The direction Microsoft took with Windows 8  

855 members have voted

  1. 1. Do you like the direction Microsoft took with Windows 8?

    • Yes I love it, i'll be upgrading
    • No I hate it, i'll stick with Windows 7
    • It doesn't bother me
    • I will use Windows 8 with a start menu hack program


Recommended Posts

The only reason why the folks that criticize it complain about bias is because the Start menu is missing.

I'm not saying this to be saying it - out of the detractors' own mouths, the one major criticism of Windows 8 is that the Start menu is gone.

No, its obviously still there cause it takes up the whole screen so it can fit its huge googly tiles.

Never mind that compatibility with *desktop applications* with Windows 8 is not only not broken, but is actually better than that of the benchmark it is compared against - Windows 7 + SP1.

Another anecdotal case you haven't shown, not that anyone here is complaining about compatibility issues.

Never mind that the QuickTask power-user's menu is *only* discoverable by mouse-users (there's no shortcut key combo or touch gesture that can launch it).

Another consistancy issue since we have to learn new keyboard shortcuts to do other stuff easily, like the charms.

Because it supports touch *at all* , it's criticized.

No, because to use your favorite word, its biased for touch. (which you think is bias away from mouse - potato, potato)

Yes, & then there's that. Which again makes me wonder why MS didn't just create two separate operating systems, one for desktops & one for tablets. Unless they have a hidden agenda.

I posted my thoughts about this in another Windows 8 discussion with a similar question

"Because the tech companies are moving fast these days and Microsoft is ran by imbeciles (like Balmer) who just fail to understand the importance of user experience and style in general. They always had that problem and they still do.

They are also mammoths who move at a snail pace, who always responded to market as a reaction to something new not as a leader of new things.

THis is probably because they have absolutely no idea what they are doing and then watch the market and see what sticks and then they do it themselves because they have huge resources.

Unfortunately for them, this might have worked in the past 20 years because they largely had no competition in the business market as well as platforms in general. But now, the web has become a part of our lives, smartphones and mobile devices have taken the front seat, there is less and less dependency on desktop operating systems and they woke up a few years ago and saw that by the time they respond to these market changes it will be too late.

And the result? Windows Phone 7 which is ok but seriously lacks in functionality and the new Apollo where none of the current WP devices will even support it and Windows 8 which is an abomination of all UI principles in existence.

They could have done this so much better, but Win8 is what happens when the company is ran by suits and people devoid of any passion but one for money."

I posted my thoughts about this in another Windows 8 discussion with a similar question

"Because the tech companies are moving fast these days and Microsoft is ran by imbeciles (like Balmer) who just fail to understand the importance of user experience and style in general. They always had that problem and they still do.

They are also mammoths who move at a snail pace, who always responded to market as a reaction to something new not as a leader of new things.

THis is probably because they have absolutely no idea what they are doing and then watch the market and see what sticks and then they do it themselves because they have huge resources.

Unfortunately for them, this might have worked in the past 20 years because they largely had no competition in the business market as well as platforms in general. But now, the web has become a part of our lives, smartphones and mobile devices have taken the front seat, there is less and less dependency on desktop operating systems and they woke up a few years ago and saw that by the time they respond to these market changes it will be too late.

And the result? Windows Phone 7 which is ok but seriously lacks in functionality and the new Apollo where none of the current WP devices will even support it and Windows 8 which is an abomination of all UI principles in existence.

They could have done this so much better, but Win8 is what happens when the company is ran by suits and people devoid of any passion but one for money."

I have a feeling that they have misread a lot of the market though. A friend of mine who custom built my desktop PC has a computer shop/store. He reckons he's selling more 'budget boxes' than laptops or tablets. People are buying portable devices but probably for a multitude of reasons. A home computer is more of a necessity than a convenience for many people today, especially for work reasons. MS seem to have lost some business with various hardware manufacturers & I feel that they seriously want to push the Surface tablet. In which case, using one OS for both can be seen as a way of subtly familiarising the new operating system for potential tablet users. I also have a feeling that this Metro hybrid will be discontinued in Windows 9.

