Recommended Posts

I loved it. I'm a Mac user and a devout one ... I won't go switching to Windows 8, but I tell ya ... I've been playing with it on my girlfriend's Windows laptop and I think it's beautiful. Sure, it's rough around the edges, but it's really on the right track :) Good luck to them :)

The "special" partition that Windows create has grown to 350Mb with Win8.... A jump from 100Mb in Win7...

The lack of better integration between Metro and Desktop is jarring. IE10 Metro and Desktop should be able to share the same Favorite, history, cookies. It makes no sense to have to do everything twice.

And I know it's a preview, but darn, all the Metro apps seems to be simple demo, quite unfinished product.

It's not looking good.

they actually do, what confuses people is the fact that ie metro is 64 bit and the ie desktop version is the 32 bit version. That's why they don't share anything I think

How to launch Immersive Internet Explorer? i mean when i launch it from Taskbar or from metro its the same thing..... is this okay? or is there any other way around to launch immersive?

thanks

IE10 needs to be your default browser for the Metro version to launch.

they actually do, what confuses people is the fact that ie metro is 64 bit and the ie desktop version is the 32 bit version. That's why they don't share anything I think

Metro apps are managed, hence it's both 32bits & 64bits, it depends if you have installed the x64 or x86 version.

The desktop is either 32bit OR (not and!) 64bits, and again it depend on which CP you have installed.

Obviously Microsoft's devs can't really deal with it either because Visual Studio isn't an Immersive app.

And why would it be done it Metro? Are you under the impression that everything now has to be done in Metro? Microsoft have stated that there are times where the desktop is still the obvious and better choice for programs (especially in regards to productivity apps). Desktop apps and Metro apps are both better suited to different things.

The desktop is there for a reason. To be USED. They'll continue supporting and developing applications for the desktop, as well as developing different applications for Metro. Metro is not going out there to replace the entire desktop environment.

And why would it be done it Metro? Are you under the impression that everything now has to be done in Metro? Microsoft have stated that there are times where the desktop is still the obvious and better choice for programs (especially in regards to productivity apps). Desktop apps and Metro apps are both better suited to different things.

The desktop is there for a reason. To be USED. They'll continue supporting and developing applications for the desktop, as well as developing different applications for Metro. Metro is not going out there to replace the entire desktop environment.

Reading something today about resetting Windows 8 using its new reset feature

One of the reset options was to keep files and apps, 'but will not keep legacy explorer apps' or words to that effect, and 'non metro apps will be used for power users mainly anyway'

Not a direct quote, might have been something Paul Thurrott said on twit.tv - but words that implied the desktop and non metro apps will be power user / legacy

Should my favorites from IE have moved with me when I installed the CP?

I thought that when using your Live ID that things like favorites and other settings would be saved in the cloud?

Or do you have to set up something special for this?

Also wasn't SkyDrive supposed to be more integrated in explorer? Or is that still coming?

The "special" partition that Windows create has grown to 350Mb with Win8.... A jump from 100Mb in Win7...

The lack of better integration between Metro and Desktop is jarring. IE10 Metro and Desktop should be able to share the same Favorite, history, cookies. It makes no sense to have to do everything twice.

And I know it's a preview, but darn, all the Metro apps seems to be simple demo, quite unfinished product.

It's not looking good.

I think Metro apps can't interact with desktop programs because desktop programs are not programmed using WinRT. All of the Metro apps are sandboxed and can only communicate with each other via "contract" API.

They'll continue supporting and developing applications for the desktop, as well as developing different applications for Metro.

Doesn't that mean though that they've basically given up on the goal of providing a consistent user experience (assuming that ever existed)? That's the thing I don't get about the 'no compromise' claim. There's a compromise alright...

I like what Im seeing so far. One issue Im having is it doesn't seem to see my intergrated NVidia video on my HP laptop. So I guess its using a default one. The display looks fine but I cant update drivers so I cant use it through HDMI on my 36 inch tv I use as a monitor. Microsoft Basic Display Adapter is what I see in Device Manager under Display Settings.

I had the same issue on my Asus laptop. Just go to the NVidia web site and get the appropriate GeForce drivers for your integrated card. I have the 9M series, and they had already certified that the Vista/Win7 drivers would work with Windows 8, and they installed fine.

Doesn't that mean though that they've basically given up on the goal of providing a consistent user experience (assuming that ever existed)? That's the thing I don't get about the 'no compromise' claim. There's a compromise alright...

