Recommended Posts

This is not intended to start a flame war, just express my opinion and see if anyone else feels the same way.

Honestly I moved to OS 10.5 when I started to get tired of using XP and Vista's performance bugged me, pre-SP1. When Windows 7 came out I found it very interesting and I enjoy using it at work, but with a good MacBook still having life in it I had no reason to switch, I alo enjoyed 10.6, and to a lesser extent 10.7. With 10.8 coming out and not liking its direction I was looking forward to Windows 8. After playing with the first public release I hoped to disable the Metro UI with a registry hack (I do not know if this still works or not), and then use the Explorer interface that I'm used to with it's Windows 8 additions. Now that the newest Preview is out I find myself again finding OS X as the better option. Which honestly really annoys me as I was looking forward to migrating back to Windows to avoid 10.8.

This time instead of migrating from an OS I don't like to one I find interesting, I find I'm picking the lesser of two evils. What worries me most is that my parents are in their 50's and my mother has been using a Windows computer since 3.1, currently on 7, and when I put her in front of Windows 8, it frustrated her so much that she walked away, came back a few hours later and then got annoyed again. An OS upgrade should never frustrate a long time user to the point that they give up on it, and feel they need to force themselves to learn it. I will probably just be leaving them on Windows 7 until it's no longer supported or end up moving them to a Mac, as they enjoy using my iPad.

Does anyone else feel that Windows 8 is going to be a black mark for any PC user not on a touch screen?

I personally feel torn between an OS that I don't like where it is started going to 10.7/8 and one that I feel jumped right into everything I hate with Windows 8, which I hoped would be the OS to pull me back to Windows after how much I enjoyed Windows 7.

I am curious as to why you don't like where OSX is going? there are some things I don't care much for in 10.7 and a few added things in 10.8 I could certainly do without, but overall OSX in any version is way more user friendly and polished than windows 8 will ever be.

  • Like 1

I feel my workflow is much faster in Windows 7 than in Windows 8. I feel like I'm working backwards now, I haven't setup any real tests for time. This is just what I am feeling when I use it. So my sense of time might be incorrect and /or it may just be my brain re-adjusting to this new way. I will see I don't see business migrating to Windows 8 at all for their user environment maybe for tablets but definitely not Desktops/Laptops.

I feel my workflow is much faster in Windows 7 than in Windows 8. I feel like I'm working backwards now, I haven't setup any real tests for time. This is just what I am feeling when I use it. So my sense of time might be incorrect and /or it may just be my brain re-adjusting to this new way.

When you first start, you might be slower. But once you use it for a while, it become second nature - just like using Windows 7 is second nature to you now.

I will see I don't see business migrating to Windows 8 at all for their user environment maybe for tablets but definitely not Desktops/Laptops.

I think they will, but not for a long while. First let employees use it on their home computers and learn. But that's normal. They never jump on board right away.

That real problem I think Microsoft is going to have is not with users like us, but with average users. Every single person I've shown it to can't stand it, and at least half of them have said their next computer will be a Mac.

The changes in 10.7 and 10.8 are implemented in a much smarter way in my opinion.

This all depends on how you introduce it to the average user. People always say this, but the people I have shown Windows 8 all thought it was great! I told them about it in a positive manner and went on to show them all the fancy new features. They liked it just fine.

Touch enabled PCs are also going to become much more popular. I gave my mom my old Tablet PC with Windows 8 installed and she loves touching the screen instead of using the mouse.

The re-education of users will be the biggest challenge ms faces with win8 and it will take years just like the first mouse/kb took. I expect them to have a VERY large budget dedicated to this purpose and you will see a ton of marketing showing you how to use it (the question will be how poor of a job do because ms's marketing is one of the worst out there). I think it will also help a ton by having some kind of tutorial when you first turn on a new win8 pc.... already has been showing up in some of the screenshots so you know it will be there in the final version.

Win8 always was going to be a transition os to winRT and metro.... I fully expect win8 to be considered a "failure" by windows standards but will get 500+ million new devices out there designed for metro and in the longrun will be better off for it. Now is actually the perfect time to start this transition because win7 is as strong as it is.

This all depends on how you introduce it to the average user. People always say this, but the people I have shown Windows 8 all thought it was great! I told them about it in a positive manner and went on to show them all the fancy new features. They liked it just fine.

