Recommended Posts

Exactly. The foreskin can trap all sorts of nasty bacteria and can increase the risk of contracting an STD.

What jew told you that?

Edit: For the record, I am circumcised and wish I would of had the choice.

We shouldn't be doing cosmetic surgery on children.

That's great, we shouldn't, except to Muslims and Jews it's not a cosmetic surgery, it's a religious practice.

You're not seriously comparing a cancer with a foreskin, are you? Nobody can be that asinine.

Both are natural, are they not? Should we let babies born with deformities (that pose no health hazard whatsoever) live with them and not remove them when it's possible? Should we abolish the health care system globally and let nature take its course? Should we listen to religious people and follow their advice and/or "law"?

What's more is that there amount of deaths recorded when compared to the number of surgeries is ridiculously low, it's practically an impossibility here in Israel for a baby to die because of a circumcision.

that has to be the dumbest comparison I've ever seen.

While male and female cirucmcision might not be exactly the same I'll tell you how it does compare. Society sees violence against men, and even infant male children whom have no ability to consent, as perfectly acceptable while we freak out and abhorr consentual female cirumcision and banned it immediately and everyone felt morally justified in that decision.. AND THEY WERE MORALLY JUSTIFIED. It's time that men receive equality too now and end violence against infant children.

Circumcision is not a violent act, female circumcision has nothing to do with this thread, this is solely about male circumcision, both are worlds apart.

Like I said, this is purely an attack on religion, there aren't enough incidents for this ban to be justified, why didn't Germany ban beer yet? Way more people hurt themselves and die because of alcohol, why the hell is it still freely available to society?

What's disgusting is that you're playing the children card when in reality it's just another "HAH IN YOUR FACE, RELIGION" moment for you.

That's great, we shouldn't, except to Muslims and Jews it's not a cosmetic surgery, it's a religious practice.

We also shouldn't force religious practices on people before they can choose for themselves. Doing it for religious reasons is even more stupid.

Circumcision is not a violent act, female circumcision has nothing to do with this thread, this is solely about male circumcision, both are worlds apart.

Like I said, this is purely an attack on religion, there aren't enough incidents for this ban to be justified, why didn't Germany ban beer yet? Way more people hurt themselves and die because of alcohol, why the hell is it still freely available to society?

What's disgusting is that you're playing the children card when in reality it's just another "HAH IN YOUR FACE, RELIGION" moment for you.

Yes it is violent. And my basis for being happy about this isn't based on a bias against religion. It's based on the fact I'm sick of seeing boys being treated as so disposable that within days of their birth that they make it painfully clear by removing part of their body.

  • Like 1

How long till its illegal to have your daughters get ear piercings.... Sigh, society moving backwards as always.

Disagree, an ear piercing cause's no permanent change to the body.

You can remove the stud/ring and never know it had been pierced. Whereas with circumcision this is not the case now is it.?

Both are natural, are they not? Should we let babies born with deformities (that pose no health hazard whatsoever) live with them and not remove them when it's possible? Should we abolish the health care system globally and let nature take its course? Should we listen to religious people and follow their advice and/or "law"?

What's more is that there amount of deaths recorded when compared to the number of surgeries is ridiculously low, it's practically an impossibility here in Israel for a baby to die because of a circumcision.

WTF?

Comparing something life threatening like cancer to circumcision is probably the most asinine thing that I've heard. :angry:

The fact that there is ANY risk of possible death due to circumcision just gives more weight to it being ****ing wrong.

If you ignore your religious rhetoric for 5 seconds and look at from a medical perspective, you'd realize that it just yet another outdated practice like removing tonsils.

What's disgusting is that you're playing the children card when in reality it's just another "HAH IN YOUR FACE, RELIGION" moment for you.

Religions have dictated a variety of senseless, stupid and meaningless acts in history, many of which have been banned a long time ago in every single civilized country in the world.

Do I really need to start cherry picking some examples of things that are banned today in Israel that were mandated to be legal and acceptable in your Bible? Do we really, really need to go there?