I have gotta hand it to MS, they have taken a BIG gamble with this, unfortunately its going to fail, and I mean fail big time. They surely must have hints of that already, with the pricing structure introduced, they know its not gonna sell at the usual prices for a Windows OS, hence the much cheaper costs ;)

I have gotta hand it to MS, they have taken a BIG gamble with this, unfortunately its going to fail, and I mean fail big time. They surely must have hints of that already, with the pricing structure introduced, they know its not gonna sell at the usual prices for a Windows OS, hence the much cheaper costs ;)

I don't think it's going to be as a failure people make it out to be. People still seem stuck in the past when they think we still need big, bulky devices thrown on a desk to be productive, which we don't. This is Microsoft's break out moment. Windows has entered the mobile realm, unhindered by device form factor, as evidenced by the Surface Pro.

I don't think it's going to be as a failure people make it out to be. People still seem stuck in the past when they think we still need big, bulky devices thrown on a desk to be productive, which we don't. This is Microsoft's break out moment. Windows has entered the mobile realm, unhindered by device form factor.

There's more desktop PCs than there are touch-enabled PCs. Oh also, most productivity is done on a PC. Not a touch based device.

It's very fit for tablets and the speed improvements across the board are overall very good. However, I still think the mouse and keyboard experience is not as intuitive as it should be. I'll probably be upgrading and using one or two programs to restore mouse and keyboard productivity.

There's more desktop PCs than there are touch-enabled PCs. Oh also, most productivity is done on a PC. Not a touch based device.

Which Windows 8 is more than able to accompany. However, take a look at what the Surface is doing. Instead of big, clunky machines, the Surface is bringing the power of a desktop into an easy to convert and carry form factor. If I am up and moving, I have a mobile UI to work from, if I am sitting, I have access to a keyboard, mouse and traditional desktop to work from.

I know big, desktop models aren't going to go away, but it's nice to have a unified OS that can play even with all devices.

Oh also, most productivity is done on a PC. Not a touch based device.

(which is probably why the Surface and almost every Windows 8 touch device concept/prototype I've seen has a keyboard, trackpad, and USB port for a mouse)

You guys have to realize something. Some "casual users" have jobs where they will be using a computer. That computer will probably be on XP if not 7. If a casual user wants a new computer and they get Windows 8, are you really expecting them to learn two completely different UIs (one for work and one for home)? No, they will do what they should and request something they can easily use.

This OS is built for tablets. You cannot deny the fact. If you give somebody a Windows 8 tablet and Windows 8 desktop, I bet you they will know how to work the tablet much faster than the desktop version.

Oh and those saying WinRT is amazing because it can produce games like angry birds. Hmm, did everyone forget the HTML5 version of Angry Birds? http://chrome.angrybirds.com/

I am a very heavy power user/content producer, and Windows 8 makes my life a complete mess. I work in Adobe After Effects, Adobe Premiere Pro, Adobe Photoshop, Visual Studio to program games, FL Studio and Garageband on OS X, record gameplay footage with Fraps, and so on.

Dot Matrix, do you honestly think those interfaces (Avatar, Iron Man, and Star Trek) will benefit everybody? Um NO. I do not want to have my hand up in the air programming for 40 hours a week (job), or use it with Photoshop, Garageband, FL Studio, Video Production, playing video games, and all of this productive stuff.

Those interfaces you say we are evolving towards are only made for specialized purposes (Starship controls as in Star Trek, virtual 3D modeling as in the Iron Man movies, and health monitoring as in Avatar). You honestly cannot expect programmers or heavy content producers like myself to evolve to an interface like that.

I will stick to mouse and keyboard. And I cannot use those new Surface computers that you said we the next evolution of desktop computing. Why? Did you read my list of stuff I do? I do not want to wait for 5 hours for my video to finish rendering because I no longer have the horsepower needed to speed up the process. I have one of the highest i7 processors, and I have a hexa-core Intel Xeon in my Mac Pro that I actually need all that power for.

Bottom line, I do not think Windows 8 will be a huge success, even for the casual users (read my first few lines to see why I feel that way).

