Recommended Posts

Well, as a gamer, I'm stuck on Windows. If I didn't game, I probably would have moved to a Mac a while ago. Heck, my "desktop" PC might simply be a MacBook Air chained to a keyboard, monitor, mouse, and speakers.

why not just go ahead and move over to mac? I have my macbookpro dual-booted with windows for gaming and love it

MS seriously need more competition in the OS market - competitors would be so happy right now if they were launching a new PC OS at the same time as Win 8 and it might make MS appreciate the desktop market.

What situation? Having to learn new things? Things changing?

why not just go ahead and move over to mac? I have my macbookpro dual-booted with windows for gaming and love it

MacBook Pro for gaming? What nonsense is that? (Or any laptop for that matter.) Apple machines are just not strong enough or robust enough for gaming, even their desktop ranges. Now, I am an owner for MacBook Air, so let's not brand ourselves as this fanboy or that. I am telling it as it is. You are probably a casual gamer who is probably better off with a console.

I have to say though, I see no future in Windows. Anyone who knows me, know this is a very strange thing coming from me. But watching Microsoft attempt this rape upon users makes me furious. And when I look at OS X and how elegant it is (while incrementally including touch features where they make sense), and I am losing my faith. I mean, Windows 8 is not elegant as a desktop alone. The new Aero is horrible, the task bar is a mess (how hard is it to make a Process Explorer Light? :rolleyes:) and the rest of the UI changes are bad and go against the design philosophy of Windows Vista/7's elegance. Metro, on the other hand, is also horrific from UI aesthetics. Boxes boxes boxes. If it comes down between iOS & Android vs. Windows Metro on a tablet, I'd go with the former any day. You can have live information on an elegant design.

Oh, and now we go down to petty insults and gross overgeneralizations now. I don't like Windows 8, so I must be an Apple fanboy! It makes so much sense now!

The interface is bad. It gets in the way. It took me forever to figure out how to close a Metro app or shut down the computer. When an OS gets in the way like that, it's bad.

Not too say that Metro is bad per se - just needs a lot of refinement. And with the Consumer Preview, Microsoft is still far away from making Metro usable on the desktop.

You're not supposed to shut down metro apps. When tombstones they use a few Kb of memory if that. It's one of the main points of the metro apps, they practically don't use any resources. And will kill themselves if left alone.

MacBook Pro for gaming? What nonsense is that? (Or any laptop for that matter.) Apple machines are just not strong enough or robust enough for gaming, even their desktop ranges. Now, I am an owner for MacBook Air, so let's not brand ourselves as this fanboy or that. I am telling it as it is. You are probably a casual gamer who is probably better off with a console.

You have got to be kidding. My Mac Pro would like a word with you. I can max out anything on that computer. My iMac performs very well too.

Metro interface comes from world of limited better say crippled devices compared to PC. As such Metro is very limited and basic that simply does not belong to Desktop computers.

yet it still does everything the start menu does just as good and some things better, like access to 46+ pinned items right away instead of ~8

Oh, and now we go down to petty insults and gross overgeneralizations now. I don't like Windows 8, so I must be an Apple fanboy! It makes so much sense now!

The interface is bad. It gets in the way. It took me forever to figure out how to close a Metro app or shut down the computer. When an OS gets in the way like that, it's bad.

Not too say that Metro is bad per se - just needs a lot of refinement. And with the Consumer Preview, Microsoft is still far away from making Metro usable on the desktop.

1. You don't really need to close metro apps

2. Even then, is right click really that difficult to figure out?

It took me forever to figure out how to close a Metro app or shut down the computer.

Proof right there that you don't understand Windows 8 and are dismissing it out of ignorance. Not necessarily your fault, perhaps Microsoft's for not explaining it all sufficiently, but still a lack of understanding on your part nonetheless. You're not supposed to close Metro apps. Why would you want to?. When not in the foreground they get suspended and use next to no resources.

And for the record, all of these things will be explained in detail by Microsoft in the form of tutorial videos, welcome guides and edu-adverts.

