[BREAKING] Apple V. Samsung Jury reaches verdict.


Recommended Posts

Even Samsungs own lawyers couldn't tell the devices apart. I guess that was Apples Lawyers fault too?

At 10 feet away, with all logo's covered, anyone would struggle to tell the difference. That's the point of the logo's.

  • Like 3

apple must have payed off Samsungs lawyers for making the same mistake earlier in the case then i guess ?

As FFM just pointed out, that was from 10 feet away, and just looking. Only a mentally handicapped person would pick it up and not be able to distinguish between a choice of only 2 phones.

At 10 feet away, with all logo's covered, anyone would struggle to tell the difference. That's the point of the logo's.

Yup, the fact that Samsung devices say Samsung on the front of it and/or back, must confuse the Apple folks and many of the people who use them.

When I buy something, I always check it out and make sure it is what I wanted before I pay for it.

At 10 feet away, with all logo's covered, anyone would struggle to tell the difference. That's the point of the logo's.

I can tell a Nexus 7 from an iPad without needing to cover logos because they are very different looking. But the iPad and the Galaxy Tab 10.1 look almost completely identical. Which was just the way Samsung wanted it. You don't need to copy to compete as Google and Asus have clearly shown with the Nexus 7 or Amazon with the Kindle Fire.

I can tell a Nexus 7 from an iPad without needing to cover logos because they are very different looking. But the iPad and the Galaxy Tab 10.1 look almost completely identical. Which was just the way Samsung wanted it. You don't need to copy to compete as Google and Asus have clearly shown with the Nexus 7 or Amazon with the Kindle Fire.

At 10 foot, if I put an iPad and a Samsung digital picture frame (released YEARS before the iPad) next to each other and covered the logo's, you wouldn't be able to tell the difference.

  • Like 2

At 10 foot, if I put an iPad and a Samsung digital picture frame (released YEARS before the iPad) next to each other and covered the logo's, you wouldn't be able to tell the difference.

Of course I would, one is a picture frame and the other is a tablet.

He also pointed out that the jury didn't have a hometown bias in favor of Apple, saying that "we were going by the judges instructions on how we should go about it and we stuck to that. We weren't thinking Apple or Samsung." And while the deliberation was surprisingly short, Ilagan insists that the decision wasn't rushed. "We weren't impatient," he explained. "We wanted to do the right thing, and not skip any evidence. I think we were thorough."

http://www.theverge.com/2012/8/25/3267843/apple-vs-samsung-juror-speaks

Hopefully that hushes the haters who think the jury was rigged/paid by Apple.

[/font][/color]

http://www.theverge....ng-juror-speaks

Hopefully that hushes the haters who think the jury was rigged/paid by Apple.

the court was 10miles of apple's campus.. atleast they didn't have trial inside the campus lol

j/king

[/font][/color]

http://www.theverge....ng-juror-speaks

Hopefully that hushes the haters who think the jury was rigged/paid by Apple.

This actually show right away that the jurors didn't even listen to evidence. They listened to this one guy and decided right away. Plus the jurors from California. This trial was far from fair or objective.

According to Ilagan, jury foreman Velvin Hogan helped make the decision process easier for the jury, imparting his wisdom as a patent owner. "After that it was easier."

Jury Foreman Velvin Hogan had some words of his own when speaking toReuters this morning. "We didn't want to give carte blanche to a company, by any name, to infringe someone else's intellectual property,"

You can't have important things like this that affect the whole patent system decided on by a bunch of idiots half of which don't even have a smartphone.

Btw, see what I highlighted, this jury foreman is the one who actually made decisions. The others looked at him as a "pro" considering he had prior "patent experience".. so basically he explained them what he thought was right and they voted that way. He likes being in the spotlight, that's pretty clear. And the "we didn't want to give carte blanche to a company" was clearly his stand and why Apple won everything and Samsung didn't win a thing.