I've had the same experience.... but I also don't plop the thing down infront of them and say go.... never understood why people think that's an accurate representation of the intuitiveness of something. I give them a quick 30 second demo of the basics and let them discover the rest.... 100% positive reaction from the people I have shown it to.

I've had the same experience.... but I also don't plop the thing down infront of them and say go.... never understood why people think that's an accurate representation of the intuitiveness of something. I give them a quick 30 second demo of the basics and let them discover the rest.... 100% positive reaction from the people I have shown it to.

Exactly. The bare minimum is show them the hot corners and if on a touch enabled PC show them swiping in from the sides. That's enough to understand how to use it. And both of these will be shown in the first log in OOBE.

I don't even know if it's that. I've been a Windows user since 3.0, so I've been through a "relearning" already when 95 came out, and so far Windows 8 hasn't been a problem for me either. In fact, I find it to be pretty good, especially when more Metro programs become available. I'd say it's perfect for tablets and touch screens, and the desktop is still there, so I don't see what all the fuss is about. I can use my old programs just fine like I could in Windows 7.

This sums up my feelings about Windows 8. Not only do I feel that I can continue to use Windows the way I always have, it also looks perfect on a tablet. I've never been interested in iPads with their dated, fake wood and metal UI or any of the countless knock-off Android tablets with their laggy, spyware-infested OS but I can really see myself using a Win8-based tablet. It still needs some polish but it looks like Microsoft got the fundamentals right.

This all depends on how you introduce it to the average user. People always say this, but the people I have shown Windows 8 all thought it was great! I told them about it in a positive manner and went on to show them all the fancy new features. They liked it just fine.

I didn't use positive or negative manner, just showed them the basics and answered any questions they had. They decided they care for it all for themselves.

The result probably would have been different if I had a touch screen/tablet PC.

Does anyone know if Microsoft has had any feedback for 8 from business customer? In my opinion, thats when the real world attitude will hit them and the s>>> reallly hits the fan. Its only one opinion from a friend who works in computers for business, but Microsoft should worry if is is typical.

This is not intended to start a flame war, just express my opinion and see if anyone else feels the same way.

Honestly I moved to OS 10.5 when I started to get tired of using XP and Vista's performance bugged me, pre-SP1. When Windows 7 came out I found it very interesting and I enjoy using it at work, but with a good MacBook still having life in it I had no reason to switch, I alo enjoyed 10.6, and to a lesser extent 10.7. With 10.8 coming out and not liking its direction I was looking forward to Windows 8. After playing with the first public release I hoped to disable the Metro UI with a registry hack (I do not know if this still works or not), and then use the Explorer interface that I'm used to with it's Windows 8 additions. Now that the newest Preview is out I find myself again finding OS X as the better option. Which honestly really annoys me as I was looking forward to migrating back to Windows to avoid 10.8.

This time instead of migrating from an OS I don't like to one I find interesting, I find I'm picking the lesser of two evils. What worries me most is that my parents are in their 50's and my mother has been using a Windows computer since 3.1, currently on 7, and when I put her in front of Windows 8, it frustrated her so much that she walked away, came back a few hours later and then got annoyed again. An OS upgrade should never frustrate a long time user to the point that they give up on it, and feel they need to force themselves to learn it. I will probably just be leaving them on Windows 7 until it's no longer supported or end up moving them to a Mac, as they enjoy using my iPad.

Does anyone else feel that Windows 8 is going to be a black mark for any PC user not on a touch screen?

I personally feel torn between an OS that I don't like where it is started going to 10.7/8 and one that I feel jumped right into everything I hate with Windows 8, which I hoped would be the OS to pull me back to Windows after how much I enjoyed Windows 7.

What's so bad about OS X 10.8? Oh no, a few new apps that you can completely ignore. Windows 8 is so incredibly stupid, there aren't even words to describe the stupidity. Facepalm.

Does anyone know if Microsoft has had any feedback for 8 from business customer? In my opinion, thats when the real world attitude will hit them and the s>>> reallly hits the fan. Its only one opinion from a friend who works in computers for business, but Microsoft should worry if is is typical.

