Recommended Posts

I assume they're blocked as the release drivers are newer. I don't have it so can't verify, but it seems logical.

Hang on, are you saying there are RTM drivers? I didn't see any....

Tried installing an older version but the catalyst install manager simply didn't even show the option to install drivers.

I managed to get the VISION centre app installed but it only showed power options for my cpu (and clock speed stuff) none of the usual graphics stuff.

Hang on, are you saying there are RTM drivers? I didn't see any....

Tried installing an older version but the catalyst install manager simply didn't even show the option to install drivers.

I managed to get the VISION centre app installed but it only showed power options for my cpu (and clock speed stuff) none of the usual graphics stuff.

I see your problem. You have an AMD card. :shifty:

I see your problem. You have an AMD card. :shifty:

Har har har. I actually really love it. Some people stick with a single brand, I've switched between nVidia and AMD (well, ATI) several times now, always getting the best bang for buck. And no, (when I can actually get) drivers, I don't have any problems at all with them and haven't done for years.

I just did some gaming on Windows 8 RTM using an AMD 6950 and the default RTM drivers. BF3 was smooth, just like it was under Windows 7. It had a few hiccups though. It would have periods of smooth, with a few freezes. Then eventually the game got so slow I had to quit. If you have an AMD card, I think this might not be a good idea right now. I have a machine with a GTX 680 in it, reluctant to go to 8 right now on that one though.

Hard to tell currently as most of the Windows 8 drivers including both the NVIDIA and AMD Catalyst are in Beta.

However overall we expect noticeable performance improvements including in graphics/gaming because Windows 8 can handle a lot better the existing hardware and its a "lighter" OS from Windows 7.

Har har har. I actually really love it. Some people stick with a single brand, I've switched between nVidia and AMD (well, ATI) several times now, always getting the best bang for buck. And no, (when I can actually get) drivers, I don't have any problems at all with them and haven't done for years.

I said I assume. I won't have the OS til October o.o

Performance is definitely improved over Windows 7 and 8 RP.

i5 3550 @ 4.1Ghz

8GB @ 1866Mhz

ASUS GTX670 2GB @ stock speeds

Nvidia Driver 304.79 for Windows 7 & 8

3D Mark 2011

Windows 7 SP1 : P7992

Windows 7 SP1 : P8403 (Overclocked GPU)

Windows 8 RTM: P8533

Windows 8 RTM: P9009 (Overclocked GPU)

TDU2

Windows 7 SP1: 55-60 fps variable on Vsync

Windows 8 RTM: 60fps fixed on Vsync

I think the DPC latency checker tool is not functioning correctly in windows 8.

I just did some gaming on Windows 8 RTM using an AMD 6950 and the default RTM drivers. BF3 was smooth, just like it was under Windows 7. It had a few hiccups though. It would have periods of smooth, with a few freezes. Then eventually the game got so slow I had to quit. If you have an AMD card, I think this might not be a good idea right now. I have a machine with a GTX 680 in it, reluctant to go to 8 right now on that one though.

And this is why you should wait for a couple of months to install Windows 8 as your main OS ;)

And this is why you should wait for a couple of months to install Windows 8 as your main OS ;)

Indeed, this is why it is not on my 680 GTX machine. Though with Windows 7, as soon as it became RTM, it worked pretty well right away. I guess because Windows Vista drivers worked with 7 pretty darn well.

Har har har. I actually really love it. Some people stick with a single brand, I've switched between nVidia and AMD (well, ATI) several times now, always getting the best bang for buck. And no, (when I can actually get) drivers, I don't have any problems at all with them and haven't done for years.

AMD dropped support for anything below 5xxx series for W8. No bang.

NVIDIA created unified drivers, like a boss. They still support really old GPU with W8. Bang.

:3

AMD dropped support for anything below 5xxx series for W8. No bang.

NVIDIA created unified drivers, like a boss. They still support really old GPU with W8. Bang.

:3

They're still supported with the launch drivers, which are probably still many versions past anything that actually made a difference for those cards.

In short, everything in Windows 8 is hardware accelerated, and as a result its text, 2D, and 3D performance will blow Windows 7 away. DirectX 11.1 has also received a significant overhaul that should result in faster and more efficient games and applications. The bulk of the graphics changes in Windows 8 pertain to hardware acceleration for simple, typographically-rich Metro-style apps. In Windows 8, the rendering speed of text and simple shapes has been massively increased across the board: Title and heading text renders 336% faster than Windows 7; Lines render 184% faster; Rectangles render 438% faster; and so on. The rendering of JPEG, PNG, and GIF image files has also been improved in Windows 8, mostly by expanding SIMD usage. In one demo, Windows 8 decodes and renders 64 JPEGs in 4.38 seconds, while Windows 7 performs the same task in 7.28 seconds. Amongst a few changes to DirectX, the most significant feature in DX 11.1 is the new, simplified, unified Direct3D 11.1 API, which finally brings together the many API offshoots that MS has implemented in recent years.

http://gamesmonkey.org/news/windows-8-graphics-performance-and-directx-11-1/

well, this is good right? I'll watch the next weeks benchmarks and maybe I'll jump to Win 8 and happily ignore the Metro fail.