FORTUNE -- One of the reasons -- perhaps the main reason -- the jury was able to deliver a verdict in Apple's (AAPL) landmark patent infringement suit against Samsung in less than three days was that it chose as its foreperson a 67-year-old retired engineer with two grown children, three civil cases under his belt, a 35-year career in hard-drive technology (Memorex, Storage Technology, Digital Equipment) and a U.S. patent in his name.

It was Velvin R. Hogan who signed the 20-page jury form and read the verdict aloud. And it was reportedly under his guidance that the jury worked through with the thorny issue of whether Apple's patents were valid.

So basically, this whole trial was decided by this one guy. Wow.

http://tech.fortune....an-of-the-jury/

  • Like 2

http://www.theverge....ng-juror-speaks

Hopefully that hushes the haters who think the jury was rigged/paid by Apple.

If they didn't rush the deliberation, how did they manage to goof?

In two instances, results were crazily contradictory, and the judge had to have the jury go back and fix the goofs. As a result the damages award was reduced to $1,049,343,540, 1 down from $1,051,855,000. For just one example, the jury had said one device didn't infringe, but then they awarded Apple $2 million for inducement. In another they awarded a couple of hundred thousand for a device they'd ruled didn't infringe at all. This all was revealed by The Verge in its live blog coverage

Obviously, something is very wrong with this picture. The Verge also reported that the jury foreman, who is a patent holder himself [this appears to be his patent, "Method and apparatus for recording and storing video information"], told court officials that the jury didn't need the answer to its question to reach a verdict: "The foreman told a court representative that the jurors had reached a decision without needing the instructions."

http://www.groklaw.n...012082510525390

This is a funny post on Google+..

I'm sitting in a Starbucks doing random whatever over an iced americano. While I waiting for my drink, I watched a guy with his friend, pick up a newspaper; and start to remark on the Samsung Apple verdict.

Guy: "Wait, so what they're saying is, Samsung is the same as Apple?"

Friend: "I know, right? Makes me think twice about how much I paid for my Mac Book"

Guy: "Seriously"

Not 10 minutes later, a husband and wife, same newspaper:

Husband: "... Samsung's iPad is the same as Apple's iPad, and I paid how much for the Apple one? Honey, I told you they were a ripoff", after looking up the Samsung tablet on his iPhone.

Wife: "Oh wow," looking at the screen, "... that's a lot cheaper. Think we can return it?"

I put my Samsung QX410 on my table, and started to plug in, when he leans over to me, "Sorry, you don't mind if I ask, how much did you pay for your Samsung laptop?"

"Oh, no worries, it was $700." I replied.

I watched shock overcome his face, like actual shock. He looked at me, blankly, for an awkward amount of time, "Mind if I have a look?" he asked.

So, I obliged, and showed him a few things. He commented on Windows 7, so I opened up my virtual machine of OS/X... By the time the conversation was over, he was ready to kick Cupertino in the nuts, I think.

... Now, the punchline:

I'm writing this post after the FOURTH group of Starbucks patrons have made the connection that Samsung is now the same as Apple. They don't know the details, they don't really care, what they know is Apple is saying that Samsung is the same as Apple ... and with one simple Google Search, you get prices that are basically half for what seems to be the same products -- for nearly everything.

Two of these groups (including the husband/wife) asked me about my Samsung laptop, the second group noticed my Galaxy phone (also by Samsung)... Best billion dollar ad-campaign Samsung ever had.

  • Like 1

You can't have important things like this that affect the whole patent system decided on by a bunch of idiots half of which don't even have a smartphone.

Out of order. Intelligence isn't decided by owning a smartphone, or even being able to operate a computer, its highly likely these jurors are more intelligent then most people on this thread, thats almost a definite looking at some of the replys.

If they didn't rush the deliberation, how did they manage to goof?

[/size][/font][/color]

http://www.groklaw.n...012082510525390

Mistakes happen, especially as the Jury had to go over dozens of phones. The difference was only $2 million which is a drop in the bucket for Samsung.

Mistakes happen, especially as the Jury had to go over dozens of phones. The difference was only $2 million which is a drop in the bucket for Samsung.

