ITC Judge Bans Xbox

By simplezz
in Back Page News

 Share

Recommended Posts

Grand Master

simplezz

Posted
Posted

ITC judge recommends import ban on Microsoft's Xbox

An administrative law judge for the International Trade Commission issued a recommendation that the commission ban 4GB and 250 GB Xbox gaming consoles from import to the United States. The recommendation(PDF) was released to the public on Monday, and would punish Microsoft for infringing against some of Motorola?s patents. The patents permit video transmission and compression on the console and between the console and its controllers.

Not all import bans are created equal though. In Judge David Shaw?s statement, he suggested a cease and desist order be placed against Microsoft. It would, "require the respondent to submit an annual report to the Commission regarding the number and value of infringing goods in its domestic inventory," according to the authors of ITC Remedial Orders in the Real World(PDF). "Failing to do so, or providing false information in the report, may lead to criminal prosecution under 18 U.S.C. ? 1001." The cease-and-desist order is more strict than a standard exclusion order, which would simply require US customs agents to keep tabs on Microsoft?s activities.

Judge Shaw also ordered "that Microsoft post a bond equal to 7 percent of the declared value of unsold Xbox inventory already in the country," according to Courthouse News.

Source [Ars Technica]

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1079227-itc-judge-bans-xbox/
Share on other sites
Grand Master

HSoft

Posted
Posted

Confused by this. Motorola has a patent for video transmission and compression on the console? Wouldn't this then apply to DVRs, DVD recorders, Blu Ray players, TVs etc. etc.? Woudn't there be prior art?

Video transmission to controllers doesn't apply here as there is no video on an xbox controller (would affect the new wii however).

Grand Master

BajiRav

Posted
Posted

From: IGN

A Microsoft representative stated, "the full Commission will rule on this in August, and until that time, nothing will change." As such, IGN received the following statement, which is identical to the original comment from last month:

?The recommendation by the Administrative Law Judge is the first step in the process leading to the Commission?s final ruling. We remain confident the Commission will ultimately rule in Microsoft?s favor in this case and that Motorola will be held to its promise to make its standard essential patents available on fair and reasonable terms.?

Grand Master

BajiRav

Posted
Posted

I'm also really confused as to why the Xbox was singled out here.

  1. Microsoft sued Motorola for unlicensed patents
  2. Motorola sued back Microsoft MPEG-LA licensed patents.

  • Glassed Silver, Site Lab and remixedcat
  • Like 3
Grand Master

Astra.Xtreme

Posted
Posted
  1. Microsoft sued Motorola for unlicensed patents
  2. Motorola sued back Microsoft MPEG-LA licensed patents.

Okay, I can believe that. All these patent wars seem to be is one company trying to get back at the other.

I'm sure the lawyers love it, but I bet the judges are sick of it.

Experienced

georgevella

Posted
Posted

Okay, I can believe that. All these patent wars seem to be is one company trying to get back at the other.

I'm sure the lawyers love it, but I bet the judges are sick of it.

Some lawyer/rep for Motorola said something along the lines of "we are getting back at them because of the licensing agreements MS was doing with Android manufacturers". Dunno the exact quote or the article in question but this was around the time of the first ruling/judgment/consideration that the xbox should be banned (a couple of weeks ago).

Correct me if wrong but this started when MS complained about the (unfair?) pricing of Moto's FRAND video licenses right?

Grand Master

HawkMan

Posted
Posted
  1. Microsoft sued Motorola for unlicensed patents
  2. Motorola sued back Microsoft MPEG-LA licensed patents.

They where not unlicensed, they where licensed under the common low rate FRAND terms,

Motorola just might make FRAND worthless. which is far worse for them than anyone else if they succeed. they need others FRAND licenses far more than others need theirs.

Grand Master

simplezz

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Correct me if wrong but this started when MS complained about the (unfair?) pricing of Moto's FRAND video licenses right?

Actually Microsoft sued Motorola over it rather than just paying up as Android OEM's did. I can't say Microsoft didn't have this coming though. You can't go around suing/threatening everyone then complain when the same happens to you.

