Recommended Posts

Who gave you a license key? VMWare? - I asked a friend who has something like 100 servers running this and he says the client software (vSphere Client) has never been free. That if you don't enter a license key (which aren't free) it will stop working after 60 days.

Anyway if you have a valid license I'd suggest contacting VMWare. Even if the hardware isn't supported. I mean you are a paying customer right? You didn't pirate it or anything?

Yeah, got my Licence from VMWare (not paid), regarding vSphere not being free, I wasn't aware of that. I'd be more than happy to purchase one if I could get this Network Speed issue resolved and they released a Mac Client. If not, CentOS+VirtualBox is the way I shall go.

ESXi can be obtained free. As soon as you add the licence your features are reduced to that of the free licence.

http://www.vmware.com/products/vsphere-hypervisor/overview.html

Product: VMware vSphere 5 Hypervisor Licensed for 1 physical CPUs (unlimited cores per CPU)

License Key: xxxxx-xxxxx-xxxxx-xxxxx-xxxxx

Expires: Never

Product Features:

Up to 32 GB of memory

Up to 8-way virtual SMP

Earlier in the thread I suggested you install Linux and see if the speed issue remains between Linux guests, did you ever try that?

Two CentOS 6 VMs had the same communication speeds as advertised with Windows VMs.

SK[' timestamp=1336464789' post='594852099]

ESXi can be obtained free. As soon as you add the licence your features are reduced to that of the free licence.

http://www.vmware.co...r/overview.html

Exactly!

Erm... heres something a bit weird!

I've just downloaded the Ubuntu 12.04 LTS 32-bit ISO and gone to push it to the Server. I attempted to upload to my 250GB Datastore which gave me an ETA of 60 minutes, attempting to go to my 500GB DataStore gave me an ETA of 25 minutes. The 8GB SSD only took 1 minute 30 seconds.

Hmm....

Hi,

Firstly thanks for all this :-)

I am getting similar issues with my VMWare install on a N36 and reading this has been a real help in starting to troubleshoot. I have noticed that my server VMDK file on my Samsung SP F4 2TB is performing below par, which manifested itself in very poor copy speeds over the wire (roughly 10MBPS).

I am going to try with another disc before looking at ESX more closely. I'll also try testing the network too although copying from the same hardware on a native windows7 install was much faster so that kind rules out anything but the vswitch.

Look forward to reading updates :-)

Cheers,

Max

Good to see somebody else is having issues. It looks like it's either an I/O or vSwitch issue at current. I've not yet delved into any advanced troubleshooting or peeling back through logs etc, but naturally I'll update this thread as I know more.

Tried another disk, and deffo a problem with ESX, Same Disk, same hardware with native windows 7 i get about 80 MBPS, with ESXi i get about 10MBPS :-(

I have ESXi on a USB key so was gonna do an install on a HDD and see if it makes any difference?

Not happy Jan :-(

Just a thought - my pfSense is running in promiscuous mode, could this somehow be effecting things?

Could it be that every time I do a network transfer involving these VMs the pfSense VM is receiving every packet pushed over the Virtual Switch?

Yeah, if your vswitch is promiscuous mode?? It sure couldn't be helping performance.

Now I just created a new port group to be able to mirror the traffic that goes to the internet for IDS and nchronos, etc. But I haven't installed anything yet to the switch port other than my pfsense lan interface.

So mirrored port group is set to accept promiscuous mode, lan port group is set to reject

post-14624-0-15796700-1337088149.jpg

But if you have your whole vswitch in that mode, then set promiscuous to reject - does that help? Didn't we go over your vswitch settings already.

Well - I decided to move some stuff around to see if I could improve performance at all. I moved pfSense to it's own group similar to what you've done and set Promisc to Accept, the rest of the LAN Group is set to Reject.

I'm seeing about 450Mbits/sec over IPerf to most machines on my network on average.

Lets just throw around some other ideas here. I'm starting to think maybe the 8GB SSD is to blame (somehow) at the moment.

If I was to move data to a single Datastore, reinstall ESXi on the provided 250GB HDD and begin setting things up from scratch and reimport the VMs then test performance again?

Or do you think it's worth trying the HP ESXi thats been mentioned multiple times here?

