Shooting at Wisconsin Sikh temple


Recommended Posts

Let who have guns? You can get guns illegally too dude. The Mexican cartels have no problem getting illegal guns.

All you need is money or drugs and boom you can buy guns, it's not rocket science kids.

Right. So you might aswell make it easy for any one to get them?

Even if they ban ownership of firearms and demand us to turn them in, do you really think owners would give up their weapons? Hell no. They will have to take them from me. But they better bring a lot of body bags with them.

Ok, you've changed my mind. If I lived next to you I would want a gun.

Good job Fox News.. You riled up rednecks to the point where they go with their guns and kill everyone they think are muslims. I hope government raises investigation in this and Fox News religious and anti-muslim fear mongering and shuts them down permanently.

Awesome, you like the other id10ts out there jumping forward like MSNBC and blaming the right already. Just like in Florida with the Martin shooting, why wait for the facts before, oh wait, why be right, just loud and mouthy.

Awesome, you like the other id10ts out there jumping forward like MSNBC and blaming the right already. Just like in Florida with the Martin shooting, why wait for the facts before, oh wait, why be right, just loud and mouthy.

LOL.. here I'll live you with this.. there are HUNDREDS of clips and collages like this..

Not to mention months of calling the president muslim as if he was a terrorist.

This is your typical Fox News message.

At least you'd be decent enough to put them in body bags after you shot them. I mean, because they couldn't do it themselves.

Anyway, no one is talking about banning firearms. It's a discussion about the practicality and viability of regulation.

A couple ppl in this thread mentioned banning and gun control. So I was stating my opinion on that. Sorry I got a little side tracked. As for the shootings, someone was blaming it on Rednecks. I guess the old addage "Blame it on the Rednecks" is still alive and well. Rednecks and Racists do NOT go hand in hand. Only a sick individual could have done something like this.

Really, so that is why it is the #1 cable TV news channel? It is rated higher in the US then all other channels added together, and world wide it was a tie with BBC.

Sorry, but they really don't talk about muslims and terrorism all the time here in america , they do talk about the government waste other BS that is going on.

Being #1 doesn't make it the best. Given that more Americans accept young earth creationism than evolution I don't think judging how popular something is gives you an accurate measure of it's voracity. Americans seem to love drama and Fox sells that in abundance.

Being #1 doesn't make it the best. Given that more Americans accept young earth creationism than evolution I don't think judging how popular something is gives you an accurate measure of it's voracity. Americans seem to love drama and Fox sells that in abundance.

It's the fear factor man.. when you go and spread how muslims are taking over, president is a muslim terrorist, Sharia is taking over and muslim flag will be over white house (btw, all things talked about on Fox non-stop), you have people watching again because they are scared it's true. They are not thinking "OMG these guys are lying and fear mongering" etc.. they watch because they believe it and lack an ounce of critical thinking or care to check facts because they think everyone else is a lying liberal who wants socialism and to hurt America.

No intellectual will watch Fox News. At least not a single one I know.. that's why Fox is viewed so much.. they create these lies and fear mongering so they can get people to watch in fear they will miss something life threatening.

Well we see what that thing brings. Rednecks take guns and go kill anyone who is colored thinking they are muslims and in the mean time Fox and right wing is saying "we need assault rifles and don't let them take it away from you".

Now you can put 2 and 2 together right? On one hand America being taken over by muslims, gays and so on and on the other hand government wants to take your guns. What could go wrong right?

Being #1 doesn't make it the best. Given that more Americans accept young earth creationism than evolution I don't think judging how popular something is gives you an accurate measure of it's voracity. Americans seem to love drama and Fox sells that in abundance.

Really now? So ppl from other countries don't? Foreigners latch onto the worst in America and go on websites and post about how bad we are. That isn't drama? In your mind I guess it isn't.

It's the fear factor man.. when you go and spread how muslims are taking over, president is a muslim terrorist, Sharia is taking over and muslim flag will be over white house (btw, all things talked about on Fox non-stop), you have people watching again because they are scared it's true. They are not thinking "OMG these guys are lying and fear mongering" etc.. they watch because they believe it and lack an ounce of critical thinking or care to check facts because they think everyone else is a lying liberal who wants socialism and to hurt America.

No intellectual will watch Fox News. At least not a single one I know.. that's why Fox is viewed so much.. they create these lies and fear mongering so they can get people to watch in fear they will miss something life threatening.

Well we see what that thing brings. Rednecks take guns and go kill anyone who is colored thinking they are muslims and in the mean time Fox and right wing is saying "we need assault rifles and don't let them take it away from you".

Now you can put 2 and 2 together right? On one hand America being taken over by muslims, gays and so on and on the other hand government wants to take your guns. What could go wrong right?

Fair point. 9/11 was a gold mine for Fox, it put the fear in people that they exploit so readily.

