Mountain Lion = ....meh?


Recommended Posts

It's not for the devs, it's for the users running programs made by devs that aren't around anymore.

It's going to be a consideration between cost/benefit of keeping Rosetta support in OS X Mountain Lion. Providing support for those few PPC-only installers most likely isn't going to be worth it. Once again, you can still execute said PPC-only installer packages without Rosetta.

Add to the problem with Mac OS X arbitrary cut offs along with Microsoft Office more or less completely abandoned in favour of focusing on Office for Windows we have the final leg of the chair that keeps me using a Mac - without Microsoft Office for Mac I'm stuck in a situation where by I can't do the work I need from home and thus I'll be forced back to using Windows.

What's wrong with Office:Mac 2011? Has Microsoft made an announcement they're not working on a new version of Office:Mac that I've missed?

It would be silly of Microsoft to not implement some of the great features found in their competitors' products. Their products wouldn't be very competitive or successful if they didn't.

Microsoft could have given it their own twist instead of an almost 1:1 ripoff. Luckily Apple since moved on and gave their own new twist to their own concept. In the end it doesn't matter so much. Mission Control/Expos? is fully integrated into the OS whereas Microsoft's clone is just a slapped on solution that's bundled with their touch mouse.

  • Like 3
What's wrong with Office:Mac 2011?

Failure to fix long standing bugs for starters - why can't it read my language settings (System Preferences) as British English when my keyboard is set to Australian? dumb crap like that annoys me - then add to the problem of documents saved in one language and when I open it on my computer the Office application doesn't over ride the document language with the one I prefer.

Has Microsoft made an announcement they're not working on a new version of Office:Mac that I've missed?

There announcement that there will be no new release (normally it follows 12 months after the Windows version) in favour of providing a minor update. In other words Microsoft has abandoned Mac users.

Failure to fix long standing bugs for starters - why can't it read my language settings (System Preferences) as British English when my keyboard is set to Australian? dumb crap like that annoys me - then add to the problem of documents saved in one language and when I open it on my computer the Office application doesn't over ride the document language with the one I prefer.

Those are good points, except that I have the same issues when using the Windows version of Office as well.

There announcement that there will be no new release (normally it follows 12 months after the Windows version) in favour of providing a minor update.

Source? As far as I'm aware all they said was that they hadn't yet " announced the next release of Office for Mac" and that there were no plans for an Office 2013 for the Mac, which is not exactly surprising or unexpected as the Windows and Mac version are on different schedules?!

If I remember correctly, Microsoft actually has a pretty good business going, selling Office to Mac users.

  • Like 2

I thought it was a incredibly dumb question AppleInsider asked Microsoft. Of course there isn't going to be a Microsoft Office 2013 for Mac. As long as I can remember the Mac and Windows versions have been released in different years. Nowhere did Microsoft reps say there won't be an Office 2014 for Mac. So yeah, I interpreted it exactly the same way as CJEric.

http://www.appleinsi...r_mac_2013.html

  • Like 2

Well don't assume because that just makes you look stupid when you're wrong. :)

Yea that's why I said "I don't think". Your description of how you use Aero Peek didn't make much sense hence my assumption. ;-)

Updated (clean install) to Mountain Lion this morning. I can't get along with the new Safari. I don't like how the tabs spread across the whole window, and I hate how the address bar doesn't take focus in a new window/tab.

I can't stand the spreading out, too... Maybe it will grow on to me and make sense eventually. :p

I think the main feature for me is the iMessage on ML, makes it much easier for me to reply to messages on my phone when I am on my mac!

Does it sync all your previous iMessages from my iPhone to Mesages on my Mac?

That'd be awesome, until then, I might disable it and wait...

If I get a mirrored experience, it should be complete.

Not only developers get access to ML. You can be Beta tester as well. I am not a dev, but I do have access to ML ;)

Torrents or AppleSeed? :)

Source? As far as I'm aware all they said was that they hadn't yet " announced the next release of Office for Mac" and that there were no plans for an Office 2013 for the Mac, which is not exactly surprising or unexpected as the Windows and Mac version are on different schedules?!

If I remember correctly, Microsoft actually has a pretty good business going, selling Office to Mac users.

*phew* I was shocked for a moment! :laugh:

And yea, iWork needs some TLC ASAP.

It's getting ridiculous - almost as bad as the eternal wait for the new Mac Pro.

I was close to getting one, but I thought I'd rather not buy a super outdated "new" device, so I got an iMac again and I'm pleased with it. :yes:

Next desktop Mac will probably be a Mac Pro finally.

Glassed Silver:mac

There announcement that there will be no new release (normally it follows 12 months after the Windows version) in favour of providing a minor update. In other words Microsoft has abandoned Mac users.

Not necessarily abandonment, rather OSX has always been a lower priority compared to Windows, and rightfully so in their opinion considering it's a rival platform. Pretty much the reason why there is Office 2010 for Windows and Office 2011 for Mac. Whether there is a Office for Mac 2014 or not, can't say for sure, but as long as the update they will push out this year has retina support, it's enough for me.

iWork hasn't even received an interim update for the Retina Display, yet.