I'm pretty sure people who likes Windows 8 are these type:

minimal-windows-7-desktop-590x472.jpg

and those who hate Win8 are these type:

many-icons-cleaning-with-broomstic.png

My notebook has Vista still. My desktop is very much like that picture. I love it. My Win 7 machine is a bit tidier desktop-wise, but I don't find anything wrong with that. I can find everything I need quite easily on either machine.

bull****, If people have lots of icons why would they care about having the apps. I have only a couple of icons on my desktop as I like it clean. I don't like the start menu as it's full of stuff that I just don't care about. I don't want to see the weather on my desktop, I can look outside to see this info. I don't have to have lots of apps to show me info all of the time.

Actually, the latter sshot is more proof who the Win8 audience is. Living in Metro is just like surrounding yourself in a sea of useless icons. Isn't that another reason MS pretty much threw in the towel on the old Start Menu? They gave users an application launcher they refused to learn/use, instead relying on the crutch of I'll just put shortcuts everywhere. So screw it, we'll just combine the Start Menu and Desktop!

The question you have to ask is, does Win8 have the energy to overcome the intertia of bad computing practices that breed of user has clung to for years? Andrea says No. ;)

My current 'hate du jour' is that if you have lots of programs (and hence a messy, uncustomizable All Programs menu) - if you zoom out to find the app group you want, it doesn't highlight it when you click on it, so you still have to relocate it in the sea of icons. Useless!

