The direction Microsoft took with Windows 8  

855 members have voted

  1. 1. Do you like the direction Microsoft took with Windows 8?

    • Yes I love it, i'll be upgrading
    • No I hate it, i'll stick with Windows 7
    • It doesn't bother me
    • I will use Windows 8 with a start menu hack program


Recommended Posts

I have gotta hand it to MS, they have taken a BIG gamble with this, unfortunately its going to fail, and I mean fail big time. They surely must have hints of that already, with the pricing structure introduced, they know its not gonna sell at the usual prices for a Windows OS, hence the much cheaper costs ;)

Microsoft also sold Windows 7 for the low cost of $50 and a few years later, it is such a big time fail! Is that the source of your guess?

My notebook has Vista still. My desktop is very much like that picture. I love it. My Win 7 machine is a bit tidier desktop-wise, but I don't find anything wrong with that. I can find everything I need quite easily on either machine.

It's ironic when people with desktop choke full icons complain about bad UI design in Windows 8. (not directed at you, just general observation)

It's ironic when people with desktop choke full icons complain about bad UI design in Windows 8. (not directed at you, just general observation)

I just love irony. Win 8 is probably a brilliant design. IMHO it is ugly & overly minimalistic though.

I see so much hate and bad press for Windows 8 when searching for Windows 8 info so it's got me wondering what is it about Windows 8 that you dislike so much and will keep you from upgrading to it in the future? It seems like the most hated things about Windows 8 are the new full screen Metro interface Start menu, Removed Start button from taskbar and the fact that you can not boot directly to the desktop anymore.

What other things do you dislike about Windows 8 so much?

Also is most of the things you dislike about Windows 8 from a UI point of view? Or is there under the hood changes that you also do not like? Because its my understanding that Windows 8 has lots of under the hood changes that improve and help things like better memory management , faster boot times and lots of other improvments I am sure aswell.

Do you think it may be worth upgrading to Windows 8 just for the Under the hood improvments? Or is the new UI look and operation really that bad and will keep you from upgrading?

I think all of the under the hood changes are great. I believe that the biggest issue that people have with it is not even so much the "Removal of the Start Button" but rather the in your face'ness of the Metro Start Screen and the unbalance of the Classic Desktop and Metro interfaces working together. At least from a desktop/corporate point of view. It boils down to "If it wasn't broken, why fix it?" Well because MS wants to capitalize on the mobile market and unify their products. Will it work? Time will tell...

It works/looks great on a tablet however.

I'm really getting tired of people saying they want to be able to boot directly to the desktop. you haven't been able to do that since the days of ME and earlier. It boots the the login screen just like normal. what you guys want is to login directly to the desktop. Get your terminology right or you keep sounding like idiots!!! /rant

Windows 8 success is entirely dependent on its success in the tablet department. Despite what people say about it still being good on the desktop, it is a platform designed to create a consistent experience across both desktop and tablet. Which means, that whether people like it or not is entirely dependent on whether they "get" what the new UI is for.

People will only truly realize this when they get home, put down their tablet, and go on their desktop where all their files and settings are synced, and they can use it in more or less the same way. It's beautiful.

Windows 8 success is entirely dependent on its success in the tablet department. Despite what people say about it still being good on the desktop, it is a platform designed to create a consistent experience across both desktop and tablet. Which means, that whether people like it or not is entirely dependent on whether they "get" what the new UI is for.

People will only truly realize this when they get home, put down their tablet, and go on their desktop where all their files and settings are synced, and they can use it in more or less the same way. It's beautiful.