It's not just a matter of some extra millions:

If the jury instructions [PDF] are as long and complex as they were in this case, a quick verdict can indeed mean it shirked its duty. For example, if the jury rushed so much it assigned $2 million dollars to Apple, and then had to subtract it because there was no infringement, it raises a valid question: what was the basis for any of the damages figures the jury came up with? If they had any actual basis, how could they goof like this? Was there a factual basis for any of the damages figures?

And then (as clearly stated by the foreman) the jury didn't even bother reading the instructions. This is what he had to say about the fine:

"We wanted to make sure the message we sent was not just a slap on the wrist," Hogan said. "We wanted to make sure it was sufficiently high to be painful, but not unreasonable."

Now check what's stated on the jury instructions that they didn't read:

The amount of those damages must be adequate to compensate the patent holder for the infringement. A damages award should put the patent holder in approximately the financial position it would have been in had the infringement not occurred, but in no event may the damages award be less than a reasonable royalty. You should keep in mind that the damages you award are meant to compensate the patent holder and not to punish an infringer.

its highly likely these jurors are more intelligent then most people on this thread, thats almost a definite looking at some of the replys.

Read the article I posted earlier in this thread. And the fact they are in a jury doesn't make them intelligent at all. The fact they needed one guy who leaned Apple to make decisions for them says a lot. Plus, what intelligent person doesn't get out of jury duty?

I rest my case your honor.

Read the article I posted earlier in this thread. And the fact they are in a jury doesn't make them intelligent at all. The fact they needed one guy who leaned Apple to make decisions for them says a lot. Plus, what intelligent person doesn't get out of jury duty?

I rest my case your honor.

Deciding a case that you didn't like the final result off, doesn't lessen or mean anything about their intelligence, it just makes you look idiot for making such daft statements.

Deciding a case that you didn't like the final result off, doesn't lessen or mean anything about their intelligence, it just makes you look idiot for making such daft statements.

This is about a ruling that was influenced by a single juror. I don't see how you can't see a problem.

This is about a ruling that was influenced by a single juror. I don't see how you can't see a problem.

No different then any court case, they all discuss it till they come to a conclusion. They discussed.

You're bitter at the result and waving around trying to find something to gripe about.

This is about a ruling that was influenced by a single juror. I don't see how you can't see a problem.

The jury decided together. They were not there to decide the validity of the patents Apple held only if Samsung infringed upon the patents as written, which Samsung did. Apple had a patent for the list scrolling bounce back effect, Samsung included that feature in their phones after Apple had that patent thus they were in breach of that patent. Are you suggesting the only reason the jury found Samsung in breach of that patent was because of this one juror who holds a patent himself? It was a similar situation with the pinch to zoom functionality.

Then when it comes to the trade dress, the Jury's decision was that the Samsung S1 and a few other devices ripped off Apples trade dress just like those fake rolex watches rip off the real rolex designs. It was so similar it looked like a knock off and based on the documentation Samsung themselves presented which basically detailed every mm of an iPhone and how they needed to copy it in every way imaginable it showed they purposefully and willfully attempted to copy the iPhone which is why the damages the jury awarded were so high.

Great comment on Engadget:

I need to point out that people have spoken with jurors, and some damning facts were revealed.

First, the jury felt from day one that Samsung had harmed Apple, the debate amongst them from that point was how much to punish them. It was a partial, biased jury from the get-go.

Second, most of the jurors were unfamiliar with patent law... so they looked up to the jury foreman, who was a tech patent holder with a patent similar to Apple's. Thus, he had a vested interest in upholding Apple's patents, to create a precedent to protect his own patent if it ever came up in a court. He basically led the rest of the jury on it, which is why the jury disregarded the prior art.

Third, the jury all came from near Cupertino, a region which economy depends on Apple's success and in which Steve Jobs is bigger than Jesus.