That's great, we shouldn't, except to Muslims and Jews it's not a cosmetic surgery, it's a religious practice.

Incorrect, it's a cosmetic surgery. The only valid reason for circumcision that's NOT cosmetic surgery, is medical necessity. Trying to justify it as a religious practice doesn't stop it being a cosmetic surgery.

Both are natural, are they not? Should we let babies born with deformities (that pose no health hazard whatsoever) live with them and not remove them when it's possible? Should we abolish the health care system globally and let nature take its course? Should we listen to religious people and follow their advice and/or "law"?

Cancers and deformities, whilst occurring in the body, are NOT natural. They are malfunctions either in the developmental process or in the cell structure.

What's more is that there amount of deaths recorded when compared to the number of surgeries is ridiculously low, it's practically an impossibility here in Israel for a baby to die because of a circumcision.

It's not about how many babies die. It's about removing a part of their body without their consent. That it's also done without any form of anaesthesia is just barbaric.

Like I said, this is purely an attack on religion, there aren't enough incidents for this ban to be justified, why didn't Germany ban beer yet? Way more people hurt themselves and die because of alcohol, why the hell is it still freely available to society?

What's disgusting is that you're playing the children card when in reality it's just another "HAH IN YOUR FACE, RELIGION" moment for you.

Beer IS banned, for children. You must be a consenting adult to drink it, so your point is irrelevant

As for religion, it should NOT be granted ANY legal exceptions to anything, ever.

Circumcision is common in Africa, Australia, the Middle East and North America.

Circumcision in Australia is relatively uncommon and is currently only performed on 10-20% of boys. Even in the US, only a minority of boys are circumcised with about 32% currently being subjected to the procedure. The rates are continually dropping in both countries.

At the end of the day it doesn't matter each way, the person can be perfectly normal with or without, and banning it is nothing more than making a statement about something they don't really understand and is really about sending a big FU to religions involved. Say hello to the 4th Reich.

Ignoring the obvious Godwinism, it's cleart that you didn't read the article. If you had you would have seen that one of the reasons the court reached it's decision was in defence of religious freedom - the child's religious freedom. By forcing circumcision on a baby the parents are effectively imposing a particular religion on their son and limiting his freedom to choose his own religion.

I also think it's interesting that you'd seek to defend religions that think it's alright to brutalise babies.

1. Incorrect, it's a cosmetic surgery. The only valid reason for circumcision that's NOT cosmetic surgery, is medical necessity. Trying to justify it as a religious practice doesn't stop it being a cosmetic surgery.

2. Cancers and deformities, whilst occurring in the body, are NOT natural. They are malfunctions either in the developmental process or in the cell structure.

3. It's not about how many babies die. It's about removing a part of their body without their consent. That it's also done without any form of anaesthesia is just barbaric.

4. Beer IS banned, for children. You must be a consenting adult to drink it, so your point is irrelevant

5. As for religion, it should NOT be granted ANY legal exceptions to anything, ever.

1. Fine, it's a cosmetic surgery, but with a heavy religious influence.

2. They are most certainly natural.

3. So now it's the consent issue, along with outrages claims that it's "barbaric", there's nothing barbaric about it, else you'd bitch and moan about how 8 days old babies are subjected to anesthesia and ****.

4. That wasn't my point. Beer is still being produced and it's a bloody disaster when compared to circumcision, even if you take the huge difference in the amount of people both things apply to, like circumcision only applies to babies and the % of incidents is so low that it's ridiculous, beer is available to every adult in (mostly) every country, and the % of incidents is way higher when compared to that of circumcisions'.

5. Thanks for proving my point, it's all about religion, you don't give two ****s about children or the actual incidents, it's just another front to attack religion.

Why the **** can't you be a normal Atheist, like me?

Before commenting bull**** replies (as most did, hence I only replied to you), you should really do a small scale research about circumcision, many of the posts here are so ignorant and the people behind them don't even try to hide the fact that they know **** about it.

Consent in babies is a bull**** concept.

The only thing that perhaps should be changed is anesthesia, that's it.

