Recommended Posts

the thing is, your average user don't want elegance. they want bright easy to find colors

I know, I agree. I've never said that something like I'm asking for must be mandatory. I just want options.

the thing is, your average user don't want elegance. they want bright easy to find colors

People respond positively to aesthetics. I have a feeling part of people's reactions to the new Start Screen is "What the heck is with all these colors?"

People respond positively to aesthetics. I have a feeling part of people's reactions to the new Start Screen is "What the heck is with all these colors?"

That's true. An interesting read about this can be found here:

http://www.amazon.com/Art-Visual-Perception-Psychology-Anniversary/dp/0520243838/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1338138330&sr=8-1

People didn't like the sidebar when it first came into Vista, this I remember, they hated the fact it took up the right side of the screen and "forced" you to use a wide screen monitor now. Just another example of how someones always going to hate something regardless

Let's see, you can easily turn off the sidebar in vista without using any 3rd party software to do it, unlike metro, metro is in your face as soon as the machine is booted and can't be avoided without 3rd party intervention.

Clearly the horrors of metro do not even come close to being compared with the sidebar in vista since the sidebar was easily turned off and made permanent.

Let's see, you can easily turn off the sidebar in vista without using any 3rd party software to do it, unlike metro, metro is in your face as soon as the machine is booted and can't be avoided without 3rd party intervention.

Clearly the horrors of metro do not even come close to being compared with the sidebar in vista since the sidebar was easily turned off and made permanent.

The Start Screen is a hub/dashboard to your computer, it's a place to quite literally, Start.

Let's see, you can easily turn off the sidebar in vista without using any 3rd party software to do it, unlike metro, metro is in your face as soon as the machine is booted and can't be avoided without 3rd party intervention.

Clearly the horrors of metro do not even come close to being compared with the sidebar in vista since the sidebar was easily turned off and made permanent.

The start screen is in my face as much as the start menu in Win7 is, which is not much at all. I've said it countless times, majority of people pin to the taskbar and don't go digging through the start menu like they used to. This isn't going to change, it's not going to change to me, the most I use the start menu for is to access one of the right side links (which I can now do through the new power user menu in Win8 instead so no change there) and for the few apps I'll run once a week or even once a month. So much for "horrors", like I said, people are blowing this out of proportion.

The start screen is in my face as much as the start menu in Win7 is, which is not much at all. I've said it countless times, majority of people pin to the taskbar and don't go digging through the start menu like they used to. This isn't going to change, it's not going to change to me, the most I use the start menu for is to access one of the right side links (which I can now do through the new power user menu in Win8 instead so no change there) and for the few apps I'll run once a week or even once a month. So much for "horrors", like I said, people are blowing this out of proportion.

It's sad for you that you don't seems to understand the advantages of Metro apps & live tiles.

It's sad for you that you don't seems to understand the advantages of Metro apps & live tiles.

I do, I have a WP device and love the live tile idea, the point is that since on my desktop i'm always in a number of win32 desktop apps and that I either have them starting up when windows starts and minimized to the systray or I start them directly from the taskbar because they're pinned there that I've stopped using the start menu in Win7 almost completely. Because of this and the taskbar still being the same in Win8 I don't see the loss of the start menu as a impairment to my "workflow" on the desktop. Will I use the start screen? Sure, I'll probably have metro apps as well but even moving between running desktop and metro apps hasn't changed, Atl+tab still works like it always has. My point is that the stance that the start screen has totally ruined the ability of you to work on the desktop has been greatly overblown.

It's sad that you guys don't realize Microsoft is trying to lock down Windows and shoehorn in a Phone/Tablet UI. I like my mouse, I like my keyboard, I like my non-touchscreen monitor, and I LOVE my start menu. Sue me. That "at-a-glance" ugly colored notification-piece-of-crap-one-window-only-****ty-multitasking-monster-we-call-Metro...is complete garbage on the desktop! Why don't you nincompoops understand that? Its like a constant p*ssing contest on this website! If all you do is look up porn and check Facebook/twitter then Metro is fine for you! Get a tablet! Leave me alone! Let the more hard-core nerds like myself and 95% of the damn world have what we want!