You get no argument from me that Metro needs a bit of refinement though (isn't that what beta's are for??), things like the power options really shouldn't be buried away inside a settings menu. That said though, your computer already has a single key to shut down... it's called the power button. Using that is quicker to shutdown even than Windows 7. But no doubt you'll now tell me that your computer is hard to reach or something. But if having to press a button on the front of your PC instead of clicking a couple of times with the mouse is your only complaint, then we're onto a winner ;-)

No it doesn't. I can have as many apps inside start menu all nice arranged inside folder. I can right click on each thing in start menu and send to, copy, paste, create. Can you do it in metro, Beep you cannot. Can you open two windows next to each other in Metro? Beep you cannot.

And yet Microsoft's own telemetry from hundreds of thousands (if not millions) of computers around the world has shown that the vast majority of people do not use the All Programs folder within the start menu any more, and the majority of people migrated to use the new search feature for launching apps that was introduced in 2005 (Vista) and refined in 2009 (7). The fact you continue to use the old Windows 95 method of using the start menu speaks volumes about your unwillingness to change and adapt to new ways of doing things.

Metro is not hard to use, but every single thing you are used to do in Windows 7 is harder in Windows 8.

Consistency anybody? Clicking the network icon brings in some huge ugly blue thing from the right. Clicking the volume control doesn't.

If you want to remote desktop somewhere, your first choice would be the Metro app. The native remote desktop application is quite hard to find. But why would I want to be forced to remote in full screen on my 24" monitor? I'm not using some ****ty 7" tabled.

Nah, Windows 8 feels snappy and all, but the Metro interface isn't (currently at least) made for us desktop users.

Metro is not hard to use, but every single thing you are used to do in Windows 7 is harder in Windows 8.

Consistency anybody? Clicking the network icon brings in some huge ugly blue thing from the right. Clicking the volume control doesn't.

If you want to remote desktop somewhere, your first choice would be the Metro app. The native remote desktop application is quite hard to find. But why would I want to be forced to remote in full screen on my 24" monitor? I'm not using some ****ty 7" tabled.

Nah, Windows 8 feels snappy and all, but the Metro interface isn't (currently at least) made for us desktop users.

May be, just may be..it's because you need to do more than just control volume level with network icon?

Metro is not hard to use, but every single thing you are used to do in Windows 7 is harder in Windows 8.

Consistency anybody? Clicking the network icon brings in some huge ugly blue thing from the right. Clicking the volume control doesn't.

If you want to remote desktop somewhere, your first choice would be the Metro app. The native remote desktop application is quite hard to find. But why would I want to be forced to remote in full screen on my 24" monitor? I'm not using some ****ty 7" tabled.

Nah, Windows 8 feels snappy and all, but the Metro interface isn't (currently at least) made for us desktop users.

how is it hard? just search it then pin it into start screen/superbar

holy crap :|

To be fair though, the remote desktop icon was never particularly well exposed in Windows 7 either.

Start > All Programs > Accessories > Remote Desktop Connection

or

Win+R > Type "mstsc" > Enter

or

Start > Type "remote" > Enter (if Remote desktop is top result, otherwise click On Remote Desktop)

The middle of which still works in Windows 8, while also adding...

Start > Type "mstsc" > Enter

  • Like 2

On a multi-monitor setup, the "hot spots" are difficult to hit to bring up the charms bar and the settings menu. It's because the "hot spot" is designed to be at the lower right corner of the primary monitor.

Windows 8 was designed, implemented, and optimized to work via touch on a single-screen system. I.e. a tablet interface. Yes, they tossed in some after-thought methods of working with the system using a mouse and keyboard, but it is most certainly not OPTIMIZED to work with a mouse and keyboard. If you don't believe me, please go get a second monitor and then demonstrate to me how "easy" it is to bring up the charms bar with the mouse.

