The direction Microsoft took with Windows 8  

855 members have voted

  1. 1. Do you like the direction Microsoft took with Windows 8?

    • Yes I love it, i'll be upgrading
    • No I hate it, i'll stick with Windows 7
    • It doesn't bother me
    • I will use Windows 8 with a start menu hack program


Recommended Posts

Agreed. It is very disruptive with my productivity.

Who says I run it fullscreen?

I run it as a background task - which it is designed to do.

It replaces a Win32 applet (specifically, AWS WeatherBug) that normally lives in the Tasktray. AccuWeather/RT is quite invisible until/unless there is an alert - which pops up like alerts from other WinRT apps, such as Mail or Messenger. That means it's less visible OR distracting than AWS WeatherBug - until it needs to be. It uses fewer resources than AWS WeatherBug as well. While it is configured on first use full-screen, after that, you need never go full-screen with it again 9like the original Weather/RT app that is included with Windows 8, which it is designed to replace.

Agreed. It is very disruptive with my productivity.

And the Start menu chopping off part of the desktop isn't?

How much customization and ordering have you had to do of your4 Start menu?

Do you have to install additional utilities to manage the Start menu to keep it from getting cluttered?

Do you have to invest additional TIME dealing with Start menu clutter?

If you answered "Yes" to either (let alone both) of the last two questions, then the Start menu certainly is NOT *working* by default.

If you've had to spend any time customizing and/or ordering your Start menu, then there's obviously some reason you do so.

I have no issues with it. My games run fine, any programs i need run fine normally, or in compatability mode. I hardly ever use the metro screen, though the search is fast and painless. All in all, i have no issues with the OS, and the under the hood improvements are enough for me to drop money on an upgrade when it's released.

The hate to me seems to come from only 1 thing and that's a full screen start menu and search.

Personally I have no issue with that, I'm one of those people that can only concentrate on 1 thing at a time.

If you don't see the point of Metro apps, just don't use them. Unpin all of them from the start screen and just pin anything you would normally pin in your start menu.

You can pretty much pin anything you like to the start screen.You can put much more up front on the start screen then you can on the start menu. So that way everything is only 2 clicks away. Seems faster to me then clicking the start button, then All Programs and then maybe have to scroll through a long list to find what you need.

This way you can use Win8 pretty much like you would use Win7. That all assumes that you can live with the full screen start menu and search.

For the majority of the people who only use facebook, mail, internet, the casual game,... Win 8 seems like a massive improvement to me. It will make the lives of people much easier, after a short adjustment period.

I'm all for Win8 and will be upgrading asap

<snip>

Yeah, because there's just no way someone without Metro could have the common sense to organise their files properly, huh? :rolleyes:

post-446153-0-19392000-1342312435_thumb.

Look ma! All like magic, no desktop mess and I did it all without Metro! (and I have more than 1 TiB of video files in my library and more than 400 GB of games on my hard drive so I have more than enough content). Absolutely amazing, huh?

I don't like the fact that it appears to be more oriented towards touch devices, with the desktop user experience seemingly tacked on at the last minute.

Do I hate it? No. Do I like it? Certainly not. Would I use it with various tweaks put in? If the tweaks made it more of a desktop experience that I've become used to, probably.

This isn't the case at all. I've been using the CP on my Netbook (with 1024x576 resolution) for the past several months, desktop mode only, and it's a better experience than Windows 7.

I'm really getting tired of people saying they want to be able to boot directly to the desktop. you haven't been able to do that since the days of ME and earlier. It boots the the login screen just like normal. what you guys want is to login directly to the desktop. Get your terminology right or you keep sounding like idiots!!! /rant

Uhm...if you hide the admin account or any extra guest/user accounts and don't set a password your computer will boot directly to the desktop. It's been that way since Windows 2000 at least. Just an fyi.

I'm pretty sure people who likes Windows 8 are these type:

and those who hate Win8 are these type:

Completely wrong.

its always a case of damned if you do and damned if you dont with MS isnt it??

