Android fans: pay for your apps, please


Recommended Posts

As I've said before, while big corporations can deal with piracy, it hurts small companies like these, some of which suffer over 90% piracy rates. I've known enough people who stopped buying things altogether simply because they can get them for free, whether it be apps, games, music, movies, etc. The excuse that "most of them wouldn't buy it anyways" simply isn't true.

As I've said before, while big corporations can deal with piracy, it hurts small companies like these, some of which suffer over 90% piracy rates.

What a load of rubbish. How can it hurt a company if people wouldn't have bought it anyway? It annoys me when people automatically assume a download equals a lost sale. This is MAFIAA propaganda.

The excuse that "most of them wouldn't buy it anyways" simply isn't true.

It's verifiably true. There have been studies conducted that prove it. In fact you only have to look at France's own figures to realise that stopping piracy had no effect in reducing falling physical music sales, in fact it's still falling. This alone blows a huge hole in the download = lost sale fallacy.

I couldn't possibly afford to buy all the stuff I download. And I wouldn't want to. If I couldn't get access to it, I'd just go without. It's really not that important to me.

I pirated a game on Android because I'd already given the developer my money when i bought it on iOS, didn't really wanna pay again just for changing ecosystems.

Yeah, because they're so expensive and android and iOS use the same code so the dev didn't need to do any work at all when porting the iOS version...

As a developer if* my apps are pirated then so be it, not great but if you need it that badly and are not willing to pay ?1 then just take it. Its affect on me is that it just means less money to buy new stuff to develop for which means it takes longer to update or create new stuff as the motivation isn't there. It does take time and it does cost (got to test on devices) but people will always develop for Android because it has such high numbers.

* yes they are :)

  • Like 1

4) Have a realistic price.

Yes, many apps are as cheap as chips. But there are many which are completely overpriced. That is the main reason people pirate surely? Because they can't afford to buy the app. Cutting the price may encourage more people to buy.

I don't think people really "need" the apps they pirate, if they can't afford them (which I find strange considering the average price is well below 5?) they could either not use it or find a free/cheaper alternative.

IMO, if certain app is not realistically priced, then don't buy it. I've yet to find any expensive app that is an absolute must have, so either buy it or skip it.

So far I've bought every app I've felt like installing and that hasn't set me back more than 20?. I'm sure some people might not be able to afford spending 20? over a couple of years on apps for their 100?+ phone, but I don't think they are a majority.

I'd guess most pirates are either a)cheap, b)scared of using their credit card number on online transactions, or c)kids without a CC whose parents are unwilling to spend money on cellphone games.

My opinion still stands that the problem remains with how easy it is to install pirated apps on Android. I mean with the .apk it's pretty easy due to Android allowing you to use apps from outside the Play store.

I know iOS has a lot of pirated apps, but you need to jailbreak to do that, which limits the number of devices, Android doesn't need a jailbreak, the ability is there in stock.

My opinion still stands that the problem remains with how easy it is to install pirated apps on Android. I mean with the .apk it's pretty easy due to Android allowing you to use apps from outside the Play store.

I know iOS has a lot of pirated apps, but you need to jailbreak to do that, which limits the number of devices, Android doesn't need a jailbreak, the ability is there in stock.

Yep, true. Although I guess it wouldn't really stop many people given how easy it is to root and flash custom roms / recovery etc on droid devices

And the fact you can buy an app, back it up, then get a refund

On the iphone front I know around 15 people who use them and all of them have the phone jailbroken and use Installous to download apps for free, none of them have ever bought an app for their phones. Of the 11 Android users I know , including myself, all have bought all of the apps in use.

I think that they are somewhat inflating the statistics there.

They should blame pirace for this, take me for an example had my Galaxy S1 for over a year now, never installed one pirated file/game/app.

I always use free apps and if I didn't find an app that does what I need then, I don't need to do it.

On the iphone front I know around 15 people who use them and all of them have the phone jailbroken and use Installous to download apps for free, none of them have ever bought an app for their phones. Of the 11 Android users I know , including myself, all have bought all of the apps in use.

I think that they are somewhat inflating the statistics there.

So the data that they have on their game might be incorrect based on your "study" of 20-30 people that you know? *rolls eyes*

I've never pirated an app, not on iOS or Android, IF the app is worth it, you gets my monies, otherwise you get jack, especially when there's a free alternative that's as good and usually better

Most of the Game companies that are bitching about "piracy" and Android are the ones that thing a mobile game will ever be worth $10+, guess what, your games are barely $5 DL games for any console, you aren't going to screw over that many iOS/Android users, well they seem to screw over many more iOS people than Android, and that's the crux of their complaint

So the data that they have on their game might be incorrect based on your "study" of 20-30 people that you know? *rolls eyes*

It's about as accurate as the "data" pointing at piracy, both sides are using incomplete and I dare say on the game maker's side, false data

It's about as accurate as the "data" pointing at piracy

No it's not. Read the game developer's post on Wired (http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2012-05/02/android-market-game-piracy). His methods may not be flawless but the results are certainly more conclusive than one person thinking about how 30 people use their device. We're not talking about the overall piracy rate on Android either; the "5:1" statistic is about one game.