No compromise means they're not stuck in a half way house of franken apps - for example, applying Metro techniques to desktop applications. The desktop apps remain the desktop apps, with all their full power and design. Metro apps introduce simpler, more animated Metro apps, consumption focused experiences. They haven't tried to shove desktop applications into Metro, and they haven't tried to shove Metro apps in the desktop. That's what they mean by no compromise.

Should my favorites from IE have moved with me when I installed the CP?

I thought that when using your Live ID that things like favorites and other settings would be saved in the cloud?

Or do you have to set up something special for this?

Also wasn't SkyDrive supposed to be more integrated in explorer? Or is that still coming?

On the favorites, I'm not sure if Win 8 brings them along from 7 or not. I do know before 8 you could use Mesh to sync them but mesh isn't part of 8. I exported mine to a file before I installed and then just imported from that file. The Live ID thing only works for 8. It syncs your settings, apps and such across the cloud.

As far as skydrive desktop, that's still coming.

On the favorites, I'm not sure if Win 8 brings them along from 7 or not. I do know before 8 you could use Mesh to sync them but mesh isn't part of 8. I exported mine to a file before I installed and then just imported from that file. The Live ID thing only works for 8. It syncs your settings, apps and such across the cloud.

As far as skydrive desktop, that's still coming.

Should have mentioned that I came from Win8 DP

That's why I was hoping that some of my settings would have moved with me

They haven't tried to shove desktop applications into Metro, and they haven't tried to shove Metro apps in the desktop. That's what they mean by no compromise.

They must realize though that the mere fact that, depending on the specific application, you are forced to switch between very different UIs on the same system, amounts to a compromise in user experience. I just think it's a bit disingenuous of them to claim that there is no compromise involved. It's not like it wouldn't be possible to create "simpler, more animated apps, consumption focused experiences" as Desktop apps, which would be more ideally suited to mouse&keyboard input. The reason apps like Mail and Calendar are metrofied and full screen only in Windows 8 (yeah, I know about Metro Snap) is because that makes them usable on a tablet, not because it results in a great experience on the Desktop.

OK, why the hell does one of my computers show Seattle Weather (I don't know how to change this to something useful!!) and the other shows the weather of the city I am actually in?

Any ideas?

EDIT: Uninstalled it because I couldn't find a way to remove Seattle

You wouldn't switch to Metro to use it, you would check it in the preview pane to the left. You still have to open it if you're in desktop mode. Unless, you have it snapped, or you have multiple windows open at once on the desktop. Most people tend to work in one app at a time. They may have two up simultaneously while running many. You can't physically work more than one app simultaneously anyway. For example, I can't do something in Excel while composing an email or writing this reply at the same time. I have to do one, switch to the other, do that, switch back and so on.

If I wanna check Twitter either thru the web or via an app, I have to go somewhere else and click somewhere else. Or... I can have an app snapped to the side be that in Win 7 desktop OR in Win 8 Start Screen.

About apps to be written. Traditional desktop apps can be written in WinRT and work on x86/x64, and ARM with the same functionality. This enables Metro is the design language and philosophy. A dev can opt in to use that design language if they choose. Or, they can opt out and use their own design. Targeting WinRT does not in anyway handicap an app. Using the Metro design language, likewise, does not handicap an app.

I would further explain this but... I don't wanna. ;) Seriously, I hope that clears some stuff up. Probably not. But, one can hope.

I've just tried to play with this to put it to the test. What feels weird is that the left preview menu seems to duplicate taskbar functionality for Metro apps with the desktop being treated as one. If desktop apps also appeared in that menu it wouldn't be a terrible way to navigate between applications. But as it stands if I was in a Metro app I'd have to go to the left preview menu, then select the "desktop app" and then once back in the desktop head down to the taskbar to get those apps up. Again there's an extra step involved. It'd feel logical for all Metro and desktop apps to be in the preview menu or for them all to be on the taskbar in the traditional minimise/maximise format. Either one of those would make switching between desktop and Metro apps seameless and perhaps it wouldn't feel as alien or jarring. To be honest if it was like that I probably wouldn't be as opposed to trying a few Metro apps for certain basic functions like a Facebook or Twitter app.

I don't fully understand all the WinRT and Metro design language stuff but if the jist is that having a separate Metro app doesn't require too much extra work and that devs don't have to choose between either interface then that must be a good thing.

The reason apps like Mail and Calendar are metrofied and full screen only in Windows 8 (yeah, I know about Metro Snap) is because that makes them usable on a tablet, not because it results in a great experience on the Desktop.

