Recommended Posts

This is what highly disappointed me. I feel that I cannot experience the full benefit of Windows 8 at the moment because the communication and entertainment apps aren't of decent quality and don't take full advantage of the new Windows 8 features. After having been annoyed by the lack of offline Facebook messaging in Windows Phone's Facebook integration since last June, I was sorely disappointed to see that the Windows 8 Messaging app doesn't allow for sending Facebook messages while offline (and it probably doesn't allow for sending Facebook messages to the recipient while they're offline, either). The latest version of Windows Live Messenger didn't allow for this either. I do hope this is something Microsoft change in the version of Messaging that they ship because it's an important feature to me. Perhaps this is merely something that Facebook APIs don't allow for?

They've already released updates for some applications, hopefully, they'll continue to build them and release them during the lifetime of the CP.

I enjoy my 'cluttered mess' of windows. It does not hamper my productivity; unlike the restrictive snapping of only 2 Metro Applications will. It also makes no sense to me that on a PC, IE's address bar and buttons have to waste an inch of screen real-estate of my 24" monitor the IE window take up the whole screen.

Anyone find a way to put the 'Classic' Desktop UI fonts back to being left-justified and less hideously big?

I know people my age (24) who still finds the desktop complicated. My sister still doesn't know how to use an anti-virus program. The fact is, if we started off in metro since 1995, then switched to desktop view now, the vast majority of people who find it a step backwards with it's over-complexity. With metro, you can view right on your start screen any have new mail you may have (or just about anything) instead of opening up a browser, then navigating to gmail.com. This is probably how the desktop show always have been.

They've already released updates for some applications, hopefully, they'll continue to build them and release them during the lifetime of the CP.

That's great news! Thanks for letting me know :) I watched the Windows 8 Consumer Preview event video that Microsoft released yesterday, and one of the speakers said they will be regularly updating Windows and the preview apps during the lifetime of the Consumer Preview; he said that it's going to be a dynamic experience. I didn't expect updates so soon, though :D

I posted this on the Windows 8 Blog earlier:

I really like the new interface. I want to make one suggestion for Metro IE10.

favorites =/= pinned sites. These MUST be treated separately.

Pinned sites within Metro IE10 clutter the Start Screen too much. I've 40 sites using the fake "bookmark" with the "Pin to Start," and it's cluttering up my Start Screen. Please EMULATE the WP7 team and move the "Pin to Start" button to the 3 ellipsis. NO ONE is going to pin sites SO FREQUENTLY to the Start Screen that that button needs to be in the main UI. We don't sit at the browser and make pinned sites. It makes absolutely NO sense.

Replace the "Pin to Start" with "Favorites" that open up the favorites pane where user can add, delete, create folders, and move to other folders, etc... At minimum, treat "Pin to Start" and "Favorites" as two completely different idea because they're actually DIFFERENT.

How do I make feedback to the Metro IE 10 group?

I found something irritating about the metro remote desktop,

I remoted from my netbook into my PC, both running Win8.. then tried to use the hotspots! not sure there is way to use the hotspots on the remoted PC, only seemed to trigger the host hotspots.

Anyone else had a similar experience or figured out a workaround for this?

I found something irritating about the metro remote desktop,

I remoted from my netbook into my PC, both running Win8.. then tried to use the hotspots! not sure there is way to use the hotspots on the remoted PC, only seemed to trigger the host hotspots.

Anyone else had a similar experience or figured out a workaround for this?

Hm... This worked as normal when I tested Teamviewer into Windows 8.

So some of the keyboard shortcuts are not working for me in the consumer preview. For instance, Win + D does nothing, which is annoying as it is one that I will likely use a lot.

Also, in the unveiling at the press event, they stated that you could tile a metro app next to a desktop app with Aero Snap. This doesn't work for me either, as I can't dock metro apps to one side of the screen or the other.

Anyone else having these issues?

Also, I'm considering dual booting it on my primary machine to give it more thorough testing, but this would mostly be in the form of games - has anyone got any remarks about gaming performance on the beta yet? If it's not really working properly then it would be a waste of time for me to go through that.

Actually, the metro snap doesn't work either (Win + . / ,)

I posted this on the Windows 8 Blog earlier:

I really like the new interface. I want to make one suggestion for Metro IE10.

favorites =/= pinned sites. These MUST be treated separately.

