Hey Look: Aero is NOT Gone in Windows 8 RTM!


Recommended Posts

You are confusing desktop composition (provided by the DWM) with the Aero theme. The Aero theme required desktop composition, but it is not the same thing. Desktop composition is now always on in Windows 8 and cannot be disabled.

  • Like 1
I don't remember anyone complaining that aero was gone, just aero glass.

You clear didn't see the "Why did Microsoft remove aero?" topic then. People are getting confused because Microsoft hasn't been clear about the situation.

The reality is that Aero still exists, it's just been updated. Like a new model of car there will be some people that like the changes, some that don't and most people won't care / notice the difference. And like a new model of car the reason it changes is not because the old version was bad or that the new version is better but rather to differentiate the new version, to keep it fresh in the minds of consumers. Microsoft did exactly the same when moving from Vista to 7. For what it's worth I like the new theme. I don't love it; I don't think it's the biggest improvement in history; I don't think it's going to redefine the world. There are simply subtle changes that I appreciate.

You are confusing desktop composition (provided by the DWM) with the Aero theme. The Aero theme required desktop composition, but it is not the same thing. Desktop composition is now always on in Windows 8 and cannot be disabled.

Technically, yes, it is the Desktop Window Manager. However, through the lack of clear communication from Microsoft, many people are mistaking the removal of Aero Glass as the removal of Desktop Window Manager. As theyarecomingforyou pointed out, people replying to the thread "Why did Microsoft remove aero?" are clearly confused and many are thinking that DWM is gone in RTM of Windows 8.

Furthermore, many of the features are still present in Windows 8 that was once branded as Windows Aero back in the days of Windows Vista and Windows 7 Beta. For instance, in Windows Vista Home Basic, the DWM was in fact turned on, however, some of the "premium" features of Aero was intentionally turned off, including Glass, taskbar thumbnail, Minimize/Close animations, etc. These features, along with Flip 3D, were the big advertisement point of Aero back in the day. In the Beta of Windows 7, the Snap, Peek, and Shake, were branded with the prefex of Aero.

In Windows 8 RTM, only the visual look is gone, but many of the features are present that once were branded as the hallmark of Windows Aero.

Final Remark: STOP CRYING ABOUT "NO AERO IN WINDOWS 8".

LOL, before I read this part I thought the whole post was you complaining about how Aero's still a part of Windows 8 :)

but I was a little disappointed that they didn't replace more of the Aero icons with Metro (excuse me, Windows-8-Style :D) icons.

People want transparency on their windows. Also you confused Aero and DWM in some parts.

DWM is needed for the animations and magnification. Not Aero.

Please read my response a couple of posts above yours about desktop window manager. I explain it all there.

Technically, yes, it is the Desktop Window Manager. However, through the lack of clear communication from Microsoft, many people are mistaking the removal of Aero Glass as the removal of Desktop Window Manager. As theyarecomingforyou pointed out, people replying to the thread "Why did Microsoft remove aero?" are clearly confused and many are thinking that DWM is gone in RTM of Windows 8.

Furthermore, many of the features are still present in Windows 8 that was once branded as Windows Aero back in the days of Windows Vista and Windows 7 Beta. For instance, in Windows Vista Home Basic, the DWM was in fact turned on, however, some of the "premium" features of Aero was intentionally turned off, including Glass, taskbar thumbnail, Minimize/Close animations, etc. These features, along with Flip 3D, were the big advertisement point of Aero back in the day. In the Beta of Windows 7, the Snap, Peek, and Shake, were branded with the prefex of Aero.

In Windows 8 RTM, only the visual look is gone, but many of the features are present that once were branded as the hallmark of Windows Aero.

You are explaining all that to a Microsoft employee? :p Brandon is a very well known name around here. I think now that he is actively posting here again, we can conclude that his work on Windows "codename" 9 hasn't started yet. :shifty: :laugh:

Technically, yes, it is the Desktop Window Manager. However, through the lack of clear communication from Microsoft, many people are mistaking the removal of Aero Glass as the removal of Desktop Window Manager. As theyarecomingforyou pointed out, people replying to the thread "Why did Microsoft remove aero?" are clearly confused and many are thinking that DWM is gone in RTM of Windows 8.

Furthermore, many of the features are still present in Windows 8 that was once branded as Windows Aero back in the days of Windows Vista and Windows 7 Beta. For instance, in Windows Vista Home Basic, the DWM was in fact turned on, however, some of the "premium" features of Aero was intentionally turned off, including Glass, taskbar thumbnail, Minimize/Close animations, etc. These features, along with Flip 3D, were the big advertisement point of Aero back in the day. In the Beta of Windows 7, the Snap, Peek, and Shake, were branded with the prefex of Aero.

In Windows 8 RTM, only the visual look is gone, but many of the features are present that once were branded as the hallmark of Windows Aero.

Actually, Microsoft has been very clear about it only being Aero Glass and not DWM being removed. The people who are confused are non-technical people who come onto a technical forum to discuss something they know nothing about.

All the information is there for those who know anything about Windows and have followed it for a few years. Microsoft always references the DWM in documentation and in technical blogs when discussing the engine behind Aero Glass. It's also very clear that DWM is used in all videos showing the Desktop. It's even clear when I go into the task manager by a process called DWM.

