Recommended Posts

Who gave you a license key? VMWare? - I asked a friend who has something like 100 servers running this and he says the client software (vSphere Client) has never been free. That if you don't enter a license key (which aren't free) it will stop working after 60 days.

Anyway if you have a valid license I'd suggest contacting VMWare. Even if the hardware isn't supported. I mean you are a paying customer right? You didn't pirate it or anything?

Yeah, got my Licence from VMWare (not paid), regarding vSphere not being free, I wasn't aware of that. I'd be more than happy to purchase one if I could get this Network Speed issue resolved and they released a Mac Client. If not, CentOS+VirtualBox is the way I shall go.

ESXi can be obtained free. As soon as you add the licence your features are reduced to that of the free licence.

http://www.vmware.com/products/vsphere-hypervisor/overview.html

Product: VMware vSphere 5 Hypervisor Licensed for 1 physical CPUs (unlimited cores per CPU)

License Key: xxxxx-xxxxx-xxxxx-xxxxx-xxxxx

Expires: Never

Product Features:

Up to 32 GB of memory

Up to 8-way virtual SMP

Earlier in the thread I suggested you install Linux and see if the speed issue remains between Linux guests, did you ever try that?

Two CentOS 6 VMs had the same communication speeds as advertised with Windows VMs.

SK[' timestamp=1336464789' post='594852099]

ESXi can be obtained free. As soon as you add the licence your features are reduced to that of the free licence.

http://www.vmware.co...r/overview.html

Exactly!

Erm... heres something a bit weird!

I've just downloaded the Ubuntu 12.04 LTS 32-bit ISO and gone to push it to the Server. I attempted to upload to my 250GB Datastore which gave me an ETA of 60 minutes, attempting to go to my 500GB DataStore gave me an ETA of 25 minutes. The 8GB SSD only took 1 minute 30 seconds.

Hmm....

Hi,

Firstly thanks for all this :-)

I am getting similar issues with my VMWare install on a N36 and reading this has been a real help in starting to troubleshoot. I have noticed that my server VMDK file on my Samsung SP F4 2TB is performing below par, which manifested itself in very poor copy speeds over the wire (roughly 10MBPS).

I am going to try with another disc before looking at ESX more closely. I'll also try testing the network too although copying from the same hardware on a native windows7 install was much faster so that kind rules out anything but the vswitch.

Look forward to reading updates :-)

Cheers,

Max

Good to see somebody else is having issues. It looks like it's either an I/O or vSwitch issue at current. I've not yet delved into any advanced troubleshooting or peeling back through logs etc, but naturally I'll update this thread as I know more.

Tried another disk, and deffo a problem with ESX, Same Disk, same hardware with native windows 7 i get about 80 MBPS, with ESXi i get about 10MBPS :-(

I have ESXi on a USB key so was gonna do an install on a HDD and see if it makes any difference?

Not happy Jan :-(

Just a thought - my pfSense is running in promiscuous mode, could this somehow be effecting things?

Could it be that every time I do a network transfer involving these VMs the pfSense VM is receiving every packet pushed over the Virtual Switch?

Yeah, if your vswitch is promiscuous mode?? It sure couldn't be helping performance.

Now I just created a new port group to be able to mirror the traffic that goes to the internet for IDS and nchronos, etc. But I haven't installed anything yet to the switch port other than my pfsense lan interface.

So mirrored port group is set to accept promiscuous mode, lan port group is set to reject

post-14624-0-15796700-1337088149.jpg

But if you have your whole vswitch in that mode, then set promiscuous to reject - does that help? Didn't we go over your vswitch settings already.

Well - I decided to move some stuff around to see if I could improve performance at all. I moved pfSense to it's own group similar to what you've done and set Promisc to Accept, the rest of the LAN Group is set to Reject.

I'm seeing about 450Mbits/sec over IPerf to most machines on my network on average.

Lets just throw around some other ideas here. I'm starting to think maybe the 8GB SSD is to blame (somehow) at the moment.

If I was to move data to a single Datastore, reinstall ESXi on the provided 250GB HDD and begin setting things up from scratch and reimport the VMs then test performance again?

Or do you think it's worth trying the HP ESXi thats been mentioned multiple times here?

Extra Note: The Server Completely crashed today when I attempted to download an image from Usenet on my Windows 7 x86 VM. Wasn't responding to any commands, reboot, ssh reboot, etc and required a hard reboot when I got home.