Every negative response somehow comes from the perspective that you now are forced to use the new start screen against your will, always under all circumstances??? None focus on the most impressive aspects on windows 8 an the fact that you can pretty much live in desktop mode for the rest of your life with the most minimal of metro flavour, if any at all???

Its like the start menu is something these people are using like its their day job??? i mean really, its a fairly ridiculous basis on which to form an oppinion.

How bout he massive speed increases in boot, shutdown, hibernate?

How bout Built in anti-virus, Trusted Boot and improved BitLocker drive encryption, along with AppLocker and claim-based access control

How bout built in Hyper-V (to run that classic goodness if your crying about it so much)

How bout the better multilanguage support

How bout better multi monitor support

How bout smaller memory footprint and better performance on th same hardware, better security, privacy and system reliability

How bout enhanced Task Manager and Windows Explorer

How bout ntegrated windows store

How bout Windows To Go

How bout enhanced DirectAccess and built-in mobile broadband features that natively support 3G and 4G telecommunication

How bout enhanced multi touch support

How bout ie10

Just to name a few

And best of all for developers (ME) you can write code in practically any language and if its targetted to metro it runs on everything and its 1 click publish and sales on the store...Yes actually running tablet and phone apps on my desktop via metro not to mention killer dev tools...pus auto natice cloud sync and support, plus folow on from 1 devcie to next...

No other platform currently is offering that and certainly not for the F*ckOff stupid upgrade price they currently announced...

Love windows 8, theres lots to love cause its windows 7 with tons more...sure its missing the round icon in the bottom left corener but if your spending any significant amount of time fiddling with that then your probably spending a whole lot more time fiddling with yourself...time to get your hand off it and take an actual look at what 8 is offering compared with 7 and youll realie its all gonna work out just fine and if not, windows 7 aint going anywhere for agggggeeeessss, so live in that world for as long as you can...heaven forbid youd want to have a tablet that can sync nicely with your desktop.....

its always a case of damned if you do and damned if you dont with MS isnt it??

Every negative response somehow comes from the perspective that you now are forced to use the new start screen against your will, always under all circumstances??? None focus on the most impressive aspects on windows 8 an the fact that you can pretty much live in desktop mode for the rest of your life with the most minimal of metro flavour, if any at all???

Its like the start menu is something these people are using like its their day job??? i mean really, its a fairly ridiculous basis on which to form an oppinion.

How bout he massive speed increases in boot, shutdown, hibernate?

How bout Built in anti-virus, Trusted Boot and improved BitLocker drive encryption, along with AppLocker and claim-based access control

How bout built in Hyper-V (to run that classic goodness if your crying about it so much)

How bout the better multilanguage support

How bout better multi monitor support

How bout smaller memory footprint and better performance on th same hardware, better security, privacy and system reliability

How bout enhanced Task Manager and Windows Explorer

How bout ntegrated windows store

How bout Windows To Go

How bout enhanced DirectAccess and built-in mobile broadband features that natively support 3G and 4G telecommunication

How bout enhanced multi touch support

How bout ie10

Just to name a few

And best of all for developers (ME) you can write code in practically any language and if its targetted to metro it runs on everything and its 1 click publish and sales on the store...Yes actually running tablet and phone apps on my desktop via metro not to mention killer dev tools...pus auto natice cloud sync and support, plus folow on from 1 devcie to next...

No other platform currently is offering that and certainly not for the F*ckOff stupid upgrade price they currently announced...

Love windows 8, theres lots to love cause its windows 7 with tons more...sure its missing the round icon in the bottom left corener but if your spending any significant amount of time fiddling with that then your probably spending a whole lot more time fiddling with yourself...time to get your hand off it and take an actual look at what 8 is offering compared with 7 and youll realie its all gonna work out just fine and if not, windows 7 aint going anywhere for agggggeeeessss, so live in that world for as long as you can...heaven forbid youd want to have a tablet that can sync nicely with your desktop.....

People are always talking about the metro start screen because it's the most blatantly obnoxious in your face (almost literally) change that comes in Windows 8. If we say that we don't like we're told how we're wrong and it's the best thing ever since sliced bread and blah blah blah.

