Upgrade to Win 8

By kiddingguy
in Microsoft (Windows)

 Share

Recommended Posts

Grand Master

kiddingguy

Posted
Posted

When Win 8 will hit Technet, I'm planning on upgrading one of my machines.

I noticed on the Dev.Prev. and TR that there is an upgrade option. The current Windows folder Will be renamed Windows.old

Can this folder safely be removed after the upgrade and migration of my data?

Or should this folder be kept at all times?

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1096117-upgrade-to-win-8/
Share on other sites
Grand Master

kiddingguy

Posted
  • Author
Posted

So this is the right order??

1. Upgrade with keeping all data,

2. Check if data is still there with all shortcuts (like documents not in users\<...>)

3. When OK delete Windows.old

And in the case it still goes wrong:

4. Perform a clean Windows 8 install and install all your programs

The reason why I would do an instant upgrade - and not a clean install - is to check how this works, because I have never done this before. I guess I'm just a "clean install junkie". It's just in case when I upgrade my "main" computer to Windows 8 eventually I know the procedure.

This Windows 8 PC is just for daily basic usage, testing & work and in case something goes wrong there will be no damage to (important) files.... just the time to reinstall everything.

Rising Star

Andrea Borman

Posted
Posted

Well they say that Microsoft may only sell update DVDs of Windows 8. But when Windows 8 does go out on sale in the shops.I want to do a clean install of Windows 8,like I do when I install Windows 7.

They say on all of the Windows forums I have read that upgrade install causes too many problems. And that clean install is best. Andrea Borman.

Grand Master

articuno1au

Posted
Posted

Yes, but:

Personally I would suggest establishing a good backup system, formatting and going from clean.

Not to give Andrea's input any credence whatsoever; there are advantages to clean installs (mainly in neatness and install size) which make it worth while.

On top of this, having a good backup system means you can format, reinstall and be up and running in next to no time. For instance, my turn around time from format start to back fully installed and running is about 2 hours (I scripted an unattended install for office/visual studio etc).

It's a huge advantage if anything crashes/needs replacing or you get a virus you don't want to risk leaving on your system.

Grand Master

kiddingguy

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Yes, but:

Personally I would suggest establishing a good backup system, formatting and going from clean.

Not to give Andrea's input any credence whatsoever; there are advantages to clean installs (mainly in neatness and install size) which make it worth while.

On top of this, having a good backup system means you can format, reinstall and be up and running in next to no time. For instance, my turn around time from format start to back fully installed and running is about 2 hours (I scripted an unattended install for office/visual studio etc).

It's a huge advantage if anything crashes/needs replacing or you get a virus you don't want to risk leaving on your system.

True.

However, what's the deal with the install size of (the new) Windows folder?

Will the old folder just be renamed Windows.old and a new one created and installed in?

The itchy part is the registry I guess.... (neatness)

Basically you are just saying... do a clean install and I'm better off in the long run?

Like I said, the progams used on my notebook - and which are to be installed afterwards - are not that much. Just some Office applications and browsers and other productivity software, like Adobe, Diskeeper etc.

EDIT:

Windows 8 has a new file system right? Windows ReFS.

I guess with an upgrade I'd still stick to the NTFS file system of Windows 7 and have Windows 8 as primary OS on NTFS. This could cause some (major) problems - maybe.

So a clean install is preferred. At least I think so....?

Grand Master

neo1911

Posted
Posted

Most people are confused when we say Upgrade to Windows 8

1. Upgrade to windows 8 by clean install

2. Actual upgrade by keeping programs, settings, files, etc.

3. Mix of above two by keeping all old operating system data in windows.old folder.

Any other upgrade scenario?

@ OP

Make sure you have restored save games, program settings, and documents, music from the windows.old folder. If you don't require any of the data in Windows.old, you can delete it.

Collaborator

SledgeNZ

Posted
Posted

The other option is to convert your current machine into a VM. You can use disk2vhd (Available from MS) and then run your original setup via hyper-v in win8.

You need to check that your machine supports hyper-v prior to doing all of this though.

At the very least you'll be able to mount the virtual hard drive of your previous install under win8 and copy anything off it that you need.

Grand Master

articuno1au

Posted
Posted

True.

However, what's the deal with the install size of (the new) Windows folder?