Here educate yourself:

The average person = Computer stupid

Metro UI = Job Security (I do IT)

Here come the trolls and harsh comments...

That's not an average person

1. he's not had the tutorial since it's not there on the CP

2. he's faking it, he's the son of a tech journalist who's been told to act ignorant, since the journalist in question is fairly anti MS.

meanwhile int he real world, regular dumb users are able to sit down in front of Win8 and just get it, right away, without training, far more intuitive and user friendly than the start menu.

  • Like 2

meanwhile int he real world, regular dumb users are able to sit down in front of Win8 and just get it, right away, without training, far more intuitive and user friendly than the start menu.

So why couldn't my 70 year old grandma use it when I showed it to her...or my 20 year old girlfriend? (Both on Win7) After I showed them how to use it they said it was still a pain in the arse....

That's not an average person

1. he's not had the tutorial since it's not there on the CP

2. he's faking it, he's the son of a tech journalist who's been told to act ignorant, since the journalist in question is fairly anti MS.

meanwhile int he real world, regular dumb users are able to sit down in front of Win8 and just get it, right away, without training, far more intuitive and user friendly than the start menu.

While I agree with your first point... I'd say you are wrong in your second point, he's likely just like everyone else, "how do I close this crap" and "where is the start menu". I was the same way at first. because from a desktop point of view it doesn't make sense that I have to grab the top of a window and drag it all the way to the bottom on my 30 inch 2560x1600 monitor, to close an app. When it would be MUCH easier for me just to click an "x" TBH...

While I agree with your first point... I'd say you are wrong in your second point, he's likely just like everyone else, "how do I close this crap" and "where is the start menu". I was the same way at first. because from a desktop point of view it doesn't make sense that I have to grab the top of a window and drag it all the way to the bottom on my 30 inch 2560x1600 monitor, to close an app. When it would be MUCH easier for me just to click an "x" TBH...

In that regard though you don't have to really worry about closing winrt apps, the system does a good job managing that side of things for you.

That's not an average person

1. he's not had the tutorial since it's not there on the CP

2. he's faking it, he's the son of a tech journalist who's been told to act ignorant, since the journalist in question is fairly anti MS.

meanwhile int he real world, regular dumb users are able to sit down in front of Win8 and just get it, right away, without training, far more intuitive and user friendly than the start menu.

If you're talking about Chris Pirillo, he's not anti-MS. He does like Apple a lot, but he isn't anti-MS.

Wow thanks for sharing that, I had no idea the metro interface could get any more ugly than it already is until now..

To each it's own. I think it looks more professional comparing it to the actual W8 screen.

so, instead of hitting the start button, you hve to find and locate the minimize button or the top edge to move the windows and move it or click the minimize, and then you have to move or restore it again, afterwards....

seriously, are you even thinking about this ? 1 key conveniently on the keyboard vs lots of mouse waving and clicking. even using the mouse on the bottom corner to open the start screen is faster and more convenient.

Actually it's not hard to fine, it's in the same place on every window and my hands are ALWAYS on the mouse whereas using the Windows key is not and routine movement while working on the PC. If I were to go that route, I would Windows Key-D twice and never leave the desktop environment, quick, faster, more effecient than bringing in the start page. The point is moot because Gadgets failed, but if you guy just want to argue efficiency you can't win. It's simply not more efficient to bring in the start page. Whehter you use shortcut keys or mouse, you are bringing in a new page, that is less efficient, all the time, than doing the same thing without bringing in a new page.

In that regard though you don't have to really worry about closing winrt apps, the system does a good job managing that side of things for you.

Listen to what he's saying, I happen to agree: 'When it would be MUCH easier for me just to click an "x" TBH...'