Pinned sites within Metro IE10 clutter the Start Screen too much. I've 40 sites using the fake "bookmark" with the "Pin to Start," and it's cluttering up my Start Screen. Please EMULATE the WP7 team and move the "Pin to Start" button to the 3 ellipsis. NO ONE is going to pin sites SO FREQUENTLY to the Start Screen that that button needs to be in the main UI. We don't sit at the browser and make pinned sites. It makes absolutely NO sense.

Replace the "Pin to Start" with "Favorites" that open up the favorites pane where user can add, delete, create folders, and move to other folders, etc... At minimum, treat "Pin to Start" and "Favorites" as two completely different idea because they're actually DIFFERENT.

How do I make feedback to the Metro IE 10 group?

agreed. Thats exactly what i was looking for. And found out that Favorites will automatically pin to the Start Screen. Sometimes you want stuff within an app and not outside. IE is one of them.

Same for many other apps right now. But those apps are like alpha versions. IE10 isnt. Its been there from the very start and they should add alot of funtionality. Atleast mirror WP7 level. Right now Its weaker than that. Also I hope they allow folders in IE10 favorites if they do add the ability. I dont want all my favorites to be like a list. I cant remember the names of all sites and i have more than hundreds of favorites. They should be organizable into folders. Like in desktop.

I can't even add my own music collection into the music app!!! Bloody stupid!

The Music Metro app uses your Windows Music Library, so whatever you put in the music Library folder in Windows Explorer will show up in the music app, it doesn't manage it's own collection.

Windows 8 is actually Windows 7 + Metro. It is really going to create some troubles for the users in the future, if not now, because every product will then have two interfaces and thus two setups, one Metro and one Traditional style application.

I don't see the majority of developers making two versions of their software. Why invest time making a Metro version of your software when you don't know whether people will embrace it. Metro isn't going to become the primary application type because it is so limited in functionality and for even moderately savvy computer users Metro apps just won't cut it. I've yet to find a single Metro app I would actually ever use. I have a huge collection of desktop apps which do exactly what I want and are feature-rich - there's no way that could all be replicated into Metro. I imagine Metro apps will be limited to small, quirky and basic apps - essentially their equivalent of the Apple App Store and designed primarily for Tablet or WOA users.

I don't see the majority of developers making two versions of their software. Why invest time making a Metro version of your software when you don't know whether people will embrace it. Metro isn't going to become the primary application type because it is so limited in functionality and for even moderately savvy computer users Metro apps just won't cut it. I've yet to find a single Metro app I would actually ever use. I have a huge collection of desktop apps which do exactly what I want and are feature-rich - there's no way that could all be replicated into Metro. I imagine Metro apps will be limited to small, quirky and basic apps - essentially their equivalent of the Apple App Store and designed primarily for Tablet or WOA users.

Our company has a C#/XAML application that most of our customers use already, the conversion into metro is about 15-30 minutes of work in total. I can totally see that we offer both a "classic" version and another Metro version of that application.

Our company has a C#/XAML application that most of our customers use already, the conversion into metro is about 15-30 minutes of work in total. I can totally see that we offer both a "classic" version and another Metro version of that application.

Would this conversion make the app fit into the metro design guidelines? Would some of the functionality work on touch and mouse? Would you need to hire a graphic designer to rework the UI for Metro?

Btw, I don't know about you but live tiles only seem to start working for me once the app has been opened. When I restart, any apps that have live tile functionality have to be relaunched for them to work...

Would this conversion make the app fit into the metro design guidelines? Would some of the functionality work on touch and mouse? Would you need to hire a graphic designer to rework the UI for Metro?

Btw, I don't know about you but live tiles only seem to start working for me once the app has been opened. When I restart, any apps that have live tile functionality have to be relaunched for them to work...

Our application is already heavily adjusted to work on a touch interface. Some customers already use it on a touch screen running Windows XP. The conversion into Metro would of course not enable features such as "dock to the side", but it would be a easy way to make it "Metro".

Adding features such as Live tile update would then of course add more code to it, same as the Windows 7 jump-list and aero-peek did. Thankfully we have a very touch oriented GUI already, and won't have to adjust too much to conform with the guidelines.

