Shooting at Wisconsin Sikh temple


Recommended Posts

And changing the laws will have zero effect on teen gangsta's because they and other criminals don't get guns through legal channels.

As to automatic weapons etc., because of year of production restrictions etc. they are so expensive very few people legally own them - mostly 3-5%'ers. Anyone else that has one is again getting one illegally.

A lot of those guns are stolen from people who bought them legally.

Only a few percent of the whole. A lot of firearms come into the US fom Europe, Asia and elsewhere. Gunrunning is alive and well here too.

These people doing the mass shootings are buying the guns themselves legally, so your point doesn't really go along with reality.

It goes perfectly with my oft-stated point that our mandatory psychiatric reporting standards need serious tightening up.

Saying getting rid of guns wont help at all, is just silly and very ignorant of you.

It's based on really-real-world facts; there are over 300 million firearms in the US and a huge number of them are of pre-1968 manufacture, which means a great many have no serial numbers or sales records and therefore no way to track ownership. Even then, a lot of post-1968 weapons required no paperwork trail when they're re-sold, so they too are in the wind. If you expect those to just disappear because some bureaucrats say they should, you're delusional.

BTW, i already know its stupid of me to even try to argue with a old man with a signature full of guns.

Your accurate self-description noted.

Only a few percent of the whole. A lot of firearms come into the US fom Europe, Asia and elsewhere. Gunrunning is alive and well here too.

It goes perfectly with my oft-stated point that our mandatory psychiatric reporting standards need serious tightening up.

It's based on really-real-world facts; there are over 300 million firearms in the US and a huge number of them are of pre-1968 manufacture, which means no serial numbers and no way to track ownership. Even then, a lot of post-1968 weapons required no paperwork trail when they're re-sold, so they too are in the wind. If you expect those to just disappear because some bureaucrats say they should, you're delusional.

Your accurate self-description noted.

Just shut up now, at this point I would be surprised if gun laws were looked at, regardless of whether or not you agree with it, it's too late now.

Just shut up now, at this point I would be surprised if gun laws were looked at, regardless of whether or not you agree with it, it's too late now.

Before your edit you said "Just keep your mouth shut"

I have ZERO intention of shutting up EITHER WAY you state it. If you don't like what I have to say, either come up with a valid counterpoint or stuff it.

BTW: the FBI is now investigating this as an act of domestic terrorism, whatever that means.

And changing the laws will have zero effect on teen gangsta's because they and other criminals don't get guns through legal channels.

As to automatic weapons etc., because of year of production restrictions etc. they are so expensive very few people legally own them - mostly 3-5%'ers. Anyone else that has one is again getting one illegally.

Why even waste your breath DoC? Just ignore these pointless threads where all they are trying to do is get a rise out of people. No one on this board can do absolutly anything in regards to ownership, so why bother talking either way?

Before your edit you said "Just keep your mouth shut"

I have ZERO intention of shutting up EITHER WAY you state it. If you don't like what I have to say, either come up with a valid counterpoint or stuff it.

BTW: the FBI is now investigating this as an act of domestic terrorism, whatever that means.

It means that most likely someone of your same political background, murdered these people cause they thought they were Muslim. I won't keep my mouth shut, better enjoy buying guns now, cause it won't be long before people are done with this bull**** and put an end to it.

It goes perfectly with my oft-stated point that our mandatory psychiatric reporting standards need serious tightening up.

Why bother with that, didn't you say earlier: "And crazies who want to kill will find a way to do it." - crazies will get guns illegally and go and shoot up a school or shopping centre. Gun runners aren't going to tick off a mental health check list before they sell someone a weapon.

What would be the standards to refuse someone the sale of a weapon? I'll assume any kind of violent psychotic episode would rule out legal gun ownership. Schizophrenia would probably be on the list. Bipolar, depression, anxiety? Millions of Americans are medicated for those reasons, so I guess they might be refused sale aswell.