I don't know about everyone else, but I don't want my tablet sync'd with my desktop, nor my laptop with my desktop or anything else

I use them all for completely different things and have completely different things saved to each

For example, I don't want to take my laptop with me somewhere and have all my personal data, photos, favourites, emails all popping up in-front of everyone as soon as I boot up, yes it could be avoided with a different account but that defeats the point

I don't know about everyone else, but I don't want my tablet sync'd with my desktop, nor my laptop with my desktop or anything else

I use them all for completely different things and have completely different things saved to each

For example, I don't want to take my laptop with me somewhere and have all my personal data, photos, favourites, emails all popping up in-front of everyone as soon as I boot up, yes it could be avoided with a different account but that defeats the point

well you don't HAVE to use your hotmail account, you can just as easily use a local account on everything

well you don't HAVE to use your hotmail account, you can just as easily use a local account on everything

It cripples everything decent about Metro then though, you need to be logged into a live account for most of the apps to work, ie. the store

I'm really getting tired of people saying they want to be able to boot directly to the desktop. you haven't been able to do that since the days of ME and earlier. It boots the the login screen just like normal. what you guys want is to login directly to the desktop. Get your terminology right or you keep sounding like idiots!!! /rant

You can boot directly to the desktop XP / Vista / 7 (run > control userpasswords2) i have my media center set to do this...

Great for a PC setup to perform a single task.

No option to turn Areo on, I like the transparent windows on the desktop. - unconfirmed

No Gadgets - there were very few good ones, and just seemed to eat up resources

No option to turn Metro Off. - stop being lazy and get a start menu replacer if you don't like it so much

My computer is NOT a smart phone or a tablet. - now you're just complaining for the sake of complaining

I don't intrinsically dislike Windows 8 -- I think it's lovely on phones, tablets, etc. I simply dislike how Microsoft is forcing it into the desktop environment where it doesn't really belong. We have these enormous monitors with crisp displays, insane resolutions, the ability to have 6 different windows up and all of them be clear and readable, and it's being ****ed away on giant colourful blocks that are more suited for a less precise, touch interface than a keyboard and mouse. The whole thing just reminds me of a plaything, which is what I want in my tablet, but not on my work desktop.

I know people *can* get used to it and *can* get work done with it. I do *not* think it is ideal for this, it was not designed for the way people have learned to use their computers and have for years, and that most people can be far more productive in a traditional desktop environment. It has been the same way for so long and evolved the way it has for a reason.

yes it could be avoided with a different account but that defeats the point

If you didn't like the point anyway, why does it matter if it defeats the point? Just use a different account.

The people who want their data synced can use unified accounts.

I'm really getting tired of people saying they want to be able to boot directly to the desktop. you haven't been able to do that since the days of ME and earlier. It boots the the login screen just like normal. what you guys want is to login directly to the desktop. Get your terminology right or you keep sounding like idiots!!! /rant

You can set your profile to login automatically and show the desktop in 7, Vista, XP, etc..

I am getting used to it but even after months and months of use, the desktop and metro interfaces feel disjoint. Metro at the moment feels like a random Rainmeter skin stuck on top of desktop.

Time will tell how the desktop looks in RTM. Hopefully there is a new Metro matching iconset at release.

I'm really getting tired of people saying they want to be able to boot directly to the desktop. you haven't been able to do that since the days of ME and earlier.

I get what you are saying on the terminology. But you can boot directly to the desktop in XP, Vista, 7, etc. Just remove or do not set an account password...

My Biggest reason: Microsoft is copying Apple Store Model and shoving down our throats Kindergarten apps with reduced functionality (atleast initially). The experience feels dumbed down where I cannot even resize Metro Apps and we get the feeling that Metro is one fat mobile OS which somehow mutated itself to leech on desktop.

No option to turn Areo on, I like the transparent windows on the desktop.

No Gadgets

No option to turn Metro Off.

My computer is NOT a smart phone or a tablet.

All of that is basically eye-candy. You can still use desktop gadgets that were written for Windows 7 (I'm using the AccuWeather.com desktop gadget while their WinRT app gets rewritten) - you just can't get them from Microsoft any more. (And that applies just as much to Windows 7 as it does to Windows 8.)

