".

I do like the ability to right click on my Junk folder and empty it without having to actually open the junk folder first, same goes for the Trash folder.

Conclusion

While most of the issues I have with Hotmail are minor, they are severe enough, to me at least, to stick with Gmail for the time being. I really wish Hotmail was as polished as Gmail, because I would really prefer using it, but sadly it is not. I will, however, continue to monitor the progress of the Hotmail experience and maybe someday in the future I will make the switch for good!

  • Like 3

Don't worry Google is in the process of destroying Gmail with new look that will have you running to Hotmail.

i have to agree with the way gmail is looking nowadays,

but that saying , i dont think i would ever go back to hotmail, to me it just doesn't seem professional to have a @hotmail email address.

but thats just my opinion

Hotmail is miles ahead of Gmail in the user interface department in my opinion. I find Gmail to be annoying and nothing where i would expect to find it. Hotmail just works for me.

As a Windows Live Messenger User i like how i can use that directly from my inbox. I know you can use Google Talk from your Gmail inbox, however no one i know uses that, everyone is on Windows Live.

I guess its what ever works best for you, Ive had Hotmail since 1999 and found no reason to switch. Nice webmail interface, works perfectly with a desktop email client and push email works great.

i have to agree with the way gmail is looking nowadays,

but that saying , i dont think i would ever go back to hotmail, to me it just doesn't seem professional to have a @hotmail email address.

but thats just my opinion

I've never understood this. @hotmail @live @yahoo is no more professional or unprofessional than @gmail. Sure, the name before might come into play but as long as that is sensible and not offensive people shouldn't worry about it. Do you think people years ago before gmail got laughed at for using hotmail and yahoo and impacted their job prospects or even now. Of course not. Yes, Gmail pushed things forward and was somewhat cooler at the start but it's just like the rest now.

@OP

Fair comments. I would like themes for Hotmail similar to the full page Gmail ones or at least allow more customisation.

Don't see much of an issue with the reply email part though. Full page seems better than two seperate parts when writing and replying to the original email.

Have you tried pulling your content down to something like Thunderbird or another client to see if it's just a hotmail issue. 56% of storage space is quite a lot. Something like that will take time and I imagine it won't get the new stuff until it's finished.

I quite like the Hotmail UI. Yeah, work in progress but it seems quite fucntional and clear, Text options make it straightforward and quicker for people rather than more drop downs hiding stuff you use regularly. Not cluttered.

My problem with Microsoft recently is that they put too much emphasis on integrating the interface to the underlining code base.

Any other company like Google builds the underpinnings of a product separate to the user interface. They provide frameworks so that any interface can seamlessly sit atop a strong foundation. So over the years they can make things look better and do radical interface changes without sacrificing a single feature.

Microsoft however seems to go "ok we need a new interface, better recode the whole entire thing" and then you constantly get products that feel unfinished that lack tons of functions that the previous version had. Like hotmail.

I use Hotmail because I've had my account since 1997....I would rather use gmail (mostly for IMAP) but it's too complicated to switch now :/

Go into Gmail settings and there is an option to import mail and contacts from another account.

I'm someone who switched the other way: Hotmail -> Gmail

Bear in mind I had used Hotmail since like 1998... I much prefer gMail. Easier to find mails, better interface, quicker, better integration.

  • Like 3

With the exception of the trouble you had copying your emails none of your problems seem insurmountable. I'm sure you'd get used to Hotmail's UI if you gave it a try.

You're correct, they aren't insurmountable, but when you're used to doing things a certain way, I guess it's just hard to get used to not having the convenience you're used to. Gmail's UI is miles ahead of Hotmails.

Go into Gmail settings and there is an option to import mail and contacts from another account.

Copying mail is fine my biggest problem is that all my accounts are tied to my hotmail and every one I know has my hotmail too.....just seems so complicated :/

I use Hotmail because I've had my account since 1997....I would rather use gmail (mostly for IMAP) but it's too complicated to switch now :/

I have a similar problem, and am actually migrating to my own personal server. If it helps, you can get Exchange connectivity to Hotmail from mobile devices (if you didn't know already): http://www.redmondpie.com/hotmail-push-email-exchange-activesync/

Copying mail is fine my biggest problem is that all my accounts are tied to my hotmail and every one I know has my hotmail too.....just seems so complicated :/

Does hotmail not offer an option to forward your mail to another account? Gmail offers that and I used that feature when moving to a new account.