1: and why should cosmetic surgeries on babies be allowed because or religion, you still haven't answered this

2: Natural but abnormal, foreskin however is NORMAL

3: What's wrong with the consent issue ? it ties in with everythign else, the "person" should be able to chose if something is cut of and what if any religion he should follow.

4: not sure what you're arguing here but it seems to be another one of those comparing it to somethign completely irrelevant arguments so I'll ignore it as irrelevant

5: And why should Religions have special Exceptions to laws? why should the "person" when he's old enough be allowed to chose his own religion and what if any body mods his religion should perform on him ?

So as you said, before commenting bull**** replied, do some research and answer the actual questions that's been given to you.

Why should it be given special exceptions because it's a religion(not that's not an attack on religion, it's merely making them follow the same laws and rules as everyone else) and why should the person be allowed to chose for himself ?

yes, consent for babies is BS, so that's why you wait till 16-18. there is NO reason to force it on a baby and thus person.

2. They are most certainly natural.

Only in the sense that they occur in the body. However, they're cell malfunctions, so are rightly considered UNnatural.

3. So now it's the consent issue, along with outrages claims that it's "barbaric", there's nothing barbaric about it, else you'd bitch and moan about how 8 days old babies are subjected to anesthesia and ****.

Of course it's a consent issue, that's the ENTIRE point of this. A baby cannot consent to being mutilated, only an adult can. And ANY kind of cutting of the body is barbaric where no pain relief is involved.

4. That wasn't my point. Beer is still being produced and it's a bloody disaster when compared to circumcision, even if you take the huge difference in the amount of people both things apply to, like circumcision only applies to babies and the % of incidents is so low that it's ridiculous, beer is available to every adult in (mostly) every country, and the % of incidents is way higher when compared to that of circumcisions'.

Again, beer is something people CHOOSE to drink. Circumcision is something DONE to a baby, without consent. The two cannot be compared.

5. Thanks for proving my point, it's all about religion, you don't give two ****s about children or the actual incidents, it's just another front to attack religion.

Why the **** can't you be a normal Atheist, like me?

Seeing as religion is the root for this practice, it deserves to be pulled up on it.

I think I'm still most impressed that Germany has stood up to the religious pressure from the Jews. As one poster already did here, misplaced screams of anti-semitism is always a sure way to make modern Germans second guess themselves. Hell, we saw the same religious backlash and much louder screams of anti-semitism (gods I hate that charge) in Cali when they started talking about it there too.

Maybe if Hitler would have done this the exodus would have been less bloody. :whistle:

Circumcision in Australia is relatively uncommon and is currently only performed on 10-20% of boys. Even in the US, only a minority of boys are circumcised with about 32% currently being subjected to the procedure. The rates are continually dropping in both countries.

32% in the US? You mean the last 10 years or last 5 years? I understand it was over 90% 10 years ago.

32% in the US? You mean the last 10 years or last 5 years? I understand it was over 90% 10 years ago.

Yes, that's right. That's why I said the rates are dropping and and used the word "currently". Rates were much higher in the past, especially in the '50s and '60s. Presumably thanks to better education rates, people now realise that the practice is not only unnecessary but abhorrent.

You know what I hate ? Specific laws. If it's really what it is about just make it illegal to modify a children's body in any way before he/she can have an educated opinion. No piercings, no circumcision, hell maybe the guy wants his hair long so no haircuts.

Objectively, I think we are in very delicate times. While there is certainly a certain truth about the right of children to decide for themselves later on, I think that we are moving towards societies where the parents have very little say about how they want to raise their own children. In my opinion, it shouldn't be illegal for parents to raise their children in accordance to their own convictions as long as they don't harm him. Circumcision is far from being harmful, it's not healthier either mind you, it just makes your life a little easier.

Really? Who here would absolutely miss their foreskin? Don't give me that bull**** about it making you less sensitive because half of you would bust a nut in under two minutes anyway.