That particular WinRT app was the only WinRT *anything* that wasn't a game that I use regularly - also, the AccuWeather app (like the gadget) is a background, not foreground, process - alerts pop-up like Tasktray notifications. In fact, it replaced AWS WeatherBug, which lives in the Tasktray. That is, in fact, pretty much the sort of WinRT app that sticks - something that replaces a Tasktray-based applet from 7 and earlier.

I use WinRT where it fits - otherwise, I pay no attention to it.

Exactly! I can't understand why anybody would need to have a damn weather app running fullscreen, or a slow stocks app, or mail, or anything for that matter. I hate fullscreen apps on Windows and Mac. But that's my opinion :)

Agreed. It is very disruptive with my productivity.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • AMD RX 9070 GRE AI, Blender benchmarks vs 9070 XT, 7800XT, Nvidia RTX 5070, 4070 by Sayan Sen Earlier this week, we shared the first part of our review of AMD's new RX 9070 GRE. It was about the gaming performance of the GPU, and we gave it an 8 out of 10. As a follow-up, similar to how we did with the 9070 XT and non-XT, we are doing a dedicated productivity review for the RX 9070 GRE as well, where we compare it against the 9070 XT, 9070, 7800 XT, as well as Nvidia's 5070 and 4070. This will include AI, rendering, compute, and more benchmarks. AI performance, especially, is a very important metric in today's world, and AMD also promised big improvements thanks to its underlying architectural improvements. We will be pitching it against the data we already have for the RX 9070, and RX 9070 XT, but also the Nvidia 5070 FE, MSI GeForce RTX 4070 VENTUS 2X 12G, and Gigabyte Radeon RX 7800 XT GAMING OC 16G as they are in a similar price class, but also because we do not have a comparable 5060 Ti card lying around here that we can compare it against. Before we get underway, this is a collaboration between Sayan Sen and Steven Parker, who lent me his test bed. Also, there was no editorial input from AMD. First up, the specs of the RX 9070, 9070 XT, and 9070 GRE, which were given to us by AMD: Radeon RX 9070 GRE Radeon RX 9070 Radeon RX 9070 XT Boost Clock: Game Clock: up to 2.79GHz up to 2.20GHz up to 2.52GHz up to 2.07GHz up to 2.97GHz up to 2.40GHz Stream Processors 3,072 (48 CU) 3,584 (56 CU) 4,096 (64 CU) Ray Accelerator 48 56 64 AI Accelerator 96 112 128 ROPs 96 128 Texture Mapping Units 192 224 256 Memory 12 GB GDDR6, 18Gbps Clock, 192-bit Bus 432 GB/s 16 GB GDDR6, 20Gbps Clock, 256-bit Bus Effective Memory Bandwidth: 640 GB/s Infinity Cache 48 MB (3rd Gen) 64 MB (3rd Gen) Card Bus PCI-E 5.0 X16 Output 2x HDMI 2.1b 2x DisplayPort 2.1a Power consumption 220W 304W Recommended PSU 650W 750W Slot width 2x 3x Price (SEP) $549 $599 As you can see from the specs above, it is less than the standard RX 9070 in every way that counts, except for slightly higher Boost and Game clock speed. Design Moving on, the RX 9070 GRE we were given is an XFX Swift triple-fan, dual-slot design with two 8-pin connectors. At 30cm (self-measured), it will fit in most systems easily. There is no RGB either. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE by XFX from all angles. Test system Our test system consists of the following: Lian Li O11 Dynamic Mini V2 Flow (Amazon|Newegg) ASUS Z890 ProArt Creator WiFi (Amazon|Newegg) Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus (Amazon|Newegg) Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet - 44x37 (Amazon|Newegg) 2x 16GB G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB (7200 MT/s in XMP) (Amazon|Newegg) Sabrent Rocket4 Plus 2TB SSD (Amazon) Windows 11 25H2 (Build 26200.8246) AMD shared a press driver based on the recently released Adrenaline 26.5.2 that we were required to use. We now move on to our benchmarks. First up, we have Geekbench AI running on ONNX. For some reason, the 9070 GRE does exceptionally well here in both half-precision (FP16) and single-precision (FP32). It manages to beat the RTX 5070 and RX 9070 non-XT, and is only behind the 9070 XT. Since Geekbench runs in short bursts instead of continuously hammering the graphics card, it seems the GRE's faster boost clocks are helping here. Next up, we move to the UL Procyon AI test suite, starting with the image generation