So of course it gets talked about the most. It's been said many times that most people who dislike the metro start screen want all the other new features and improvements that are being added in Windows 8. It's just that the metro start screen is what you see first and taints everything else.

And no, using a third party program to get the same functionality we have now by default is not a solution. What if the people who made one of those particular programs decides they don't want to maintain it anymore and a future windows update breaks it? Then you either have to go in search of another replacement or be stuck with the metro start screen.

Giving people the option to have the start menu that Windows 7 has or the metro start screen hurts nobody and would make most if not all of the criticism against windows 8 go away in a hurry. All the people who like the metro start screen though don't want to discuss that option, they just want to tell us how we're wrong. But if enough people that like the start screen but aren't against having options spoke up about it then maybe there might be a chance Microsoft would be compelled to include the options to have one or the other.

People just want to tell the other side why they are wrong instead of discussing a way to get everyone what they want, even if it's unlikely to make a difference.

You guys took my comment out of context. It's the mess, not the desktop. :sleep: :sleep:

I took it in exactly the context it was meant in... which was your inane assertion that people are incapable of organising their files without the Metro UI.

I took it in exactly the context it was meant in... which was your inane assertion that people are incapable of organising their files without the Metro UI.

I never said anything of the like. Please stop putting words in my mouth. :)

I never said anything of the like. Please stop putting words in my mouth. :)

Then make your point a bit more clearly. Posting a screenshot of 1 person that clearly has no idea how to organise their files properly has nothing to do with the merits of Metro, and what you screenshotted is just as possible in Windows 8 as it was in 7 and Vista.

Well, regardless, I'm staying with Win 7 on my desktop PC. It's only about 14 months old & I'm still just getting into it. I really really like Win 7. I can't think of a single reason why I need to upgrade, well apart from making Microsoft a profit of course. If I buy a computer in the future maybe I'll use Win 8. Maybe I'll wait for Win 9, who knows?

I'm going to stick with Win 7 for as long as it is supported.

I think Windows 8 is an OS designed implicitly for tablets but also encompasses Desktops and Laptops. It's faster than Windows 7 but when I used the charm bar in the CP and RP I somtimes had trouble getting to it with my mouse as I tried to hover( which slowed down my multi tasking by a little).

I can't give a full verdict until a few years after its release, this will depend how will developers will adapt to Metro applications.

Even if it is a massive failure on the desktop?

Well if it were a failure on the desktop I believe they'd be forced to add the old start menu code back in as an option but I still don't think they would remove it completely.

Well if it were a failure on the desktop I believe they'd be forced to add the old start menu code back in as an option but I still don't think they would remove it completely.

I think you guys really have to let it go. Microsoft has never shown any sign of product back tracking when XYZ product "fails". When ME failed, people used Win98, until XP, even after XP was released people went back to 2000 or 98 until Microsoft fixed the security issues it suffered from. XP was an upgraded ME.

When Vista failed, people went back to XP, Vista was then upgraded to Windows 7, which people now love.

If Windows 8 fails to make inroads (Which due to the booming touch market I don't think it will), people will use Windows 7, and Windows 9 will be an upgraded Windows 8. By Windows 9, the hardware market will be a different place, one that still won't allow for a Start Menu anymore. Computing is moving forward not back to the 90's.