I too have seen that I need to open a Metro app before the Live tiles start updating btw.

Based on my limited experience with Windows 8 and Windows Server 8 so far, I think the average "mom and pop" user is going to be confused as hell. Even I've had to Google for shortcut key combo's and stuff which I just don't think is a good sign at all :|

I like to think Microsoft are much better these days and indeed I am a very content Windows 7 user but I would be lying if I said I wasn't worried about how Windows 8 is going to be received and how usable it'll be every day, etc.

We keep hearing that the "average consumer" will be so confused by Windows 8. What exactly does the average person being referred to constantly in the negative posts here and elsewhere, do on their computer that will be so hard in Windows 8? Just asked the wife, she uses her personal laptop for browsing, email, youtube, dvd's and that's it. How is that going to be so much more "confusing" in Windows 8? Are they programming nuclear fusion, or trying to cure the common cold? Can anyone list these actions that average, not geeks or so called support tech here, consumers are doing that they KNOW are going to be so confusing and bad in Windows 8?

Because the way I see it, logging in and seeing your start screen immediately tell you how many emails you have having your favourite (pinned sites) right there, is much easier than logging in, opening a program and waiting for it to load before you can get any information from it. Telling someone to move their mouse to the top left corner and click to cycle through their open programs is simpler than trying to tell someone how to maximize a window that was accidentally minimized. Please can someone enlighten us?

We keep hearing that the "average consumer" will be so confused by Windows 8. What exactly does the average person being referred to constantly in the negative posts here and elsewhere, do on their computer that will be so hard in Windows 8? Just asked the wife, she uses her personal laptop for browsing, email, youtube, dvd's and that's it. How is that going to be so much more "confusing" in Windows 8? Are they programming nuclear fusion, or trying to cure the common cold? Can anyone list these actions that average, not geeks or so called support tech here, consumers are doing that they KNOW are going to be so confusing and bad in Windows 8?

Because the way I see it, logging in and seeing your start screen immediately tell you how many emails you have having your favourite (pinned sites) right there, is much easier than logging in, opening a program and waiting for it to load before you can get any information from it. Telling someone to move their mouse to the top left corner and click to cycle through their open programs is simpler than trying to tell someone how to maximize a window that was accidentally minimized. Please can someone enlighten us?

I also don't see how it will effect average users either. Business and productivity on the other hand... I know they can just use the regular desktop, but it isn't really a valid solution IMO. To use the dreaded car analogy, it is like owning a Ferrari - it's wonderful, but you need another car to put your shopping/golf clubs/children/etc in. So what MS has done is attach a towbar to the Ferrari so they can tow their Range Rover behind for the important things. It is a half-baked solution to a major problem with the apparent future direction of Windows. I want the Metro concept throughout, including productivity. It isn't easy, but they don't have to be touch friendly - they just need to fit with the design concept (look at Steam).

We keep hearing that the "average consumer" will be so confused by Windows 8. What exactly does the average person being referred to constantly in the negative posts here and elsewhere, do on their computer that will be so hard in Windows 8? Just asked the wife, she uses her personal laptop for browsing, email, youtube, dvd's and that's it. How is that going to be so much more "confusing" in Windows 8? Are they programming nuclear fusion, or trying to cure the common cold? Can anyone list these actions that average, not geeks or so called support tech here, consumers are doing that they KNOW are going to be so confusing and bad in Windows 8?

Because the way I see it, logging in and seeing your start screen immediately tell you how many emails you have having your favourite (pinned sites) right there, is much easier than logging in, opening a program and waiting for it to load before you can get any information from it. Telling someone to move their mouse to the top left corner and click to cycle through their open programs is simpler than trying to tell someone how to maximize a window that was accidentally minimized. Please can someone enlighten us?

You assertions are as subjective as those who speak about the average consumer. I had my landlady, well to be I honest I forced her to try out Win8 when she was over couple of hours ago. In your email example, they way she knows how many emails she's got unread currently is via the Messenger balloon popup indicating so. That's something this 60 something ear old homemaker has been used to since forever. I'm sure she would prefer a huge AOL window saying "YOU'VE GOT MAIL!!" and that's brilliantly simple but it ain't exactly indicative of 'progress' now is it?