If ever there was a case where a mistrial should be declared because of a biased jury (excluding the Jim Crow days in the South), this is it. The jury had made their minds before the trial began, the foreman had a clear conflict of interest and had authority on all others, etc...

Everything Samsung's lawyers said fell on deaf ears. The jury was rigged to begin with, they could not win this.

Here is a VERBATIM quote from the foreman:

"?When I got in this case and I started looking at these patents I considered: ?If this was my patent and I was accused, could I defend it??? Hogan explained. On the night of Aug. 22, after closing arguments, ?a light bulb went on in my head,? he said. ?I thought, I need to do this for all of them.?"

Can ANYONE deny that this juror had a clear conflict of interest?

Here is the link http://www.bloomberg...persuasive.html. And it is a conflict of interest, don't kid yourself. The guy admitted he made his mind by thinking about his patent and not about the case at hand. He wanted to uphold Apple's patents not because of their own merits, but because he wants to protect his own patent.

If he helped declare Apple's patent invalid here because of prior art, he would have created a precedent that could have hurt his own patent. That is a clear and definite conflict of interest. It is the very definition of a conflict of interest.

Here is a definition of conflict of interest: "A conflict of interest is a set of circumstances that creates a risk that professional judgment or actions regarding a primary interest will be unduly influenced by a secondary interest"

The primary interest here is serving as an impartial jury and rendering an objective and unbiased ruling. The secondary interest is the protection of this juror's own patent, which he ADMITS he understood to be equivalent to Apple's own patents involved in the case.