Will the old folder just be renamed Windows.old and a new one created and installed in?

The itchy part is the registry I guess.... (neatness)

Basically you are just saying... do a clean install and I'm better off in the long run?

Like I said, the progams used on my notebook - and which are to be installed afterwards - are not that much. Just some Office applications and browsers and other productivity software, like Adobe, Diskeeper etc.

EDIT:

Windows 8 has a new file system right? Windows ReFS.

I guess with an upgrade I'd still stick to the NTFS file system of Windows 7 and have Windows 8 as primary OS on NTFS. This could cause some (major) problems - maybe.

So a clean install is preferred. At least I think so....?

The install will only gain a couple of gb (at a guess) but it's the small things like finding backed up profiles with random names, backed up program settings etc etc that when you are browsing your files just annoy the hell out of you.

The same thing is true of the registry. There'll be tons of changes between the system. I just think that you are better off avoiding having to clean up by starting clean >.<

It's purely a personal choice thing. I've "upgraded" a dozen machines and the users have had no problems whatsoever.

Windows 8 doesn't allow you to use ReFS. It's currently only available in Server '12 (just like NTFS was when it was released) with client support likely coming by Windows 9.

Both answers are completely viable. I just like clean installs :p Worst that happens is you run an upgrade, decide it ****es you off too much and then do a clean install.

The only consistent piece of advice between both scenarios is make sure your backup is solid >.<

  • 2 weeks later...
Grand Master

BajiRav

Posted
Posted

Any experiences with this so far?

I had upgraded a 13+ month Windows 7 install to Windows 8 RP and the system performance was pretty much same as what I have now (with a clean install at RTM). I had few minor issues but I think they were unrelated.

Collaborator

brlmedia

Posted
Posted

this is a question that will be debated for ages lol. I personally have cleaned installed the RTM on 2 machines, one hour I was back up and running. have tested 2 upgrades as well, just seemed to have "junk" I didn't need or want.

whatever you decide, have your data backed up. product keys, your favorites folder, etc. you will thank yourself :)

Grand Master

Nothing Here

Posted
Posted

EDIT:

Windows 8 has a new file system right? Windows ReFS.

I guess with an upgrade I'd still stick to the NTFS file system of Windows 7 and have Windows 8 as primary OS on NTFS. This could cause some (major) problems - maybe.

So a clean install is preferred. At least I think so....?

ReFS? Then why is my disk still NTFS when I did a clean install?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Posts

    • Microsoft confirms Windows 11 26H2, urges IT admins to prepare for release

      By Usama Jawad96 · Posted

      Microsoft confirms Windows 11 26H2, urges IT admins to prepare for release by Usama Jawad Windows 11 typically follows an annual update cycle, but Microsoft recently broke that tradition a bit by releasing a "26H1" version in the first half of this year as a "scoped" build for select new silicon PCs only. This version was not available for customers using 24H2 and 25H2 builds, as Microsoft is busy preparing version 26H2 for them, confirmed officially for the first time. In a Windows IT Pro blog, Microsoft has urged IT admins to prepare for the upcoming release of Windows 11 version 26H2. The company has confirmed that this will be a small enablement package (eKB) that will simply light up certain disabled features that are already present in the operating system's code base. This means that the "refined" Windows update and deployment experience will be simpler and quicker, with minimal disruptions, as the feature update will simply toggle a few flags rather than performing a complete replacement. Microsoft has explained that this is all possible because the standard Windows 11 releases share the same servicing branch and hence, the same source code. However, this also means that Windows 11 26H1 users won't be able to upgrade to 26H2 as that is a different branch, but this is something we have known for a while now. Similar to previous annual feature updates, Windows 11 26H2 will offer the following support cycles: 24 months of support for Home, Pro, Pro EDU, and Pro for Workstations editions 36 months of support for Enterprise, Education, IoT Enterprise, and Enterprise Multi-session editions Microsoft has not confirmed a concrete release date for Windows 11 26H2, but noted that it is "coming soon". If we go by the ongoing release cadence, we can expect it to begin rolling out in early October 2026. As such, IT admins have been encouraged to begin validating Windows Insider releases in the Experimental Channel, plan rollout rings, and strategize the utilization of their existing deployment tools.
    • Windows 11 gets new audio improvements in the latest builds