This issue will go away if/when MS allows Metro apps to run windowed in the desktop environment.

Just found this screenshot that presents something I think works better:

7013557301_54e6b27de8_b.jpg

This is GUI elegance at it's finest.

I believe the desktop environment is more effecient than a full screen Metro environment. But, this is slick as heck. If Metro apps come in like this, it may be worth the extra effort. If Metro apps like this ever run in the desktop environment, MS will have a super hit on their hands. Is this just a mock-up? This is just the consumption end, but very nice. The creation end needs to be in the desktop environment IMO though.

If my health and fitness apps give me data back like this, while taking input from all my digital devices, Metro will be a hit. As I said, less effecient or not, Apps are what will really make the difference.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • AMD RX 9070 GRE AI, Blender benchmarks vs 9070 XT, 7800XT, Nvidia RTX 5070, 4070 by Sayan Sen Earlier this week, we shared the first part of our review of AMD's new RX 9070 GRE. It was about the gaming performance of the GPU, and we gave it an 8 out of 10. As a follow-up, similar to how we did with the 9070 XT and non-XT, we are doing a dedicated productivity review for the RX 9070 GRE as well, where we compare it against the 9070 XT, 9070, 7800 XT, as well as Nvidia's 5070 and 4070. This will include AI, rendering, compute, and more benchmarks. AI performance, especially, is a very important metric in today's world, and AMD also promised big improvements thanks to its underlying architectural improvements. We will be pitching it against the data we already have for the RX 9070, and RX 9070 XT, but also the Nvidia 5070 FE, MSI GeForce RTX 4070 VENTUS 2X 12G, and Gigabyte Radeon RX 7800 XT GAMING OC 16G as they are in a similar price class, but also because we do not have a comparable 5060 Ti card lying around here that we can compare it against. Before we get underway, this is a collaboration between Sayan Sen and Steven Parker, who lent me his test bed. Also, there was no editorial input from AMD. First up, the specs of the RX 9070, 9070 XT, and 9070 GRE, which were given to us by AMD: Radeon RX 9070 GRE Radeon RX 9070 Radeon RX 9070 XT Boost Clock: Game Clock: up to 2.79GHz up to 2.20GHz up to 2.52GHz up to 2.07GHz up to 2.97GHz up to 2.40GHz Stream Processors 3,072 (48 CU) 3,584 (56 CU) 4,096 (64 CU) Ray Accelerator 48 56 64 AI Accelerator 96 112 128 ROPs 96 128 Texture Mapping Units 192 224 256 Memory 12 GB GDDR6, 18Gbps Clock, 192-bit Bus 432 GB/s 16 GB GDDR6, 20Gbps Clock, 256-bit Bus Effective Memory Bandwidth: 640 GB/s Infinity Cache 48 MB (3rd Gen) 64 MB (3rd Gen) Card Bus PCI-E 5.0 X16 Output 2x HDMI 2.1b 2x DisplayPort 2.1a Power consumption 220W 304W Recommended PSU 650W 750W Slot width 2x 3x Price (SEP) $549 $599 As you can see from the specs above, it is less than the standard RX 9070 in every way that counts, except for slightly higher Boost and Game clock speed. Design Moving on, the RX 9070 GRE we were given is an XFX Swift triple-fan, dual-slot design with two 8-pin connectors. At 30cm (self-measured), it will fit in most systems easily. There is no RGB either. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE by XFX from all angles. Test system Our test system consists of the following: Lian Li O11 Dynamic Mini V2 Flow (Amazon|Newegg) ASUS Z890 ProArt Creator WiFi (Amazon|Newegg) Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus (Amazon|Newegg) Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet - 44x37 (Amazon|Newegg) 2x 16GB G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB (7200 MT/s in XMP) (Amazon|Newegg) Sabrent Rocket4 Plus 2TB SSD (Amazon) Windows 11 25H2 (Build 26200.8246) AMD shared a press driver based on the recently released Adrenaline 26.5.2 that we were required to use. We now move on to our benchmarks. First up, we have Geekbench AI running on ONNX. For some reason, the 9070 GRE does exceptionally well here in both half-precision (FP16) and single-precision (FP32). It manages to beat the RTX 5070 and RX 9070 non-XT, and is only behind the 9070 XT. Since Geekbench runs in short bursts instead of continuously hammering the graphics card, it seems the GRE's faster boost clocks are helping here. Next up, we move