While on the subject, Microsoft has also stated that the underpinnings of Metro Apps uses Direct2D. Direct2D as many will know here was Microsoft's answer to the failure of WPF catching on by moving the Graphical capabilities to Native Code so that apps can rewrite the UI while keeping their back-end in C++. That is why the vast majority of Microsoft's apps are not in WPF now, they are all moving to Direct2D, hence the loss of support of XP. This includes IE9/10, Windows Live Essentials, and now Office 2013 (surprise, surprise).

Seeing how even in the RTM they left the taskbar with a bit of transparency then then option or ability to turn it back on to how it was at the RP should still be in there, just hidden. I doubt they actually went though all the trouble to just rip out the code for windows borders yet left the taskbar with it.

I give it a few weeks and someone will find and release a hack or a tweak tool that will let you go crazy with transparency again, or if not that then some custom theme will add it back

Personally I'm ok without glass borders as long as I can tweak the thickness of the new solid borders. I'm all for the Office 2013 style thin borders with a thin drop shadow.

They did actually remove the code like they did the startmenu

Am I the only one who wants to cry whenever I look at these screenshots of Windows 8 RTM? Colors are just dull for a full fledged interface. I didn't expect this from Microsoft! I guess first thing I would be doing after upgrading to RTM is to upgrade Windowsblinds as well, as and when it becomes available....or may be find a way to enable some other colors.....although, that's not what I always intended to do......Aero in RP looks (looked) so promising and usable!! :/

The reason I din't do RTM screenshots is because these screenshots would look almost exactly the same in Windows 8 RTM.

No, they don't!

Trolltastic

My complaint is about the transparency being gone, and the general ugliness of the new design. I'm well aware that the UI is still GPU accelerated, that doesn't make it any less ugly though.

You do realize you can use third party utilities to flip any type of transparency back on you want.

By creating the shader blur of the borders, Microsoft left the chrome of Windows less customizable. In removing this effect, the ability for developers to touch the chrome and create borderless applications with more consistency is far easier.

Additionally, because of the new rendering order by removing this, more functionality is possible. This spans a lot of topics from the RDP aspects to the Software DWM fallback features Windows 8 has. (The vector composer does not need a GPU to operate anymore.)

If you really need the 'glass' effect, there will be utilities that flip it back on, trust me.

Is it just me, or is Windows 8 desktop mode extremely ugly? Even in Windows 7 - transparency disabled is ugly. Aero without glass makes me want to puke :(

It's just you. I think Aero in Windows 8 is the best it has ever looked. But then again, I've always been a fan of minimal, simplistic UIs. Always loved the Windows Classic theme and always went from the most minimal looks in Linux. I, for one, really like the squared windows, simplified widgets, etc.

  • Like 1

It's just you. I think Aero in Windows 8 is the best it has ever looked.

Same here. Someone complained about the look of the Screen Saver Settings window in another thread. Personally I think, it has never before looked as tasteful as this:

EDIT: Wait a minute...that was you! :laugh:

post-5569-0-94221900-1344116576.png

Same here. Someone complained about the look of the Screen Saver Settings window in another thread. Personally I think, it has never before looked as tasteful as this:

EDIT: Wait a minute...that was you! :laugh:

I was referring specifically to the continued use of that 9x-era monitor icon. The Aero look in of itself I think looks best in Win8.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • But building your own.. what? You can't build anything like the Steam Machine yourself. Even trying to get close costs a good deal more. Even just the CPU cooler in their price comparison is as big as the entire Steam Machine. If you want a regular gaming PC, then by all means, build that. If you want a a small console-like PC for the living room that is good for gaming, I'm not sure what else is a better deal. In the GN review, they only mentioned a small form factor Dell, which is like twice the size and hundreds of dollars more expensive.
    • Those are some popular multiplayer games. But hardly "all". Just those that don't work on Linux currently due to specific anti-cheat implementations. I think it's also fair to point out the literally thousands of games that don't work on the PS5. And it's not locked at 1080p. That's the default, which you can change.
    • Ubuntu Livepatch arrives on Arm64 to eliminate system reboots for kernel updates by Paul Hill Canonical has just announced that its Livepatch service now supports computers with Arm64 processors. For those who are not familiar, Livepatch allows users to apply important kernel updates without any service interruption or rebooting. While home users will benefit from this, it’s even more important for critical machines that absolutely should not be going offline at all. The feature is available as part of Ubuntu Core 26 for Arm64 and Ubuntu Core 20 and onwards for AMD64. According to Canonical, this will improve the security of systems that aren’t security-maintained daily or weekly, and it helps organizations work towards Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) compliance. If you are familiar with Ubuntu, you probably know that most packages can be updated without having to restart the system. There is one big exception to this, and that’s the kernel; it typically requires you to reload the system to boot into the new kernel. With Livepatch, Canonical has done something so that you don’t need to restart to begin using the new kernel. Aside from Ubuntu Core 26, users with Arm64 chips running Ubuntu 26.04 LTS can also use Livepatch. If you want to learn more about Livepatch, check out its product page. There, you can also find a button to join Ubuntu Pro (it’s free for several home devices) so that you can enable Livepatch. By linking your computer to Ubuntu Pro, you will also extend the life of your Ubuntu install from five years to ten years. If you are running Ubuntu, let us know in the comments if you have been looking forward to this feature on your ARM-based computer. If you’ve had a compatible AMD64 machine for a while and never used this feature, let us know why in the comments!
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      mike_rumble earned a badge
      First Post
    • Dedicated
      tuben earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      501
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      207
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      97
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      89
    5. 5
      neufuse
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!