Shooting at Wisconsin Sikh temple


Recommended Posts

What utter nonsense. A few handguns and automatic weapons aren't going to do anything against a government willing to use tanks, jets, helicopter gunships, chemical weapons or drone strikes against its citizens. Yet firearms restrictions do reduce the number of firearms fatalities... dramatically.

It worked for Libya No firearms alone wouldn't but don't you think it would be the IRAQ times 100? Of course you don't, There are places where civilians get tactical training in the style of military training by former special forces members and other agencies. There's one called Tactical Response. Its located in my state. The owner and his instructors go through training exercises just like the military would but for civilians. A lot of gun owners take those classes so trust me there would be some tactics involved in fighting an enemy who ever it would be.

And here was me thinking that the US was a civilised country. My mistake.

Yeah I guess we are old fashion. We got rid of a monarchy 200+ years ago :rolleyes: I bet the majority of you brits would love to come here and shoot guns at a gun range so you can go home and tell your friends that you shot guns in the colonies..Then the next day you'd be ranting on neowin about how those blood thirsty americans are allowed to own guns.

Found this disturbing. An anti gunners tweets. One particular tweet disturbed me the most. The one about if things wont change at the ballot box theres always the ammo box. An anti gunner willing to kill people to make people turn to control?

post-435544-0-36374400-1344225216_thumb.

They don't understand. They don't have to deal with gang members willing to kill you over the things you own or kill you just because you're on their turf. They don't have the same problems we do.

KC, you've got some valid points in these gun debates, but I think you watched the Warriors too many times. Gang "turf" as you call it is all over. So, being on their turf may just be a matter of eating at a restaurant somewhere or shopping at a store, or getting gas, etc. And, they don't just arbitrarily kill the average citizen who steps on their turf.

For example, a white dude winds up where I grew up and isn't from there. Most people assume he's there to buy drugs. Nobody goes and tries to randomly kill the guy. I've never seen a banger say, "Say, cuz... that jive turkey honky on our turf. Let's lay this albino cat flat, blood."

Then Barbara Billingsley steps out and says, "Oh. I speak jive." Anyway... there's a chance they might rob the dude if he ain't there to buy drugs. Other than that, they don't really bother. So... lay off the flicks, money. Sucka chumps don't know nuttin' 'bout no geez.

KC, you've got some valid points in these gun debates, but I think you watched the Warriors too many times. Gang "turf" as you call it is all over. So, being on their turf may just be a matter of eating at a restaurant somewhere or shopping at a store, or getting gas, etc. And, they don't just arbitrarily kill the average citizen who steps on their turf.

For example, a white dude winds up where I grew up and isn't from there. Most people assume he's there to buy drugs. Nobody goes and tries to randomly kill the guy. I've never seen a banger say, "Say, cuz... that jive turkey honky on our turf. Let's lay this albino cat flat, blood."

Then Barbara Billingsley steps out and says, "Oh. I speak jive." Anyway... there's a chance they might rob the dude if he ain't there to buy drugs. Other than that, they don't really bother. So... lay off the flicks, money. Sucka chumps don't know nuttin' 'bout no geez.

They do how ever do a lot of home invasions and theres been times when they broke into the wrong house and killed everyone in the house because they thought that's where a rival gang member lived. It has happened and a lot of people think it wont ever happen to them but it does happen. I can't speak for Dallas but I can speak for where I used to live, North Highlands CA, there's a lot of crime and murders there. Gang activity and general low lifes. That place is what got me into gun ownership. A girl was killed in a drug store by a thug less than a mile from where I lived. Home invasions were happening on the same block on the same road as where I lived. in the next town over where I used to live before I moved to North Highlands a guy strangled to death his neighbor because he thought his neighbor hit it big at a casino and a few weeks later there was a dead body found the next road over from where I lived at the time. Telling me to give up my guns is just crazy when things like that do happen and happen daily.