Let's hope Samsung lawyers use all these statements and subpoena all jury members to testify whether they were influenced by the foreman. This whole thing is turning out to be very ripe for a mistrial.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I notice how you dodged the questions I had about the racism shown by ignorant, gullible, cowardly people when the Poles, like your partner, were the immigrants. Ahem. I wonder how you'd feel if native born Brits suddenly treated you as "dirty crooked immigrant" for being half Trump-American? If they ordered you to leave and "go back to your corrupt country" (on the other side of the Atlantic), would you go? The truth is based on facts as supported by evidence. As requested in your previous posts, I have used the facts in your own post to show everyone the truth.
    • US citizens are paying to their government, who could use that to fund healthcare and tuition and relieve the costs of these for citizens instead of making tax breaks that overwhelmingly favor the rich. I'm not saying that tariffs are the correct solution, but what else would they be used for? What else could Trump have in mind for wanting them, if he hasn't figured out that labor costs are higher in the US?
    • I’m in need of a new chair and it sounds like the backrest cannot be locked? I also sat on a Herman miller and was devastated that it couldn’t be locked also, what is going on with chairs. I want to be able to lock the backrest into any position but not even the Herman’s do that
    • Sihoo Doro C300 Pro V2 Ergonomic Office Chair review: The Ikea of chairs by Steven Parker I've reviewed a few gaming chairs over the past three years or so and generally found them to score well in our reviews. SIHOO reached out asking if I was interested in taking a look at their flagship chair, the Doro C300 Pro V2. I never got the chance to check out its predecessor, but the V2 is described as an "Adaptive Ergonomic Chair." It became available to buy in April of this year. Let's get things rolling with a closer look at the specifications and features. Specifications Doro C300 Pro V2 Model Ergonomic Materials Mesh Back and Seat; Soft PU Coated Armrests Height adjustability 45.5 - 53 cm / 17.5" - 20.9" Seat (w+d) 52 x 43 - 47 cm / 20.5" x 16.9" - 18.5" (adjustable) Backrest 52 – 60 cm / 20.5" - 23.6" (adjustable) Lumbar support Mesh built-in (adjustable) Armrest adjustability 8D Bionic Armrests Rocking angle 105°, 120°, 135° (fixed) Neck support Mesh built-in (adjustable) Net weight 27.3 kg / 59.64 lbs Weight support 150 kg / 330 lbs Colors Black, White Warranty 5 years (upon registering) Price $499.99, $539.99 Introduction At first glance, it looks like a chair that in another life wants to be a Herman Miller; It certainly looks like my Aeron Remastered, but the Doro C300 Pro V2 has quite a few more features and costs quite a bit less. SIHOO says that it is made up of a "DynaCore" system that tracks your movement and synchronizes the headrest, backrest, lumbar support, and armrests as you shift, twist, or recline. They also say that the "SyncroFlex Backrest" molds to your spine, which kind of describes how the mesh fabric works in most ergonomic chairs, but anyway. Below are the meat and potatoes measurements for the chair. Here is the same tech sheet, but in inches. Durability I would be remiss to not talk about the various durability testing this chair underwent before coming to market, as this is claimed on the product page. First of all, the chair is BIFMA-, SGS-, and TÜV-certified. As for durability, the tests undergone were: 100,000 Castor cycles tested 120,000 Armrest cycles tested 120,000 Recline cycles tested 120,000 Gas lift cycles tested 60,000 Armrest durability cycles tested 120,000 Rotation cycles tested Nothing about weights testing, though. Now that's all disclosed, now onto my own personal findings. Assembly The Doro C300 Pro V2 came in two large boxes (1) (2), and everything was packed very well, protecting the different parts of the chair. In the box, there is a folded sheet that explains the 12 steps to assemble it; they are: Remove the bottom cover on the aluminum base; Insert the five legs into the aluminum base and use ten screws to fasten them; Insert the castors into the legs; Replace the bottom cover on the bottom of the aluminum base; Place the Class 4 Hydraulics gas cylinder into the aluminum base; Screw the bottom part of the arm rests, taking care of the orientation using two screws on each side; Use three torx screws to fasten the footrest to the bottom of the seat; Fasten the backrest to the seat using four torx bolts; Fasten the armrests to the backrest using four Torx bolts (two on each side), taking care to note the orientation; Place the chair onto the Class 4 Hydraulics gas cylinder; Insert the headrest into the top of the backrest; Use two torx screws to fasten the headrest to the backrest. There's also an online guide you can refer to. Carefully unpacking the two boxes took around 15 minutes because almost everything is wrapped in plastic and protective foam; the chair assembly itself took around an hour. I say in the above assembly steps to take note of the orientation, because it's not obvious which way around the bottom portion of the armrests go, and although there is an L and R on the bottom of the armrests, it also wasn't clear from the instructions which was actually left or right, facing the chair, or in the seated down orientation? Anyway, I ended up putting the bottom portions on the wrong sides, and after securing one of the armrests, I discovered that although it was on the correct side, the armrest base could rotate a full 360°, but not when bolted to the chair, so I had to remove it, rotate it, and then bolt it back on. Truly an Ikea experience! Also, to complicate things further, although all the parts are labeled from A to X (yes, that's 24 parts) unhelpfully, these letters do not appear on the parts themselves or the package with the bolts, screws, and washers. There's also a pair of protective gloves in the box, but I think they were made for much smaller hands than I have. Even my friend, who is 5.1, had difficulty putting them on. Once assembled, I needed