Extra Note: The Server Completely crashed today when I attempted to download an image from Usenet on my Windows 7 x86 VM. Wasn't responding to any commands, reboot, ssh reboot, etc and required a hard reboot when I got home.

I don't quite see how a VM could bring down the entire Host OS. Either way, I want to explore importing VMs into Xen or VirtualBox and maybe look at moving the VM Platform over to CentOS shortly.

Yeah a vm should not be able to bring down the host - that clearly should not happen!! Maybe it was a coincidence? My host crashed last week as well, had to hard reboot the host. Not sure exactly what caused it? I was not even home when it crashed, and systems were not doing any downloads or anything.

As to the HP version of esxi -- a buddy told me it wouldn't install to the N40L.. He recently bought one, but I don't have the details of what he was doing, etc. Could be he was full of **** ;) I have not had time to try it, was thinking I could just install it to a thumb drive to see if worked and added the other hardware to the health tab. But If he was correct I don't think it will -- just that the micro server are not currently supported by HP for esxi it seems. If they were adding the cims should install the needed stuff for the other hardware to be listed.

Doing a clean install to the 250GB drive with 1 datastore would duplicate my install - and sure could see if that bumps your performance up. There is a thread I have been watching on the vmware forums about a guy seeing a limit of ~300Mbps between guests on the same vswitch. Which could be related to your reduced performance - but as of yet nothing of significance in it.

http://communities.vmware.com/thread/392477?start=0&tstart=0

Yeah a vm should not be able to bring down the host - that clearly should not happen!! Maybe it was a coincidence? My host crashed last week as well, had to hard reboot the host. Not sure exactly what caused it? I was not even home when it crashed, and systems were not doing any downloads or anything.

Well in that case I'll assume it was a simple bug instead of a Load Issue. Going to try and replicate now anyway.

As to the HP version of esxi -- a buddy told me it wouldn't install to the N40L.. He recently bought one, but I don't have the details of what he was doing, etc. Could be he was full of **** ;) I have not had time to try it, was thinking I could just install it to a thumb drive to see if worked and added the other hardware to the health tab. But If he was correct I don't think it will -- just that the micro server are not currently supported by HP for esxi it seems. If they were adding the cims should install the needed stuff for the other hardware to be listed.

Yeah I couldn't see it on the list of Supported Hardware, and Google yielded few results.

Doing a clean install to the 250GB drive with 1 datastore would duplicate my install - and sure could see if that bumps your performance up. There is a thread I have been watching on the vmware forums about a guy seeing a limit of ~300Mbps between guests on the same vswitch. Which could be related to your reduced performance - but as of yet nothing of significance in it.

http://communities.v...tart=0&tstart=0

Right - that's a plan for the weekend then. I'll remove the SSD and attempt an install on the 250GB Drive.

Funny thing is though that the SSD is massively faster than the two hard drives, even when just copying something to the Datastore.

Going through the logs, found this:

2012-05-15T13:45:52.954Z: <<throttled>> Storage I/O Control: connection with vobd failed, error code: -1 errno: 2[/CODE]

Not sure what it is, but it's mentioned CONSTANTLY!

Additionally:

[CODE]
2012-05-16T07:37:08.952Z: [scsiCorrelator] 64332112349us: [vob.scsi.device.io.latency.high] Device t10.ATA_____SAMSUNG_HD502IJ_________________________S13TJDWQ620722______ performance has deteriorated. I/O latency increased from average value of 22658 microseconds to 684718 microseconds.

2012-05-16T07:37:08.952Z: [scsiCorrelator] 64336113058us: [esx.problem.scsi.device.io.latency.high] Device t10.ATA_____SAMSUNG_HD502IJ_________________________S13TJDWQ620722______ performance has deteriorated. I/O latency increased from average value of 22658 microseconds to 684718 microseconds.

2012-05-16T08:03:08.708Z: [scsiCorrelator] 65891868893us: [vob.scsi.device.io.latency.improved] Device t10.ATA_____SAMSUNG_HD502IJ_________________________S13TJDWQ620722______ performance has improved. I/O latency reduced from 684718 microseconds to 174335 microseconds.
[/CODE]

More:

My Windows 7 VM is basically completely unresponsive from an I/O standpoint. System is very very slow while copying a VMDK between Datastores. Yet the HDD Indicator light on the Server itself is only flashing once in a while, indicating that minimal I/O is happening on the disk itself.

at that point, i would start from scratch and check your hdds' health

I know all hard drives are perfectly healthy.