Apps like Mail & Calendar aren't included in Windows 7 - but they do have their desktop equivalents out there already that provide a great desktop experience (and in fact, more feature filled experience right now), namely the Windows Live Essentials suite - which covers a large basis of included Metro apps on the desktop side (Mail, Calendar, People, Messaging, Photos, partly Videos), and Zune & WMP cover the Metro music player.

The great experience on the desktop is already there for you to try out if you want it. There's nothing inherently new in the Metro apps that you can't really get on the desktop already. But saying that, I've also quite enjoyed using most of them as Metro apps too, though I wouldn't use them in their current state for lack of features. People makes a decent Facebook client, and I haven't got much complaints about photos. It's nice to view photos where the only thing there is your actual photo :p

Quick Warning...

Don't even try to install Windows 8 Consumer Preview if you have an additional Sata III controller card, I did, I have the Asus U3S6 card (not a very rare one), it does Sata III and USB 3, Windows 8 install hangs at the progress wheel. This is a common problem on the Microsoft forums. I tried installing by just plugging my Sata III drive onto my onboard Sata II ports. This completed, then I installed the Windows drivers for the controller card, in the belief that I would then be able to plug the drive back into the card and boot with full Sata III speed. Wrong! The exact same hang happens.

So be warned! :)

I've had many failed attempts at upgrading a Win7 install to Win8. My OS drive is a Sata 3 SSD so maybe that's why it also says installation failed.

The "special" partition that Windows create has grown to 350Mb with Win8.... A jump from 100Mb in Win7...

I can only think that it is something to do with the PC Reset and PC Refresh functionality. PC Reset will be a useful alternative to a clean install, but PC Refresh is going to be very limited in its usefulness as it doesn't retain installed desktop apps, only those Metro ones.

The great experience on the desktop is already there for you to try out if you want it. But saying that, I've also quite enjoyed using most of them as Metro apps too

To be honest, in concept I love the original Metro design approach, and think they are theoretically on the right track there, to simplify apps to their essence, reduce distractions and provide a beautiful view onto your data. What I would like to see is Microsoft apply that approach to their Desktop apps. Providing only the Metro full screen experience on the Desktop instead, to me, is an obvious compromise, one they clearly made to gain a foothold in the tablet market. Opening a PDF or an image and being thrown into a full-screen Metro view is seriously weird. I'm not even sure you can open two PDFs or images next to each other. And, yes I know, you can use the (old) photo viewer application or install the Adobe Reader, but shouldn't the goal for Microsoft be to provide a great out of the box experience here?!