On a brighter note, Sony and Nintendo must be jumping with joy :)

Grand Master

BajiRav

Posted
Posted

They where not unlicensed, they where licensed under the common low rate FRAND terms,

Motorola just might make FRAND worthless. which is far worse for them than anyone else if they succeed. they need others FRAND licenses far more than others need theirs.

? I did say that Microsoft had licensed the FRAND patents but motoroloa still sued them.

Grand Master

HawkMan

Posted
Posted

Actually Microsoft sued Motorola over it rather than just paying up as Android OEM's did. I can't say Microsoft didn't have this coming though. You can't go around suing/threatening everyone then complain when the same happens to you.

On a brighter note, Sony and Nintendo must be jumping with joy :)

you're sentence doesn't make sense and is all distorted, and whileI think I know what you're trying to say, that's also wrong.

MS did try to make a deal with Motorola, Motorola refused, there's was a short back and forth before MS sued because Motorola wouldn't pay a small fair price for the patents like every other OEM.

MEanwhile all of MS' demands have been a fair license price. meanwhile Motorola, besides suing over FRAND patents, are also demanding ridiculous prices that are what, 50% the valule of the xbox...

Grand Master

HawkMan

Posted
Posted

On a brighter note, Sony and Nintendo must be jumping with joy :)

They shouldn't be, if this lawsuit is successful, and for the laqsuit to have any validity, both of those(seeing as they use the same h.264 stuff) will have to pay the same patents.

luckily that this will never actually go anywhere in reality though. at best it'll be settled for a bare percentage of the ridiculous suit, or it'll eventually be thrown out when they get some actual tech judges and not just the general idiots who don't know what they're doing.

Grand Master

TEX4S

Posted
Posted

My father's company was involved in a $200,000,000 intellectual property infringement (NAC vs Plastipak) - it boiled down to the use of 1 word... "generally"

Right and wrong dont matter, only thing that matters is how good your lawyer's relationship is with the judge - thats it.

Grand Master

simplezz

Posted
  • Author
Posted

you're sentence doesn't make sense and is all distorted, and whileI think I know what you're trying to say, that's also wrong.

Seems fine to me.

MS did try to make a deal with Motorola, Motorola refused

Microsoft wants to charge $15 per device that uses Android. Motorola is asking for what? $25 for a laptop and something similar for the Xbox. Sounds fair.

, there's was a short back and forth before MS sued because Motorola wouldn't pay a small fair price for the patents like every other OEM.

Do you have the minutes of the meeting as well? ;)

MEanwhile all of MS' demands have been a fair license price.

And Motorola is asking for an equally fair licence price too.

meanwhile Motorola, besides suing over FRAND patents, are also demanding ridiculous prices that are what, 50% the valule of the xbox...

What goes around comes around. So it's okay if Microsoft does it, but unfair when others respond commensurately?

Grand Master

HawkMan

Posted
Posted

Microsoft wants to charge $15 per device that uses Android. Motorola is asking for what? $25 for a laptop and something similar for the Xbox. Sounds fair.

Try one third of that, some partners get a better deal. so not really. and besides that, most phones are at least twice the price of an xbox today. both of these on their own makes the rest of your post irrelevant.

Grand Master

Noir Angel

Posted
Posted

Right and wrong rarely if ever matter in the corporate world, it's all a cut-throat little world of "I better crush my opposition before they crush me". The lack of ethics here isn't new, it's just taking a different form.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Posts

    • We now know when and how the Universe may truly end

      By +pmrd · Posted

      Anybody that thinks flying cars were possible are idiots. Everyone would basically need a pilot liscence, can you imagine how insane and dangerous that would be.
    • Microsoft Edge 149.0.4022.80

