Microsoft, THIS is what Metro UI on Desktop Should Look Like! Community


Recommended Posts

People that talk about the icons needing to be changed, they're doing it, we'll see more as we get closer to RTM. We don't know how new or old that build is at this point. Sure it's post-RP but the RP has been out for a bit already.

let hope they fix icon chrome size

they look **** ugly in start screen

Yes it's awesome to finally have an updated version of Windows 2.0. :rolleyes: Actually curious how this 'new' GUI fits in with recent news that the Gov. has moles planted in Microsoft, which IS a reason to ditch Microsofts products.

Yes it's awesome to finally have an updated version of Windows 2.0. :rolleyes: Actually curious how this 'new' GUI fits in with recent news that the Gov. has moles planted in Microsoft, which IS a reason to ditch Microsofts products.

recent news? wow welcome to the 1990s... everyones known that MS and the gov works together since then on "things"

Well, Microsoft, from what we have seen so far, almost no one is happy with what you are doing with the desktop ...

Well , that first statement is a bit daft to start with ... almost no one??

.. as for the design , no thanks , not for me.

I'm not a big "Metro" fan, but I gotta agree.. this is 100 times better than the crap Microsoft will release.

I like the "close", "minimize" and "maximize" buttons... You want to go Metro Microsoft? Do it properly or keep Aero for God's sake!!!

Poor us, Windows users... lol

Just for your information, I hate the Windows 7 Aero interface. I like the metro UI and the digitally authentic concept. But the desktop itself looks ugly, and I really hope MS can make the desktop look beautiful using the metro design concept.

Well the actual UI isn't far off that. Probably will be refined even further till the final product is released

we still have windows 98 era icons in windows 7/2008R2.

we still have windows 98 era icons in windows 7/2008R2.

Yuk, 98's icons were really bad. Personally most icons on Windows I can't stand. Ever since I started using OSX, I fell in love with the graphics on that side of the fence.

Yuk, 98's icons were really bad. Personally most icons on Windows I can't stand. Ever since I started using OSX, I fell in love with the graphics on that side of the fence.

Has anyone found any dated icons in OSX????

Has anyone found any dated icons in OSX????

Up until Mountain Lion, the camera icon for taking screenshots was lifted straight out of NeXTstep. And it took until Lion for the original Aqua-style widgets to be retired.

Beyond that, no, Mac OS X doesn't seem to have many legacy icons, but that's because it was a completely new code base from the classic Mac OS.

Yeah, nice. I could live with that. Don't know what the hell is going on with Microsoft and Metro right now. Billion dollars and dudes in online forums produce better concepts. Yeah, I have an issue with that. Something is really wrong at MS in the UI/Graphic Design areas.

I'm not a big "Metro" fan, but I gotta agree.. this is 100 times better than the crap Microsoft will release.

I like the "close", "minimize" and "maximize" buttons... You want to go Metro Microsoft? Do it properly or keep Aero for God's sake!!!

Just asking, take a look at the real one again. The window controls in this mockup are exactly what MS did in the real thing.

Microsoft are limited in the amount they can change without potentially breaking older apps. Also without window borders it because a lot more difficult to use touch to resize them.

I would like to be able to change the accent colour, and have it effect icons, and the status bar, taskbar etc Not sure if this would be possible with the theme system as it is.

The Icons need to be much more Metro-fied, just look at Visual Studio 2012 and Office 2013

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Qualcomm takes on NVIDIA with new Dragonfly CPU and AI chips by Pradeep Viswanathan Microsoft, Google, Amazon, AMD, Meta, Apple, OpenAI, and several others have been developing their own chips for AI infrastructure. However, NVIDIA still remains the dominant player in the market. Today, Qualcomm announced a major expansion of its data center infrastructure portfolio to better compete with NVIDIA. The new lineup includes the Qualcomm Dragonfly C1000 CPU, Qualcomm High Bandwidth Compute technology, the Dragonfly AI300 inference accelerator, new connectivity products, and custom silicon solutions. Qualcomm claims that this new lineup improves performance per watt, token throughput, and total cost of ownership for AI data centers. The Dragonfly C1000 is a new data center CPU built with Qualcomm’s custom Oryon cores. This chip will feature more than 250 cores, frequencies above 5GHz, and a chiplet-based design. Qualcomm claims that this new C1000 can deliver more than 2x better performance per watt compared to existing server CPU offerings based on specifications. The Dragonfly C1000 will support PCIe Gen 7 with more than 2TB/s of connectivity, along with CXL, advanced RAS features, and both air and liquid cooling. Qualcomm expects the Dragonfly C1000 to be commercially available in 2028. Additionally, Qualcomm and Meta announced a multi-year, multi-generation agreement under which Qualcomm will supply Dragonfly C1000 data center CPUs for Meta’s next-generation server fleet. Qualcomm also announced High Bandwidth Compute, a new near-memory computing architecture designed to address AI’s memory bandwidth bottleneck. HBC Gen 1 will debut with the Dragonfly AI250, which is expected to sample in mid-2027. The AI250 will deliver 133TB/s per card, an 18x increase in effective memory bandwidth compared to the AI200 with LPDDR5X. The new Dragonfly AI300 with HBC Gen 2 is a rack-level AI inference platform from Qualcomm. Qualcomm claims that the AI300 can deliver 4x to 8x better performance per watt compared to existing GPU-based architectures based on memory bandwidth per watt per card. The Dragonfly AI300 is expected to be available in 2028.
    • IBM reveals sub-1nm chip technology, production expected in another 5 years by Pradeep Viswanathan TSMC is now leading the chip manufacturing industry with its 2nm-class process node called N2. Samsung Foundry also has a 2nm-class process node called SF2. TSMC says N2 entered volume production in Q4 2025. Samsung says SF2 started mass production in 2025. Today, IBM announced the world’s first sub-1-nanometer chip technology, marking another major semiconductor research milestone. The new technology is based on a 0.7nm, or 7-angstrom, node and uses a new transistor architecture called “nanostack.” The new design vertically stacks and staggers nanosheet-based transistors so that more components can fit into the same chip area while also improving performance and power efficiency. IBM claims that this new sub-1nm chip can pack nearly 100 billion transistors onto a chip the size of a fingernail. This offers almost twice the density, up to 50 percent higher performance, or 70 percent better energy efficiency when compared to IBM's 2nm node design announced back in 2021. Also, IBM mentioned that this new architecture can deliver 40 percent SRAM scaling. It is important to consider that this announcement from IBM is a research milestone rather than a near-term process node launch. Back in 2021, IBM unveiled the world’s first 2nm chip design, claiming 50 billion transistors on a fingernail-sized chip and major performance and efficiency gains. Five years later, IBM’s 2nm technology has still not entered mainstream commercial production. That is because IBM is no longer a major commercial chip manufacturer. It sold its chip manufacturing business to GlobalFoundries years ago and has since then focused only on semiconductor research, IP development, and partnerships. To productize its 2-nm chip technology, IBM partnered with Japan’s Rapidus, but it has not resulted in anything shipping at scale. IBM says that its new sub-1nm technology can reach production as early as within the next five years. If that happens, it will likely depend on manufacturing partners, advanced EUV tooling, and years of yield improvements.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Meta Plast earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      kinowa earned a badge
      First Post
    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      454
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      135
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Xenon
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!