  • Like 2
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • AMD RX 9070 GRE AI, Blender benchmarks vs 9070 XT, 7800XT, Nvidia RTX 5070, 4070 by Sayan Sen Earlier this week, we shared the first part of our review of AMD's new RX 9070 GRE. It was about the gaming performance of the GPU, and we gave it an 8 out of 10. As a follow-up, similar to how we did with the 9070 XT and non-XT, we are doing a dedicated productivity review for the RX 9070 GRE as well, where we compare it against the 9070 XT, 9070, 7800 XT, as well as Nvidia's 5070 and 4070. This will include AI, rendering, compute, and more benchmarks. AI performance, especially, is a very important metric in today's world, and AMD also promised big improvements thanks to its underlying architectural improvements. We will be pitching it against the data we already have for the RX 9070, and RX 9070 XT, but also the Nvidia 5070 FE, MSI GeForce RTX 4070 VENTUS 2X 12G, and Gigabyte Radeon RX 7800 XT GAMING OC 16G as they are in a similar price class, but also because we do not have a comparable 5060 Ti card lying around here that we can compare it against. Before we get underway, this is a collaboration between Sayan Sen and Steven Parker, who lent me his test bed. Also, there was no editorial input from AMD. First up, the specs of the RX 9070, 9070 XT, and 9070 GRE, which were given to us by AMD: Radeon RX 9070 GRE Radeon RX 9070 Radeon RX 9070 XT Boost Clock: Game Clock: up to 2.79GHz up to 2.20GHz up to 2.52GHz up to 2.07GHz up to 2.97GHz up to 2.40GHz Stream Processors 3,072 (48 CU) 3,584 (56 CU) 4,096 (64 CU) Ray Accelerator 48 56 64 AI Accelerator 96 112 128 ROPs 96 128 Texture Mapping Units 192 224 256 Memory 12 GB GDDR6, 18Gbps Clock, 192-bit Bus 432 GB/s 16 GB GDDR6, 20Gbps Clock, 256-bit Bus Effective Memory Bandwidth: 640 GB/s Infinity Cache 48 MB (3rd Gen) 64 MB (3rd Gen) Card Bus PCI-E 5.0 X16 Output 2x HDMI 2.1b 2x DisplayPort 2.1a Power consumption 220W 304W Recommended PSU 650W 750W Slot width 2x 3x Price (SEP) $549 $599 As you can see from the specs above, it is less than the standard RX 9070 in every way that counts, except for slightly higher Boost and Game clock speed. Design Moving on, the RX 9070 GRE we were given is an XFX Swift triple-fan, dual-slot design with two 8-pin connectors. At 30cm (self-measured), it will fit in most systems easily. There is no RGB either. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE by XFX from all angles. Test system Our test system consists of the following: Lian Li O11 Dynamic Mini V2 Flow (Amazon|Newegg) ASUS Z890 ProArt Creator WiFi (Amazon|Newegg) Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus (Amazon|Newegg) Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet - 44x37 (Amazon|Newegg) 2x 16GB G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB (7200 MT/s in XMP) (Amazon|Newegg) Sabrent Rocket4 Plus 2TB SSD (Amazon) Windows 11 25H2 (Build 26200.8246) AMD shared a press driver based on the recently released Adrenaline 26.5.2 that we were required to use. We now move on to our benchmarks. First up, we have Geekbench AI running on ONNX. For some reason, the 9070 GRE does exceptionally well here in both half-precision (FP16) and single-precision (FP32). It manages to beat the RTX 5070 and RX 9070 non-XT, and is only behind the 9070 XT. Since Geekbench runs in short bursts instead of continuously hammering the graphics card, it seems the GRE's faster boost clocks are helping here. Next up, we move to the UL Procyon AI test suite, starting with the image generation benchmark. We chose the Stable Diffusion XL FP16 test since it is the most intense workload available on Procyon. The Nvidia cards do very well here, as even the 4070 out-muscles AMD's best fairy easily. The positive thing about the GRE is that it gets quite close to the 9070 non-XT in this test; this indicates that the VRAM does not play a very big role here, as SD XL relies on float16 (FP16). So this is something to keep in mind again. If you wish to work with float32 AI workloads, graphics cards with larger than 12 GB buffers would likely emerge as victors. Regardless, the gains are still massive on AMD's 9000 series compared to the 7000 series. Following image generation, we move to the text generation benchmark. This is one test where the 9070 GRE struggled, quite a lot. It seems that the 12 GB VRAM and lower memory bandwidth of the new Radeon 9070 GRE are hurting it quite a bit; the split is massive, especially in a test like Llama2, which packs 13 billion parameters. As such, in all the tests, the 9070 GRE is the slowest of the lot. Next, we tried Blender, and here the AMD GPUs were beaten by Nvidia. Rendering is something the Green team has always had a lead over the Red side, and it has not changed so far. On the positive side, though, the 9070 GRE shows significantly better results than the 7800 XT, which means AMD is on the right path. Catching up to Nvidia, though, will require a lot more effort. And we hope HIP and ROCm can keep improving. Wrapping up AI testing, we measured OpenCL throughput in the Geekbench compute benchmark. The RX 9070 GRE alongside the 9070 did not fare well here at all, even falling behind the 7800 XT. Interestingly, even the RTX 5070 could not beat the 4070 on OpenCL, so perhaps this suggests that OpenCL optimization may not have been a priority for either AMD or Nvidia in the modern era. Conclusion We reached the end of our productivity performance review of the 9070 GRE, and we have to say it's a mixed bag. Unlike the 9070 and 9070 XT, the GRE excels in some areas while losing ground fairly easily in others. Similar to how it happened in gaming, any time the card's memory subsystem gets hammered, it tends to fall behind the others. This was the case with text generation, wherein we saw the VRAM sometimes hit its maximum available 12 GB of usage with larger model sizes. So what do we make of the RX 9070 as a productivity hardware? It can certainly be used, but you have to know it has its limitations. For those looking for a GPU that can deal with more, AMD recently unveiled the Radeon AI PRO R9700, which is essentially a 32 GB refresh of the 9070 XT with some additional workstation-based optimizations. On a similar note, the new Ryzen AI Halo platform is something you can consider if you want to set up a local AI processing station. Considering everything, we rate AMD's Radeon RX 9070 GRE a 7.5 out of 10 for its productivity performance. Price is less of a factor for those looking at productivity cases compared to those considering the GPU for gaming, and as such, we felt it did quite decently on many occasions and can be handy if you need a 12 GB GPU and, for some reason, don't want to get Nvidia. Purchase links: RX 9070 / XT / GRE (Amazon US) As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Does anyone here know if these updates are integrated into the UUP dump isos?