After using Windows 8 as my primary desktop for close to 4 months, I can confidently state that Metro is crap for running multiple apps at once. I must be in the 0.00000001% of the population that actually *uses* more than two windows on the desktop at once in Windows 7. I like being able to see what's going on in multiple apps at once without needing to "swap" each one out all the time just to keep an eye on them. For example, I have Outlook set up next to a PDF book I'm reading right now. When I get an e-mail, I can see the full text of the e-mail without touching anything. If it's not important, I shift my eyes back to the PDF and continue reading. My browser is running on the other side of the screen so I can keep tabs on the haps at Neowin. :) So again, Metro is not a "Windows" interface; it's a consumer-focused interface designed for stripped-down portable devices. Trying to argue against this point is like trying to argue that a carrier pigeon is a more efficient communication medium than a telephone. :)

On a multi-monitor setup, the "hot spots" are difficult to hit to bring up the charms bar and the settings menu. It's because the "hot spot" is designed to be at the lower right corner of the primary monitor.

Windows 8 was designed, implemented, and optimized to work via touch on a single-screen system. I.e. a tablet interface. Yes, they tossed in some after-thought methods of working with the system using a mouse and keyboard, but it is most certainly not OPTIMIZED to work with a mouse and keyboard. If you don't believe me, please go get a second monitor and then demonstrate to me how "easy" it is to bring up the charms bar with the mouse.

I'm wondering if this isn't a bug yet. But those working on a multi-monitor setup are usually the more techy crowd. The easiest way for me to bring up the menu is to hit Win+C. But I do agree that the Charms bar should travel to the rightmost edge of the right monitor.

On a multi-monitor setup, the "hot spots" are difficult to hit to bring up the charms bar and the settings menu. It's because the "hot spot" is designed to be at the lower right corner of the primary monitor.

Windows 8 was designed, implemented, and optimized to work via touch on a single-screen system. I.e. a tablet interface. Yes, they tossed in some after-thought methods of working with the system using a mouse and keyboard, but it is most certainly not OPTIMIZED to work with a mouse and keyboard. If you don't believe me, please go get a second monitor and then demonstrate to me how "easy" it is to bring up the charms bar with the mouse.

After using Windows 8 as my primary desktop for close to 4 months, I can confidently state that Metro is crap for running multiple apps at once. I must be in the 0.00000001% of the population that actually *uses* more than two windows on the desktop at once in Windows 7. I like being able to see what's going on in multiple apps at once without needing to "swap" each one out all the time just to keep an eye on them. For example, I have Outlook set up next to a PDF book I'm reading right now. When I get an e-mail, I can see the full text of the e-mail without touching anything. If it's not important, I shift my eyes back to the PDF and continue reading. My browser is running on the other side of the screen so I can keep tabs on the haps at Neowin. :) So again, Metro is not a "Windows" interface; it's a consumer-focused interface designed for stripped-down portable devices. Trying to argue against this point is like trying to argue that a carrier pigeon is a more efficient communication medium than a telephone. :)

I'm able to multi task just fine with metro, it also works just fine on my dual monitors, the hits spots have enough space to work just fine, and you can move what monitor the metro start screen shows on as well.