Frankly, I agree with you that regulation won't do much. America has gone way past the point of no return when it comes to gun regulation. Couple that with a form of paranoia about the government seen nowhere else in the Western World and you're never going to get gun reform. It's a lefty pipe-dream.

Why bother with that, didn't you say earlier: "And crazies who want to kill will find a way to do it." - crazies will get guns illegally and go and shoot up a school or shopping centre. Gun runners aren't going to tick off a mental health check list before they sell someone a weapon.

What would be the standards to refuse someone the sale of a weapon? I'll assume any kind of violent psychotic episode would rule out legal gun ownership. Schizophrenia would probably be on the list. Bipolar, depression, anxiety? Millions of Americans are medicated for those reasons, so I guess they might be refused sale aswell.

Frankly, I agree with you that regulation won't do much. America has gone way past the point of no return when it comes to gun regulation. Couple that with a form of paranoia about the government seen nowhere else in the Western World and you're never going to get gun reform. It's a lefty pipe-dream.

I hope something is done, the gun discussion in this nation needs to take place, it's not a matter of principle anymore, something needs to be done.

I hope something is done, the gun discussion in this nation needs to take place, it's not a matter of principle anymore, something needs to be done.

Gun culture is as much a part of America as baseball, Big Macs, and Mom's apple pie. You're never going to put that genie back in the bottle.

Call me a crusty, grumpy, 25 year old cynic, but I think that hope of yours is misplaced. :crazy:

>

What would be the standards to refuse someone the sale of a weapon? I'll assume any kind of violent psychotic episode would rule out legal gun ownership. Schizophrenia would probably be on the list. Bipolar, depression, anxiety? Millions of Americans are medicated for those reasons, so I guess they might be refused sale as well.

>

Not that it's perfect, it's far from it, but the California Mental Health Firearms Prohibition (California Welfare and Institutions Code, sections 8100-8108) is a jumping off point. These exclusions are commonly known as a 5150 exclusion, but that's only one of the provisions.

Not that it's perfect, it's far from it, but the California Mental Health Firearms Prohibition (California Welfare and Institutions Code, sections 8100-8108) is a jumping off point. These exclusions are commonly known as a 5150 exclusion, but that's only one of the provisions.

But isn't your whole argument against gun control that it is largely ineffective because black markets for firearms exist and are exploited by criminals all the time?

Is this just a token gesture by a pro-gun person? Not being a smartass. Sincere question.

Personally I couldn't care less if Americans want to own guns and murder one another. It's the incessant fake hand-wringing, the insincere sympathy for victims and the constant media spectacle in America every time something like this happens that I find boring.

If you need a gun to pretend that you're not a frightened little man then knock yourself out but don't complain when someone gets shot. You've got nobody but yourselves to blame.

  • Like 2

Not aware of a lot of knife massacres.

What liberty would really be impacted on sensible gun regulation? Your right to own high powered, automatic weapons? Why do people even own them? Why not flame throwers and rocket propelled grenade launchers, too? Automatic weapons have no practical use in civilized society, so why not allow other forms of arms which are also impractical and downright dangerous?

No, really, I'm curious. Someone care to enlighten me?

First off, automatic weapons require special license and permits. you just can't get them. How in the hell do you or anyone one connect these type of weapons to this type of issue? Honestly what have you been taught, do you believe everything you read about guns on the internet?

Here is a guide that most people believe : 529976_446269762060271_695265977_n.jpg

It is domestic terrorism, just as the Move Attacks on the Fire Fighters and Cops in Philly in the 80's or any wacko that intended to cause harm.

But isn't your whole argument against gun control that it is largely ineffective because black markets for firearms exist and are exploited by criminals all the time?

Is this just a token gesture by a pro-gun person? Not being a smartass. Sincere question.

The fact is that the vast majority of rampage killers have a psychiatric history that wasn't reported to the ATF (firearms regulatory body) so they could be put on the instant background check services they run for dealers and those states & municipalities that require them for purchases.. Because of this they were able to legally buy weapons. This was true of the Va. Tech, Arizona and the Aurora shooters.