The company I work for (one US FMCG giant) has been replacing XP for Win7 since last year. Not done yet. I doubt Win8 will be considered at all.

I'm sure there will be a hack to disable Metro and enjoy desktop freedom.

I don't even know if it's that. I've been a Windows user since 3.0, so I've been through a "relearning" already when 95 came out, and so far Windows 8 hasn't been a problem for me either. In fact, I find it to be pretty good, especially when more Metro programs become available. I'd say it's perfect for tablets and touch screens, and the desktop is still there, so I don't see what all the fuss is about. I can use my old programs just fine like I could in Windows 7.

I gotta say I'm in the same boat. And I've organized my Start screen where the programs I use are close by and available. Otherwise I'm pretty much always on the Desktop and if I need to, I can just pin Word and Excel to the Taskbar to get the Jumplists back for them. I only wish that when I did a search on the Start screen I could choose for which file types to find, instead of it always defaulting to Apps.

Yes that's what it is, a generation gap omg! /s

Why not? I'm sure I could find research saying younger people buy more tablets and mp3 players and Macs.

Said people are obviously going to have less inhibitions towards learning new interfaces. I know enough people who wouldn't even know why they needed a DVD player if it wasn't for their kids.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Nudge me when they bring back hardware audio acceleration so I can get my EAX 5 back. We've evolved graphics to real-time path tracing, but regressed audio some 15 years back in time with this stupid software audio stack.
    • Ocenaudio 3.19.4 by Razvan Serea  Ocenaudio is a full featured, fast and easy to use audio and music editor. It is the ideal software for people who need to edit and analyze audio files without complications. Ocenaudio also has powerful features that will please more advanced users. To assist ocenaudio development, a powerful toolset of audio editing, analysis and manipulation called Ocen Framework was created. ocenaudio is also based on Qt framework, a well known library for cross-platform development. Cross-platform support ocenaudio is available for all major operating systems: Microsoft Windows, Mac OS X and Linux. Native applications are generated for each platform from a common source, in order to achieve excelent performance and seamless integration with the operating system. All versions of ocenaudio have a uniform set of features and the same graphical interface, so the skills you learn in one platform can be used in the others. VST plugins support Ocenaudio supports VST (Virtual Studio Technology) plugins, giving its users access to numerous effects. Like the native effects, VST effects can use real-time preview to aide configuration. Real-time preview of effects Applying effects such as EQ, gain and filtering is an important part of audio editing. However, it is very tricky to get the desired result by adjusting the controls configuration alone: you must listen the processed audio. To ease the configuration of audio effects, ocenaudio has a real time preview feature: you hear the processed signal while adjusting the controls. The effect configuration window also includes a miniature view of the selected audio signal. You can navigate on this miniature view in the same way as you do on the main interface, selecting parts that interest you and listening to the effect result in real time. Multiselection for delicate editions To speed up complex audio files editing, ocenaudio includes multi-selection. With this amazing tool, you can simultaneously select different portions of an audio file and listen, edit or even apply an effect to them. For example, if you want to normalize only the excerpts of an interview where the interviewee is talking, just select them and apply the effect. Eficient edition of large files With ocenaudio, there is no limit to the length or the quantity of the audio files you can edit. Using an advanced memory management system, the application keeps your files open without wasting any of your computer's memory. Even in files several hours long, common editing operations such as copy, cut or paste happen almost instantly. Fully featured spectrogram Besides offering an incredible waveform view of your audio files, ocenaudio has a powerful and complete spectrogram view. In this view, you can analyze the spectral content of your audio signal with maximum clarity. Advanced users will be surprised to find that the spectrogram settings are applied in real time. The display is updated immediately when altering features such as the number of frequency bands, window type and size and dynamic range of the display. Ocenaudio 3.19.4 changelog: Adds fallback fonts so every language and symbol displays correctly Improves autosave and session recovery stability Improves region navigation and display Fixes a crash when the level meter is used on displays with a scaling greater than 200% Fixes memory corruption when using the silence selection tools Fixes crashes when closing a file while effects are still being processed Fixes a freeze when applying effects to many files at once (macOS) Fixes crashes related to audio devices on Windows Fixes invalid file names when exporting regions whose label is used as the file name Other