benchmark. We chose the Stable Diffusion XL FP16 test since it is the most intense workload available on Procyon. The Nvidia cards do very well here, as even the 4070 out-muscles AMD's best fairy easily. The positive thing about the GRE is that it gets quite close to the 9070 non-XT in this test; this indicates that the VRAM does not play a very big role here, as SD XL relies on float16 (FP16). So this is something to keep in mind again. If you wish to work with float32 AI workloads, graphics cards with larger than 12 GB buffers would likely emerge as victors. Regardless, the gains are still massive on AMD's 9000 series compared to the 7000 series. Following image generation, we move to the text generation benchmark. This is one test where the 9070 GRE struggled, quite a lot. It seems that the 12 GB VRAM and lower memory bandwidth of the new Radeon 9070 GRE are hurting it quite a bit; the split is massive, especially in a test like Llama2, which packs 13 billion parameters. As such, in all the tests, the 9070 GRE is the slowest of the lot. Next, we tried Blender, and here the AMD GPUs were beaten by Nvidia. Rendering is something the Green team has always had a lead over the Red side, and it has not changed so far. On the positive side, though, the 9070 GRE shows significantly better results than the 7800 XT, which means AMD is on the right path. Catching up to Nvidia, though, will require a lot more effort. And we hope HIP and ROCm can keep improving. Wrapping up AI testing, we measured OpenCL throughput in the Geekbench compute benchmark. The RX 9070 GRE alongside the 9070 did not fare well here at all, even falling behind the 7800 XT. Interestingly, even the RTX 5070 could not beat the 4070 on OpenCL, so perhaps this suggests that OpenCL optimization may not have been a priority for either AMD or Nvidia in the modern era. Conclusion We reached the end of our productivity performance review of the 9070 GRE, and we have to say it's a mixed bag. Unlike the 9070 and 9070 XT, the GRE excels in some areas while losing ground fairly easily in others. Similar to how it happened in gaming, any time the card's memory subsystem gets hammered, it tends to fall behind the others. This was the case with text generation, wherein we saw the VRAM sometimes hit its maximum available 12 GB of usage with larger model sizes. So what do we make of the RX 9070 as a productivity hardware? It can certainly be used, but you have to know it has its limitations. For those looking for a GPU that can deal with more, AMD recently unveiled the Radeon AI PRO R9700, which is essentially a 32 GB refresh of the 9070 XT with some additional workstation-based optimizations. On a similar note, the new Ryzen AI Halo platform is something you can consider if you want to set up a local AI processing station. Considering everything, we rate AMD's Radeon RX 9070 GRE a 7.5 out of 10 for its productivity performance. Price is less of a factor for those looking at productivity cases compared to those considering the GPU for gaming, and as such, we felt it did quite decently on many occasions and can be handy if you need a 12 GB GPU and, for some reason, don't want to get Nvidia. Purchase links: RX 9070 / XT / GRE (Amazon US) As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Does anyone here know if these updates are integrated into the UUP dump isos?
    • Motrix Next 3.9.4 by Razvan Serea Motrix Next is a modern, open-source cross-platform download manager built as the official next-generation successor to the original Motrix project. It has been completely rewritten using Tauri 2, Vue 3, TypeScript, and Rust, while still relying on the powerful Aria2 download engine for high-speed multi-protocol transfers. The app supports HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, BitTorrent, ED2K and magnet links, offering advanced features like multi-connection acceleration, task scheduling, bandwidth control, and batch download management. With a significantly reduced install size (around 20MB), it focuses on being lightweight, fast, and resource-efficient compared to traditional Electron-based download tools. Designed for Windows, macOS, and Linux, Motrix Next delivers a clean, modern UI inspired by Material Design 3 principles, with smooth animations and a minimal workflow. It