I'm sure the consumers that will buy these Win8 systems will get used to it because it will primary touch interfaced. You mentioned that the metro multitask preview is easy and I do agree(i prefer program icons or live previews over mouseover) but in that construct, I think the Apple expose is much more richer and this falls way shorter.

Again opinions as they say as are like.... ;)

I like they idea of search & share charms, but of course the big problem is discoverability. For example, you can search by people tags and other tags in the Metro photo app, but theres no indication that it can do that. Most people wouldn't even realize there's a search charm right now that can do it.

Obviously that's because our workflow right now is to use search inside an app rather than the charm, but Microsoft is going to have a lot of work on it's hands to try and drill into people to actually use the charms, hopefully it'll become second nature one day.

Well, I just tried the Windows 8 Consumer Preview and overall it feels more polished than the Developers Preview, but one thing I can't really stand is the use of the four corners UI.

So now it seems, when I want to close any full-screen Desktop UI window, the charms bar will unintentionally appear. And, if I were to use a program that follows the Windows 7 UI paradigm (i.e. buttons on the top left hand corner in place of menubar) such as Firefox, Opera, or even Microsoft Paint, the buttons at the top left hand corner are very hard to reach (impossible with Microsoft Paint's quick access toolbar) without the app switcher showing up.

The thing with a traditional keyboard-and-mouse (that Microsoft probably doesn't understand) is that most of us use EVERY corner of the screen, and hovering to corners using a mouse will just mean that part of the screen will now be rendered useless as it's now a target "hotspot". For a touch UI, this is a non-issue as I assume they will have to drag in from the left or something.

Also, one of the other things that should be implemented should be a non-full screen Start Screen, perhaps a view to just quickly run an app non-intrusively. Sometimes, when I'm watching a video, maybe I just want to fire up a small little program without taking my eyes off the video. In Win7, I can press Start and type in the program name and within seconds be able to achieve my task, while not taking my eyes off the video. However, this full-screen monstrosity called the Start Screen forces my attention away from my video, even if it's just for a few seconds. Searching for apps shouldn't require a ****ing Start Screen.

All in all, Windows 8 feels great from a content-consumer point-of-view. Yet, when I want to do something productive, I find myself having to make several concessions, which I feel shouldn't be necessary in the first place. As a KB and Mouse user, I want things to be achieved in the most efficient way, in part because I'm lazy. I want to achieve my targets with the least number of clicks possible. As much as I can, I want to only use my mouse, for easy one-handed operations. While I appreciate the numerous keyboard shortcuts added into Windows 8, it seems they are just making these additions only because it is much harder to accomplish using a mouse alone now.

And there must surely be a way to sign out of Messenger without resorting to using a local account... It's getting on my nerves, really.

i am reading some posts about zune app missing etc.

I just wanted to say (if it hasn't been mentioned already) that the new Music and Videos apps are based on Zune.

On the top right corner of those apps where the "Sign in" is if you are unable to actually sign in an error message will come with a link for more info on the "problem". If you click on that link it will take you to zune troubleshooting webpage here: http://www.zune.net/...lp_locale=el-GR

post-287862-0-56772400-1330694223_thumb.

I notice that the win + tab key scrolling window display doesn`t work now in aero desktop mode, or am i just missing something? It`s certainly starting to grow on me :)

