New Flash Player 11.3.300.270


Recommended Posts

Has anyone else noticed how the youtube player UI messes up when the page is scrolled? I noticed it happening a few weeks back. Is this a Flash issue or a youtube issue?

it's a firefox issue as far as i'm aware, it doesn't happen in chrome for me just firefox

i think it has to do with how firefox has its smooth scrolling set up

it's a firefox issue as far as i'm aware, it doesn't happen in chrome for me just firefox

i think it has to do with how firefox has its smooth scrolling set up

I'm not too sure about that as I have the same issue with computers running IE9 and IE10 at the moment.

I'm not too sure about that as I have the same issue with computers running IE9 and IE10 at the moment.

hmm, I wonder what chome's doing differently then that it doesn't happen with the same version of flash

It does sound very strange, am I correct in believing that Chrome has a special version of flash baked in though which may be slightly modified from the core versions?

AFAIK it's not modified at all, just baked in (which you can still disable and use the version on your computer, which still the issue doesn't appear[at least it didn't for me])

I am stumped then, I just tested it on a couple of other websites with flash banners at the top of the page and the problem occurs there as well, if flash is enabled the page blurs when scrolling until you scroll up and down slightly, with flash disabled no such issue. Are you testing it on Windows or OSX though?

I am stumped then, I just tested it on a couple of other websites with flash banners at the top of the page and the problem occurs there as well, if flash is enabled the page blurs when scrolling until you scroll up and down slightly, with flash disabled no such issue.

what browser?

AFAIK it's not modified at all, just baked in (which you can still disable and use the version on your computer, which still the issue doesn't appear[at least it didn't for me])

Its uses PPAPI rather NPAPI... plugin interface.. PPAPI which is standardized by Google (if wrong correct me).. As far as Mozilla does not have plan to implement it soon so PPAPI gives edge of Chrome Metro on Win8 having Plugin support etc.. So overall Flash in Chrome is quite different than others.

But as far as I know the PPAPI version of Flash in Chrome is older than the currently released version. The draw issues when scrolling are very common on Firefox, Internet Explorer and Opera. Very annoying too.

i'll agree with you there, it's a very annoying bug :/

AFAIK it's not modified at all, just baked in (which you can still disable and use the version on your computer, which still the issue doesn't appear[at least it didn't for me])

How do you disable the internal Chrome Flash plugin? I'm still searching for a way to set the browser completely back to defaults. I've probably messed it up so much trying to fix these Flash issues.

How do you disable the internal Chrome Flash plugin? I'm still searching for a way to set the browser completely back to defaults. I've probably messed it up so much trying to fix these Flash issues.

chrome://plugins
Today, Flash Player 11.3.300.270 for Windows was released to address a crash that was occurring in the Adobe Flash Player Update Service (FlashPlayerUpdateService.exe). There are no other fixes or changes provided with this build.

http://forums.adobe.com/thread/1043626?tstart=0

so is this a windows only update? ive been scouring lookin for the mac version of this but to no avail .. on my 2 windows machines even though the download page listed .268 it still delivered .270 , but on my MBP i still continue to only get .268 .. hmm?

so is this a windows only update? ive been scouring lookin for the mac version of this but to no avail .. on my 2 windows machines even though the download page listed .268 it still delivered .270 , but on my MBP i still continue to only get .268 .. hmm?

Read what the link says - it clearly states that 11.3.300.268 is the latest version.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • I'm hoping with the Surface Pro 12, I can use either USB-C for my Xreal One Pro glasses. With my Surface Pro 11 OLED X Elite, I have to plug them into the top port. The bottom port will power it, but nothing shows on the screen. Maybe it's my setting. When I plug in the glasses, I have it output only to the glasses. So maybe I need to turn on both displays with it in the top port, then switch the glasses to the bottom port and set it to output only to the glasses. And then hopefully Windows remembers the settings for either the top port and bottom port (one of the awesome features of Windows where it remembers the exact configuration when plugging in external monitors.
    • Forgive my ignorance, but the only difference I see here is that a USB-A is now a USB-C, so there are two of them. For the modern age (and I'd argue since 2020), most products would now come with USB-C as an option, if not the default. Display, charging, devices, etc on TWO connectors, sometimes all combined! So having 2 of those powerful ports is great for something this size! Meanwhile my Surface Pro (5) has a single USB-A port which I cannot even get display out to, instead relying on some Surface Connect dock which I don't have. That is a poor experience, not to mention expensive and not compatible with other devices. Thank God USB-C is mainstream!
    • wow. that color finally comes to Surface Pro. was always a little jelly when a friend had the sandstone Surface Laptop. I wonder how different this dune is from the sandstone. I'll be getting the dune version. always thought black and platinum were a little boring. I'll still have access to my blue Surface Pro 11 as it'll be a hand-me-down.
    • Looks a very subjective aren't they!? I like its simple design. I love the way Apple designs their products with function over form, minimalization, and simplicity over cluttered complex designs. Many, not all, of their products follow this trend, and the device becomes a tool rather than dominating the space. I do not however like their OS. I have never bought a Apple product, and while I'd consider the Neo for my wife, I am hoping there are better alternatives out there when her failing MacBook Pro 2017 finally stops. Fischer-Price is famously plastic, garish, and poorly made. Basically you're describing the Window Laptops the Neo competes against! This is how product design should be, and what Apple have often followed in recent years: https://tenprinciples.design/
    • Isn't that true for every codec? I remember having to buy a PCI MPEG-2 decoder card just so I could play DVDs on my computer back in the late 90s. AV1 support is still fairly new.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      B2Proxy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      MadMung0 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      jefred earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Apprentice
      JoeyNeo went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Week One Done
      oliviaexpo earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      485
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      228
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      70
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      58
    5. 5
      neufuse
      56
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!