Nor has it been updated to include OS X Lion's auto-correct features. I also can't get Dictionary to pop-up by using three fingers. It worked once by accident, but that one time only.

Not necessarily abandonment, rather OSX has always been a lower priority compared to Windows, and rightfully so in their opinion considering it's a rival platform. Pretty much the reason why there is Office 2010 for Windows and Office 2011 for Mac. Whether there is a Office for Mac 2014 or not, can't say for sure, but as long as the update they will push out this year has retina support, it's enough for me.

You seem oblivious to the fact the Office for Mac team is a completely independent one from the Office for Windows team. There's simply no contest going on which of the two get more priority since they don't share the same workforce.

You seem oblivious to the fact the Office for Mac team is a completely independent one from the Office for Windows team. There's simply no contest going on which of the two get more priority since they don't share the same workforce.

I honestly think that in some ways it's superior to its Windows counterpart.

Oh, and whilst it's true they are separate teams, they are only separate teams in ONE company, after all, they COULD get supervising authorities in the companies to go a bit easier etc...

Just saying, so it's not ruled out per se, that the Mac version could somehow be put less interest in. Not saying they do though.

+1 to the lack of OS native functions: very annoying!

Dictionary is a constantly used feature for me, it's so awesome since Lion I cannot believe how often I use it for Japanese and Wikipedia lookups! :jump:

Glassed Silver:mac

It has been told time and time again that Microsoft's Mac division is a totally separate one. Obviously the team is smaller, but what I'm trying to say is: It's not like people are being pulled away from the Office for Mac team to work on the Windows version because the latter takes priority. Per example.

How's the notification center in ML -- does it completely replace the need for Growl or is it still missing a lot of the notifications Growl provides? If so, could Growl be used alongside?

Not all applications use the Notification Center now. They?re not on the App Store until a week before ML is released. So right now, it could be a good idea to use Growl in parallel, but you reminded me that I had it installed and I just uninstalled it. My #1 use was with Adium and now I?m using Messages even though there?s a bunch of things I hate about it. Adium is long dead in my book.

Does it sync all your previous iMessages from my iPhone to Mesages on my Mac?

That'd be awesome, until then, I might disable it and wait...

If I get a mirrored experience, it should be complete.

Usually, yes it is a mirrored experience. But for some reasons, it doesn?t *always* work. There?s room for improvement here.

And yea, iWork -----

Ugh? Don?t tell me about it !!!

I was over on Arstechnica and folks were saying, "Oh, this is just a transition from 32bit to 64bit" and "you won't see any more early cut offs like this in the future" etc. The issue I have isn't fact that future versions might run like crap on a 5 year old machine but the feeling that I'm being constantly forced into an upgrade - that I really don't have much choice but 'just do it'. Anyone who knows me will know that I hate the idea of being pushed into something - that if I do something it is because I see material benefit in it rather than being pushed. With the control over hardware and software might sound nice but look what we have as a result - when Apple wishes to push the hardware sales up they can come up with some arbitrary reason why and as a Mac user we have no choice but to accept it if we want to run the latest version of Mac OS X. With the horizontal mode like we see in the Windows world there is disjointedness but equally there is the ability to run a newer version of Windows without some sort of arbitrary cut off point because business A wishes to push more hardware sales.

For me I'm going to hang in here for another 2 years to get the most out of my machine (making the ownership 3 years in total) but I'm going to move over to Windows 9 once it is released. Add to the problem with Mac OS X arbitrary cut offs along with Microsoft Office more or less completely abandoned in favour of focusing on Office for Windows we have the final leg of the chair that keeps me using a Mac - without Microsoft Office for Mac I'm stuck in a situation where by I can't do the work I need from home and thus I'll be forced back to using Windows. Btw, iWork is a joke - 3 years without an upgrade is something I can't base my work flow on - I need to know that the software vendor I rely on actually gives a crap about their software by providing regular updates and upgrades rather than the sporadic out of the blue shipping when it seems convenient.

Yeah, that's a huge advantage with Microsoft not being hardware vendor (let's hope Asus, Lenovo, et al put out some good tablets and keep it that way). They go out of their way to support backwards compatibility, even when it's to their detriment.

It's going to be a consideration between cost/benefit of keeping Rosetta support in OS X Mountain Lion. Providing support for those few PPC-only installers most likely isn't going to be worth it. Once again, you can still execute said PPC-only installer packages without Rosetta.

They're sitting on $100billion in cash. They should give something back to the users that made them so damn rich.

Well don't assume because that just makes you look stupid when you're wrong. :)

In this case, he was right though, or you're being dishonest.

I honestly think that in some ways it's superior to its Windows counterpart.

I thought Word 2004 was definitely better than Word 2003, partly because it also included a lot of features of OneNote as well, while in Office 2003 they were two separate programs.