    • Motrix Next 3.9.4 by Razvan Serea Motrix Next is a modern, open-source cross-platform download manager built as the official next-generation successor to the original Motrix project. It has been completely rewritten using Tauri 2, Vue 3, TypeScript, and Rust, while still relying on the powerful Aria2 download engine for high-speed multi-protocol transfers. The app supports HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, BitTorrent, ED2K and magnet links, offering advanced features like multi-connection acceleration, task scheduling, bandwidth control, and batch download management. With a significantly reduced install size (around 20MB), it focuses on being lightweight, fast, and resource-efficient compared to traditional Electron-based download tools. Designed for Windows, macOS, and Linux, Motrix Next delivers a clean, modern UI inspired by Material Design 3 principles, with smooth animations and a minimal workflow. It improves usability through better download organization, system tray integration, and enhanced torrent handling including selective file downloads and tracker management. Motrix Next features: Multi-protocol downloads — HTTP, FTP, BitTorrent, Magnet, .torrent, ED2K, and Metalink tasks BitTorrent — Selective file download, DHT, peer exchange, encryption controls, metadata caching, GeoIP peer flags, and tracker probing Browser extension integration — Embedded Extension API with independent authentication, download confirmation, smart auto-submit, filename hints, referer/cookie forwarding, and real-time controls (Chrome Web Store · Edge Add-ons) Safe filename handling — Content-Disposition, RFC 2047, non-UTF-8, percent-encoded, and extensionless URL resolution with path traversal sanitization Download organization — Favorite and recent folders, optional file-type categorization, stale-record cleanup, and completed history backed by SQLite Concurrent downloads — Independent controls for active tasks, HTTP connections per server, segments per file, and BT peer limits Speed control — Global and per-task upload/download limits with day-of-week and time-of-day scheduling System integration — Tray operation, optional tray speed display, macOS Dock badge/progress, protocol handlers for magnet://, thunder://, and motrixnext:// Lightweight mode — Destroys the WebView on minimize-to-tray while Rust keeps the engine, task monitor, notifications, history, and extension routing alive Notifications and power options — Native task start/complete/failure notifications, keep-awake during downloads, and optional shutdown after completion Network controls — Scoped proxy support for downloads, app updates, and tracker updates, plus system proxy detection Auto-update channels — Stable, Beta, and Latest Across Channels policies with separate download and install phases Diagnostics — Structured logs, exportable diagnostic ZIPs, database integrity checks, automatic DB rebuild, and Linux GPU rendering fallback Personalization — Light/dark/system theme, 10 color schemes, 26 languages, and first-launch system language detection Motrix Next 3.9.4 changelog: Motrix Next 3.9.4 promotes the 3.9.4 beta cycle to stable. This release refreshes bundled engine binaries, improves task detail readability and copy actions, expands link handling for magnet and ED2K workflows, polishes responsive navigation and text wrapping, updates browser extension documentation, and refines network preference controls. New Features Task Detail copy actions — Added copyable values for task metadata and reusable render functions for long text fields. Magnet and ED2K lifecycle support — Added task lifecycle handling for magnet and ED2K links. History cleanup for deleted tasks — Deleted tasks can now remove matching history records. User-Agent management — Added user-agent management and improved related network preference controls. Browser extension documentation — Added the Firefox Add-ons link for the Motrix Next extension. Improvements Engine binaries — Updated bundled binaries for supported architectures. Task Detail readability — Long task names, URLs, tracker values, and copyable metadata now render more clearly. Deletion messaging — Refined localized task deletion text for clarity and consistency. Text wrapping — Improved URI input wrapping and task name multiline display. Navigation layout — Improved sub-navigation responsiveness. Disk allocation default — Changed the default file allocation method to trunc. Proxy controls — Improved proxy button styling in network preferences. Download: Motrix Next 64-bit | ARM64 | macOS ~20.0 MB (Open Source) Links: Website | macOS / Linux | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • NVIDIA officially supports Ubuntu, as linked above with the GeForce NOW Hands on I did in collaboration with Paul Hill.
    • TO be clear I am not running linux today, however I keep thinking about it. And I want to make sure there are minimal obstacles if I decide to make that switch in the coming months.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      479
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      244
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      66
    5. 5
      +Edouard
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!