They do how ever do a lot of home invasions and theres been times when they broke into the wrong house and killed everyone in the house because they thought that's where a rival gang member lived. It has happened and a lot of people think it wont ever happen to them but it does happen.

True. It has happened. But, the majority of Americans don't ever come face-to-face with gang related incidents. Gangs frequent the inner-city where most Americans don't live.

True. It has happened. But, the majority of Americans don't ever come face-to-face with gang related incidents. Gangs frequent the inner-city where most Americans don't live.

Read my edited post above. Also I'm a originally from Knoxville,TN. I moved to CA and then moved back and before I moved back there was a case where this guy took this girl on a date they ended up getting car jacked and the woman was raped and murdered while tied up they also made her drink some kind of cleaning liquid . they took the guy shot him in the head and burned his body next to some rail road tracks. Even for a place like Knoxville crime happens. There's places in Knoxville I wouldn't go without a gun.

I know what you said. And I know what you were trying to get at. No the box cutter wasn't the reason they took over the plane. If they didn't have a box cutter, they still would have taken over the plane.

Well, reguardless of that they still used a consumer plane to be a weapon which is not meant to be used that way.

Well, reguardless of that they still used a consumer plane to be a weapon which is not meant to be used that way.

And since then the restrictions on airport security have increased.

Going back to firearms, polls show that the vast majority of Americans - including NRA members - support increased gun restrictions (read: not an outright ban) and yet politicians are afraid to act on that.

I hope something is done, the gun discussion in this nation needs to take place, it's not a matter of principle anymore, something needs to be done.

You know nothing about what you say so you should keep quiet on things above you :)

Really? The idea of an automatic seat belt which takes away a persons choice of whether to wear a seatbelt is the thought police?

I don't think they understand the concept of the Thought Police at all.

Might want to keep watching.. They go into more examples.

  • Like 1

?We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the New World Order.? ? David Rockefeller

?Terrorism is the? best political weapon for nothing drives people harder than a fear of sudden death.? ? Adolf Hitler

  • Like 1

?We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the New World Order.? ? David Rockefeller

?Terrorism is the? best political weapon for nothing drives people harder than a fear of sudden death.? ? Adolf Hitler

The Rise and fall of the third reich best read for me so far. Hitler loved his propaganda

http://www.wanttoknow.info/falseflag

about how the US government and other governments have staged for example fast and furious where the US government conspired to send 20,000 weapons to mexico and blame the 2nd amendment.

a great quote at forbes;

? Life is a system of half-truths and lies. Opportunistic, convenient evasion. ?

? Langston Hughes

the video is then backed by this Forbes report-->http://www.forbes.co...whistleblowers/

an excerpt:

the once-secret operation that, by design mind you, let thousands of guns ?walk? from U.S. gun stores to the arsenals of Mexican drug cartels.

By THE government. A government. you have to ask why?what is the gain? Obama has made it clear he's against gun ownership.. bingo, now you have MO

And since then the restrictions on airport security have increased.

Going back to firearms, polls show that the vast majority of Americans - including NRA members - support increased gun restrictions (read: not an outright ban) and yet politicians are afraid to act on that.

Airport security has flaws, terrorists can study and thus exploit those flaws.

There is no solution that will give you everything you want.

Bad people will find a way to do bad things.

Really? Bringing up Airport security? Airport security makes it hell for travelers if you want the same thing for gun owners lol. wow infringing on my right to bear arms and trampling on my right to persue happiness. The video I posted makes several points one is. Cars are made to go 120 mph and some even faster does that mean i'm going to drive that fast? No, I own a gun does that mean i'm going to go kill someone.NO. Another point it makes is people make guns and gun owners out to be evil, more than a few brits here have done that. They make guns and gun owners out to be evil and they keep repeating it hoping people will believe them and once people believe them the next generation will accept it. That's the case with the brits. Handguns were demonized in the u.k enough people believed it, got them banned and now the next generation accepts it and believes they are evil. Now they get on these international forums and speak out and tell me i'm evil and my gun is evil.