I think you have no clue what you're talking about, no in fact I know you don't.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Dude, im talking about simply disable it from settings app. Because of the eu regulation, you could disable it here for years.
    • One big question about Mars was answered thanks to Einstein's 100 year old theory by Sayan Sen Image via DepositPhotos Scientists at the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) have calculated how time passes on Mars compared with Earth, adding detail to how timekeeping would need to work beyond Earth’s orbit. The study, published in The Astronomical Journal, found that clocks on Mars run an average of 477 microseconds, or millionths of a second, faster per day than clocks on Earth. A microsecond is one millionth of a second, a very small unit used in precise scientific timing systems such as atomic clocks, which measure time using consistent atomic behavior. This difference is not constant. Because Mars moves around the Sun in a non-circular path (an eccentric orbit, meaning its distance from the Sun changes over time instead of staying fixed) and is affected by gravity from other bodies, the daily difference can vary by as much as 226 microseconds over a Martian year. The study also identifies smaller repeating changes of about 40 microseconds per day linked to synodic cycles (repeating periods that describe how planets line up with each other as they orbit the Sun from different positions). These longer patterns affect how time differences slowly rise and fall. To make these estimates, researchers compared Mars with Earth and the Moon. The work looks at relativistic proper time (the time actually measured by a clock depending on its speed and the strength of gravity where it is located, as described in Einstein’s relativity). This shows that each world has its own slightly different “rate” of time. This becomes more important as space missions expand into cislunar space (the region between Earth and the Moon) and toward Mars. On Earth, time systems rely on atomic clocks and satellites, which stay closely synchronized for navigation and communication. The study is based on Albert Einstein’s theory of relativity, which shows that time is affected by gravity and motion. Stronger gravity makes clocks run slower, while weaker gravity makes them run faster. “The time is just right for the Moon and Mars,” said NIST physicist Bijunath Patla. “This is the closest we have been to realizing the science fiction vision of expanding across the solar system.” A day on Mars is about 40 minutes longer than on Earth, and a Martian year lasts 687 Earth days. But the main question is not just about days and years, but how fast time itself passes. An atomic clock placed on Mars would function normally, but compared with one on Earth, the two would slowly drift apart due to differences in gravity and motion. This requires careful calculation of what is similar to a time-zone difference across planets. Researchers modeled Mars using a reference surface and included gravitational effects from the Sun, Earth, the Moon, and other planets. This includes a multi-body gravitational system (often described as a three-body or four-body problem, where predicting motion becomes difficult because multiple large objects all pull on each other at the same time through gravity). Mars also follows a Keplerian orbit (an idealized elliptical orbit based on simple gravitational laws that assume smooth motion, before adding real-world disturbances from other bodies). In addition, the researchers accounted for solar tides (small changes in gravitational force caused by the Sun that slightly distort planetary motion and timing, especially in systems involving Earth and the Moon). These combined effects are described as relativistic proper-time offsets (small but measurable differences in elapsed time between locations caused by gravity and motion), which must be included when comparing clocks across planets. “But for Mars, that’s not the case. Its distance from the Sun and its eccentric orbit make the variations in time larger. A three-body problem is extremely complicated. Now we’re dealing with four: the Sun, Earth, the Moon and Mars,” Patla explained. “The heavy lifting was more challenging than I initially thought.” Although the differences are extremely small, they matter for navigation and communication systems that depend on precise timing. Even modern networks on Earth, such as mobile systems, rely on timing accuracy at very small fractions of a second. Communication between Earth and Mars currently takes about four to 24 minutes or more depending on planetary positions, meaning signals are not real-time. A shared and accurate time system could help future missions reduce confusion in navigation and data exchange. “If you get synchronization, it will be almost like real-time communication without any loss of information. You don’t have to wait to see what happens,” Patla said. Researchers note that fully developed interplanetary communication networks are still far in the future. However, understanding how time behaves across planets helps prepare for those systems. “It may be decades before the surface of Mars is covered by the tracks of wandering rovers, but it is useful now to study the issues involved in establishing navigation systems on other planets