I don't quite see how a VM could bring down the entire Host OS. Either way, I want to explore importing VMs into Xen or VirtualBox and maybe look at moving the VM Platform over to CentOS shortly.

Yeah a vm should not be able to bring down the host - that clearly should not happen!! Maybe it was a coincidence? My host crashed last week as well, had to hard reboot the host. Not sure exactly what caused it? I was not even home when it crashed, and systems were not doing any downloads or anything.

As to the HP version of esxi -- a buddy told me it wouldn't install to the N40L.. He recently bought one, but I don't have the details of what he was doing, etc. Could be he was full of **** ;) I have not had time to try it, was thinking I could just install it to a thumb drive to see if worked and added the other hardware to the health tab. But If he was correct I don't think it will -- just that the micro server are not currently supported by HP for esxi it seems. If they were adding the cims should install the needed stuff for the other hardware to be listed.

Doing a clean install to the 250GB drive with 1 datastore would duplicate my install - and sure could see if that bumps your performance up. There is a thread I have been watching on the vmware forums about a guy seeing a limit of ~300Mbps between guests on the same vswitch. Which could be related to your reduced performance - but as of yet nothing of significance in it.

http://communities.vmware.com/thread/392477?start=0&tstart=0

Yeah a vm should not be able to bring down the host - that clearly should not happen!! Maybe it was a coincidence? My host crashed last week as well, had to hard reboot the host. Not sure exactly what caused it? I was not even home when it crashed, and systems were not doing any downloads or anything.

Well in that case I'll assume it was a simple bug instead of a Load Issue. Going to try and replicate now anyway.

As to the HP version of esxi -- a buddy told me it wouldn't install to the N40L.. He recently bought one, but I don't have the details of what he was doing, etc. Could be he was full of **** ;) I have not had time to try it, was thinking I could just install it to a thumb drive to see if worked and added the other hardware to the health tab. But If he was correct I don't think it will -- just that the micro server are not currently supported by HP for esxi it seems. If they were adding the cims should install the needed stuff for the other hardware to be listed.

Yeah I couldn't see it on the list of Supported Hardware, and Google yielded few results.

Doing a clean install to the 250GB drive with 1 datastore would duplicate my install - and sure could see if that bumps your performance up. There is a thread I have been watching on the vmware forums about a guy seeing a limit of ~300Mbps between guests on the same vswitch. Which could be related to your reduced performance - but as of yet nothing of significance in it.

http://communities.v...tart=0&tstart=0

Right - that's a plan for the weekend then. I'll remove the SSD and attempt an install on the 250GB Drive.

Funny thing is though that the SSD is massively faster than the two hard drives, even when just copying something to the Datastore.

Going through the logs, found this:

2012-05-15T13:45:52.954Z: <<throttled>> Storage I/O Control: connection with vobd failed, error code: -1 errno: 2[/CODE]

Not sure what it is, but it's mentioned CONSTANTLY!

Additionally:

[CODE]
2012-05-16T07:37:08.952Z: [scsiCorrelator] 64332112349us: [vob.scsi.device.io.latency.high] Device t10.ATA_____SAMSUNG_HD502IJ_________________________S13TJDWQ620722______ performance has deteriorated. I/O latency increased from average value of 22658 microseconds to 684718 microseconds.

2012-05-16T07:37:08.952Z: [scsiCorrelator] 64336113058us: [esx.problem.scsi.device.io.latency.high] Device t10.ATA_____SAMSUNG_HD502IJ_________________________S13TJDWQ620722______ performance has deteriorated. I/O latency increased from average value of 22658 microseconds to 684718 microseconds.

2012-05-16T08:03:08.708Z: [scsiCorrelator] 65891868893us: [vob.scsi.device.io.latency.improved] Device t10.ATA_____SAMSUNG_HD502IJ_________________________S13TJDWQ620722______ performance has improved. I/O latency reduced from 684718 microseconds to 174335 microseconds.
[/CODE]

More:

My Windows 7 VM is basically completely unresponsive from an I/O standpoint. System is very very slow while copying a VMDK between Datastores. Yet the HDD Indicator light on the Server itself is only flashing once in a while, indicating that minimal I/O is happening on the disk itself.

at that point, i would start from scratch and check your hdds' health

I know all hard drives are perfectly healthy.