No, it doesn't work and it didn't work in the DP either.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Glow 26.9 by Razvan Serea Glow provides detailed reporting on every hardware component in your computer, saving you valuable time typically spent searching for CPU, motherboard, RAM, graphics card, and other stats. With Glow, all the information is conveniently presented in one clean interface, allowing you to easily access and review the comprehensive hardware details of your system. Glow provides detailed information on various system aspects, including OS, motherboard, processor, memory, graphics card, storage, network, battery, drivers, and services. The well-organized format ensures easy access to the required information. You can export all the gathered data to a plain text file, facilitating sharing with others for troubleshooting purposes. No installation needed. Just decompress the archive, launch the executable, and access computer-related information. Glow runs on Windows 11 and Windows 10 64-bit versions. Glow 26.9 changelog: New Features The processor hardware detection engine has been significantly enhanced beyond traditional Intel and AMD architectures. Native support is now available for modern platforms such as Apple Silicon (M-Series) and the newly introduced NVIDIA Spark. In addition, all ARM-based processors can now be accurately distinguished between ARM32 and ARM64 architectures, providing precise hardware reporting. This marks a major milestone for Glow's hardware detection capabilities. The RAM manufacturer identification algorithm has been expanded. JEDEC vendor codes for popular brands such as Patriot, PNY, Team Group, GeIL, Lexar (Longsys), and Asgard/Gloway have been integrated into the database. This significantly reduces the likelihood of incorrect or "Unknown Manufacturer" results and improves overall hardware detection accuracy. New Public IP Address and Internet Service Provider (ISP) features have been added to the Network section. To ensure reliability, this information is retrieved from the trusted service ipwho.is. When Hiding Mode is enabled, no requests are sent and these features remain hidden, as they may expose sensitive information. The search engine used in the Installed Drivers, Installed Services, and Installed Applications sections has been enhanced. You can now perform more flexible and accurate searches using initials, partial matches, and loosely arranged character sequences. The TS Preloader loading bar has been rebuilt using our modern TS Custom Controls graphics library, developed entirely in-house. As a result of this infrastructure upgrade, the loading bar now features smooth rendering and rounded corners that align with the visual style of Windows 11. [TS Updater] A new validation algorithm has been added to check whether the target application is currently running before the update process begins. Bug Fixes Resolved a condition that could prevent TS Preloader from shutting down safely during rare application crash scenarios. Fixed a text alignment issue in the Network section affecting the display of DNS addresses. Alignment is now rendered correctly. [TS Updater] Fixed an issue that could prevent the updated application's executable "*.exe" file from being located after the update process. [TS Updater] Fixed a bug that could leave outdated "*.sha256" files in the application directory after an update. [TS Updater] Fixed a rare issue that could cause subfolders to be moved into the root directory after an update. [TS Updater] Fixed an issue during the first launch that could cause flickering and a temporary white window appearance due to Windows Defender interactions. Changes A small improvement has been made to the internet connectivity detection algorithm. Connectivity checks are now performed in the background with minimal impact on the user interface thread. The keyboard shortcuts in the top menu have been reorganized and simplified to provide a consistent experience across all Türkaysoft applications and to avoid potential conflicts with standard Windows shortcuts. The TS Preloader splash image has been updated with a Türkiye-themed stadium design to celebrate Türkiye's qualification for the 2026 FIFA World Cup—its first appearance in 24 years. Congratulations, Türkiye! The TS Custom Controls module has been updated to version 26.6, delivering improved stability and a more polished visual appearance. [TS Updater] The application icon has been redesigned to provide a more modern and refined look. Note: Always unzip the program before using it. Otherwise you may get an error. Download: Glow 26.9 | 1.8 MB (Open Source) Links: Glow Homepage | Screenshot | Github Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • DWARF mini review: the world's smallest smart telescope for night and day sky captures by Steven Parker DWARFLAB reached out to me asking if I was interested in checking out the DWARF mini, which is a portable astronomy telescope designed for amateur astronomers. Why do I say it's for amateurs? Well, for starters, it's not what you'd call "high end"; it's more of a professional-grade starting point for amateurs serious about capturing what's up there in our night and day skies. A typical amateur astronomer is most likely thousands of dollars deep into the hobby, and I will make no claims that this