And again, the start screen works very well for power users as it gives instant access to far more pinned "favorites" than the start menu.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • ...but you're Johnny, from Australia?    
    • Glow 26.9 by Razvan Serea Glow provides detailed reporting on every hardware component in your computer, saving you valuable time typically spent searching for CPU, motherboard, RAM, graphics card, and other stats. With Glow, all the information is conveniently presented in one clean interface, allowing you to easily access and review the comprehensive hardware details of your system. Glow provides detailed information on various system aspects, including OS, motherboard, processor, memory, graphics card, storage, network, battery, drivers, and services. The well-organized format ensures easy access to the required information. You can export all the gathered data to a plain text file, facilitating sharing with others for troubleshooting purposes. No installation needed. Just decompress the archive, launch the executable, and access computer-related information. Glow runs on Windows 11 and Windows 10 64-bit versions. Glow 26.9 changelog: New Features The processor hardware detection engine has been significantly enhanced beyond traditional Intel and AMD architectures. Native support is now available for modern platforms such as Apple Silicon (M-Series) and the newly introduced NVIDIA Spark. In addition, all ARM-based processors can now be accurately distinguished between ARM32 and ARM64 architectures, providing precise hardware reporting. This marks a major milestone for Glow's hardware detection capabilities. The RAM manufacturer identification algorithm has been expanded. JEDEC vendor codes for popular brands such as Patriot, PNY, Team Group, GeIL, Lexar (Longsys), and Asgard/Gloway have been integrated into the database. This significantly reduces the likelihood of incorrect or "Unknown Manufacturer" results and improves overall hardware detection accuracy. New Public IP Address and Internet Service Provider (ISP) features have been added to the Network section. To ensure reliability, this information is retrieved from the trusted service ipwho.is. When Hiding Mode is enabled, no requests are sent and these features remain hidden, as they may expose sensitive information. The search engine used in the Installed Drivers, Installed Services, and Installed Applications sections has been enhanced. You can now perform more flexible and accurate searches using initials, partial matches, and loosely arranged character sequences. The TS Preloader loading bar has been rebuilt using our modern TS Custom Controls graphics library, developed entirely in-house. As a result of this infrastructure upgrade, the loading bar now features smooth rendering and rounded corners that align with the visual style of Windows 11. [TS Updater] A new validation algorithm has been added to check whether the target application is currently running before the update process begins. Bug Fixes Resolved a condition that could prevent TS Preloader from shutting down safely during rare application crash scenarios. Fixed a text alignment issue in the Network section affecting the display of DNS addresses. Alignment is now rendered correctly. [TS Updater] Fixed an issue that could prevent the updated application's executable "*.exe" file from being located after the update process. [TS Updater] Fixed a bug that could leave outdated "*.sha256" files in the application directory after an update. [TS Updater] Fixed a rare issue that could cause subfolders to be moved into the root directory after an update. [TS Updater] Fixed an issue during the first launch that could cause flickering and a temporary white window appearance due to Windows Defender interactions. Changes A small improvement has been made to the internet connectivity detection algorithm. Connectivity checks are now performed in the background with minimal impact on the user interface thread. The keyboard shortcuts in the top menu have been reorganized and simplified to provide a consistent experience across all Türkaysoft applications and to avoid potential conflicts with standard Windows shortcuts. The TS Preloader splash image has been updated with a Türkiye-themed stadium design to celebrate Türkiye's qualification for the 2026 FIFA World Cup—its first appearance in 24 years. Congratulations, Türkiye! The TS Custom Controls module has been updated to version 26.6, delivering improved stability and a more polished visual appearance. [TS Updater] The application icon has been redesigned to provide a more modern and refined look. Note: Always unzip the program before using it. Otherwise you may get an error. Download: Glow 26.9 | 1.8 MB (Open Source) Links: Glow Homepage | Screenshot | Github Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • DWARF mini review: the world's smallest smart telescope for night and day sky captures by Steven Parker DWARFLAB reached out to me asking if I was interested in checking out the DWARF mini, which is a portable astronomy telescope designed for amateur astronomers. Why do I say it's for amateurs? Well, for starters, it's not what you'd call "high end"; it's more of a professional-grade starting point for amateurs serious about capturing what's up there in our night and day skies. A