      By TarasBuria · Posted

      Windows 11 gets new audio improvements in the latest builds by Taras Buria Today's Experimental builds (26H1 and Future Platforms, formerly Canary) pack several audio-related improvements. If your device is enrolled in the Experimental Channel (26H1), you can download build 28120.2315, while those in the Future Platforms version have build 29613.1000 to try. Here is what is new in build 29613.1000: [Audio] Following up on our previous improvements, we’re making some more adjustments to Settings > System > Sounds based on your feedback. Namely, we’ve updated the “All sound devices” page so: You now have the ability to change default devices from this page. Each of the devices displayed on this page now has a little volume meter next to it to show if there is audio actively playing. We’ve adjusted the page design slightly so now you can filter whether you’re viewing input or output devices. We’ve added toggles so you can choose if you want to hide or show disabled, disconnected, and unplugged devices on this page. We’ve also updated the input and output audio properties page for devices in Settings to now include jack information for those that need it. And here is the changelog for build 28120.2315: This update includes a small number of minor bug fixes and improvements. [Accessibility] This update improves caption style responsiveness by redrawing captions immediately for caption style changes. If no current caption is visible, a sample caption string is displayed. [Audio] This update improves the reliability of the inbox HD Audio driver. You can find the official release notes for build 28120.2315 here and for build 29613.1000 here.
    • Google is opening the world's first AI museum in Los Angeles

      By sphbecker · Posted

      I agree with what I think you are saying, just not in the way you are saying it. Like any tool, the amount it represents your work is perorational to the effort you put into it. It is similar to why 2nd grade math students learning to add and subtract are not allowed to use calculators, but a high-school calculous student is. For the 2nd grader, that tool would completely replace the work they are doing, for the calculous student the same tool allows them to work far more effectively while in no way replacing their effort or knowable. If you spend 30 seconds writing a prompt, then the image that comes out is no more "yours" than if you found the same image with a Google Image search. However, many of these generative tools also support highly iterative processes that allow back and forth, and merging generated images with photos or human created images. I am sure you would agree that a human spending hours of time working on a project, even if AI was involved in the process, still reflects that human's work.
    • Windows 11 version 26H2 is now available for testing in the latest preview build

      By TarasBuria · Posted

      Windows 11 version 26H2 is now available for testing in the latest preview build by Taras Buria Friday Windows 11 preview builds are here. Insiders in the Experimental (formerly Dev) and Beta Channel can download builds 26300.8697 and 26220.8690. There are no new features, but Microsoft is officially moving the Experimental Channel to version 26H2. In addition, Microsoft is improving the copy dialog in File Explorer, the Start menu reliability, and fixing virtualization issues. Here is the changelog: [General] With today’s build, Windows Insiders in the Experimental channel will see the versioning updated under Settings > System > About (and winver) to version 26H2. For more information, see the Windows Insiders blog. [File Explorer] We’ve improved the visual consistency and reliability of the Copy dialog in Dark mode, including its launch experience and the expanded progress view. [Start menu] - Also available in Beta Improved reliability of Start menu reflecting newly installed or removed apps without requiring sign-out or restart. [Taskbar] Fixed an issue for Insiders using the new smaller taskbar option, where the system tray might get cut off or pushed off screen. [Settings] - Also available in Beta Improved reliability of Settings > Apps > Startup. [Virtualization] - Also available in Beta This update addresses an issue that could result in bugchecks citing HYPERVISOR_ERROR (0x20001) and KMODE_EXCEPTION_NOT_HANDLED (0x1E) errors after installing the latest flights on some devices during system restarts, virtual machine operations, or while running some gaming applications. You can find the official changelog for the Experimental build here and for the Beta build here.
    • We now know when and how the Universe may truly end

      By sphbecker · Posted

      I've always preferred this possibility. There is something that feels good about the idea that all matter in the universe will eventually come back together and maybe even result in another big bang. The idea that the universe would fizzle out over the eons and forever drift apart is a little depressing. I realize it is not logical to let a basic human desire for life to have a grand everlasting meaning change the way I feel about a scientific theory, but I am human, so that is how I feel :-).

  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later

  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      574
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      77
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      76
    5. 5
      neufuse
      71
    Show More

  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!