DWARF mini (at a fraction of the cost) could replace it all, okay? Well, if you read on, it will be clearer what I am trying to convey. Disclosure: DWARFLAB provided a free sample without any editorial input or review pre-approval. I have always been interested in looking up and observing the night sky. I see satellites crossing the sky above my garden most nights, and I am always looking at the moon. Yeah, I have a 200MP camera on my phone, but at 200X zoom, AI takes over and makes the pretty moon pictures that I snap, the DWARF mini does not, you get an actual true picture of what you can barely see with the naked eye. Before we start, let's share the highlights of the DWARF mini in bite-sized format: Pocket-Sized & Ultra-Lightweight Weighing just 1.85 lbs (840g), the DWARF mini easily fits into a backpack or large pocket. Its all-in-one, compact design makes it the ultimate grab-and-go digital telescope for hiking, camping, or traveling to dark-sky locations. Intuitive App Control & Built-in Sky Atlas Go from unboxing to your first shot in just 3 minutes! The DWARFLAB App provides a seamless experience with an interactive star map. Simply select your target and start exploring without the steep learning curve of traditional setups. Auto GOTO & 360° Pivot Freedom Enjoy pinpoint automated tracking with full 360° rotation. Powered by a high-sensitivity Sony IMX662 sensor (1/2.8-inch, 2.9μm pixels), it captures amazing, low-noise astro details, bringing faint nebulas and star clusters to life with stunning clarity. Pro-Level EQ Mode & Long Exposure Unlock advanced deep-space imaging with Equatorial (EQ) Mode. Supporting impressive single-frame exposures up to 90 seconds and featuring built-in light pollution filters, it easily cuts through city glow to reveal intricate celestial structures. Smart Cloud Processing & All-Ages Fun Effortlessly enhance your raw data with integrated cloud processing for professional-grade results. Perfect for beginners, kids, and adults, this telescope makes exploring and sharing the wonders of the universe an exciting, family-friendly adventure. The packaging is a pretty minimal affair with the outer box opening like a flap to reveal the plastic mould of the DWARF mini sitting in it. Below, the Sun filter, charging cable, cleaning cloth, and documentation can be found. DWARFLAB also provided a Mini Hydraulic Tripod ($89.99), and I highly recommend getting it if you plan on purchasing the DWARF mini, as it fully supports the motorized tracking feature of the telescope; plus, at 840g, the weight of the telescope, you will need a tripod that supports more than the weight of a smartphone anyway. What's in the box DWARF Mini Smart Telescope × 1 Sun Filter x 1 Type-C to Type-C Cord x 1 Cleaning Cloth x 1 User Guide With that out of the way, here are the full specs: DWARF mini Dimensions (DWH): 60.70 mm x 100.38 × 183.61 (2.39" x 3.95" x 7.23") Weight: 840g (1.85lbs) Aperture diameter: 30 mm (telephoto), 3.4 mm (wide angle) Image Sensor: SONY IMX662 1/2.8" (Telephoto) OmniVision OS02K10 1/2.8" (Wide-angle) Focal length: 150 mm (telephoto), 6.7 mm (wide-angle) Equivalent focal length: 1016 mm (telephoto), 45 mm (wide-angle) Shutter Speed: Tele - 1/10000-90s, Wide - 1/10000-30s Maximum exposure time: 90s (telephoto & wide-angle), Both in EQ mode Rotation range: Lens: 225°, Base: 360° Effective Pixels: 2.07M Maximum Resolution: 1920 × 1080 (Telephoto & Wide-angle) Built-in filters: Astro, Dark, Duo-Band (Telephoto), Astro (Wide-angle) Output: JPG, FITS, TIFF, MP4 Shooting Mode: Photos, Videos, Astronomy, Burst Shooting, Time-lapse Photography Storage: 64 GB Battery: Built-in 7000 mAh, supports external USB charging Charging Port: Type-C NPU: 1 TOPS Features: WiFi, NFC NFC One-Touch Connection Astronomy Post-Processing/Appointment Shooting/Astronomy Mosaic Wi-Fi Transmission Range: 15m (open environment) Color: Black Compatibility: iOS & Android smartphones/tablets Warranty: 2-years (24-months) MSRP: $399 Design Charge port On/off button Lens On the DWARF mini itself, it is a pretty minimal affair. On one side, there is a Type-C USB port to charge the non-removable 7000 mAh battery, and on the other side, a large button to power on or off the telescope. The button is flanked by an LED that is green when connected via the DWARFLAB app, or lights up red when being powered off. Below the button, there are four LEDs that indicate battery power. The DWARF mini does not have any sharp edges as all sides are rounded off; it has a good heft to it, but the weight of it feels quite balanced in the hand, so it isn't top or bottom-heavy. On the front there is the DWARFLAB logo which is quite small and there are no other markings on it. The tripod offers full 360° rotation of the motorized base, which allows for tracking for the time-lapse mode, but also for the 90-second captures of nearer objects in the sky, such as the Sun or the moon. Usage To get started, simply power on the DWARF mini and open the DWARFLAB app, tap on Connect, and it will scan for the DWARF mini over the Wi-Fi network. The device supports both 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz Wi-Fi, as well as Bluetooth for discovery, so connection issues were minimal in my experience with it. As previously noted in the specs, the DWARF mini will stay connected with a phone or tablet up to 15 