improves usability through better download organization, system tray integration, and enhanced torrent handling including selective file downloads and tracker management. Motrix Next features: Multi-protocol downloads — HTTP, FTP, BitTorrent, Magnet, .torrent, ED2K, and Metalink tasks BitTorrent — Selective file download, DHT, peer exchange, encryption controls, metadata caching, GeoIP peer flags, and tracker probing Browser extension integration — Embedded Extension API with independent authentication, download confirmation, smart auto-submit, filename hints, referer/cookie forwarding, and real-time controls (Chrome Web Store · Edge Add-ons) Safe filename handling — Content-Disposition, RFC 2047, non-UTF-8, percent-encoded, and extensionless URL resolution with path traversal sanitization Download organization — Favorite and recent folders, optional file-type categorization, stale-record cleanup, and completed history backed by SQLite Concurrent downloads — Independent controls for active tasks, HTTP connections per server, segments per file, and BT peer limits Speed control — Global and per-task upload/download limits with day-of-week and time-of-day scheduling System integration — Tray operation, optional tray speed display, macOS Dock badge/progress, protocol handlers for magnet://, thunder://, and motrixnext:// Lightweight mode — Destroys the WebView on minimize-to-tray while Rust keeps the engine, task monitor, notifications, history, and extension routing alive Notifications and power options — Native task start/complete/failure notifications, keep-awake during downloads, and optional shutdown after completion Network controls — Scoped proxy support for downloads, app updates, and tracker updates, plus system proxy detection Auto-update channels — Stable, Beta, and Latest Across Channels policies with separate download and install phases Diagnostics — Structured logs, exportable diagnostic ZIPs, database integrity checks, automatic DB rebuild, and Linux GPU rendering fallback Personalization — Light/dark/system theme, 10 color schemes, 26 languages, and first-launch system language detection Motrix Next 3.9.4 changelog: Motrix Next 3.9.4 promotes the 3.9.4 beta cycle to stable. This release refreshes bundled engine binaries, improves task detail readability and copy actions, expands link handling for magnet and ED2K workflows, polishes responsive navigation and text wrapping, updates browser extension documentation, and refines network preference controls. New Features Task Detail copy actions — Added copyable values for task metadata and reusable render functions for long text fields. Magnet and ED2K lifecycle support — Added task lifecycle handling for magnet and ED2K links. History cleanup for deleted tasks — Deleted tasks can now remove matching history records. User-Agent management — Added user-agent management and improved related network preference controls. Browser extension documentation — Added the Firefox Add-ons link for the Motrix Next extension. Improvements Engine binaries — Updated bundled binaries for supported architectures. Task Detail readability — Long task names, URLs, tracker values, and copyable metadata now render more clearly. Deletion messaging — Refined localized task deletion text for clarity and consistency. Text wrapping — Improved URI input wrapping and task name multiline display. Navigation layout — Improved sub-navigation responsiveness. Disk allocation default — Changed the default file allocation method to trunc. Proxy controls — Improved proxy button styling in network preferences. Download: Motrix Next 64-bit | ARM64 | macOS ~20.0 MB (Open Source) Links: Website | macOS / Linux | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • NVIDIA officially supports Ubuntu, as linked above with the GeForce NOW Hands on I did in collaboration with Paul Hill.
    • TO be clear I am not running linux today, however I keep thinking about it. And I want to make sure there are minimal obstacles if I decide to make that switch in the coming months.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      479
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      244
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      66
    5. 5
      +Edouard
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!