Recommended Posts

I assume they're blocked as the release drivers are newer. I don't have it so can't verify, but it seems logical.

Hang on, are you saying there are RTM drivers? I didn't see any....

Tried installing an older version but the catalyst install manager simply didn't even show the option to install drivers.

I managed to get the VISION centre app installed but it only showed power options for my cpu (and clock speed stuff) none of the usual graphics stuff.

Hang on, are you saying there are RTM drivers? I didn't see any....

Tried installing an older version but the catalyst install manager simply didn't even show the option to install drivers.

I managed to get the VISION centre app installed but it only showed power options for my cpu (and clock speed stuff) none of the usual graphics stuff.

I see your problem. You have an AMD card. :shifty:

I see your problem. You have an AMD card. :shifty:

Har har har. I actually really love it. Some people stick with a single brand, I've switched between nVidia and AMD (well, ATI) several times now, always getting the best bang for buck. And no, (when I can actually get) drivers, I don't have any problems at all with them and haven't done for years.

I just did some gaming on Windows 8 RTM using an AMD 6950 and the default RTM drivers. BF3 was smooth, just like it was under Windows 7. It had a few hiccups though. It would have periods of smooth, with a few freezes. Then eventually the game got so slow I had to quit. If you have an AMD card, I think this might not be a good idea right now. I have a machine with a GTX 680 in it, reluctant to go to 8 right now on that one though.

Hard to tell currently as most of the Windows 8 drivers including both the NVIDIA and AMD Catalyst are in Beta.

However overall we expect noticeable performance improvements including in graphics/gaming because Windows 8 can handle a lot better the existing hardware and its a "lighter" OS from Windows 7.

Har har har. I actually really love it. Some people stick with a single brand, I've switched between nVidia and AMD (well, ATI) several times now, always getting the best bang for buck. And no, (when I can actually get) drivers, I don't have any problems at all with them and haven't done for years.

I said I assume. I won't have the OS til October o.o

Performance is definitely improved over Windows 7 and 8 RP.

i5 3550 @ 4.1Ghz

8GB @ 1866Mhz

ASUS GTX670 2GB @ stock speeds

Nvidia Driver 304.79 for Windows 7 & 8

3D Mark 2011

Windows 7 SP1 : P7992

Windows 7 SP1 : P8403 (Overclocked GPU)

Windows 8 RTM: P8533

Windows 8 RTM: P9009 (Overclocked GPU)

TDU2

Windows 7 SP1: 55-60 fps variable on Vsync

Windows 8 RTM: 60fps fixed on Vsync

I think the DPC latency checker tool is not functioning correctly in windows 8.

I just did some gaming on Windows 8 RTM using an AMD 6950 and the default RTM drivers. BF3 was smooth, just like it was under Windows 7. It had a few hiccups though. It would have periods of smooth, with a few freezes. Then eventually the game got so slow I had to quit. If you have an AMD card, I think this might not be a good idea right now. I have a machine with a GTX 680 in it, reluctant to go to 8 right now on that one though.

And this is why you should wait for a couple of months to install Windows 8 as your main OS ;)

And this is why you should wait for a couple of months to install Windows 8 as your main OS ;)

Indeed, this is why it is not on my 680 GTX machine. Though with Windows 7, as soon as it became RTM, it worked pretty well right away. I guess because Windows Vista drivers worked with 7 pretty darn well.

Har har har. I actually really love it. Some people stick with a single brand, I've switched between nVidia and AMD (well, ATI) several times now, always getting the best bang for buck. And no, (when I can actually get) drivers, I don't have any problems at all with them and haven't done for years.

AMD dropped support for anything below 5xxx series for W8. No bang.

NVIDIA created unified drivers, like a boss. They still support really old GPU with W8. Bang.

:3

AMD dropped support for anything below 5xxx series for W8. No bang.

NVIDIA created unified drivers, like a boss. They still support really old GPU with W8. Bang.

:3

They're still supported with the launch drivers, which are probably still many versions past anything that actually made a difference for those cards.

In short, everything in Windows 8 is hardware accelerated, and as a result its text, 2D, and 3D performance will blow Windows 7 away. DirectX 11.1 has also received a significant overhaul that should result in faster and more efficient games and applications. The bulk of the graphics changes in Windows 8 pertain to hardware acceleration for simple, typographically-rich Metro-style apps. In Windows 8, the rendering speed of text and simple shapes has been massively increased across the board: Title and heading text renders 336% faster than Windows 7; Lines render 184% faster; Rectangles render 438% faster; and so on. The rendering of JPEG, PNG, and GIF image files has also been improved in Windows 8, mostly by expanding SIMD usage. In one demo, Windows 8 decodes and renders 64 JPEGs in 4.38 seconds, while Windows 7 performs the same task in 7.28 seconds. Amongst a few changes to DirectX, the most significant feature in DX 11.1 is the new, simplified, unified Direct3D 11.1 API, which finally brings together the many API offshoots that MS has implemented in recent years.

http://gamesmonkey.org/news/windows-8-graphics-performance-and-directx-11-1/

well, this is good right? I'll watch the next weeks benchmarks and maybe I'll jump to Win 8 and happily ignore the Metro fail.

I bit the bullet and installed it on my machine with the GTX 680. Much better experience. Beautifully quick. From the looks of things, I am about 8 FPS faster with the same settings.

I wonder if I can use windows 7 drivers for my 6950 machine in the meantime.

proofop.jpgI am running windows 8 Professional x64 RTM with AMD Display Driver 9.00 w/ ATi 5750 that installed perfectly on windows 8 RTM and I installed battlefield 3 the first time boot up in windows 8 took no time at all 5 seconds to fully render all the graphics and let me select my class. it is such an amazing operating system consistent Frames per second I get roughtly about 35-50FPS(windows7) windows 8 (48-52FPS) consisntent cause of my video card some dense places on the map were a tad laggy (hence no polished AMD drivers yet for 8) but ive used every build of windows 8 and it only got better.

