Recommended Posts

so lets compare build -- I am using

VMware ESXi 5.0.0 build-623860 from VM, are you running the same or you using the HP builds?

BTW - question for you, do you have or do you know how to enable the other hardware listings in the health section.. I have tried installing the cim providers from HP.. But has not added anything.. Would like to see fan and hdd, etc.

post-14624-0-50733000-1335464310.jpg

yeah I agree the physical nic should not be used in a vm to vm copy, or iperf test.

I show 1.55Gbps with iperf between vms - since the nic is only 1Gb, my test kind of shows that the physical nic is not involved at all in this copy.

Now that you bring up that is only memory -- maybe his issue is some bad memory? 300mbps seems pretty bad!

so lets compare build -- I am using

VMware ESXi 5.0.0 build-623860 from VM, are you running the same or you using the HP builds?

I'm using the Vanilla ESXi 5.0.0 build-469512. Didn't even realise patches would be out, I just assumed the build I downloaded would be up-to-date.

Am Updating Via the following method:


cd /scratch/downloads
wget http://hostupdate.vmware.com/software/VUM/OFFLINE/release-328-20120312-212851/update-from-esxi5.0-5.0_update01.zip
wget http://hostupdate.vmware.com/software/VUM/OFFLINE/release-331-20120408-206167/ESXi500-201204001.zip
vim-cmd hostsvc/maintenance_mode_enter
esxcli software vib install -d /scratch/downloads/update-from-esxi5.0-5.0_update01.zip
esxcli software vib install -d /scratch/downloads/ESXi500-201204001.zip
vim-cmd hostsvc/maintenance_mode_exit
reboot
rm /scratch/downloads/update-from-esxi5.0-5.0_update01.zip
rm /scratch/downloads/ESXi500-201204001.zip
[/CODE]

BTW - question for you, do you have or do you know how to enable the other hardware listings in the health section.. I have tried installing the cim providers from HP.. But has not added anything.. Would like to see fan and hdd, etc.

I get no health information display either. I too would like to be able to at very least monitor the HDD's SMART capabilities.

From what I understand if you are copying files between VM's it doesn't even touch the wire i.e the NIC it uses shared memory? Thats why you would get impressive speeds VM to VM Am I right..

Thats the general consensus, so why is mine going so slow... hmm? hopefully upgrading to the new build will help.

one thing to keep in mind on the u1, it seems to break the autostart feature. Work around is to just create add some commands in the rc file -- not sure if you autostart any of your vms -- but if you do, you will wonder why after you update it no longer works.

one thing to keep in mind on the u1, it seems to break the autostart feature. Work around is to just create add some commands in the rc file -- not sure if you autostart any of your vms -- but if you do, you will wonder why after you update it no longer works.

Got those commands handy?

I auto-start my pfSense and Server 2008 Domain Controller VMs. The rest I don't really need. But without pfSense I cannot remote in, and without the Domain Controller, DNS doesn't work.

one thing to keep in mind on the u1, it seems to break the autostart feature. Work around is to just create add some commands in the rc file -- not sure if you autostart any of your vms -- but if you do, you will wonder why after you update it no longer works.

Ah, I noticed that. Nice that it's not just me.

Problem I had on an HP MicroServer N36 was my network throughput on a Unix machine as an ESXi host was terrible (5MB/s up & 15MB/s down) compared to when I put just a base Unix system on (90MB/s up and 110MB/s down). I now run a Unix based server with VirtualBox VM's for my needs, it never needs a restart. So far I am loving it. Same config, 8GB ram, 120GB hdd for OS's and 4 1.5TB drives in raid Z1 for data.

SK[' timestamp=1335508472' post='594828125]

Ah, I noticed that. Nice that it's not just me.

I'll let you know if I have the same issue this afternoon after the upgrade. I'm planning the upgrade at 2:30PM today, as thats when most of my household is offline.

Problem I had on an HP MicroServer N36 was my network throughput on a Unix machine as an ESXi host was terrible (5MB/s up & 15MB/s down) compared to when I put just a base Unix system on (90MB/s up and 110MB/s down). I now run a Unix based server with VirtualBox VM's for my needs, it never needs a restart. So far I am loving it. Same config, 8GB ram, 120GB hdd for OS's and 4 1.5TB drives in raid Z1 for data.

I'd go this route, but as the server has a WAN connection I'd rather go for something a little more closed source.

I guess something we never asked is; do all your VMs have vmware-tools installed on them, and are using hardware configuration version 8?

All Version 8, All with VMWare-Tools installed except for pfSense, that's running Vanilla.

Got those commands handy?

* Use a SSH-client like PuTTy to connect to your host.

* Once logged into the host, run the command "vim-cmd vmsvc/getallvms" to find all VMs on your host and theire IDs (first column). Note the IDs for the VMs you would like to autostart. Or if you would like to start everyone, theres no need to remember the ID.

* Now edit /etc/rc.local with the editor "vi" using this command "vi /etc/rc.local"

* To enter insert-mode in "vi" press "i"-key.

