Microsoft, THIS is what Metro UI on Desktop Should Look Like! Community


Recommended Posts

People that talk about the icons needing to be changed, they're doing it, we'll see more as we get closer to RTM. We don't know how new or old that build is at this point. Sure it's post-RP but the RP has been out for a bit already.

let hope they fix icon chrome size

they look **** ugly in start screen

Yes it's awesome to finally have an updated version of Windows 2.0. :rolleyes: Actually curious how this 'new' GUI fits in with recent news that the Gov. has moles planted in Microsoft, which IS a reason to ditch Microsofts products.

Yes it's awesome to finally have an updated version of Windows 2.0. :rolleyes: Actually curious how this 'new' GUI fits in with recent news that the Gov. has moles planted in Microsoft, which IS a reason to ditch Microsofts products.

recent news? wow welcome to the 1990s... everyones known that MS and the gov works together since then on "things"

Well, Microsoft, from what we have seen so far, almost no one is happy with what you are doing with the desktop ...

Well , that first statement is a bit daft to start with ... almost no one??

.. as for the design , no thanks , not for me.

I'm not a big "Metro" fan, but I gotta agree.. this is 100 times better than the crap Microsoft will release.

I like the "close", "minimize" and "maximize" buttons... You want to go Metro Microsoft? Do it properly or keep Aero for God's sake!!!

Poor us, Windows users... lol

Just for your information, I hate the Windows 7 Aero interface. I like the metro UI and the digitally authentic concept. But the desktop itself looks ugly, and I really hope MS can make the desktop look beautiful using the metro design concept.

Well the actual UI isn't far off that. Probably will be refined even further till the final product is released

we still have windows 98 era icons in windows 7/2008R2.

we still have windows 98 era icons in windows 7/2008R2.

Yuk, 98's icons were really bad. Personally most icons on Windows I can't stand. Ever since I started using OSX, I fell in love with the graphics on that side of the fence.

Yuk, 98's icons were really bad. Personally most icons on Windows I can't stand. Ever since I started using OSX, I fell in love with the graphics on that side of the fence.

Has anyone found any dated icons in OSX????

Has anyone found any dated icons in OSX????

Up until Mountain Lion, the camera icon for taking screenshots was lifted straight out of NeXTstep. And it took until Lion for the original Aqua-style widgets to be retired.

Beyond that, no, Mac OS X doesn't seem to have many legacy icons, but that's because it was a completely new code base from the classic Mac OS.

Yeah, nice. I could live with that. Don't know what the hell is going on with Microsoft and Metro right now. Billion dollars and dudes in online forums produce better concepts. Yeah, I have an issue with that. Something is really wrong at MS in the UI/Graphic Design areas.

I'm not a big "Metro" fan, but I gotta agree.. this is 100 times better than the crap Microsoft will release.

I like the "close", "minimize" and "maximize" buttons... You want to go Metro Microsoft? Do it properly or keep Aero for God's sake!!!

Just asking, take a look at the real one again. The window controls in this mockup are exactly what MS did in the real thing.

Microsoft are limited in the amount they can change without potentially breaking older apps. Also without window borders it because a lot more difficult to use touch to resize them.

I would like to be able to change the accent colour, and have it effect icons, and the status bar, taskbar etc Not sure if this would be possible with the theme system as it is.

The Icons need to be much more Metro-fied, just look at Visual Studio 2012 and Office 2013

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Free Software Foundation Europe pushes EU to force Google to allow AI uninstalls on Android by Paul Hill Credit: Pexels Users should be able to fully uninstall AI-based features from Android devices and be able to access interoperability functions, free from Google’s verification requirements, the European Commission has heard as part of an Android interoperability consultation under the Digital Markets Act. These measures were proposed by the Free Software Foundation Europe (FSFE) last week when it submitted its documentation. The FSFE noted that Google had started silently installing AI models without telling users. It noted that the EU’s DMA requires companies like Google to allow users to uninstall pre-loaded software from their devices, but in the case of the AI models Google is installing, they reinstall if you delete them, contravening the DMA. To get Google back under control, the FSFE has told the European Commission that there needs to be improvements within the Android Open Source Project (AOSP). First, it said that users should be able to fully remove pre-loaded AI components from their devices, with companies being prohibited from silently reinstalling or reactivating them. Second, access to Android interoperability features should not be contingent on registration, authorization, or contractual relationships with Google. This pertains to Google’s attempt to force developers to register with Google, even to publish apps to alternative app stores like F-Droid. Discussing its submission, Lucas Lasota, FSFE Legal Programme Manager, said: Google is planning to roll out its Android Developer Certification in September 2026. This will force every Android app developer to register with Google before their software can be installed on certified Android devices, but it should affect those who have removed Google Apps from their device. The program is controversial because it entails the signing of contracts and payment of account fees to Google, as well as the handing over of the identities of developers. It said: The FSFE said that if the Commission’s draft measures remain unchanged, then Google will be allowed to make developers verify their identity. The FSFE believes that asking developers to register is contrary to the text and spirit of the law. In summary, the FSFE has told the Commission that no developer should need a Google account, a Play Store presence, or any agreement with Google to access Android’s interoperability features.
    • You could disable this "functionality/feature/whatever" with 2 registry keys, ages ago.
    • My Photos app is version 2026.11050.1001.0 and it remembers the window size and position. My Snipping Tool is version 11.2602.49.0 and it can capture the taskbar.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      519
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      185
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      87
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      81
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!