And starting from Scratch won't solve anything at all as this issue has been around since I began working with ESXi, not diagnosing an issue and 'reformatting' is a very bad mentality.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Hello, Installed here without issue. Regards, Aryeh Goretsky
    • Microsoft updates Visual Studio Code with easier language model discovery and in-app search by Paul Hill Microsoft has released Visual Studio Code 1.125, its latest weekly release. This week, the company has focused on discovering and installing extra language models via the Marketplace; searching the web and securely browsing over remote connections without leaving VS Code; choosing how long VS Code waits before installing extension updates; and delivering managed Copilot settings through existing device management tooling. In older versions of VS Code, extensions could contribute their own model providers, but to find these extensions, you needed the right tags to search for in the Extension view. Now, the Language Models editor gives you an Install Model Providers button that opens the Extensions view, which is filtered to extensions that contribute model providers, making it easier to find and install them. Once you install a provider, its model will appear in the model picker. If you use the integrated browser much, you can now look up information without leaving VS Code by typing a query into the integrated browser’s address bar. It will use your configured search engine, the same way a standalone browser does. You can use workbench.browser.searchEngine to pick a search engine. When the browser is opened in a remote workspace, it's now possible to proxy HTTP(S) traffic via the remote connection. This allows you to connect to any ports or services that can only be accessed from the remote machine. If you read our coverage from two weeks ago about VS Code 1.123, you might have seen that extension updates have a two-hour delay as a safety measure. In this update, Microsoft is giving you the ability to configure the time of the delay. You can find it under extensions.autoUpdateDelay. Finally, with this update, admins can deliver managed GitHub Copilot settings through native device management (MDM) channels on Windows and macOS, in addition to account-based enterprise settings files. Settings delivered via MDM appear as policy-enforced in VS Code and can’t be overridden locally. Future updates will extend the supported policy keys across Copilot surfaces. You can download the update from the Visual Studio Code website now.
    • "it opens up new doors for people who prefer using Edge, but cannot be bothered to configure a Microsoft account" You already have a Microsoft account if you are using Windows 11, because you can't set it up without one.
    • This is how much iPhone 18 Pro could cost after Apple's price hike confirmed by Hamid Ganji Image via Apple Apple CEO Tim Cook confirmed in a recent interview that the company may have to raise prices on some of its products due to the ongoing memory shortage. While he did not elaborate on the scale of the price hikes, new estimates suggest that Pro iPhone models could become significantly more expensive this fall. The Wall Street Journal and research firm TechInsights have come up with an educated estimate of how much the upcoming iPhone 18 Pro could cost after its launch in September. The estimate is based on current increases in memory and storage chip prices. For starters, the iPhone 18 Pro base model is expected to feature 12GB of RAM and 256GB of internal storage. According to TechInsights estimates, 12GB of DRAM for the iPhone 17 Pro cost Apple $39 last year. However, for the iPhone 18 Pro, the cost of the same amount of DRAM could soar to $145. Likewise, 256GB of flash storage that previously cost $13 could now cost around $51. Producing a base iPhone 17 Pro reportedly cost Apple around $582, but TechInsights estimates that the production cost of the iPhone 18 Pro could rise to $726. If Apple wants to maintain the roughly 47% profit margin it enjoys on the iPhone 17 Pro, the base price of the iPhone 18 Pro would need to reach $1,371. After standard pricing adjustments, customers could end up paying around $1,299 for the base model. However, that may not be the end of the story. As we previously reported, the iPhone 18 Pro is said to feature a variable-aperture lens, which could cost Apple at least 50% more than the current camera system. The estimated $1,299 price tag does not include the additional cost of this upgraded camera hardware. Once that expense is factored in, the base model could cost at least $1,399. A $1,399 price tag for the base iPhone 18 Pro would represent a significant increase over the current $1,099 starting price of the iPhone 17 Pro. If Apple wants to keep its upcoming iPhones competitive, it may need to accept lower profit margins.
    • Oh man, but what if I have the PS3 version?
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      With What earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Harris Gilbert earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Vincian earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      543
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      171
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      84
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      64
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!