typical amateur astronomer is most likely thousands of dollars deep into the hobby, and I will make no claims that this DWARF mini (at a fraction of the cost) could replace it all, okay? Well, if you read on, it will be clearer what I am trying to convey. Disclosure: DWARFLAB provided a free sample without any editorial input or review pre-approval. I have always been interested in looking up and observing the night sky. I see satellites crossing the sky above my garden most nights, and I am always looking at the moon. Yeah, I have a 200MP camera on my phone, but at 200X zoom, AI takes over and makes the pretty moon pictures that I snap, the DWARF mini does not, you get an actual true picture of what you can barely see with the naked eye. Before we start, let's share the highlights of the DWARF mini in bite-sized format: Pocket-Sized & Ultra-Lightweight Weighing just 1.85 lbs (840g), the DWARF mini easily fits into a backpack or large pocket. Its all-in-one, compact design makes it the ultimate grab-and-go digital telescope for hiking, camping, or traveling to dark-sky locations. Intuitive App Control & Built-in Sky Atlas Go from unboxing to your first shot in just 3 minutes! The DWARFLAB App provides a seamless experience with an interactive star map. Simply select your target and start exploring without the steep learning curve of traditional setups. Auto GOTO & 360° Pivot Freedom Enjoy pinpoint automated tracking with full 360° rotation. Powered by a high-sensitivity Sony IMX662 sensor (1/2.8-inch, 2.9μm pixels), it captures amazing, low-noise astro details, bringing faint nebulas and star clusters to life with stunning clarity. Pro-Level EQ Mode & Long Exposure Unlock advanced deep-space imaging with Equatorial (EQ) Mode. Supporting impressive single-frame exposures up to 90 seconds and featuring built-in light pollution filters, it easily cuts through city glow to reveal intricate celestial structures. Smart Cloud Processing & All-Ages Fun Effortlessly enhance your raw data with integrated cloud processing for professional-grade results. Perfect for beginners, kids, and adults, this telescope makes exploring and sharing the wonders of the universe an exciting, family-friendly adventure. The packaging is a pretty minimal affair with the outer box opening like a flap to reveal the plastic mould of the DWARF mini sitting in it. Below, the Sun filter, charging cable, cleaning cloth, and documentation can be found. DWARFLAB also provided a Mini Hydraulic Tripod ($89.99), and I highly recommend getting it if you plan on purchasing the DWARF mini, as it fully supports the motorized tracking feature of the telescope; plus, at 840g, the weight of the telescope, you will need a tripod that supports more than the weight of a smartphone anyway. What's in the box DWARF Mini Smart Telescope × 1 Sun Filter x 1 Type-C to Type-C Cord x 1 Cleaning Cloth x 1 User Guide With that out of the way, here are the full specs: DWARF mini Dimensions (DWH): 60.70 mm x 100.38 × 183.61 (2.39" x 3.95" x 7.23") Weight: 840g (1.85lbs) Aperture diameter: 30 mm (telephoto), 3.4 mm (wide angle) Image Sensor: SONY IMX662 1/2.8" (Telephoto) OmniVision OS02K10 1/2.8" (Wide-angle) Focal length: 150 mm (telephoto), 6.7 mm (wide-angle) Equivalent focal length: 1016 mm (telephoto), 45 mm (wide-angle) Shutter Speed: Tele - 1/10000-90s, Wide - 1/10000-30s Maximum exposure time: 90s (telephoto & wide-angle), Both in EQ mode Rotation range: Lens: 225°, Base: 360° Effective Pixels: 2.07M Maximum Resolution: 1920 × 1080 (Telephoto & Wide-angle) Built-in filters: Astro, Dark, Duo-Band (Telephoto), Astro (Wide-angle) Output: JPG, FITS, TIFF, MP4 Shooting Mode: Photos, Videos, Astronomy, Burst Shooting, Time-lapse Photography Storage: 64 GB Battery: Built-in 7000 mAh, supports external USB charging Charging Port: Type-C NPU: 1 TOPS Features: WiFi, NFC NFC One-Touch Connection Astronomy Post-Processing/Appointment Shooting/Astronomy Mosaic Wi-Fi Transmission Range: 15m (open environment) Color: Black Compatibility: iOS & Android smartphones/tablets Warranty: 2-years (24-months) MSRP: $399 Design Charge port On/off button Lens On the DWARF mini itself, it is a pretty minimal affair. On one side, there is a Type-C USB port to charge the non-removable 7000 mAh battery, and on the other side, a large button to power on or off the telescope. The button is flanked by an LED that is green when connected via the DWARFLAB app, or lights up red when being powered off. Below the button, there are four LEDs that indicate battery power. The DWARF mini does not have any sharp edges as all sides are rounded off; it has a good heft to it, but the weight of it feels quite balanced in the hand, so it isn't top or bottom-heavy. On the front there is the DWARFLAB logo which is quite small and there are no other markings on it. The tripod offers full 360° rotation of the motorized base, which allows for tracking for the time-lapse mode, but also for the 90-second captures of nearer objects in the sky, such as the Sun or the moon. Usage To get started, simply power on the DWARF mini and open the DWARFLAB app, tap on Connect, and it will scan for the DWARF mini over the Wi-Fi network. The device supports both 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz Wi-Fi, as well as Bluetooth for discovery, so connection issues were minimal in my experience