I have a similar problem, and am actually migrating to my own personal server. If it helps, you can get Exchange connectivity to Hotmail from mobile devices (if you didn't know already): http://www.redmondpi...nge-activesync/

I do that with my iPhone, my ONLY gripe with Hotmail right now is that I can't do that from my computer :angry:

Does hotmail not offer an option to forward your mail to another account? Gmail offers that and I used that feature when moving to a new account.

It probably does, but then I'll have some accounts associated with my Hotmail and the new accounts I create will be with my gmail :/ and then you never remember which one you use etc etc I know I'm being picky here lol

Does hotmail not offer an option to forward your mail to another account? Gmail offers that and I used that feature when moving to a new account.

I had mine forwarding to Gmail for ages, when I had all of my 3rd party accounts moved over to gmail and I was happy that the only mail missing on my gmail was all the spam I then closed my hotmail account.

I do that with my iPhone, my ONLY gripe with Hotmail right now is that I can't do that from my computer :angry:

It probably does, but then I'll have some accounts associated with my Hotmail and the new accounts I create will be with my gmail :/ and then you never remember which one you use etc etc I know I'm being picky here lol

Well it's pretty simple really, You set up the forwarding then only use your Gmail account. Then any emails you get from services that are sent to your hotmail you login to that websites control panel and change the email. Then in a year from now you'll be switched over for all the regular mail you receive and any of your old friends who email you out of the blue will still have their email sent to you because you leave the forwarding setup.

That is how I did it about a year ago and it has all worked fine for me. I'm enjoying IMAP :p

That is how I did it about a year ago and it has all worked fine for me. I'm enjoying IMAP :p

Ahhhh stop teasing me! LOL IMAP (or lack of Exchange support from Hotmail) is pretty much the only reason I want to switch. I only want to deal with the web interface when I'm away from my computer or phone
i have to agree with the way gmail is looking nowadays, but that saying , i dont think i would ever go back to hotmail, to me it just doesn't seem professional to have a @hotmail email address. but thats just my opinion

Microsoft offer '@live' addresses now, for all of their services, including Hotmail :) '@live' doesn't sound particularly unprofessional, to me?it's on the same level as '@gmail'. I have my own personal domain with an email address, and I use Windows Live Admin Center for Windows Live Hotmail with that email address. I feel that such email addresses sound more professional than what any webmail service offers :)

I quite like the Hotmail UI. Yeah, work in progress but it seems quite fucntional and clear, Text options make it straightforward and quicker for people rather than more drop downs hiding stuff you use regularly. Not cluttered.