      By Copernic · Posted

      Microsoft Edge 149.0.4022.80 by Razvan Serea Microsoft Edge is a super fast and secure web browser from Microsoft. It works on almost any device, including PCs, iPhones and Androids. It keeps you safe online, protects your privacy, and lets you browse the web quickly. You can even use it on all your devices and keep your browsing history and favorites synced up. Built on the same technology as Chrome, Microsoft Edge has additional built-in features like Startup boost and Sleeping tabs, which boost your browsing experience with world class performance and speed that are optimized to work best with Windows. Microsoft Edge security and privacy features such as Microsoft Defender SmartScreen, Password Monitor, InPrivate search, and Kids Mode help keep you and your loved ones protected and secure online. Microsoft Edge has features to keep both you and your family protected. Enable content filters and access activity reports with your Microsoft Family Safety account and experience a kid-friendly web with Kids Mode. The new Microsoft Edge is now compatible with your favorite extensions, so it’s easy to personalize your browsing experience. Microsoft Edge 149.0.4022.80 changelog: Fixes Fixed an issue that prevented QR code generation from working. Feature updates Intune MAM Protected Downloads. The protected downloads feature for Intune MAM will now save downloaded files to the Documents > Microsoft Edge > Downloads folder in OneDrive. Extensions monitoring in the Edge management service. The Microsoft Edge management service now allows admins to gain visibility into extensions installed across their managed users. From the extensions monitoring page, admins can see which extensions have been installed as well as manage user requests for blocked extensions. For more information, see Microsoft Edge Extensions Monitoring. Validate Edge builds early with enterprise preview. Enterprise preview provides a simpler way for admins to flight pre-release Edge builds to their users. To reduce friction and bolster usage, users will receive pre-release builds directly inside of their Stable Edge application. Admins can allow users to easily opt-out of the preview experience, using built-in rollback to switch between their pre-release and stable channels with ease. Microsoft 365 admin center users can configure the feature, view their flighting population, and receive personalized recommendations all in one place. For more information, see Get started with Enterprise Preview in Microsoft Edge. Download: Microsoft Edge (64-bit) | 193.0 MB (Freeware) Download: Microsoft Edge (32-bit) | 170.0 MB Download: Microsoft Edge (ARM64) | 188.0 MB View: Microsoft Edge Website | Release History Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Waymo recalls self-driving software after cars enter closed freeway work zones

      By Slugsie · Posted

      The machines are starting to fight back any way they can.
    • Linux 7.1 arrives with an NTFS overhaul and major hardware performance boosts

      By Accuphase · Posted

      No news articles about the Arch Linux repo being majorly infected with malware?!?
    • Waymo recalls self-driving software after cars enter closed freeway work zones

      By zikalify · Posted

      Waymo recalls self-driving software after cars enter closed freeway work zones by Paul Hill Waymo, the self-driving car maker owned by Alphabet – the parent company of Google –, has recalled some of its fifth-generation Automated Driving Systems (ADS). It did so after some of its cars drove through closed construction zones. According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), the affected vehicles were capable of driving through a closed freeway construction zone and continuing to drive at speed. The listing on the NHTSA website says that Waymo is currently developing a solution to fix this issue, but in the meantime, freeway driving is being restricted. Waymo will update its ADS software so that vehicles can detect when they can avoid entering construction zones. According to the Safety Recall Report, on April 20, 2026, Waymo’s Field Safety Committee began meetings reviewing an event from April 11, 2026, and five events from April 19, 2026, where Waymo’s autonomous vehicles didn’t recognize and drove past ramp closure signs into the pre-planned freeway construction zones. This took place in Phoenix, Arizona. Separately, on May 18, 2026, seven Waymo vehicles entered freeway lanes with active construction in the San Francisco Bay Area by driving between cones that were placed to show the lane was closed. On the back of both of these events, Waymo restricted freeway driving until it could address the issue. In June, Waymo’s Safety Board reviewed the issue and additional information related to ADS performances around construction zones; then, as a result, it decided to conduct a recall. This development is not good for Waymo as it adds to a growing list of technical hiccups its cars have experienced. Ultimately, it will lead to more scrutiny from lawmakers around the world who will be more cautious about letting autonomous vehicles on their roads without tighter regulation. For readers in areas where Waymo operates, does this news make you more wary about stepping into one of these vehicles?

  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • First Post
      BizSAR earned a badge
      First Post

  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      599
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      190
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      79
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      77
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      69
    Show More

  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!