with it. As previously noted in the specs, the DWARF mini will stay connected with a phone or tablet up to 15 meters in an open environment, such as a backyard. Lighting status Powering on: The green circular light will rotate and breathe in turn Powering off: The red circular light is gradually extinguished Connecting: Green light strip rotating Connected: Green light strip solid/always on 4 lights 1= 0-25%, 2= 25-50%, 3= 50-75%, 4= 75-100% battery power To view the full lighting status, such as tracking mode and connection failure, you can check the user guide on the official DWARFLAB page. DWARFLAB app Above, you can see the steps undertaken to connect the DWARFLAB app to my Galaxy S26 Ultra. Weirdly, I got an alert that a firmware update failed to get uploaded to the DWARF mini the first time, but upon retrying, it worked. Then place the DWARF mini outside, make sure your smartphone or tablet is connected to it, and then head back inside, because you can manage it from the comfort of your home. Simply enter the Atlas tab in the app and search for what you want to capture, and then tap on the camera icon; the DWARF mini will then attempt to track the object and give you a live view right on your connected device. Results I've had the DWARF mini since April, but even though my garden is south-facing, I had a lot of trouble trying to capture a good image of the moon. In the end, it was possible after I took it with me on a trip to my parents in Southend, UK, at the end of May. Here is a capture of the moon, resulting from 20 stacked images over a 90-second exposure. What you are seeing here is not AI-assisted. A good example of what I mean is the latest flagships with their 200MP cameras claiming to capture things like closeups of the moon, and while they are not as good as the above example on the DWARF mini, the resulting image on smartphones is actually AI-assisted above 30X zoom. Here is an example of a similar shot at the moon at 200X zoom using an HONOR Magic8 Pro. The difference is clear. Next, here we have a shot of the daytime moon. Here is a shot of Arcturus, the red giant star, which is the fourth brightest in the night sky. As previously mentioned, it could be a bit clearer, but clouds passing in front of it muddied the shot a bit. The Sun The DWARF mini also ships with a sun filter, meaning you can take great shots of the sun as well. Tracking Sun Resulting (stacked) shot Live zoom The pictures themselves are limited to Full HD, and some of the examples actually came out in HD (1280x720), but this is because the standard telescopic result is in 720p while "Wide" is in 1080p. Above you can see how in the app the Sun is tracked, the resulting capture, and Live zoom. I have only scratched the surface of what is possible with this telescope; I found several examples online of shots of the Milky Way, among others, such as nebulae and galaxies. All of this requires patience and knowledge, although if you know what you are looking for, simply enter it in the Atlas tab in the DWARFLAB app, tap the camera icon, and the telescope will attempt to track it. Conclusion The good The DWARF mini definitely places itself in a price point that makes astrology accessible to anyone looking to get started in the hobby. Say you want to have a closer look at the moon, simply enter it in the Atlas, and the Live view also lets you zoom in and snap pictures. The bad Some issues I came across while operating the DWARF mini were that it sometimes failed to connect unless I held my smartphone right next to it, and finding and tracking sometimes took several attempts to get it calibrated. I discovered that it helped if I sort of positioned and pointed the telescope in the general area it was supposed to detect, but this obviously wouldn't work with objects you can't see with the naked eye; more testing is required for that. Another bit of advice is to ensure that the lens is clean. While making the examples of live zooming on the sun, I discovered that the telescope lens and sun filter were not completely clean, and only after cleaning with a microfiber cloth was I able to get a decent shot of the sun. Where to buy and a coupon Okay, $399 is not cheap for a side hobby, but nor is a $1,500 smartphone flagship that you'll most likely have for a couple of years. This is a one-time entrance into astrology, and it won't become obsolete in one year like a smartphone. It's a thumbs up from me. The DWARF mini is available to buy right now in the U.S. and U.K. at the links below. DWARF mini for $399 on the official site DWARF mini for $399 on Amazon U.S. Use the NEOWIN5OFF coupon code for an additional 5% off at checkout (expires June 21) As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Adobe Acrobat Reader Dis Continued
    • The name, you mean? If so, it's actually the objects common name. There's another one called NGC 7293 which is also known as Helix Nebula (because we're looking at a helix structure top down) but other times also known as the Eye of God. You'll understand when you see it
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      X-No-file earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      270
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      75
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      71
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!