* Somewhere in that file (I put mine above the if-statement) write this if you want every VM to autostart:

* * for i in $(vim-cmd vmsvc/getallvms|cut -f1 -d" "|grep -v Vmid); do vim-cmd vmsvc/power.on $i; sleep 10; done

* And if you only would like to start a few of the VMs on the host, this will be enough:

* * vim-cmd vmsvc/power.on ID_OF_VM

* * sleep NUMBER_OF_SECONDS (10 in my case)

* * vim-cmd vmsvc/power.on ID_OF_VM2

* * etc...

* When you are done editing, press ESC-key to exit "insert"-mode and then write ":wq" to write and quit.

* Reboot your host and the VMs should autostart once again.

so here for example is mine

-----

~ # cat /etc/rc.local

#!/bin/sh

export PATH=/sbin:/bin

log() {

echo "${1}"

/bin/busybox logger init "${1}"

}

# execute all service retgistered in ${rcdir} ($1 or /etc/rc.local.d)

vim-cmd vmsvc/power.on 5

sleep 60

vim-cmd vmsvc/power.on 3

sleep 60

vim-cmd vmsvc/power.on 8

if [ -d "${1:-/etc/rc.local.d}" ] ; then

<snippped>

----

nope -- no nano, I even looked around on how to add it. I could not find a way.

Small price to pay in functionality for an awesome product! (bar the issues I'm having, which I believe will go once I upgrade).

To further note, I've even moved VM SwapFiles to a separate Data Store to attempt to further improve speeds.

You should be able to add nano no problem! Download the source code to nano, configure it for statically linked, and move the resultant binary to ESX in /bin and you should be able to use it.

(Just compiled, I'll upload it later)

All,

Unfortunately after the upgrade I'm still facing the same performance issues, both between VMs and out to other clients on the network. Tried with a dumb switch today also, no difference.

It's 100% an ESXi switch issue.

Can you guys run through how you setup your VSwitches?

looking forward to the nano binary - that would be sweet!

As to vswitch setup, there isn't much too it.. You have not done any advanced option changes have you?

One thing I would double check.. You mentioned you changed your MTU to 9000 at one point. From your last screen of your vswitch you show 1500. Did you remember to change the MTU/Jumbo Frame setting on the nic in your vms?

have you done any changes to the nic settings in the vms?

Mine are default settings, the only thing I do on my vms related to network settings is I do disable ipv6 if not going to be using it. I turn off the llmnr (link-layer topology discovery mapper/responder) crap

IPv6 is fully disabled, not just uncheck the binding - on the vm

reg add hklm\system\currentcontrolset\services\tcpip6\parameters /v DisabledComponents /t REG_DWORD /d 255

This for one makes my ipconfig /all much easier to read ;)

Other than that I don't recall doing anything else. So we are on the same hardware, same os even for vms -- WTF your vswitch only showing 300mbps with iperf while mine shows 1.55Gbps?? You are showing a 10gbps connection on the vm nic now that you changed to vmxnet3 right?

At a loss here to what could be so different in our setups? Same freaking hardware N40L, esxi 5 u1 from vmware. Are you running your esxi off a usb disk or anything? Mine is installed to the 250GB drive that came with the N40L

Have made any changes to the bios settings of the N40L? What bios version do you have - mine is dated 7/29/11 I believe - I know its 7/11 something.

"I still need to test the thick/thin disc theory yet though." - this might have some issues with your file copies to and from vms, but should have nothing to do with the speed he is seeing on his vswitch - have you run an Iperf test between vms, and to box outside your host. Do you also see bad performance? Cpressland was seeing like 355Mbps, I show like 800 between vm and box outside. And 1.55Gbps between vms connected to the same vswitch. Iperf would remove any disk bottlenecks from the test.

Have you taken sniff using one of your vms -- is it possible that your vswitch is swamped with other traffic, maybe a broadcast storm or something going on? Turn on all the networking items -- do you see anything weird.. Mine is pretty much zero -- not doing anything currently.

post-14624-0-81550800-1335540080_thumb.j

Have you done any tweaking of the power management setting? Mine is set to balanced.

Under your security profile - what services do you have running/stopped?

post-14624-0-17908000-1335540711.jpg

So mediafire requires an account now... unimpressed. *continues to look for an alternative host*

Alright done, http://www63.zippysh...76335/file.html

Damnit, segmentation fault when running on ESXi...

Damn. Tried a full static compile of ncurses AND nano and it still won't work :( shame

Edited by n_K

As to vswitch setup, there isn't much too it.. You have not done any advanced option changes have you?

No Advanced settings at all, the only thing I changed from the defaults is the number of ports, which I brought down from 100+ to 24.

have you done any changes to the nic settings in the vms?

Nope, other than setting static IPs.

Are you running your esxi off a usb disk or anything?

Running off of an 8GB Kingston SSD mounted in the CD Bay area and connected directly to the sata connection on the mobo. While not the fastest SSD, it's a crap ton faster than a standard HDD.