No, this wouldn't stop them from buying illegally, but we can't control that so we control what we can. No excuse for doing otherwise. That and you never know - people with such disorganized thinking could well not figure out how to go any further.

Personally I couldn't care less if Americans want to own guns and murder one another. It's the incessant fake hand-wringing, the insincere sympathy for victims and the constant media spectacle in America every time something like this happens that I find boring.

If you need a gun to pretend that you're not a frightened little man then knock yourself out but don't complain when someone gets shot. You've got nobody but yourselves to blame.

If you have a gun already, I'd stay away from you. :) If I own a gun shop, I'd never sell you any gun.

It's good to see guns protecting more lives... oh wait. :whistle:

On September 11th, 2001 box cutters were used to take over a plane so it could be used as a weapon and that weapon killed more than 3000 people.

Eliminate guns all you want but it won't stop people from doing what they want to do.

It's not the guns that are the problem, but the people.

  • Like 2

First off, automatic weapons require special license and permits. you just can't get them. How in the hell do you or anyone one connect these type of weapons to this type of issue? Honestly what have you been taught, do you believe everything you read about guns on the internet?

Here is a guide that most people believe : 529976_446269762060271_695265977_n.jpg

It is domestic terrorism, just as the Move Attacks on the Fire Fighters and Cops in Philly in the 80's or any wacko that intended to cause harm.

Wasn't an AR15 used in the Aurora massacre? OK, you got me. Automatic, semi-automatic, I'm not a gun expert. My mistake for not using proper terminology.

Still doesn' really answer the question of why anyone needs one or wants one.

The fact is that the vast majority of rampage killers have a psychiatric history that wasn't reported to the ATF (firearms regulatory body) so they could be put on the instant background check services they run for dealers and those states & municipalities that require them for purchases.. Because of this they were able to legally buy weapons. This was true of the Va. Tech, Arizona and the Aurora shooters.

Something that is useless if you have an individual who has an undiagnosed psychiatric disorder. Which I imagine a lot of people do.

And if you don't have a uniform laws across the country couldn't someone just go to a neighbouring state which don't require background checks and procure firearms?

It's good to see guns protecting more lives... oh wait. :whistle:

7 people dead and the first reply you left wing nuts turns this into yet another guns related thread :| .. maybe, its time for an official gun thread or something. atleast, that'll limit all the frothing to one thread.

On September 11th, 2001 box cutters were used to take over a plane so it could be used as a weapon and that weapon killed more than 3000 people.

No. What killed 3000 people were

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_757

and

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_767#767-200

Those killed 3000 people. Not a god damn box cutter. Have some respect for those people at least and get it right ffs.

7 people dead and the first reply you left wing nuts turns this into yet another guns related thread :| .. maybe, its time for an official gun thread or something. atleast, that'll limit all the frothing to one thread.

Shooting at Wisconsin Sikh

Another gun related thread.... in regards to another... GUN RELATED INCIDENT? Go figure. :rolleyes:

  • Like 2
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • And the fact that the majority of people from Poland are white European Christians while the people you are complaining about in post after post are not is just a coincidence... Every sentence in your post I am replying to is racist nonsense. None of it is actually based on any facts whatsoever. They are seeking a better life too. They are working and contributing to the economy too, as you even admit. They get the same benefits your partner did AND that YOU are eligible for as well. That is the definition of a society where everyone is given a chance, treated equally and fairly, and is judged by the content of their character, not their different skin color or which version of ignorant superstitious nonsense their parents lied about as children. Racists said the same things about the Irish and Jews and Poles (like your partner) and...every other immigrant movement over the centuries. What's your family's heritage, by the way? Were your ancestors lied about with racist fearmongering crapola by self-entitled locals the same way as you are now? If someone like that said the same things about all people from Poland, like your partner, would they be right? Or would you want them to judge your partner based on who they actually were, not where they just happened to come from?
    • Again, this is an irrelevant attempt to attack the messenger. The truth does not require any justification.
    • Removed the blue and underline as you did not post a link. This would also  be considered spamming.
    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!