to sit down. Anyway, as I said, it looks quite similar to my Herman Miller. And here is the back of it. If you look at the product page and on Amazon, it seems like a lot of thought has gone into the chair itself and what it's capable of, but there is no mention at all about the castors, and this is an area where I think the chair trips up quite quickly. I found it difficult to move the chair in any direction. I asked a friend who came to visit me earlier this week to test my findings, and she said that the wheels were "no good," so it definitely isn't just me. I am 6'2 myself and a big guy, I work from home and gained a few pounds from mostly staying in and the hell away from other people. However, the Doro C300 Pro V2 is rated for up to 150kg (330lbs), which in my case is used well within its max rating. Ergonomics The number of adjustments you can make, right up to setting it in nap mode — which I haven't fully tested yet — is what you'd expect from a premium chair. Yes, you can go up and down (max 7.5 cm adjustment), rock back and forth (with tilt adjustment), and lock the chair between three stages of 105°, 120°, 135°, which is not quite as flat as the AndaSeat I tested at 160°. Some thought has also gone into the "8D" armrests, too, which are cushioned but quite firm; you'll only know it if you press hard into the PU-covered tops, which give about half a centimeter, but it's enough to ensure your skin won't get awkwardly stuck to it in warmer (or sweatier) conditions. It almost feels like plastic and is very easy to keep clean. However, the armrest positions move far too easily, and I am not sure what that "elbow" function is. Maybe it is good for a short person with short arms, anyway, I never used it and kept it flat at all times. There are eight levels of adjustment for the armrests, they are: backwards, forwards, swing left/right, height up and down, tilt, and 360° rotation, which can be handy for desk clearance. As I said, the armrest pads shift far too easily, which could give off an ergonomic vibe, but who wants the armrest sliding when you are shifting weight? The height adjustability does lock into place when lifting and adjusting. Comfort This is ultimately what it boils down to at the end of the day, right? Quite a lot of reviews praise the comfort of this chair, and I don't disagree that the mesh seating is quite comfortable. I am used to the material from my daily Herman Miller. However, the backrest cannot be locked into place, and this is actually a feature; as you shift or recline yourself on the chair, the backrest moves with your body. It took some getting used to. The lumbar gives ample support, but I would have preferred an adjustable one built into the seat base, as this causes the backrest to move up and down at will. Again, as with my previous chair review, this chair is also rated for tall people, but nowhere in the product documentation does it say how tall. Being 6'2 myself, I'm happy to say that the backrest is tall and wide enough, and thought has been given to being able to adjust the neck rest, but as others have mentioned in their reviews, people as tall as 6.2ft is about the limit for the neckrest. Conclusion What I didn't like The footrest is rated for 15kg (33 lbs), which to me seems a bit light, and after looking online, it seems like a chair footrest for adults must be at least twice that rating. In all honesty, they are just hollow metal tubes, so it is not recommended to let a kid sit on them. I also feel like it doesn't really go out far enough for my height, so that kind of puts the dampener on me being able to use it regularly. I'll just have to continue to use my subwoofer as a footrest! I do not like the armrests being able to shift around as easily as they can, and they are a little too forward-positioned in the chair to comfortably sit close to my desk, because even in the lowest height position, they don't allow me to go under the desk like is possible with my Herman Miller. I also feel like this chair could have been delivered partially constructed, especially the armrests on the seat, and why the aluminum base wasn't already pre-constructed (without the castors) is baffling, considering it would have fit in one of the two boxes that way. The instructions also need to be clearer. On the pamphlet, there's an A to X listing (which is also used in the steps), but none of the physical parts use this lettering system! What I did like I'll be honest, I haven't used it for very long, just one week, and seating comfort is subjective after all! Any spills wiped straight off it, the stitching, and the lines look great, not a fray to be seen or stitch out of place. It looks kind of cool, too. My favorite feature of these seats is the nap mode. While you're not lying completely flat, it leans far back enough to make you easily doze off after a heavy gaming or working session. Overall, this chair offers plenty of comfort features. The MSRP does vary quite a bit depending on the region, at £549.99 in the UK, and €580 in Europe, and $599 before tax in the U.S. However, shipping is free, which is a bonus for such a heavy item. Is it worth it, though? At three years' warranty, I think it's a decent deal. Another firm out of Germany sent me a free replacement hydraulic gas spring for a chair that failed after almost four years, so it was well outside its two-year warranty. My advice is to always try, as you might have the same luck I did. If I could fault it at all, it would be the constant shifting of the armrests and backrest. Where to buy Although the footrest variant normally costs $539.99, it has been discounted to $469.99 on the official website in Black or White. In fact, the non-footrest variant is only $40 cheaper. On Amazon, it currently costs more at $499.99 links below. Sihoo Doro C300 Pro V2 for $469.99 (official website) Sihoo Doro C300 Pro V2 for $499.99 at Amazon US SIHOO provided a free sample without any review or pre-approval. Good to know This Amazon link is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      207
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      73
    5. 5
      macoman
      62
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!