to the UL Procyon AI test suite, starting with the image generation benchmark. We chose the Stable Diffusion XL FP16 test since it is the most intense workload available on Procyon. The Nvidia cards do very well here, as even the 4070 out-muscles AMD's best fairy easily. The positive thing about the GRE is that it gets quite close to the 9070 non-XT in this test; this indicates that the VRAM does not play a very big role here, as SD XL relies on float16 (FP16). So this is something to keep in mind again. If you wish to work with float32 AI workloads, graphics cards with larger than 12 GB buffers would likely emerge as victors. Regardless, the gains are still massive on AMD's 9000 series compared to the 7000 series. Following image generation, we move to the text generation benchmark. This is one test where the 9070 GRE struggled, quite a lot. It seems that the 12 GB VRAM and lower memory bandwidth of the new Radeon 9070 GRE are hurting it quite a bit; the split is massive, especially in a test like Llama2, which packs 13 billion parameters. As such, in all the tests, the 9070 GRE is the slowest of the lot. Next, we tried Blender, and here the AMD GPUs were beaten by Nvidia. Rendering is something the Green team has always had a lead over the Red side, and it has not changed so far. On the positive side, though, the 9070 GRE shows significantly better results than the 7800 XT, which means AMD is on the right path. Catching up to Nvidia, though, will require a lot more effort. And we hope HIP and ROCm can keep improving. Wrapping up AI testing, we measured OpenCL throughput in the Geekbench compute benchmark. The RX 9070 GRE alongside the 9070 did not fare well here at all, even falling behind the 7800 XT. Interestingly, even the RTX 5070 could not beat the 4070 on OpenCL, so perhaps this suggests that OpenCL optimization may not have been a priority for either AMD or Nvidia in the modern era. Conclusion We reached the end of our productivity performance review of the 9070 GRE, and we have to say it's a mixed bag. Unlike the 9070 and 9070 XT, the GRE excels in some areas while losing ground fairly easily in others. Similar to how it happened in gaming, any time the card's memory subsystem gets hammered, it tends to fall behind the others. This was the case with text generation, wherein we saw the VRAM sometimes hit its maximum available 12 GB of usage with larger model sizes. So what do we make of the RX 9070 as a productivity hardware? It can certainly be used, but you have to know it has its limitations. For those looking for a GPU that can deal with more, AMD recently unveiled the Radeon AI PRO R9700, which is essentially a 32 GB refresh of the 9070 XT with some additional workstation-based optimizations. On a similar note, the new Ryzen AI Halo platform is something you can consider if you want to set up a local AI processing station. Considering everything, we rate AMD's Radeon RX 9070 GRE a 7.5 out of 10 for its productivity performance. Price is less of a factor for those looking at productivity cases compared to those considering the GPU for gaming, and as such, we felt it did quite decently on many occasions and can be handy if you need a 12 GB GPU and, for some reason, don't want to get Nvidia. Purchase links: RX 9070 / XT / GRE (Amazon US) As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Does anyone here know if these updates are integrated into the UUP dump isos?
    • Motrix Next 3.9.4 by Razvan Serea Motrix Next is a modern, open-source cross-platform download manager built as the official next-generation successor to the original Motrix project. It has been completely rewritten using Tauri 2, Vue 3, TypeScript, and Rust, while still relying on the powerful Aria2 download engine for high-speed multi-protocol transfers. The app supports HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, BitTorrent, ED2K and magnet links, offering advanced features like multi-connection acceleration, task scheduling, bandwidth control, and batch download management. With a significantly reduced install size (around 20MB), it focuses on being lightweight, fast, and resource-efficient compared to traditional Electron-based download tools. Designed for Windows, macOS, and Linux, Motrix Next delivers a clean, modern UI inspired by Material Design 3 principles, with smooth