Recommended Posts

That website is amazingly designed. Dinklage is a great actor, looking forward to seeing him on the "dark side." Really looking forward to this one, my only concern is that there will seemingly be gazillion characters, hope they treat them well.

That website is amazingly designed. Dinklage is a great actor, looking forward to seeing him on the "dark side." Really looking forward to this one, my only concern is that there will seemingly be gazillion characters, hope they treat them well.

 

 

I think they will all get equal time to show their characters

1375275648.jpg

I must admit, the huge center looks kinda odd, haha. But it still looks pretty neat. Also, I really hope that Nimrod will be in this movie, but maybe that's asking for too much.

James Marsden confirms he will not appear in Days of Future Past

 

http://www.comicbookmovie.com/news/?a=84744

I didn't really expect him to be in it. Bummer though that there won't be a Cyclops in the movie. Ah well, at least his brother Havok will still be in it.

The film will be shot in native 3D. 

 

No Scarlet Witch in Days of Future Past. 

 

William Stryker will be in Days of Future Past. Josh Helman is playing him. 

 

Not the brightest X-Men movie, but it has a good message, trying to right wrongs. 

 

Most of the movie takes place in 1973. Future segments are 10 years after X3. 

 

You find the characters in very different places that you saw them in First Class. Shows then becoming who they have to be. 

 

Remembers Russell Crowe saying he'd play Wolverine - but only if he could play him bald. Didn't work. 

 

Thoughts on Cyclops demise in X3: Wishes he could bring him back. Wasn't happy with that choice. Could justify bringing Xavier back because he transferred his consciousness and could possibly construct a body around that consciousness. Was however, happy about some things- like the casting of Ellen Page.

 

http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/notyetamovie/news/?a=84935

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • I have a Motorola, one of the lower end ones, it works fine. It is possible to get rid of the Gemini app and also to disable googles assistant , but A.i is still apps. I try to avoid all LLM A.I, is i can, I use no Ai duck duck go.
    • Free Software Foundation Europe pushes EU to force Google to allow AI uninstalls on Android by Paul Hill Credit: Pexels Users should be able to fully uninstall AI-based features from Android devices and be able to access interoperability functions, free from Google’s verification requirements, the European Commission has heard as part of an Android interoperability consultation under the Digital Markets Act. These measures were proposed by the Free Software Foundation Europe (FSFE) last week when it submitted its documentation. The FSFE noted that Google had started silently installing AI models without telling users. It noted that the EU’s DMA requires companies like Google to allow users to uninstall pre-loaded software from their devices, but in the case of the AI models Google is installing, they reinstall if you delete them, contravening the DMA. To get Google back under control, the FSFE has told the European Commission that there needs to be improvements within the Android Open Source Project (AOSP). First, it said that users should be able to fully remove pre-loaded AI components from their devices, with companies being prohibited from silently reinstalling or reactivating them. Second, access to Android interoperability features should not be contingent on registration, authorization, or contractual relationships with Google. This pertains to Google’s attempt to force developers to register with Google, even to publish apps to alternative app stores like F-Droid. Discussing its submission, Lucas Lasota, FSFE Legal Programme Manager, said: Google is planning to roll out its Android Developer Certification in September 2026. This will force every Android app developer to register with Google before their software can be installed on certified Android devices, but it should affect those who have removed Google Apps from their device. The program is controversial because it entails the signing of contracts and payment of account fees to Google, as well as the handing over of the identities of developers. It said: The FSFE said that if the Commission’s draft measures remain unchanged, then Google will be allowed to make developers verify their identity. The FSFE believes that asking developers to register is contrary to the text and spirit of the law. In summary, the FSFE has told the Commission that no developer should need a Google account, a Play Store presence, or any agreement with Google to access Android’s interoperability features.
    • You could disable this "functionality/feature/whatever" with 2 registry keys, ages ago.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      519
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      87
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      81
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!