Since Word 2007 though, I haven't been able to stand 2008 or 2011 because with the mandatory menu bar at the top, there's no way to do the ribbon well, so the UI is completely disjointed.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Stellarium 26.2 by Razvan Serea Stellarium is a free open source planetarium for your computer. It shows a realistic sky in 3D, just like what you see with the naked eye, binoculars or a telescope. It is being used in planetarium projectors. Just set your coordinates and go. Stellarium key features: Realistic simulation of the sky, sunrise and sunset Default catalogue of over 600,000 stars Downloadable additional catalogues for up to 210 million stars Catalog data for all New General Catalogue (NGC) objects Images of almost all Messier objects and the Milky Way Artistic illustrations for all 88 modern constellations More than a dozen different cultures with their constellations Solar and lunar eclipse simulation Photorealistic landscapes (more are available on the website) Scripting support with ECMAScript (a few demo scripts are included) Extendable with plug-ins: 8 plug-ins installed by default, including: artificial satellites plug-in (updated from an on-line TLE database) ocular simulation plug-in (shows how objects look like in a given ocular) Solar System editor plug-in (imports comet and asteroid data from the MPC) telescope control plug-in (Meade LX200 and Celestron NexStar compatible) The major changes of this version: Added new sky culture Added new plugin: Planes Many improvements in plugins Many improvements in Core and GUI Many updates in sky cultures. [full release notes] Download: Stellarium 26.2 (64-bit) | 456.0 MB (Open Source) View: Stellarium Home Page | Other Operating Systems | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • NASA: This asteroid may not kill us but it probably won't be far off either by Sayan Sen Image by Zelch Csaba via Pexels New observations by NASA's James Webb Space Telescope have eliminated the last remaining impact threat posed by asteroid 2024 YR4, ruling out the possibility that the near-Earth object could strike the Moon in December 2032. NASA said observations collected by Webb on February 18 and 26, 2026, enabled scientists to refine the asteroid's orbit enough to "rule out a chance of lunar impact on Dec. 22, 2032." Instead, asteroid 2024 YR4 is now expected to pass the Moon at a distance of about 13,200 miles (21,200 km). The agency stressed that the update "reflects improved precision in our understanding of where the asteroid is expected to be in 2032 rather than a shift in its orbital path." The announcement closes a remarkable chapter in planetary defence that began in late 2024, when the approximately 60-metre-wide asteroid briefly became the most closely watched near-Earth object in the world. Discovered on December 27, 2024, by the ATLAS telescope in Chile, 2024 YR4 initially appeared to have a small chance of colliding with Earth on December 22, 2032. As astronomers gathered more observations, the impact probability briefly climbed to around 3%—the highest ever recorded for an asteroid of its size—before steadily falling as its orbit became better understood. By early 2025, international observations had ruled out any significant risk to Earth. However, astronomers were left with another possibility: a roughly 4% chance that the asteroid could instead strike the Moon. "The probability that asteroid 2024 YR4 will strike the Moon on 22 December 2032 is now approximately 4%," the European Space Agency (ESA) had said last year, noting that "there is a 96% chance that the asteroid will not impact the Moon." ESA said such an impact, while unlikely, would have presented an extraordinary scientific opportunity. "It is a very rare event for an asteroid this large to impact the Moon – and it is rarer still that we know about it in advance. The impact would likely be visible from Earth, and so scientists will be very excited by the prospect of observing and analysing it," said Richard Moissl, Head of ESA's Planetary Defence Office. "It would certainly leave a new crater on the surface. However, we wouldn't be able to accurately predict in advance how much material would be thrown into space, or whether any would reach Earth," he added. The asteroid also exposed an important blind spot in planetary defence. Because 2024 YR4 approached Earth from the direction of the Sun, it remained hidden from ground-based telescopes until after its closest approach. "We looked into how Neomir would have performed in this situation, and the simulations surprised even us," Moissl said. "Neomir would have detected asteroid 2024 YR4 about a month earlier than ground-based telescopes did. This would have given astronomers more time to study the asteroid's trajectory and allowed them to much sooner rule out any chance of Earth impact in 2032." He added, "As an infrared telescope, like Webb, Neomir would have also immediately given us a much better estimate for the asteroid's size, which is very important for assessing the significance of the hazard." The latest NASA observations underscore the value of space-based infrared telescopes in tracking faint asteroids. According to NASA, Webb made "among the faintest ever observations of an asteroid," extending the object's observational record by nearly eight months at a time when it had become too faint for other telescopes. That additional data allowed scientists to eliminate the remaining uncertainty surrounding its 2032 flyby. Although asteroid 2024 YR4 is now confirmed to pose no threat to either Earth or the Moon, scientists say its discovery remains one of the most significant real-world tests of the international planetary defence system, demonstrating how continued observations can rapidly transform an object once considered hazardous into one whose future path is known with high confidence. Source: NASA, ESA This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Yup. Google is just scraping the entire internet for their own ad profits without sharing revenue with the sources. It's obviously stealing, but since these sites depend upon Google's search scraps to survive... As for me, I just stopped using Google for anything except Reddit searches. If Reddit's own search wasn't complete crapola, I'd never use Google search again.
    • I had a feeling this was coming. Picked up my first Mac ever last Saturday. Glad I did.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      Admir earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      First Post
    • Apprentice
      daryld went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Contributor
      Carltonbar went up a rank
      Contributor
    • One Month Later
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      418
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      130
    4. 4
      Xenon
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!