animations and a minimal workflow. It improves usability through better download organization, system tray integration, and enhanced torrent handling including selective file downloads and tracker management. Motrix Next features: Multi-protocol downloads — HTTP, FTP, BitTorrent, Magnet, .torrent, ED2K, and Metalink tasks BitTorrent — Selective file download, DHT, peer exchange, encryption controls, metadata caching, GeoIP peer flags, and tracker probing Browser extension integration — Embedded Extension API with independent authentication, download confirmation, smart auto-submit, filename hints, referer/cookie forwarding, and real-time controls (Chrome Web Store · Edge Add-ons) Safe filename handling — Content-Disposition, RFC 2047, non-UTF-8, percent-encoded, and extensionless URL resolution with path traversal sanitization Download organization — Favorite and recent folders, optional file-type categorization, stale-record cleanup, and completed history backed by SQLite Concurrent downloads — Independent controls for active tasks, HTTP connections per server, segments per file, and BT peer limits Speed control — Global and per-task upload/download limits with day-of-week and time-of-day scheduling System integration — Tray operation, optional tray speed display, macOS Dock badge/progress, protocol handlers for magnet://, thunder://, and motrixnext:// Lightweight mode — Destroys the WebView on minimize-to-tray while Rust keeps the engine, task monitor, notifications, history, and extension routing alive Notifications and power options — Native task start/complete/failure notifications, keep-awake during downloads, and optional shutdown after completion Network controls — Scoped proxy support for downloads, app updates, and tracker updates, plus system proxy detection Auto-update channels — Stable, Beta, and Latest Across Channels policies with separate download and install phases Diagnostics — Structured logs, exportable diagnostic ZIPs, database integrity checks, automatic DB rebuild, and Linux GPU rendering fallback Personalization — Light/dark/system theme, 10 color schemes, 26 languages, and first-launch system language detection Motrix Next 3.9.4 changelog: Motrix Next 3.9.4 promotes the 3.9.4 beta cycle to stable. This release refreshes bundled engine binaries, improves task detail readability and copy actions, expands link handling for magnet and ED2K workflows, polishes responsive navigation and text wrapping, updates browser extension documentation, and refines network preference controls. New Features Task Detail copy actions — Added copyable values for task metadata and reusable render functions for long text fields. Magnet and ED2K lifecycle support — Added task lifecycle handling for magnet and ED2K links. History cleanup for deleted tasks — Deleted tasks can now remove matching history records. User-Agent management — Added user-agent management and improved related network preference controls. Browser extension documentation — Added the Firefox Add-ons link for the Motrix Next extension. Improvements Engine binaries — Updated bundled binaries for supported architectures. Task Detail readability — Long task names, URLs, tracker values, and copyable metadata now render more clearly. Deletion messaging — Refined localized task deletion text for clarity and consistency. Text wrapping — Improved URI input wrapping and task name multiline display. Navigation layout — Improved sub-navigation responsiveness. Disk allocation default — Changed the default file allocation method to trunc. Proxy controls — Improved proxy button styling in network preferences. Download: Motrix Next 64-bit | ARM64 | macOS ~20.0 MB (Open Source) Links: Website | macOS / Linux | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • NVIDIA officially supports Ubuntu, as linked above with the GeForce NOW Hands on I did in collaboration with Paul Hill.
    • TO be clear I am not running linux today, however I keep thinking about it. And I want to make sure there are minimal obstacles if I decide to make that switch in the coming months.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      479
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      244
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      66
    5. 5
      +Edouard
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!