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Hello, Hope all is well. I am in UK.  
    • I'm not happy with myself for it, but I've gone and got hold of it. Just another 45 minutes and I'll be Bond, James Bond. In my defence, IO's Hitman series is awesome, and I'm a sucker for 007. So while it might seem a bit simplified compared to Hitman, I'm sure I'll be right at home.
    • Or just check the script yourself ^^. I hate having a Microsoft account tied to my windows install.
    • 007 First Light review: Satisfying spy adventure that James Bond needed by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe I have fond memories of classic James Bond games from the Electronic Arts era. Using high-tech gadgets, sneaking into parties, and dispatching bad guys were wildly exciting activities for my younger self. In recent years, Bond games have entirely disappeared, alongside the super spy genre. Fast forward to 2020, imagine my surprise when IO Interactive announced it had secured the Bond IP to make a game. Considering the studio’s Hitman history, this project is one I keenly kept an eye on. Six years later, 007 First Light is finally here, and after spending time inside this globe-trotting adventure, I can safely say that my excitement for this developer’s take on this universe was not unfounded. IO has taken lessons it has learned from Hitman and combined them with what I would expect from a directed cinematic experience like James Bond. I have refrained from mentioning major plot points to save you from story spoilers in this review. This is an original story that doesn’t tie into any movies, so there isn’t an expectation of knowing the backstory or the decades of movies either. Bond, James Bond When 007 First Light begins, Bond is just Bond. There isn’t a spy angle, fancy gadgets, or even a secret mission. The introductory mission is framed to show how James Bond handled himself and how he does not care about the odds when it comes to saving lives. It’s a gorgeous level as well, showing off an island scattered with cliffs in the middle of a storm. Looking back, this is probably the best-looking level in the game, with IO showing off all its abilities with its custom engine, Glacier. But my favorite ended up being the follow-up to this level. Once the United Kingdom's foreign intelligence agency, MI6, recruits our daring youngster into its super-spy “00” program, training begins. However, instead of treading through the same tutorial missions where the game teaches you to run and jump and drive, IO opted for a montage, and it’s amazing. The scenes cut between Bond practicing and improving his marksmanship, parkour, hand-to-hand combat, and driving as weeks go by in his training. What impressed me here was the lack of any loading screens or stutters as scenes instantly switched to different locations entirely, as if I was watching a movie. This creativity is a trend I noticed in most levels, where there is some sort of gameplay or choreography mechanic being introduced to keep things interesting. Soon, the rest of the cast is introduced, bringing other agents that our favorite secret agent will be working with, the scientists and engineers that build MI6’s spy gadgets, as well as higher-ranking officers that either appreciate or (at best) tolerate Bond’s rebellious attitude. It’s a tight cast, all with incredibly good voice acting and personalities that quickly grew on me. The casting for Bond himself is also an excellent one. From showing his iconic soft spot for women to the condescending smiles that get a rise out of enemies, I had no issues getting immersed into this universe as this new face of James Bond. The missions take place in a wide range of locations as MI6 sends Bond to tackle dangers that are growing everywhere from the UK to Africa. These aren’t unrelated adventures where MI6 is sending secret agents, which is an angle I would love to see in another game, but a part of a bigger conspiracy affecting the entire world. Some of the twists and turns were all too predictable, and the character that Lenny Kravitz played made me cringe a little too much. But all in all, I enjoyed the campaign’s storyline that sets the stage for this new agent joining the illustrious “00” program. Plenty of Possibilities The third-person style of IO Interactive fits this role quite well. Bond is presented as a master at hand-to-hand combat as well as firearms, while also having a knack for being stealthy when required. Most sections of missions have a lot of freedom. This means I could beat up every goon and security guard on the way to an objective, slip past them without sounding a single alarm, or do a mix of both. My sessions usually end up with the third option because I tend to be impatient about waiting for a patrol to move. Drawing from its Hitman genes, the developer almost always gives multiple routes for going through missions. Levels can be massive, sometimes sporting hundreds of NPCs going their own ways and having conversations. If my objective is to break into a security room on the third floor, I could look around for roof access, eavesdrop on conversations to find out where someone lost a key, create a distraction and pickpocket a guard for a keycard, sneak in through the vents, or simply kick down the offending door. I enjoyed the variety on offer, especially because the same solutions didn’t usually show up in different missions. Before heading out into a secret MI6 escapade, the gadget specialist of the branch walks Bond through the organization's latest and greatest achievements. This can be cool little devices like a laser built into the watch, a phone that fires poison darts, or a camera that emits a powerful shockwave. The choice of what can be taken into the mission is up to the player. I could usually find fresh routes or get out of tough situations with a punch or two, so I never had the feeling of missing out by not choosing the right equipment. It’s still a fun practice. Choosing the armaments before a mission enhanced the super spy feeling quite a bit. As I mentioned, stealth comes in as a very viable option for most of the missions, letting Bond sneak past foes or knock them out silently. While it is satisfying to clear entire areas of goons and walk away without any alarms, the way of accomplishing this could have been done better. Bond can lure enemies, sneak up and knock them out, or use a gadget to disorient them before dealing a nasty blow. Bodies cannot be moved or hidden afterward either. It’s a very simple system, which I wish were more exciting to pull off. Perhaps more stealth-orientated gadgets, distraction options, or multi-takedowns could have helped here, I think. Getting caught while attempting to be in stealth does not mean a game over. Other than getting into a fist fight, an interesting twist of 007 First Light is the bluffing option. While an enemy is confused as to what you are doing in a restricted location, Bond has the option to improvise and persuade them that you are exactly where you’re supposed to be. These are fun