I bit the bullet and installed it on my machine with the GTX 680. Much better experience. Beautifully quick. From the looks of things, I am about 8 FPS faster with the same settings.

I wonder if I can use windows 7 drivers for my 6950 machine in the meantime.

proofop.jpgI am running windows 8 Professional x64 RTM with AMD Display Driver 9.00 w/ ATi 5750 that installed perfectly on windows 8 RTM and I installed battlefield 3 the first time boot up in windows 8 took no time at all 5 seconds to fully render all the graphics and let me select my class. it is such an amazing operating system consistent Frames per second I get roughtly about 35-50FPS(windows7) windows 8 (48-52FPS) consisntent cause of my video card some dense places on the map were a tad laggy (hence no polished AMD drivers yet for 8) but ive used every build of windows 8 and it only got better.

When I played Battlefield 3 all my settings were set to high motion blur off AA post low and no AA ran with no fps lag at all! :)

Also im about to play crysis 2 with the dx11 patch and (windows 8 system sounds are beautiful ^^)

and im here to help you AMD users out cause well AMD is the BEST! :D

here is the display driver im using right now and its flawless in gaming. thought ive ran into a few black squares in StarCraft 2 but it disappears almost right away.

http://depositfiles....files/kkd8sr41y - AMD Catalyst + Display Driver 9.00 goodluck have fun :)

Performance is better all around for me on my GTX680 machine. One thing that is odd is I had to turn HT on on my 2600k (4.6ghz OC) or else I get near 100% CPU usage playing BF3 which results in hitching and severe FPS drops. CPU spikes also when using the Slingplayer windows app. Wondering if these will be fixed.

I do not even know why this is happening, but one of the more demanding games that are ran by the Unreal Engine 3, for example Batman: Arkham City, performs way much worse on Windows 8 than on Windows 7. I doubt it's even because of the graphics card driver, since the entire game is performing slow in all areas.

So I'm not getting only slow framerates, but also cracking sound, excessively slow gameplay, and a few more. It literally feels like running 1 frame per each second :p

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Hello, I have used a few TEAM Group SSDs, USB flash drives, and Micro SDXC cards in the past. They all seemed to work fine. Regards, Aryeh Goretsky
    • "just $100 per TB"? Just? Are we trying to make this seem like the new normal? Kinda weird to make it sound like that is not a ridiculously expensive asking price.
    • The reviews you refer to mean nothing. Where there is no journalism there is no reason to call the gaming media's opinion pieces "reviews". For GP games there is indeed a metric for success - increasing subscriptions. Which turns in revenue. The only circumstance in which subs do not rise when great is being released is a Game Pass system where the company is close to fully saturated with customers in a subscription. However, in that case as the theory goes you spend aplenty in all kind of games - from shady live service cash cows and customer offending agitprop crap in purple colours to robust and entertaining single player games. And keep a solid level of profitability. Ignoring the simply innocuous but mid games MGS has released primarily of the second kind.
    • Report: Microsoft to use AWS to help GitHub deal with a major surge in demand by Pradeep Viswanathan Thanks to the surge of coding AI agents, GitHub's usage has skyrocketed over the past 12 months. To meet this demand, GitHub started with a plan in October 2025 to increase capacity by 10x. However, by early this year, the company realized that it needed 30x scale. This rapid growth has caused severe strain on the platform's reliability, resulting in several small outages over the past few months. In April, GitHub published a long blog post explaining the steps it is taking to resolve these reliability issues. In the post, the company also confirmed that it is working toward a multi-cloud architecture for better resilience. Today, Business Insider reported that GitHub is turning to Amazon Web Services to help deal with a major surge in AI-driven coding activity. It is important to note that GitHub is still in the process of moving completely to the Azure cloud. The current plan is to move the platform fully to Azure by 2027 so that it can scale better as per developer demand. Therefore, the current decision to utilize AWS might be part of a short-term plan to meet immediate demand. A Microsoft spokesperson confirmed that GitHub is using multiple cloud providers with the following statement: For Microsoft, the decision highlights the operational pressure behind the AI boom. GitHub has to stay reliable for developers at a time when rivals such as Codex, Cursor, Claude Code, and other AI coding tools are gaining attention. And the decision to use AWS for computing capacity seems practical given the circumstances.
    • It's growing on me, however, your right, it make better usability sense if the tabs were bellow the address bar.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      vjlex earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Reacting Well
      Dys Topia earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Conversation Starter
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      Console General earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Twozo Technologies earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      517
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      106
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      88
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!