So we're back to the "it's new therefore it must be better" argument? sorry, but no. Not all changes are good. And as long as Microsoft keep forcing Metro into versions of Windows that I use you can guarantee that I'll be doing my utmost to hack it out again until they stop making it look like utter crap and disruptive to my workflow.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • inb4 someone leaves the usual "what an unfortunate name" comment
    • Cuktech 10 Ultra charger review: big display, four ports, 110W total power by Taras Buria Cuktech recently announced a couple of Ultra-branded chargers, including a desktop 300W charger, which I reviewed a few weeks ago. For those who do need that much (or who do not want to spend that much on a charger), Cuktech also offers the 10 Ultra, a traditional wall charger with similar features. Four ports, a big display, and up to 110W of power output. After using it for a few weeks, here are my impressions. Disclaimer: Cuktech provided the review unit without any editorial input or pre-approval. Like the 30 Ultra, the 10 Ultra arrived in a box made of nice cardboard with quality print all over it. Inside, besides the charger, you will find a 240W 6A charger, which, this time, is fully braided. While Cuktech always bundles high-power cables with its chargers and power banks, they are usually regular and unassuming. This time, the cable is much nicer, matching the charger's $59.99 price tag. The charger itself measures 67 x 76 x 33 mm or 2.6 x 3.0 x 1.3 inches and weighs about 250 grams. Considering the charger has four ports and a big display, I would say the compact size is quite impressive, albeit a little hefty. The overall design is similar to other chargers from the manufacturer, minus the chrome Cuktech logo next to the four ports. The Cuktech 10 Ultra has retractable prongs for better portability. Its front side is covered with piano black plastic housing two elements: a capacitive button with backlight and a quite large display for various charging stats. Ports are downward-facing, and I have mixed feelings about such a design. It is not the most convenient when you frequently connect and disconnect cables. It makes you bend over to find the right port to connect, and it is a no-go with outlets mounted closer to the floor. On the bright side, design like this eliminates clutter and sagging, especially when using four cables at once. Plus, you get plenty of space for a big display. Ports include two high-speed USB Type-C ports, one Type-C for less demanding devices, and one classic USB Type-A. The first two ports deliver full 100W, while the third is capped at 45W. As for the Type-A port, its maximum output is 18W. In total, the charger delivers 110W of power, but in my testing, I managed to squeeze 117W when charging two power banks and a tablet. Quite impressive. Type-C1 Type-C2 Type-C3 Type-A Single-port 100W 100W 45W 18W Two ports 80W 20W - - Three ports 65W 20W 20W - Four ports 65W 20W 10W 10W The charger can detect handshake protocols and balance power across all four ports according to each device's needs. As such, power is not limited to the values in the table above. You can have two ports charging at 55W, three ports at 45W + 20W, and more. For some reason, Cuktech is not listing the supported protocols, but a quick test showed that it is compatible with PD3.0, PPS, QC5, DCP, and UFCS. When you connect a compatible device, the charger automatically detects its charging standard and displays it on the screen, for example, Apple 6A or Samsung 3A. Speaking of the screen. The main highlight of the 10 Ultra is its 1.57-inch display with a maximum brightness of 700 nits and 160-degree viewing angles. The display takes up most of the front, and it shows various charging-related information, including total output power, current temperature, power distribution across ports with watts, volts, and amps, a screensaver, and more. You can toggle between the different views by tapping the button, and holding it changes the screen orientation (portrait or horizontal, plus flipped) according to your socket position. The screen is very nice. It is sharp, vivid, and the fonts are easy to read. As for settings, you can change the following: Keep the screen on or off Lock the screen orientation (hold the button to change the screen orientation) Keep the USB Type-A port on Toggle power modes The charger has three power modes: AI: standard mode that automatically allocates power to each connected device. Power Priority: prioritizes power for high-demand devices, such as laptops or power banks. Balanced: splits power evenly across connected devices according to their needs I was skeptical at first, but after testing a few devices in different modes, I can see the benefit of these three modes. The most useful is power priority, which gives the first Type-C port more power. When I was charging a 100W power bank (port 1) alongside a 140W power bank (port 2), Power Priority split the total output about 75-30. Balanced mode, as the name suggests, splits the total output between the two ports more or less equally. As for AI mode, the charger uses its brain to detect which device needs more power. In my testing, it figured out that the 140W power needs a bit more juice. As I said, I expected this to be more of a gimmick, but the three built-in modes turned out quite useful. For example, you can prioritize your laptop while giving other ports a little less power, but still enough to charge at acceptable speeds. Unfortunately, unlike the 30 Ultra, this charger cannot display the battery level of the device being charged. This small