Really now? So ppl from other countries don't? Foreigners latch onto the worst in America and go on websites and post about how bad we are. That isn't drama? In your mind I guess it isn't.

Nope. The only industrialised country worse than America on acceptance of Evolution is Turkey.

Yes, forks can kill, baseball bats, vehicles, a plastic bag, the list literally goes on and on and on and on of all of the different items that can be used to kill. We all know this to be fact.

With that said, if anyone in their right mind is going to try and tell me that guns are not the most efficient means for killing, then that is truly ridiculous. End of story.

So keep on trying to use this as some kind of counter argument. I will still know guns make it a hell of a lot easier to kill then anything else out there.

Guns are not the most efficient means for killing. You remember the Sarin gas attack on the Japanese subways a few years back?

13 dead, 50 seriously injured, 1000's injured: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sarin_gas_attack_on_the_Tokyo_subway

Ricin is also much more effective at killing people than guns and still available because guess what?? Criminals don't give a rats behind the stuff is illegal.

Guns are not the most efficient means for killing. You remember the Sarin gas attack on the Japanese subways a few years back?

13 dead, 50 seriously injured, 1000's injured: http://en.wikipedia....he_Tokyo_subway

Ricin is also much more effective at killing people than guns and still available because guess what?? Criminals don't give a rats behind the stuff is illegal.

Those things however are either harder to acquire or take more skill to effect. With a gun it's simply a case of point and click, it makes use of lethal force extremely easy. Nobody's claiming that guns are the only things that kill but they do make killing damn easy.

Even if they ban ownership of firearms and demand us to turn them in, do you really think owners would give up their weapons? Hell no. They will have to take them from me. But they better bring a lot of body bags with them.

You'd rather murder people than relinquish your weapons? You epitomise everything that is wrong with US gun culture. I mean, that's such a stupid statement to make. Either you're talking crap - in which case who are you actually trying to impress? - or you'd follow through with such a threat, which means you're actually a psychopath and should never have been allowed guns in the first place.

Every time I think humanity can't sink any lower I come across people like you.

Nope. The only industrialised country worse than America on acceptance of Evolution is Turkey.

I don't give a damn about creation or evolution. I was responding to you talking about America and drama. You foreigners LOVE drama. Especially when you hear something bad happening here in the States. "Oooo, look! Another shooting in the USA!!!" Then run and post it every where saying how bad we are. Stirring up all the trolls who hate America. If that isn't drama, I don't know what is.

I don't give a damn about creation or evolution. I was responding to you talking about America and drama. You foreigners LOVE drama. Especially when you hear something bad happening here in the States. "Oooo, look! Another shooting in the USA!!!" Then run and post it every where saying how bad we are. Stirring up all the trolls who hate America. If that isn't drama, I don't know what is.

Your posts seem to be confirming every stereotype that I make. You value your guns over other people's lives which speaks volumes about you as a person and about the nature of US gun culture in general.

It's good to see guns protecting more lives... oh wait. :whistle:

In cases like this and the Colorado shooting, its the restrictions on guns that are the problem.

Both places are gun free zones, meaning if you are a law abiding citizen, you cannot carry your firearm in there with you.

In other words, these people are attacking a disarmed people.

So yea, your whole "gun control" idea worked perfectly, it kept lawful firearms owners who abide by the restrictive gun control rules from being armed in the face of someone that is going to break the law anyhow.

But nice try.

There have already been several high profile shootings in the US in recent months and yet you're using one knife attack in China to try to justify the ineffectual gun restrictions in the US?

You can't use that as a blanket statement to avoid sensible restrictions on firearms. By that logic people shouldn't be required to have a driving licence as everybody should have the liberty to drive as they please. Liberties only extend to the point that they impact other people and in the US it is clear that the lack of adequate regulations is costing more lives than it is protecting.

There are already laws on the books about how, when and where to use firearms, laws about what happens even when unsafely used and even unsafely stored. Hey guess what, theres even a law or 2 that make murder and attempted murder illegal. So if someone was going to break all those other laws, they will break further laws regarding gun control as well, just like they did in Colorado and here in the "gun free zones"

It really cant be said any clearer, the only people impacted by gun control laws are the law abiding citizens that will follow them, and those (supposedly) are not the ones you are trying to disarm anyhow are they?

Gun restrictions have been proven to work in numerous countries, including the UK and Germany. This isn't some hypothetical scenario - gun restrictions reduce firearms fatalities.

Wrong, when gun control was introduced in Germany by Chancellor Adolph Hitler in the 1930s, it actually led to a LOT more firearms fatalities.

sigh. I love those who hate guns or blame guns. I'm sorry but, it REALLY appears that they haven't fully processed the fact that, the reason for the 2nd ammendment isn't for hunting or target shooting, it is for allowing citizens to arm themselves.