bug fixes and improvements Download: Ocenaudio 64-bit | Portable | ~40.0 MB (Freeware) Download: Ocenaudio for Linux and Mac OS View: Ocenaudio Homepage | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Hasleo Disk Clone 5.8.2.1 by Razvan Serea Hasleo Disk Clone is a free and all-in-one disk cloning software for Windows 11/10/8/7/Vista and Windows Server that can help you migrate Windows OS to another disk, clone one disk to another disk or clone one partition to another location quickly and efficiently. Completely Free Windows Migration and Disk/Partition Cloning Software Migrate Windows from one disk to another without reinstalling Windows, apps. Clone one disk to another and makes the data on 2 disks are exactly the same. Clone a partition to another location without losing any data. Easily adjust the size and location of the destination partition. Convert MBR to GPT or convert GPT to MBR by cloning. Creation of Windows PE emergency disk. Extremely fast cloning speed and multi-language support. Supported OS: Windows Vista/Server 2008 or later, fully compatible with GPT and UEFI. Hasleo Disk Clone 5.8.2.1 changelog: Fixed an issue that caused disk enumeration to fail Fixed an issue where WinPE created under Windows ARM64 26H1 did not work properly Download: Hasleo Disk Clone 5.8.2.1 | 32.3 MB (Freeware) Link: Hasleo Disk Clone Home Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • This got me thinking, would you rather a self driving car prioritise protecting its passengers or everyone else? I'd choose the one that keeps me and my kids safest. At some point, these cars have to make those choices already, don't they? Wonder if we have a way to find out what way they lean.
    • The proportion (or number of iterations) has nothing to with this aspect of Copyright I am describing. In short, it doesn't matter how many times the manager tells you to change something or how. Your work product is always YOURS until and unless you then assign that to the person representing the client/company, usually for financial compensation -- either in salary or as a subcontract work for hire payment. if iterations determined copyright, then businesses would have learned to just keep making changes until they could claim they owned the copyright, without having to compensate the artist for their work. And that would be BAD. The only place where the amount of changes does have a role is in how much does a human modify a previous public domain work (from any source) before it is considered fair use or their own work, etc. For example, if a human makes substantial changes to a public domain (re: AI, by definition) work, then they can then claim that derivative work as their own...but NEVER the original version, of course. That's why anyone can make a movie about Dracula, for example, as long as it is based on the public domain novel, but not if they take new ideas from copyrighted movies made afterwards. As one of the people who personally advised the US Copyright Office on their recent ruling on these very issues, be assured that I specifically used the terminology precisely -- though I made it simple enough for laymen to understand it. If I made this confusing by doing so, I apologize. But, to be clear regarding your assumption that I would agree to your second statement that I quoted above -- the answer is NO. If AI does the work, no matter how much "direction" you give it, it cannot be copyrighted. All AI generated content is in the Public Domain and therefore the copyright cannot be assigned to ANYONE, even you -- until and unless substantial modifications are made to it BY A HUMAN BEING (yourself or a contracted artist/writer/etc.) and then that copyright on the derivative work is legally (in writing) transferred to you. This is a critical distinction. And it is important that people, especially AI sloppers, understand this. For example, YouTube is not paying AI slop generators for the copyright, etc. of their AI slop. What YouTube is doing is sharing AD REVENUE for permission to publish your AI slop. Copyright/ownership/rights never come into it. Importantly, that means that anyone can copy any AI slopware on YouTube, etc. and rehost it anywhere they want, even back on YouTube, and there is nothing legal that YouTube can do about it with regards to copyright protections, ownership, DMCA, etc. Anyone is legally free to use any AI slopware in any way they want. When this ruling was pending, I warned Disney legal of all of this before they did their OpenAI deal -- that it would literally dilute their entire IP portfolio forever. They ignored that warning for the PR and stock bump. But that is why, when the ruling came down last year, Disney quickly extricated themselves from that OpenAI deal, even eating the initial upfront fees -- followed closely by OpenAI ending their entire AI video generating business model. They adjusted their PR release dates to make this less obvious to shareholders, of course. Phew. I hope that this clears up the key distinctions for you and anyone reading. If you have any additional questions or even hypotheticals about AI and Copyright, please feel free to ask.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      553
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      78
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      74
    5. 5
      neufuse
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!