Recommended Posts

I think the worst thing is this:

post-67543-0-72117700-1344026978_thumb.j

How that slipped all the way to RTM is beyond me.

I have to agree. You talk about blandy Mcblanderson. But! They keep the same see-through reflective icon for Recycle Bin? Really? and the same child's toy icon for Control panel. The same horrid icon for My Computer. But make the Desktop look like this ultra crazy super flat thing. I don't know, it's just kinda wonky if you ask me.

Why u no understand that Aero is not ONLY transparency!

Aero is:

- Bigger, bolder cursor

- Effects of maximizing and minimizing Windows continuously.

- Taskbar Preview

- Transparency

If they actually "killed" the Aero we've known of, we would have reverted to a classic style or worse, and that is not the case.

Why u no understand that Aero is not ONLY transparency!

Aero is:

- Bigger, bolder cursor

- Effects of maximizing and minimizing Windows continuously.

- Taskbar Preview

- Transparency

If they actually "killed" the Aero we've known of, we would have reverted to a classic style or worse, and that is not the case.

Exactly. I think Microsoft officially called the UI of Vista/7 "Aero Glass." The glass is no more in Win8, but Aero is certainly still around.

  • Like 3

And they can not use the reasoning 'well, we found that the majority of users don't customize Windows that way anymore, so we got rid of it.' They didn't use such reasoning for creating a Start screen made primarily for touch. Certainly, most people don't have touch-centric devices on their home PCs, but they made a huge change. I think it's more because in a Tablet / handheld OS, there's no such option. So, they removed it from Windows 8. And since it was kind of a Rube Goldberg to find where to change the fonts in Windows 7, such customization from users took a nose dive. Then they said 'most users don't change fonts in their UI anymore.'

They clearly need to adapt to the gamma of devices that are coming, and can dethrone the OS. Android is starting to look to me more like a virus rather than an OS.

Furthermore, I would bet you around one thousand dollars that People would have complained anyways, if MS would have left the UI the same. I'm not fond of the Start Screen, and to use it I clearly need 3rd Party apps (I admit this).

The Neowin forums have taught me this! Hell, there was ONE person which has made the greatest approach to bring back the real Windows 7 Taskbar, and he received almost no praise! There was even bashing on how counterproductive it is instead of the Classic Shell (seriously, WTF?!). So I'm glad they're trying new things. Windows 8 RTM still feels (from the looks) like a very unfinished OS (desktop department), but then... the Next Windows + the hardware which will be having... Oh yes... I know we will all give Metro the place it deserves.

I have to agree. You talk about blandy Mcblanderson. But! They keep the same see-through reflective icon for Recycle Bin? Really? and the same child's toy icon for Control panel. The same horrid icon for My Computer. But make the Desktop look like this ultra crazy super flat thing. I don't know, it's just kinda wonky if you ask me.

Have a look inside the window, more specifically at the bottom. They left the blue as is from Vista/7 in the details pane. That was originally why I posted this screenshot.

I think the worst thing is this:

post-67543-0-72117700-1344026978_thumb.j

How that slipped all the way to RTM is beyond me.

That does look quite bad in terms of structure. Now that the left side panel is white, there is no division at all between content. If the window did not include the left side items, It would look much better. Right now it looks poorly thought.

Another lovely example (taken with a dark frame so you can read the text :rolleyes:):

post-288886-0-06464100-1344031044_thumb.

That looks bad. Looks just like in Windows 7. It feels like Microsoft didn't even bother to change the appearance of it. 3 years working on 8 and they still couldn't finish it properly.

I am very disappointed this didn't get changed in the RTM version. That is a terrible inconsistency.

It actually was changed. In pre-RTM builds, the title bar text was always black. Now in the RTM, the text color does change, however slightly. Even with pure black window chrome, there is visible title bar text. Is it readable? It really depends on the user and brightness settings of your display.

I think the worst thing is this:

post-67543-0-72117700-1344026978_thumb.j

How that slipped all the way to RTM is beyond me.

Not surprising when you consider similar halfassing was seen in Windows 7 - for instance, the icons in Windows Journal were corrupted and one of the toolbar separators was misplaced. Secondly, Windows Fax and Scan continued to have the Vista toolbar style.

Speaking of Vista style, was it really that difficult on Microsoft's part to strip Windows LIve Photo Gallery into just the viewer and use that instead for Windows Photo Viewer? Quite hypocritical if they claim to move beyond 'gaudy' gradients and glass yet maintain an unnecessarily thick toolbar style for a photo viewer.

The RTM does do that, though, at least somewhat. In the CP and RP, the text was always black, but in the RTM, making your window chrome pure black does lighten the text a bit. Not much, but it's viewable, at least when you use a high brightness setting on your monitor.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • It's nearly time to replace my aging Founders Edition 3080, it doesn't OC as nicely as it used to and it's running around 10c warmer than it did when I first bought it.  I don't have budget for much more than what I spent on the 3080 and locally, that means the best GPU I can manage is a 9070XT. On this basis I have a few questions: 1. At present I don't use ray tracing, if this was to change, would this GPU be an issue? 2. How does it compare on a performance basis? 3. Are the drivers worse or better than those for nVidia? 4. Linux support, is it there? 5. Anything else I should be aware of if I were to make this change? 6. Is it a good idea or shall I try and keep the 3080 a little longer.
    • What OS is that? It looks a bit like Mac OS but the command line suggests it isn't, either way I like it!
    • Outlook classic is inherently better than new outlook, for a number of reasons. That said, if the only reason people need office is to read email, they should just use thunderbird.
    • Windows 11 is a big thumbs down from me. I used for a period of a few days while it was in insider and windows 10 was the main OS, and realised it wasn't for me. I am still waiting for Windows to be tolerable again, a shame as at one point I was very pro Microsoft.  
    • Classic outlook, not only does it have a much fuller feature set, it doesn't include Microsoft attempting to sync my emails from my servers to theirs. If classic outlook is ever removed from office, and the version I paid for in 2021 stops working for some reason, I'll use Thunderbird.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Rising Star
      olavinto went up a rank
      Rising Star
    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      479
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      250
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      74
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      69
    5. 5
      +Edouard
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!