feature turned out to be very useful when I was testing the 30 Ultra, as it allowed me to see my phone's battery level without picking it up. Like other Cuktech chargers I tested, the 10 Ultra one proved itself reliable and well-made. It uses Gallium nitride semiconductor technology to reduce the charger's size and improve efficiency. It is also better at dissipating heat, but I have to say that when charging two power banks at 117W total, the charger got hotter than what I would call comfortable (hold it for a few seconds, and you start feeling a burning sensation at your fingertips). However, the built-in thermal indicator remained below the temperature threshold, with the screen reassuring that the device operated at "High performance" (I tested it in a 21 °C / 69 °F room). Overall, the Cuktech 10 Ultra is a solid choice. If you need four ports and you like to nerd out on various stats, it is a very easy recommendation. It will take care of your laptop, phone, tablet, and power bank without breaking a sweat, plus the build, material, and cable quality are top-notch. The mode switcher is handy when charging different devices with different power needs, too. I cannot say a display is a must-have in a charger, especially when it makes you more conscious about where to plug it, but it is a neat addition if you have a socket at your table or bed level, so that you can actually use the display and its features. The more important fact is that despite its size and quality, the display does not make the charger that much more expensive than similarly powerful chargers from competitors. Plus, you can save 10% on the 10 Ultra with a promo code on Amazon. Buy Cuktech 10 Ultra charger - $53.99 on Amazon with a promo code As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Last week I was investigating an issue with contacts and tried using the new Outlook. In the real (Classic) Outlook, you can easily go to any Outlook folder and present it in a Table View, then customize the columns to show/sort any field, which was exactly what I needed. But of course, the new Outlook doesn't have this feature at all. I gave up. Oh, and can we possibly stop claiming the new Outlook has PST support? What it really has is the ability to use the real Outlook in the background to pretend to have PST support. There is no PST support without the real Outlook installed.
    • Honestly just before Panos left it started to feel like MS just wasnt interested in them so they were being less innovative with them, and then when he DID leave for Amazon its kind of clear the direction is gone. It felt like Panos had both goals and drive, and a vision, but it felt like no matter what his title/department was the Surface devices never had the full interest of the rest of management and he was just pushing a bolder up a hill that MS was adding dirt to as he went.
    • A roguelike and a 4X strategy game are free to claim on the Epic Games Store by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe The final leg of the Epic Games Store's mystery giveaways promotion just landed, and it brought along two more games to keep. Last week's Lonestar and Calico giveaways have now been replaced with copies of Rogue Waters and Songs of Conquest to claim for PC gamers. As always, the game is yours to add permanently to your Epic Games Store library within the next seven days. Diving into the games, Songs of Conquest is developed by Lavapotion. This is a turn-based 4X strategy experience that has players making tough decisions and participating in tactical combat while also managing their kingdom. "Songs of Conquest is a turn-based strategy game inspired by 90s classics. Lead powerful magicians called Wielders and venture to lands unknown," explains the developer. "Wage battles against armies that dare oppose you, hunt for powerful artifacts and expand your territory. The world is ripe for the taking – seize it." Meanwhile, Rogue Waters comes from developer Ice Code Games. This rogue-lite experience has you taking the role of Captain Cutter as he commands his ship and crew through procedurally generated encounters. You'll be recruiting and training crew, use sea creatures, and battle with other ships and pirates. "Set sail as Captain Cutter, a pirate caught in a deadly struggle for power and vengeance," adds the developer. "Navigate dangerous waters, unleash mythical sea creatures, and outwit enemies as you chase legendary treasure and confront dark secrets." The newly available Rogue Waters and Songs of Conquest giveaways on the Epic Games Store are set to run until June 11, giving PC gamers seven days to claim the latest offer. Once this closes out, a new freebie will take its place on the same day, which is slated to be Warhammer 40K Speed Freeks. Don't forget that mobile gamers can check out the Epic Game Store's weekly giveaways on Android and iOS to grab a freebie there as well.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      mobandz earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Apprentice
      fernan99 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • One Month Later
      nothanks earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      B2Proxy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      MadMung0 earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      478
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      247
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      79
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      76
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      60
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!