I quite dislike the current Hotmail design; it feels awkward, cluttered, and outdated. I much prefer Gmail's new design, which is interesting because I'd always previously disliked how Gmail looked. Google have greatly impressed me with their latest design decisions. I use Hotmail, but I am hoping that Microsoft update the website design to a beautiful Metro-inspired one.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • I think there will be a 27H1 for actual users of 26H1 The 25h2 supports ARM too : Snapdragon X, Snapdragon X Plus and Snapdragon X Elite
    • Poll: Grand Theft Auto VI price predictions, cast your vote by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe After years of waiting, Rockstar will be solidifying the launch date of Grand Theft Auto VI with the launch of pre-orders next week. While the studio has confirmed a date for this occasion, it is yet to attach a price to the highly anticipated game. So let's see what our readers think it will cost at launch. The Grand Theft Auto VI pre-orders will kick off on June 25 for digital and physical editions. Unless some last-minute changes happen, the release date will be November 19, 2026, across Xbox Series X|S and PlayStation 5. Unfortunately, there's still no information about a PC version from the developer or the publisher Take-Two. Now the question becomes, how much will Grand Theft Auto VI cost at launch? The game is predicted by some analysts to be the biggest launch of an entertainment product ever. With the amount of hype that has been built behind it and with ballooning development costs, Take-Two may price this Grand Theft Auto entry differently from other AAA titles. The current price of a AAA game is $69.99. That norm almost rose to $79.99 before calming down. But with such a massive release, Grand Theft Auto VI may be the game that pushes the boundary again. It's also possible that Take-Two keeps the price relatively low to increase the number of players that jump in early and keep them hooked on Grand Theft Auto Online to spend on microtransactions for years to come. Keep in mind that the below poll is asking for a prediction of the standard edition price, not a deluxe or any other special edition that Take-Two will introduce for additional benefits. Also, there is also the chance of the company splitting up the campaign and online portions. If you think that will happen, put your vote on what you think will be the total cost of the two. Poll Poll: How much will Grand Theft Auto VI cost? $59.99 $69.99 $79.99 $89.99 $100 or more Submit Vote If you have a very specific prediction in mind, sound off in the comments below.
    • Would you please fix your graphics. They are outdated and don't fit the article.
    • The Light of Life? We actually do glow till our Death, study finds by Sayan Sen Image by Rafael Rendon via Pexels A study by researchers at the University of Calgary has found that living organisms produce an extremely faint light known as ultraweak photon emission, and that this glow appears to drop significantly after death. The research was published in the Journal of Physical Chemistry in April 2025 and quickly drew widespread attention, leading to more than 200 news stories about the findings. Ultraweak photon emission (or UPE), sometimes called biophoton emission, refers to tiny amounts of light released by living cells as a result of normal biological activity. A photon is the basic particle of light, and researchers say every living system examined so far, including plants and animals, has been found to emit these photons. The glow is far too faint to be seen by the human eye. “I suppose it has a little to do with people being reminded of auras,” says Dr. Christoph Simon, PhD, one of the authors of the study and a professor in the Department of Physics and Astronomy in the Faculty of Science. “It is a fact that living beings glow. It’s a very weak glow, but it’s there and visible with very sensitive cameras.” According to the study, the light involved is extremely weak, ranging from 10 to 1,000 photons per square centimetre per second across a spectral range of 200 to 1,000 nanometres. For comparison, a nanometre is one-billionth of a metre and is commonly used to measure wavelengths of light. Detecting emissions at such low levels requires highly specialized equipment. To study the phenomenon, researchers used electron-multiplying charge-coupled device (EMCCD) and charge-coupled device (CCD) cameras. These imaging systems are designed to detect extremely small amounts of light, including individual photons, while minimizing background noise. The technology allowed researchers to capture signals that would otherwise be impossible to observe. The team worked with the Human Health Therapeutics Research Centre at the National Research Council of Canada (NRC) in Ottawa to examine photon emissions in mice. Researchers took two-hour exposure images of the animals before and after death and compared the results. “We saw that the level of light that they emit – this biophoton glow – is distinctly different between living and dead animals,” says Dr. Daniel Oblak, PhD, an associate professor in Physics and Astronomy and the corresponding author of the study. The images showed a clear decrease in photon emissions after death across the entire body of each mouse. According to the researchers, this provided direct evidence that living and dead tissue produce different levels of ultraweak photon emission. “It’s a very small amount and it’s, of course, very tricky to detect,” Oblak says. The study grew out of discussions between Simon, whose research interests include quantum biology, and Oblak, whose work focuses on detecting light for quantum communication experiments. Quantum biology is a field that explores whether processes described by quantum physics, which studies matter and energy at very small scales, may also play a role in living systems. “Since I work as a quantum physicist on light detection for quantum communication, I thought that experimentally we have a lot of the tools to be able to detect the light,” Oblak explains. The researchers also investigated UPE in plants and found that the light changed in response to stress. When plants were exposed to higher temperatures or physically injured, their photon emissions increased. Chemical treatments also affected the glow. Among the substances tested, the local anesthetic benzocaine produced the strongest emission response when applied to injured plant tissue. These findings suggest that ultraweak photon emission is closely linked to biochemical and metabolic activity inside living organisms. Metabolism refers to the chemical reactions that allow cells and organisms to stay alive and function. Because these reactions change when an organism experiences stress, injury or disease, researchers believe UPE may provide a way to monitor those changes. The researchers stress that the glow is a physical and biological phenomenon, not a metaphysical one. Oblak says more research is needed to understand exactly how the light is produced and what information it may reveal about the condition of living tissue. “We must understand what that is to figure out what’s happening,” he says. “If we can understand how that relates to certain influences on the body – stress, diseases – then that could be used as a diagnostic tool.” The researchers believe the technique could eventually help scientists study health and disease without invasive procedures. Because UPE can be measured without adding dyes, markers or labels, it may offer a way to monitor whether tissue is healthy, damaged or alive. In plants, it could help researchers better understand how organisms respond to injury, heat and other forms of stress. While the work is still in its early stages, the study demonstrates that ultraweak photon emission imaging can provide a non-invasive and label-free way to observe biological activity. Researchers say the approach could become a useful tool for studying vitality, stress responses and other important processes in both animals and plants. Source: University of Calgary, ACS publication This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      hhgygy earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      AMV earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      513
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      171
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      82
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!