Have made any changes to the bios settings of the N40L? What bios version do you have - mine is dated 7/29/11 I believe - I know its 7/11 something.

BIOS is stock - no upgrades done due to requiring to install Windows to update.

Have you done any tweaking of the power management setting? Mine is set to balanced.

Mine is set to 'High Power'

Under your security profile - what services do you have running/stopped?

All off, except:

tbtd

SSH

Direct Console UI

So - Budman has been VPNed into my Network for the last few days and we've been trying to figure this out. We've covered BIOS updates, swapping NICs around, updating VMWare Tools, disabling DNS on Windows Server 2008 R2 due to it flooding the network with UDP Packets. We've tried everything. Any further ideas Neowin?!

Would you please post this in the WMWare forums. I would really appreciate this to be brought to thier attention and it may get resolved quicker! Thank you!!!

I would also be interested in a solution for this. I dumped ESXi because of the poor network performance. I've gone with a straight Solaris solution, I would however love to use ESXi, hell I'd even pay for it if I was guaranteed that it would give me the full performance of my network. But without this, ESXi is not right for me.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • This sounds like underneath the nice marketing spin, either someone at Adobe got tired of their lazy devs and asked Microsoft to help them sort at least some of Adobe's ancestral spaghetti code to make it go faster, or Microsoft wanted Adobe's crap to run better on Windows to make it look better when compared to Apple, so they offered to intervene. Either way, GOOD.
    • My favorite file manager for Windows 11 finally gets a long-requested feature by Taras Buria Files is among the best File Explorer alternatives for Windows 10 and 11. This free app is packed with all sorts of features and conveniences, but there is one crucial feature that is still missing—Tree View. Fortunately, the latest update in the Preview channel finally delivers it. With version 4.1.4, which is now available for download in the Preview channel, developers implemented Tree View, a new mode that displays folders in an expandable hierarchy. Windows 11's stock File Explorer always had this feature, but it was nowhere to be found in Files until now. Starting with the latest preview update, you can expand each drive and its nested folders without leaving the current location and then open the folder you need in the main view. To try Tree View in Files, update the app to the latest preview version, then click the small arrow next to a drive to expand its content. The developers say they are rolling out Tree View in Preview first to gather feedback from users and improve the feature before bringing it to all in the stable channel. In addition to Tree View, Files 4.1.14 improves the Windows Fonts folder. You can now preview each font directly in Files with no need to open the built-in font viewer. For now, these two features are only available in the Preview channel. For those using the stable release, developers recently released version 4.1.3, with improvements for the built-in tag system, on-demand folder size calculation, and plenty of various fixes. You can check out the full release notes here. You can download Files from the Microsoft Store (paid version) or its official website (free).
    • Who is paying for this 30x scale-up? Its sounds expensive.
    • Millions of users to benefit from Windows 11's new performance boost on Adobe Photoshop by Sayan Sen Despite the advent of AI-generated imagery, Adobe's Photoshop remains one of the most popular tools on this planet. Adobe does not have a publicly reported total user count but it's probably not wrong to assume there are millions. As of 2025, Adobe Creative Cloud has had approximately 41 million paid subscribers, many of whom likely use Photoshop. In addition, more than 166,000 companies worldwide are apparently also using the app. These figures are according to a very recent report by SQ Magazine. Out of them, it is fair to assume that many are probably running Windows. As such, there is good news for these users as Microsoft has announced Photoshop is getting a big 20% performance boost on x86-64 (AMD64) systems and a 13% bump-up on Arm devices. This is definitely great news for them as many have complained about the slow performance and general sluggishness of Photoshop on Windows 11 ever since the advent of the latter back in 2021. If you are wondering how Microsoft managed to do this, the answer lies in a combination of compiler-level optimizations and a technology called Sample Profile Guided Optimization (SPGO). According to Microsoft, Adobe worked closely with the company’s Visual C++ team and adopted the latest MSVC toolchain enhancements together with SPGO to squeeze more performance out of Photoshop’s CPU-bound workloads. Unlike traditional Profile Guided Optimization (PGO), which requires developers to create special instrumented builds and run lengthy training workloads, SPGO gathers performance data directly from optimized release binaries. This means Adobe could collect real-world usage information which gives a major advantage to this technique, as companies could leverage data collected from actual customer workloads rather than only relying on synthetic benchmark runs. In theory, this should allow optimizations to better reflect how users interact with software in the real world. Thanks to this, there are improvements to code layout, function inlining, hot-and-cold code separation, and other low-level tweaks that help processors execute instructions more efficiently. Essentially the compiler is better able to identify “hot” code paths, those which are most frequently executed, and optimize them accordingly.
    • "The 2TB Samsung 990 PRO NVMe SSD hits lowest price in over three months¨ I'd prefer to see the lowest price in over a year
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      Jocimo earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      suprememobiles48 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Prasann earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Prasann earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      521
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      174
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      90
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      81
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!