and moons,” said Neil Ashby. “Like current global navigation systems like GPS, these systems will depend on accurate clocks, and the effects on clock rates can be analyzed with the help of Einstein’s general theory of relativity.” Patla added that the results also help improve understanding of time itself under relativity. “It's good to know for the first time what is happening on Mars timewise. Nobody knew that before. It improves our knowledge of the theory itself, the theory of how clocks tick and relativity,” he said. Source: NIST, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 by Razvan Serea TeraCopy is a compact program designed to copy and move files at the maximum possible speed, also providing you with a lot of features. Copy files faster. TeraCopy uses dynamically adjusted buffers to reduce seek times. Asynchronous copy speeds up file transfer between two physical hard drives. Pause and resume transfers. Pause copy process at any time to free up system resources and continue with a single click. Error recovery. In case of copy error, TeraCopy will try several times and in the worse case just skips the file, not terminating the entire transfer. Interactive file list. TeraCopy shows failed file transfers and lets you fix the problem and recopy only problem files. Shell integration. TeraCopy can completely replace Explorer copy and move functions, allowing you work with files as usual. TeraCopy is free for non-commercial use only. For commercial use you need to buy a license. The paid version of the program includes the following features: Copy/move to your favorite folders. Save reports as HTML and CSV files. Select files with the same extension/folder. Remove the selected files from the copy queue. TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 changelog: Added support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. Improved exception handling and automated bug report upload. Fixed several minor bugs and small memory leaks. Build 26 (June 24) Fixed a rare exception when a transfer completed. Features added since version 3.17: Enhanced speed graph. New multi-threaded copy engine. Support for copying to multiple targets. Queue system for managing multiple copy operations. Support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. TeraCopy entry in the modern Windows Explorer context menu. Integrated toolbar in the title bar. Why receive LocalSend transfers with TeraCopy? Handle file conflicts: Skip, overwrite, or rename files when a file with the same name already exists. LocalSend always creates another copy, which can waste time and disk space, especially when resuming an interrupted transfer. Filter unwanted files: Apply ignore lists or remove files manually before accepting a transfer, so unnecessary files are not downloaded. Better performance on fast networks: In tests over a 10 Gbps connection, TeraCopy received files several times faster than the standard LocalSend app on Windows. Download: TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 | 14.5 MB (Freeware, paid upgrade available) View: TeraCopy Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Briefly used Turbo Pascal (and Turbo C++) in 97 and soon after that I bought PC magazine that included a full version of Delphi 2. I still use Delphi today, some 29 years later.
    • Age of Empires Mobile comes to PC, here's how to carry over progress from your phone by Ivan Jenic Image: YouTube/Microsoft Microsoft just released Age of Empires Mobile for PC. The game, officially called Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, is available for free on Steam and Microsoft Store, almost two years after its initial release for handheld devices. Age of Empires is one of those franchises that entire generations grew up with. The original came out in 1997, and immediately got people hooked to building civilizations and crushing their enemies on the battlefield. However, the franchise today is a far cry from its roots, as Age of Empires Mobile is, well, a game optimized for handheld devices, and not a classic RTS title we’ve all loved for years. And, of course, it includes in-game purchases. The PC version is still a mobile game at its core, but it’s been optimized for desktop play. There’s mouse control, full keyboard compatibility, and a refined UI. Microsoft also refreshed the visuals with some 4k textures, so the game should look better on larger screens. The game supports Crossplay, so you can switch between your phone, tablet, and PC without losing anything. But linked progress doesn’t come out of the box, as you have to enable it first. Here’s how to link your progress: On your mobile device, open Age of Empires Mobile. Go to Settings (Gear icon) > Account. Select Bind Account and choose a sign-in option. Once you enable account binding, sign in on PC using the same method, and your progress will be accessible across all your devices. Xbox Game Pass subscribers also get a bonus reward pack on PC, which includes: 1 Monthly Pass Token 1 Custom Resource Chest 10 Universal 60-Minute Speed-Ups 1,000 Empire Coins Exclusive Player Portrait Frame You can find more info about Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, as well as download links, on the Age of Empires official website.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      458
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!