Yes, forks can kill, baseball bats, vehicles, a plastic bag, the list literally goes on and on and on and on of all of the different items that can be used to kill. We all know this to be fact.

With that said, if anyone in their right mind is going to try and tell me that guns are not the most efficient means for killing, then that is truly ridiculous. End of story.

So keep on trying to use this as some kind of counter argument. I will still know guns make it a hell of a lot easier to kill then anything else out there.

I'd say nuclear weapons would be the most efficient. Lasers. Maybe a chain gun?

Found this disturbing. An anti gunners tweets. One particular tweet disturbed me the most. The one about if things wont change at the ballot box theres always the ammo box. An anti gunner willing to kill people to make people turn to control?

The hypocrisy that you guys spew has become so ridiculous as of late. You're disturbed by this, yet you're not disturbed by one of your own refusing to give up their fire arms? "Hail of bullets" and all that silly B.S.?

Who's the one who needs a grip on reality? You condone shooting up a storm while throwing a tantrum because someone might take your toys away, but it disturbs you to know that someone is willing to pick up a gun and show how absolutely absurd current gun laws/restrictions are? I'd call you a complete moron, but then I'd be personally attacking you and then the whining would start and you'd cry like a little girl with a skinned knee about how much I don't know about you.

It's totally stupid moronic hypocritical posts such as this one that show people the kind of person you truly are. I may hate guns and in my personal opinion definitely believe they should be banned period, but I can admit to at the very least respecting a few of the pro-gun folks around here. You know, the ones who don't spew stupid crap like "OMG THIS DISTURBS ME! ANTI-GUN PEOPLE WANT TO SHOOT US!!!" after saying "YOU'LL HAVE TO PRY MY GUNS FROM MY COLD DEAD HANDS!!!!" or the other idiot who recommended bringing body bags if they wanted his guns.

I'd say it's unbelievable but...well....it's not.

The hypocrisy that you guys spew has become so ridiculous as of late. You're disturbed by this, yet you're not disturbed by one of your own refusing to give up their fire arms? "Hail of bullets" and all that silly B.S.?

Who's the one who needs a grip on reality? You condone shooting up a storm while throwing a tantrum because someone might take your toys away, but it disturbs you to know that someone is willing to pick up a gun and show how absolutely absurd current gun laws/restrictions are? I'd call you a complete moron, but then I'd be personally attacking you and then the whining would start and you'd cry like a little girl with a skinned knee about how much I don't know about you.

It's totally stupid moronic hypocritical posts such as this one that show people the kind of person you truly are. I may hate guns and in my personal opinion definitely believe they should be banned period, but I can admit to at the very least respecting a few of the pro-gun folks around here. You know, the ones who don't spew stupid crap like "OMG THIS DISTURBS ME! ANTI-GUN PEOPLE WANT TO SHOOT US!!!" after saying "YOU'LL HAVE TO PRY MY GUNS FROM MY COLD DEAD HANDS!!!!" or the other idiot who recommended bring body bags if they wanted his guns.

I'd say it's unbelievable but...well....it's not.

First of all Calm down Second of all if you don't value you your freedom that's your choice but I do and many like me do. What is wrong with finding those tweets disturbing? I find it very disturbing. Defending my freedom against government repressors is hardly innocent people. You are trying your damnest to vilify me and I think that's comical because I've never harmed anyone in my life don't plan to either so long as i'm free to enjoy myself and enjoy what I want to do in life. If I'm not hurting anyone then don't invade on my right to pursue happiness. If government agents come to my house and force me against my will to give up my property your damn right i'm going to not go peacefully. But go ahead and take that out of context like im some mad man with a gun.. But back to the tweets I find those tweets highly offensive, saying if gun control wont pass in the ballot box they'll grab a gun and shoot people so it will happen? That's out of line I don't care what side your on. Comparing me to him is funny though because you act like i'd threaten innocent people if my guns were taken away..
  • Like 1

