Recommended Posts

Who gave you a license key? VMWare? - I asked a friend who has something like 100 servers running this and he says the client software (vSphere Client) has never been free. That if you don't enter a license key (which aren't free) it will stop working after 60 days.

Anyway if you have a valid license I'd suggest contacting VMWare. Even if the hardware isn't supported. I mean you are a paying customer right? You didn't pirate it or anything?

Yeah, got my Licence from VMWare (not paid), regarding vSphere not being free, I wasn't aware of that. I'd be more than happy to purchase one if I could get this Network Speed issue resolved and they released a Mac Client. If not, CentOS+VirtualBox is the way I shall go.

ESXi can be obtained free. As soon as you add the licence your features are reduced to that of the free licence.

http://www.vmware.com/products/vsphere-hypervisor/overview.html

Product: VMware vSphere 5 Hypervisor Licensed for 1 physical CPUs (unlimited cores per CPU)

License Key: xxxxx-xxxxx-xxxxx-xxxxx-xxxxx

Expires: Never

Product Features:

Up to 32 GB of memory

Up to 8-way virtual SMP

Earlier in the thread I suggested you install Linux and see if the speed issue remains between Linux guests, did you ever try that?

Two CentOS 6 VMs had the same communication speeds as advertised with Windows VMs.

SK[' timestamp=1336464789' post='594852099]

ESXi can be obtained free. As soon as you add the licence your features are reduced to that of the free licence.

http://www.vmware.co...r/overview.html

Exactly!

Erm... heres something a bit weird!

I've just downloaded the Ubuntu 12.04 LTS 32-bit ISO and gone to push it to the Server. I attempted to upload to my 250GB Datastore which gave me an ETA of 60 minutes, attempting to go to my 500GB DataStore gave me an ETA of 25 minutes. The 8GB SSD only took 1 minute 30 seconds.

Hmm....

Hi,

Firstly thanks for all this :-)

I am getting similar issues with my VMWare install on a N36 and reading this has been a real help in starting to troubleshoot. I have noticed that my server VMDK file on my Samsung SP F4 2TB is performing below par, which manifested itself in very poor copy speeds over the wire (roughly 10MBPS).

I am going to try with another disc before looking at ESX more closely. I'll also try testing the network too although copying from the same hardware on a native windows7 install was much faster so that kind rules out anything but the vswitch.

Look forward to reading updates :-)

Cheers,

Max

Good to see somebody else is having issues. It looks like it's either an I/O or vSwitch issue at current. I've not yet delved into any advanced troubleshooting or peeling back through logs etc, but naturally I'll update this thread as I know more.

Tried another disk, and deffo a problem with ESX, Same Disk, same hardware with native windows 7 i get about 80 MBPS, with ESXi i get about 10MBPS :-(

I have ESXi on a USB key so was gonna do an install on a HDD and see if it makes any difference?

Not happy Jan :-(

Just a thought - my pfSense is running in promiscuous mode, could this somehow be effecting things?

Could it be that every time I do a network transfer involving these VMs the pfSense VM is receiving every packet pushed over the Virtual Switch?

Yeah, if your vswitch is promiscuous mode?? It sure couldn't be helping performance.

Now I just created a new port group to be able to mirror the traffic that goes to the internet for IDS and nchronos, etc. But I haven't installed anything yet to the switch port other than my pfsense lan interface.

So mirrored port group is set to accept promiscuous mode, lan port group is set to reject

post-14624-0-15796700-1337088149.jpg

But if you have your whole vswitch in that mode, then set promiscuous to reject - does that help? Didn't we go over your vswitch settings already.

Well - I decided to move some stuff around to see if I could improve performance at all. I moved pfSense to it's own group similar to what you've done and set Promisc to Accept, the rest of the LAN Group is set to Reject.

I'm seeing about 450Mbits/sec over IPerf to most machines on my network on average.

Lets just throw around some other ideas here. I'm starting to think maybe the 8GB SSD is to blame (somehow) at the moment.

If I was to move data to a single Datastore, reinstall ESXi on the provided 250GB HDD and begin setting things up from scratch and reimport the VMs then test performance again?

Or do you think it's worth trying the HP ESXi thats been mentioned multiple times here?