meters in an open environment, such as a backyard. Lighting status Powering on: The green circular light will rotate and breathe in turn Powering off: The red circular light is gradually extinguished Connecting: Green light strip rotating Connected: Green light strip solid/always on 4 lights 1= 0-25%, 2= 25-50%, 3= 50-75%, 4= 75-100% battery power To view the full lighting status, such as tracking mode and connection failure, you can check the user guide on the official DWARFLAB page. DWARFLAB app Above, you can see the steps undertaken to connect the DWARFLAB app to my Galaxy S26 Ultra. Weirdly, I got an alert that a firmware update failed to get uploaded to the DWARF mini the first time, but upon retrying, it worked. Then place the DWARF mini outside, make sure your smartphone or tablet is connected to it, and then head back inside, because you can manage it from the comfort of your home. Simply enter the Atlas tab in the app and search for what you want to capture, and then tap on the camera icon; the DWARF mini will then attempt to track the object and give you a live view right on your connected device. Results I've had the DWARF mini since April, but even though my garden is south-facing, I had a lot of trouble trying to capture a good image of the moon. In the end, it was possible after I took it with me on a trip to my parents in Southend, UK, at the end of May. Here is a capture of the moon, resulting from 20 stacked images over a 90-second exposure. What you are seeing here is not AI-assisted. A good example of what I mean is the latest flagships with their 200MP cameras claiming to capture things like closeups of the moon, and while they are not as good as the above example on the DWARF mini, the resulting image on smartphones is actually AI-assisted above 30X zoom. Here is an example of a similar shot at the moon at 200X zoom using an HONOR Magic8 Pro. The difference is clear. Next, here we have a shot of the daytime moon. Here is a shot of Arcturus, the red giant star, which is the fourth brightest in the night sky. As previously mentioned, it could be a bit clearer, but clouds passing in front of it muddied the shot a bit. The Sun The DWARF mini also ships with a sun filter, meaning you can take great shots of the sun as well. Tracking Sun Resulting (stacked) shot Live zoom The pictures themselves are limited to Full HD, and some of the examples actually came out in HD (1280x720), but this is because the standard telescopic result is in 720p while "Wide" is in 1080p. Above you can see how in the app the Sun is tracked, the resulting capture, and Live zoom. I have only scratched the surface of what is possible with this telescope; I found several examples online of shots of the Milky Way, among others, such as nebulae and galaxies. All of this requires patience and knowledge, although if you know what you are looking for, simply enter it in the Atlas tab in the DWARFLAB app, tap the camera icon, and the telescope will attempt to track it. Conclusion The good The DWARF mini definitely places itself in a price point that makes astrology accessible to anyone looking to get started in the hobby. Say you want to have a closer look at the moon, simply enter it in the Atlas, and the Live view also lets you zoom in and snap pictures. The bad Some issues I came across while operating the DWARF mini were that it sometimes failed to connect unless I held my smartphone right next to it, and finding and tracking sometimes took several attempts to get it calibrated. I discovered that it helped if I sort of positioned and pointed the telescope in the general area it was supposed to detect, but this obviously wouldn't work with objects you can't see with the naked eye; more testing is required for that. Another bit of advice is to ensure that the lens is clean. While making the examples of live zooming on the sun, I discovered that the telescope lens and sun filter were not completely clean, and only after cleaning with a microfiber cloth was I able to get a decent shot of the sun. Where to buy and a coupon Okay, $399 is not cheap for a side hobby, but nor is a $1,500 smartphone flagship that you'll most likely have for a couple of years. This is a one-time entrance into astrology, and it won't become obsolete in one year like a smartphone. It's a thumbs up from me. The DWARF mini is available to buy right now in the U.S. and U.K. at the links below. DWARF mini for $399 on the official site DWARF mini for $399 on Amazon U.S. Use the NEOWIN5OFF coupon code for an additional 5% off at checkout (expires June 21) As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Adobe Acrobat Reader Dis Continued
    • The name, you mean? If so, it's actually the objects common name. There's another one called NGC 7293 which is also known as Helix Nebula (because we're looking at a helix structure top down) but other times also known as the Eye of God. You'll understand when you see it
    • Welcome to Neowin! Enjoy your stay!
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      X-No-file earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      505
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      272
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      75
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      71
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!