First of all Calm down Second of all if you don't value you your freedom that's your choice but I do and many like me do. What is wrong with finding those tweets disturbing? I find it very disturbing. Defending my freedom against government repressors is hardly innocent people. You are trying your damnest to vilify me and I think that's comical because I've never harmed anyone in my life don't plan to either so long as i'm free to enjoy myself and enjoy what I want to do in life. If I'm not hurting anyone then don't invade on my right to pursue happiness. If government agents come to my house and force me against my will to give up my property your damn right i'm going to not go peacefully. But go ahead and take that out of context like im some mad man with a gun..

I don't need to try my "damnest" to vilify you. You do a good job of that on your own, making idiotic statements such as "damn right I'm not going to go peacefully". Why shouldn't you? If the law changed and you were no longer allowed to own a gun, you should absolutely hand it over. By your own statements in the past, people give up their rights when they break the law. Either way, the fact of the matter is you say really stupid things and act all big and tough and when you get called on your B.S. you act like a wounded puppy "Omg you're trying to vilify me!" "Why are you personally attacking me?" "You don't even know me."

As much as I disagree with DocM and a few of the others about guns, they don't act like a bunch of idiots when discussing their points.

First of all Calm down Second of all if you don't value you your freedom that's your choice but I do and many like me do. What is wrong with finding those tweets disturbing? I find it very disturbing. Defending my freedom against government repressors is hardly innocent people. You are trying your damnest to vilify me and I think that's comical because I've never harmed anyone in my life don't plan to either so long as i'm free to enjoy myself and enjoy what I want to do in life. If I'm not hurting anyone then don't invade on my right to pursue happiness. If government agents come to my house and force me against my will to give up my property your damn right i'm going to not go peacefully. But go ahead and take that out of context like im some mad man with a gun..

too add to your comment, the government "thought Police" demonize in this case gun owners. they tell those people, like the one you're talking to that we are bad,bad,bad enough, he/she will believe it.The government has done tests in the past on thought control. they did tests on how the mind works and spent millions to understand how the human mind works.

9-11 is a prime example. The "fearful" were so stuck to the TV's and scared ****less, then listening to the news reporters say over and over the official narrative, the people believe it.

Hitler demonized the jews as was stated in that video but that I already knew.

I think the biggest crime in this nation is, the loss of american people to think for themselves. to logically reason. They expect the government to tell them what to do, what to eat, what to drink and on and on.

COINTELPRO tactics included discrediting targets through psychological warfare; smearing individuals and groups using forged documents and by planting false reports in the media; harassment; wrongful imprisonment; and illegal violence, including assassination.[4][5][6] The FBI's stated motivation was "protecting national security, preventing violence, and maintaining the existing social and political order."http://en.wikipedia....wiki/COINTELPRO

there you go. the governments plan for the record. you think the government just stopped the program?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • And the fact that the majority of people from Poland are white European Christians while the people you are complaining about in post after post are not is just a coincidence... Every sentence in your post I am replying to is racist nonsense. None of it is actually based on any facts whatsoever. They are seeking a better life too. They are working and contributing to the economy too, as you even admit. They get the same benefits your partner did AND that YOU are eligible for as well. That is the definition of a society where everyone is given a chance, treated equally and fairly, and is judged by the content of their character, not their different skin color or which version of ignorant superstitious nonsense their parents lied about as children. Racists said the same things about the Irish and Jews and Poles (like your partner) and...every other immigrant movement over the centuries. What's your family's heritage, by the way? Were your ancestors lied about with racist fearmongering crapola by self-entitled locals the same way as you are now? If someone like that said the same things about all people from Poland, like your partner, would they be right? Or would you want them to judge your partner based on who they actually were, not where they just happened to come from?
    • Again, this is an irrelevant attempt to attack the messenger. The truth does not require any justification.
    • Removed the blue and underline as you did not post a link. This would also  be considered spamming.
    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!