Extra Note: The Server Completely crashed today when I attempted to download an image from Usenet on my Windows 7 x86 VM. Wasn't responding to any commands, reboot, ssh reboot, etc and required a hard reboot when I got home.

I don't quite see how a VM could bring down the entire Host OS. Either way, I want to explore importing VMs into Xen or VirtualBox and maybe look at moving the VM Platform over to CentOS shortly.

Yeah a vm should not be able to bring down the host - that clearly should not happen!! Maybe it was a coincidence? My host crashed last week as well, had to hard reboot the host. Not sure exactly what caused it? I was not even home when it crashed, and systems were not doing any downloads or anything.

As to the HP version of esxi -- a buddy told me it wouldn't install to the N40L.. He recently bought one, but I don't have the details of what he was doing, etc. Could be he was full of **** ;) I have not had time to try it, was thinking I could just install it to a thumb drive to see if worked and added the other hardware to the health tab. But If he was correct I don't think it will -- just that the micro server are not currently supported by HP for esxi it seems. If they were adding the cims should install the needed stuff for the other hardware to be listed.

Doing a clean install to the 250GB drive with 1 datastore would duplicate my install - and sure could see if that bumps your performance up. There is a thread I have been watching on the vmware forums about a guy seeing a limit of ~300Mbps between guests on the same vswitch. Which could be related to your reduced performance - but as of yet nothing of significance in it.

http://communities.vmware.com/thread/392477?start=0&tstart=0

Yeah a vm should not be able to bring down the host - that clearly should not happen!! Maybe it was a coincidence? My host crashed last week as well, had to hard reboot the host. Not sure exactly what caused it? I was not even home when it crashed, and systems were not doing any downloads or anything.

Well in that case I'll assume it was a simple bug instead of a Load Issue. Going to try and replicate now anyway.

As to the HP version of esxi -- a buddy told me it wouldn't install to the N40L.. He recently bought one, but I don't have the details of what he was doing, etc. Could be he was full of **** ;) I have not had time to try it, was thinking I could just install it to a thumb drive to see if worked and added the other hardware to the health tab. But If he was correct I don't think it will -- just that the micro server are not currently supported by HP for esxi it seems. If they were adding the cims should install the needed stuff for the other hardware to be listed.

Yeah I couldn't see it on the list of Supported Hardware, and Google yielded few results.

Doing a clean install to the 250GB drive with 1 datastore would duplicate my install - and sure could see if that bumps your performance up. There is a thread I have been watching on the vmware forums about a guy seeing a limit of ~300Mbps between guests on the same vswitch. Which could be related to your reduced performance - but as of yet nothing of significance in it.

http://communities.v...tart=0&tstart=0

Right - that's a plan for the weekend then. I'll remove the SSD and attempt an install on the 250GB Drive.

Funny thing is though that the SSD is massively faster than the two hard drives, even when just copying something to the Datastore.

Going through the logs, found this:

2012-05-15T13:45:52.954Z: <<throttled>> Storage I/O Control: connection with vobd failed, error code: -1 errno: 2[/CODE]

Not sure what it is, but it's mentioned CONSTANTLY!

Additionally:

[CODE]
2012-05-16T07:37:08.952Z: [scsiCorrelator] 64332112349us: [vob.scsi.device.io.latency.high] Device t10.ATA_____SAMSUNG_HD502IJ_________________________S13TJDWQ620722______ performance has deteriorated. I/O latency increased from average value of 22658 microseconds to 684718 microseconds.

2012-05-16T07:37:08.952Z: [scsiCorrelator] 64336113058us: [esx.problem.scsi.device.io.latency.high] Device t10.ATA_____SAMSUNG_HD502IJ_________________________S13TJDWQ620722______ performance has deteriorated. I/O latency increased from average value of 22658 microseconds to 684718 microseconds.

2012-05-16T08:03:08.708Z: [scsiCorrelator] 65891868893us: [vob.scsi.device.io.latency.improved] Device t10.ATA_____SAMSUNG_HD502IJ_________________________S13TJDWQ620722______ performance has improved. I/O latency reduced from 684718 microseconds to 174335 microseconds.
[/CODE]

More:

My Windows 7 VM is basically completely unresponsive from an I/O standpoint. System is very very slow while copying a VMDK between Datastores. Yet the HDD Indicator light on the Server itself is only flashing once in a while, indicating that minimal I/O is happening on the disk itself.

at that point, i would start from scratch and check your hdds' health

I know all hard drives are perfectly healthy.