little dynamic interactions with unique dialog depending on the mission and location, giving a few extra moments for Bond to go past suspicious guards smoothly. It’s the first time I’ve witnessed this system in a game, and I hope to see more. License to Kill Bond isn’t just dealing with security guards or civilians. From time to time, entire gangs of gun-toting mercenaries show up in levels looking to take down our protagonist. It is then that License to Kill mode is activated for Bond, letting him use firearms with no restrictions. I was surprised by just how tight gunplay is in 007 First Light. The weapons feel powerful and satisfying to fire, with single bullets capable of taking down an enemy with a headshot. Ammo is scarce, and enemies don’t drop weapons with full magazines most of the time. This forces a hectic kind of gameplay where I am always advancing towards enemies to take their weapons after they are downed. Things like shooting legs to immobilize, aiming at the hands to make their weapon go flying, blowing up nearby fire extinguishers for cover, and using gadgets to halt a goon in their tracks while I reload, make up enjoyable levels. I had to hold back my disappointment when the enemy count in these action sequences dropped to zero and I had to go non-lethal again. Speaking of action sequences, First Light isn’t just offering sandbox levels to complete at the player’s own leisure either. Each level comes with specific linear and directed scenes to move the story forward and put Bond in tight situations. These usually end up with high-octane chases or driving sections, offering the chance to witness chaining explosions, hails of gunfire, and scripted parkour scenes that remind me of Mission Impossible movies more than Bond. Elements like seeing James Bond jump out of a plane without a parachute or drive through buildings in London inside a trash truck were fantastic and always left me at a high point when finishing a mission. The classic James Bond theme is sprinkled in here too, which only happens a handful of times in the game, but at just the right moments. Visuals and Performance Compared to Unreal Engine 5 games we are seeing nowadays, 007 First Light isn’t flexing a huge amount of realism when it comes to graphics. The models, textures, and effects all feel a little dated, with the starting mission that I mentioned being the most visually striking. However, the complete lack of stutters, the hundreds of NPCs that can be on screen without a single hitch, massive sandbox levels, and smooth transitions between them all play a part in making this an immensely immersive and complex experience. The in-engine cutscenes are gorgeous as well, offering an upgraded visual style and model detail over the gameplay sections. Animations are one aspect that jumps out at me about any new game, and First Light has nailed what a third-person action game should feel like. Walking, sneaking, and running all have a heaviness to them that I appreciate. Whenever Bond moves past a wall or a ledge, his arms reach out to lightly hold those structures until he moves away. NPCs actually react to my character and move out of the way. Even during melee combat or takedown animations, the fists impacting a body or a head hitting a wall all have that same weight. Even the more frivolous animations, like catching a gun in midair or chucking an empty one at a goon (yes, you can do that), are satisfying to pull off. Of course, the in-engine cutscene animations are remarkably well done too, with facial animations and the upgraded model details improving my engagement with the characters. I have an AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT 16GB paired with an eight-core Ryzen 7 3700X and 32GB of RAM, with the game running at 1440p resolution. Deciding to completely max out all the graphics options gave me a range of frame rates between 60 and 100 depending on the scene and level. While I did try to enable AMD FSR, which bumped up the frame rates by a good 20% at Quality mode, IO Interactive’s implementation of the technology wasn’t that great. Every corner and edge in levels began shimmering, and I was also seeing smearing issues in fast-moving sections. The title seemingly uses the older generation FSR 3.1 and not the machine learning-assisted FSR 4, leading to these artifacts. Unfortunately, there isn't a way to manually upgrade this right now either. I opted to turn off the upscaling and play the game in native 1440p to avoid problems. I would say the FPS range I was getting was an acceptable one for a single-player action game for my setup. I do wish there were an FOV slider option in the settings. While the camera is far enough back for my tastes in most situations in this third-person adventure, at times the perspective is far too close. When trying to look around quickly and spot targets, I realized I was getting a slight headache at times due to the use of an almost over-the-shoulder close-up camera. Conclusion Being James Bond in 007 First Light is a treat. Traveling around the world chasing conspiracies, using high-tech gadgets disguised as everyday accessories, and improvising on the spot to fool foes all give a fantastic feeling of being a super spy. For an origin story, IO Interactive has done a great job at introducing the character and his motives for doing what he does. The satisfying combat animation and fantastic voice acting are definitely high points, with the License to Kill moments being my favorite. Not being able to move bodies and the simplistic stealth of mechanics does hurt its presentation a little. The NPC logic and intelligence is easy to manipulate and trick, repeating the same actions over and over again if I keep making distractions. The lack of an FOV slider was also a pain (quite literally) at times, and the FSR implementation is quite poor. These are things I hope the studio will improve upon with updates. Even with its faults, IO Interactive and James Bond are a match made in heaven. The studio knows how to make a main character that oozes charm and competency while also leaning heavily into its Hitman experience to make gigantic levels with what looks like hundreds of NPCs roaming around. Being an origin story, IO’s Bond has a way to go before he becomes the highly effective agent we see in the movie world. I am hoping the studio will continue this series alongside its Hitman ventures going forward, just so we get to experience the journey for longer. 007 First Light is available on PC (Steam, Epic Games Store, and Xbox PC), Xbox Series X|S, and PlayStation 5 for $69.99. This review was conducted on the PC version of the game provided by IO Interactive.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Rising Star
      olavinto went up a rank
      Rising Star
    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      X-No-file earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      271
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      75
    4. 4
      Skyfrog
      74
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!