When I played Battlefield 3 all my settings were set to high motion blur off AA post low and no AA ran with no fps lag at all! :)

Also im about to play crysis 2 with the dx11 patch and (windows 8 system sounds are beautiful ^^)

and im here to help you AMD users out cause well AMD is the BEST! :D

here is the display driver im using right now and its flawless in gaming. thought ive ran into a few black squares in StarCraft 2 but it disappears almost right away.

http://depositfiles....files/kkd8sr41y - AMD Catalyst + Display Driver 9.00 goodluck have fun :)

Performance is better all around for me on my GTX680 machine. One thing that is odd is I had to turn HT on on my 2600k (4.6ghz OC) or else I get near 100% CPU usage playing BF3 which results in hitching and severe FPS drops. CPU spikes also when using the Slingplayer windows app. Wondering if these will be fixed.

I do not even know why this is happening, but one of the more demanding games that are ran by the Unreal Engine 3, for example Batman: Arkham City, performs way much worse on Windows 8 than on Windows 7. I doubt it's even because of the graphics card driver, since the entire game is performing slow in all areas.

So I'm not getting only slow framerates, but also cracking sound, excessively slow gameplay, and a few more. It literally feels like running 1 frame per each second :p

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Hasleo Disk Clone 5.8.2.1 by Razvan Serea Hasleo Disk Clone is a free and all-in-one disk cloning software for Windows 11/10/8/7/Vista and Windows Server that can help you migrate Windows OS to another disk, clone one disk to another disk or clone one partition to another location quickly and efficiently. Completely Free Windows Migration and Disk/Partition Cloning Software Migrate Windows from one disk to another without reinstalling Windows, apps. Clone one disk to another and makes the data on 2 disks are exactly the same. Clone a partition to another location without losing any data. Easily adjust the size and location of the destination partition. Convert MBR to GPT or convert GPT to MBR by cloning. Creation of Windows PE emergency disk. Extremely fast cloning speed and multi-language support. Supported OS: Windows Vista/Server 2008 or later, fully compatible with GPT and UEFI. Hasleo Disk Clone 5.8.2.1 changelog: Fixed an issue that caused disk enumeration to fail Fixed an issue where WinPE created under Windows ARM64 26H1 did not work properly Download: Hasleo Disk Clone 5.8.2.1 | 32.3 MB (Freeware) Link: Hasleo Disk Clone Home Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • This got me thinking, would you rather a self driving car prioritise protecting its passengers or everyone else? I'd choose the one that keeps me and my kids safest. At some point, these cars have to make those choices already, don't they? Wonder if we have a way to find out what way they lean.
    • The proportion (or number of iterations) has nothing to with this aspect of Copyright I am describing. In short, it doesn't matter how many times the manager tells you to change something or how. Your work product is always YOURS until and unless you then assign that to the person representing the client/company, usually for financial compensation -- either in salary or as a subcontract work for hire payment. if iterations determined copyright, then businesses would have learned to just keep making changes until they could claim they owned the copyright, without having to compensate the artist for their work. And that would be BAD. The only place where the amount of changes does have a role is in how much does a human modify a previous public domain work (from any source) before it is considered fair use or their own work, etc. For example, if a human makes substantial changes to a public domain (re: AI, by definition) work, then they can then claim that derivative work as their own...but NEVER the original version, of course. That's why anyone can make a movie about Dracula, for example, as long as it is based on the public domain novel, but not if they take new ideas from copyrighted movies made afterwards. As one of the people who personally advised the US Copyright Office on their recent ruling on these very issues, be assured that I specifically used the terminology precisely -- though I made it simple enough for laymen to understand it. If I made this confusing by doing so, I apologize. But, to be clear regarding your assumption that I would agree to your second statement that I quoted above -- the answer is NO. If AI does the work, no matter how much "direction" you give it, it cannot be copyrighted. All AI generated content is in the Public Domain and therefore the copyright cannot be assigned to ANYONE, even you -- until and unless substantial modifications are made to it BY A HUMAN BEING (yourself or a contracted artist/writer/etc.) and then that copyright on the derivative work is legally (in writing) transferred to you. This is a critical distinction. And it is important that people, especially AI sloppers, understand this. For example, YouTube is not paying AI slop generators for the copyright, etc. of their AI slop. What YouTube is doing is sharing AD REVENUE for permission to publish your AI slop. Copyright/ownership/rights never come into it. Importantly, that means that anyone can copy any AI slopware on YouTube, etc. and rehost it anywhere they want, even back on YouTube, and there is nothing legal that YouTube can do about it with regards to copyright protections, ownership, DMCA, etc. Anyone is legally free to use any AI slopware in any way they want. When this ruling was pending, I warned Disney legal of all of this before they did their OpenAI deal -- that it would literally dilute their entire IP portfolio forever. They ignored that warning for the PR and stock bump. But that is why, when the ruling came down last year, Disney quickly extricated themselves from that OpenAI deal, even eating the initial upfront fees -- followed closely by OpenAI ending their entire AI video generating business model. They adjusted their PR release dates to make this less obvious to shareholders, of course. Phew. I hope that this clears up the key distinctions for you and anyone reading. If you have any additional questions or even hypotheticals about AI and Copyright, please feel free to ask.
    • Each of the devices displayed on this page now has a little volume meter next to it to show if there is audio actively playing. About time.
    • Owing to the nature of Windows feature enablement updates, it was distributed over Windows Update services as a complete system upgrade rather than as an ordinary cumulative update
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      557
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      78
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      74
    5. 5
      neufuse
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!