And starting from Scratch won't solve anything at all as this issue has been around since I began working with ESXi, not diagnosing an issue and 'reformatting' is a very bad mentality.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • This sounds like underneath the nice marketing spin, either someone at Adobe got tired of their lazy devs and asked Microsoft to help them sort at least some of Adobe's ancestral spaghetti code to make it go faster, or Microsoft wanted Adobe's crap to run better on Windows to make it look better when compared to Apple, so they offered to intervene. Either way, GOOD.
    • My favorite file manager for Windows 11 finally gets a long-requested feature by Taras Buria Files is among the best File Explorer alternatives for Windows 10 and 11. This free app is packed with all sorts of features and conveniences, but there is one crucial feature that is still missing—Tree View. Fortunately, the latest update in the Preview channel finally delivers it. With version 4.1.4, which is now available for download in the Preview channel, developers implemented Tree View, a new mode that displays folders in an expandable hierarchy. Windows 11's stock File Explorer always had this feature, but it was nowhere to be found in Files until now. Starting with the latest preview update, you can expand each drive and its nested folders without leaving the current location and then open the folder you need in the main view. To try Tree View in Files, update the app to the latest preview version, then click the small arrow next to a drive to expand its content. The developers say they are rolling out Tree View in Preview first to gather feedback from users and improve the feature before bringing it to all in the stable channel. In addition to Tree View, Files 4.1.14 improves the Windows Fonts folder. You can now preview each font directly in Files with no need to open the built-in font viewer. For now, these two features are only available in the Preview channel. For those using the stable release, developers recently released version 4.1.3, with improvements for the built-in tag system, on-demand folder size calculation, and plenty of various fixes. You can check out the full release notes here. You can download Files from the Microsoft Store (paid version) or its official website (free).
    • Who is paying for this 30x scale-up? Its sounds expensive.
    • Millions of users to benefit from Windows 11's new performance boost on Adobe Photoshop by Sayan Sen Despite the advent of AI-generated imagery, Adobe's Photoshop remains one of the most popular tools on this planet. Adobe does not have a publicly reported total user count but it's probably not wrong to assume there are millions. As of 2025, Adobe Creative Cloud has had approximately 41 million paid subscribers, many of whom likely use Photoshop. In addition, more than 166,000 companies worldwide are apparently also using the app. These figures are according to a very recent report by SQ Magazine. Out of them, it is fair to assume that many are probably running Windows. As such, there is good news for these users as Microsoft has announced Photoshop is getting a big 20% performance boost on x86-64 (AMD64) systems and a 13% bump-up on Arm devices. This is definitely great news for them as many have complained about the slow performance and general sluggishness of Photoshop on Windows 11 ever since the advent of the latter back in 2021. If you are wondering how Microsoft managed to do this, the answer lies in a combination of compiler-level optimizations and a technology called Sample Profile Guided Optimization (SPGO). According to Microsoft, Adobe worked closely with the company’s Visual C++ team and adopted the latest MSVC toolchain enhancements together with SPGO to squeeze more performance out of Photoshop’s CPU-bound workloads. Unlike traditional Profile Guided Optimization (PGO), which requires developers to create special instrumented builds and run lengthy training workloads, SPGO gathers performance data directly from optimized release binaries. This means Adobe could collect real-world usage information which gives a major advantage to this technique, as companies could leverage data collected from actual customer workloads rather than only relying on synthetic benchmark runs. In theory, this should allow optimizations to better reflect how users interact with software in the real world. Thanks to this, there are improvements to code layout, function inlining, hot-and-cold code separation, and other low-level tweaks that help processors execute instructions more efficiently. Essentially the compiler is better able to identify “hot” code paths, those which are most frequently executed, and optimize them accordingly.
    • "The 2TB Samsung 990 PRO NVMe SSD hits lowest price in over three months¨ I'd prefer to see the lowest price in over a year
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      Jocimo earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      suprememobiles48 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Prasann earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Prasann earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      521
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      174
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      90
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      81
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!