What I was trying to say is 100% of the people I know with an iphone pirate everything, and 100% of the people I know with android pirate nothing. It's not scientific, but fact non the less. Most of those with iphones said they only chose it so they could jailbreak and use cydia/installous to get their stuff.

  • 2 weeks later...

I don't think people really "need" the apps they pirate, if they can't afford them (which I find strange considering the average price is well below 5?) they could either not use it or find a free/cheaper alternative.

IMO, if certain app is not realistically priced, then don't buy it. I've yet to find any expensive app that is an absolute must have, so either buy it or skip it.

So far I've bought every app I've felt like installing and that hasn't set me back more than 20?. I'm sure some people might not be able to afford spending 20? over a couple of years on apps for their 100?+ phone, but I don't think they are a majority.

I'd guess most pirates are either a)cheap, b)scared of using their credit card number on online transactions, or c)kids without a CC whose parents are unwilling to spend money on cellphone games.

It's easy for you to say that you've bought all those apps, but then, you can afford them but with others, they can't and thus are forced to pirate stuff.

I'm all for supporting the devs but if one can't afford the app then don't blame them. People do need to feed their families. You can't eat an app. Rising costs and other valid reasons often prevent users from buying apps. If users can afford them*hint apple and rich buggers* then make them pay. Also, if your gonna buy an app or something then give something worthwhile for the price.

I've bought about 5 apps. The rest I use the free version, without blocking their ads.*

Develop good apps, and you'll get customers.

Studios are too quick to blame piracy, when really, it's their crappy port that's the problem. *cough*Crysis2*cough*

It's easy for you to say that you've bought all those apps, but then, you can afford them but with others, they can't and thus are forced to pirate stuff.

They aren't forced to pirate anything. We aren't talking about basic things they absolutely need, not for their lives nor even to use their phone.

Most things on Google Play are free, ad supported or freemium, and those that are not you can certainly live without. Whether they think that it's not a problem since they just couldn't buy them anyway and hence there's no lost sale is a different issue, but at least when it comes to apps for their smartphone there's certainly nothing forcing them to pirate.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • It's really pathetic that an MMA video game triggers your political rage...
    • Nvidia GeForce NOW gains support for seven more games as discounts continue by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe There's a brand-new update rolling out to Nvidia's GeForce NOW streaming service, and like every week, that means more games have received support on the platform. This week's drop has additions like Aphelion and Pro Cycling Manager 26 attached to it. Don't forget that the GeForce NOW summer sale is still active too. This limited-time offer drops the 12-month Performance membership from $99.99 to $64.99, saving members $35. At the same time, the 12-month Ultimate membership is currently going for $129.99, dropping the price by $70 from the original $199.99. Moreover, Nvidia reiterated that support for GOG single sign-in and game library is incoming this summer, joining stores like Steam, Ubisoft Connect, Battle.net, and Xbox. "Connect supported game store accounts and stream titles with GeForce RTX power. Games that include cloud-save functionality help keep progress intact across devices," added the company. "Start a game on one screen, pick up where playtime left off on another, and spend less time managing installs and storage space." Here are the games joining GeForce NOW's supported list this week: Embers of the Uncrowned Demo (New release on Steam, available 13) Pro Cycling Manager 26 (New release on Steam, available June 15) Aphelion (Steam) Citizen Sleeper (Epic Game Store, Free from June 18-25) Megastore Simulator (Steam) OPERATOR (Steam) Super Meat Boy 3D (Xbox, available on Game Pass) Keep in mind that, unlike subscription services like Game Pass or EA Play, a copy of a game must be owned by the GeForce NOW member (or at least have a license via PC Game Pass) to start playing via Nvidia's cloud servers. There is also a limit to how many hours subscribers can use the service per month, with extra time being purchasable in chunks.
    • 47% profit margin? Wtf!! I know companies are in business to make money but come on man. I know for a fact I'll never own one of these.
    • Most AI-powered mainframe migration vendors expected to fail by 2030, Gartner warns by Paul Hill Credit: Pexels You may have read that many companies still run code written in ancient programming languages like COBOL and pay a handsome sum for those who can maintain that code. Well, it looks like this area of the tech world could be the scene of an AI bubble. It turns out that there are mainframe exit vendors, helping companies move their legacy mainframe systems to modern cloud environments or servers such as Microsoft Azure and AWS, using generative AI tooling. Unfortunately, 75% of these vendors are now expected to pivot or cease operations as market realities take hold by 2030. Alessandro Galimberti from Gartner said: Some of the companies in the mainframe exit market are IBM, 21CS, BMC, Broadcom, Rocket Software, DXC, GTSG, and Kyndryl. The reasons some of these firms are expected to quit the market are a reset of market expectations and a decline in demand for one-size-fits-all migration solutions. The reset in expectations is likely to be driven by cost overruns and threats to business, and the potential occurrence of critical failures within businesses as a result of bad transition implementations. These insights from Gartner are pretty interesting because it’s a specific area of the market where doubt is being cast on generative AI. Many people have cast doubt on whether AI companies will successfully justify the massive amounts spent on GenAI to date, and this data from Gartner suggests the road could be rocky for GenAI.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      With What earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Harris Gilbert earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Vincian earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      532
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      166
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      72
    4. 4
      neufuse
      64
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      63
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!