And starting from Scratch won't solve anything at all as this issue has been around since I began working with ESXi, not diagnosing an issue and 'reformatting' is a very bad mentality.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Glad these prices are starting to come down, but that is still crazy. I bought the 2TB 9100 Pro (slightly more expensive version with PCIe 5.0) last year for $240.
    • The 2TB Samsung 990 PRO NVMe SSD hits lowest price in over three months by Sayan Sen Yesterday, we covered a really good deal wherein you can get a 4TB TeamGroup T-FORCE G50 NVMe PCIe Gen4 SSD for a low price of just $400 with a special discount coupon. That's just $100 per TB, making it a very good offer during these hard times. The deal is still live, so you can check it out in its dedicated article here if you do not want to miss out. Meanwhile, if you don't have that kind of budget but still wish to buy an SSD for a good price, the 2TB variant of the TeamGroup SSD at $280 its lowest price in over three months. Meanwhile, those seeking 2TB but faster performance can check out Samsung's 990 PRO, which has hit the lowest price also in the last quarter or so, as it's on sale for $370 (purchase links under the specs table down below). Thus, you want a faster drive, get the 990 Pro, or you want more capacity, grab the TeamGroup 4TB linked in the first para. The 990 PRO is a PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD and still one of the fastest drives available today for under $500. Speaking of fast, sequential reads and writes are rated at 7450 MB/s and 6900 MB/s, respectively. The random throughputs for reads and writes are 1400K IOPS and 1550K IOPS, respectively. The 990 PRO is based on Samsung's 7th Gen V-NAND flash, and it too is TLC. It packs 2 gigs of LPDDR4 DRAM cache, which helps the random performance. The endurance rating for this is 1200 TBW (terabytes written), which should be sufficient for most users. The Samsung 990 PRO is compatible with the PlayStation 5, but if you are going to use the 990 PRO on a PC, check out the Samsung Magician app that lets you track your drive's health, update its firmware, customize various settings, and more. The tech specs are given below: Specification TeamGroup T-FORCE G50 2TB Samsung 990 PRO 2TB Interface PCIe 4.0 x4, NVMe 1.4 PCIe Gen 4.0 x4, NVMe 2.0 Form Factor M.2 2280 M.2 2280 Controller InnoGrit Controller Samsung In-house Controller NAND Flash 3D TLC 3D TLC DRAM Cache None (HMB supported) 2GB LPDDR4 Sequential Read (Max) 5,000 MB/s 7,450 MB/s Sequential Write (Max) 4,500 MB/s 6,900 MB/s Random Read (4K) Up to 600,000 IOPS Up to 1,400,000 IOPS Random Write (4K) Up to 700,000 IOPS Up to 1,550,000 IOPS TBW (Endurance) 1,300 TBW 1,200 TBW MTBF 3,000,000 hours 1,500,000 hours Operating Temperature 0°C to 70°C 0°C to 70°C Storage Temperature -40°C to 85°C -40°C to 85°C Shock Resistance 1,500G / 0.5ms 1,500G / 0.5ms Heatsink Patented Graphene Heat Spreader No Get them at the links below: Samsung 990 PRO SSD 2TB (MZ-V9P2T0B/AM): $369.99 (Sold and Shipped by Amazon US) TEAMGROUP T-Force G50 2TB SSD (TM8FFE002T0C129): $279.99 (Sold by TeamGroup, Shipped by Amazon US) Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • If you can't spell a simple word that 2nd graders learn, your entire argument is suspect.
    • And here goes the "Won't someone think of the children" brigade. Get stuffed mate. This has NOTHING to do with making the internet safe. It's about tracking adults, spying on your online activity, and sending the boys around when they don't like something you post. Also, again, parliament have voted TWICE against this, and Starmer is going ahead anyway. THAT is anti-democratic bullsh**. They will use this law to track you, they will use this law to control you, and they will use this law to punish you if they don't like what you do, even if it's legal. And your data? Say bye bye to that. It'll be on the darkweb in weeks. I'm not some rando online. I've been an IT professional for 40 years, many of it in security. I know exactly what this means and what will happen to your data. I do not consent and I will not comply.
    • "...but it may not be Microsoft's fault" seems like a reasonable way to tease what is going on without leaving the user with a false impression that an update is the problem. A title isn't a summery, it is meant to entice the user to read the article. It should not contain a misleading premise; which this title does not. You could maybe complain that the first paragraph should have included that detail. The writing style popularized over 100 years ago in newspapers will cover the most important information as soon as possible with details and nuance added later; the idea being that with each new paragraph you have less of the reader's focus.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      Jocimo earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      suprememobiles48 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Prasann earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Prasann earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      520
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      174
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      91
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      81
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!