@ theyarecomingforyou: you may THINK gun control works. But criminals still can get them. everyone is jealous of the US and it's 2nd ammendment.

besides. you fail to realize a truth. What ever happened to personal responsibility? having lived in germany for over a decade, it is a police state. So many ramifications of when a citizenry can't defend themselves. someone tell me please. " do you think your government is looking out for your interests?"

Sadly, reactions to these situations always take the lazy route and make guns the scapegoat. The real source of the problem stems from mentally unstable people. Why do we not take mental health more serious in this country? Guns are merely a tool in which the vast, vast, vast majority of owners do not go around killing innocent lives. It's just but a tiny minority of owners who make the rest look bad. Let's start taking mental health more serious and problems such as these will become less frequent.

p.s. if you politicize these tragic events, you're scum.

It's the fear factor man.. when you go and spread how muslims are taking over, president is a muslim terrorist, Sharia is taking over and muslim flag will be over white house (btw, all things talked about on Fox non-stop), you have people watching again because they are scared it's true. They are not thinking "OMG these guys are lying and fear mongering" etc.. they watch because they believe it and lack an ounce of critical thinking or care to check facts because they think everyone else is a lying liberal who wants socialism and to hurt America.

No intellectual will watch Fox News. At least not a single one I know.. that's why Fox is viewed so much.. they create these lies and fear mongering so they can get people to watch in fear they will miss something life threatening.

Well we see what that thing brings. Rednecks take guns and go kill anyone who is colored thinking they are muslims and in the mean time Fox and right wing is saying "we need assault rifles and don't let them take it away from you".

Now you can put 2 and 2 together right? On one hand America being taken over by muslims, gays and so on and on the other hand government wants to take your guns. What could go wrong right?

I'll match mine against yours any day, but then again I would have to give a few dozens points to even have a chance.

Fact #1 - By using the term 'assault rifle' you already provide your lack of understand as the legal def under the US law is ' Military looking or Military Like in looks', nothing to do with function or action.

nice try,

Posts like this just bring out the American hating trolls. Might as well title it: "American Haters Unite!!!" and be done with it.

Well that's why I proposed everyone should carry guns in USA.

edit: yes notice I used "guns"...you never know what criminals will use!!!111111

/s

Wrong, when gun control was introduced in Germany by Chancellor Adolph Hitler in the 1930s, it actually led to a LOT more firearms fatalities.

And yet now Germany has a very low rate of firearms fatalities. Even if the US were to introduce proper restrictions on guns tomorrow it would take years, if not decades to start to make a difference. Nobody is claiming that this is an overnight fix.

In cases like this and the Colorado shooting, its the restrictions on guns that are the problem.

Both places are gun free zones, meaning if you are a law abiding citizen, you cannot carry your firearm in there with you.

Stop watching Fox News. Seriously. If there were adequate gun restrictions in place you wouldn't need to worry about such attacks, so you wouldn't have anything to defend yourself from.

There are already laws on the books about how, when and where to use firearms, laws about what happens even when unsafely used and even unsafely stored. Hey guess what, theres even a law or 2 that make murder and attempted murder illegal.

And despite all of that the US has a massive problem with gun crime. The system doesn't work. Restricting guns reduces the number of firearms fatalities.

It's really bizarre that people would advocate more guns and more places to allow them as a solution. That's not addressing the problem - that's contributing to it!

Posts like this just bring out the American hating trolls. Might as well title it: "American Haters Unite!!!" and be done with it.

This isn't about people hating Americans. This is about people like you making stupid statements, like threatening to murder people should they ever try to take your guns away. Do you honestly think you have a sane and defensible position?

This isn't about people hating Americans. This is about people like you making stupid statements, like threatening to murder people should they ever try to take your guns away. Do you honestly think you have a sane and defensible position?

Any criticism of any part of American culture gets one labelled as anti-American these days. Just ignore it ;)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • And the fact that the majority of people from Poland are white European Christians while the people you are complaining about in post after post are not is just a coincidence... Every sentence in your post I am replying to is racist nonsense. None of it is actually based on any facts whatsoever. They are seeking a better life too. They are working and contributing to the economy too, as you even admit. They get the same benefits your partner did AND that YOU are eligible for as well. That is the definition of a society where everyone is given a chance, treated equally and fairly, and is judged by the content of their character, not their different skin color or which version of ignorant superstitious nonsense their parents lied about as children. Racists said the same things about the Irish and Jews and Poles (like your partner) and...every other immigrant movement over the centuries. What's your family's heritage, by the way? Were your ancestors lied about with racist fearmongering crapola by self-entitled locals the same way as you are now? If someone like that said the same things about all people from Poland, like your partner, would they be right? Or would you want them to judge your partner based on who they actually were, not where they just happened to come from?
    • Again, this is an irrelevant attempt to attack the messenger. The truth does not require any justification.
    • Removed the blue and underline as you did not post a link. This would also  be considered spamming.
    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!