[BREAKING] Apple V. Samsung Jury reaches verdict.


Recommended Posts

This is about a ruling that was influenced by a single juror. I don't see how you can't see a problem.

I assume that you've never been on a jury? I have (legal requirement in the UK for every citizen over the age of 18 is available for jury duty) and that's the way it works - in fact in any gathering of any description, natural leaders emerge - it's just a fact of life.

Yep, Samsung lost the way we expected them to. By Apple using dirty tactics.

Look, from the reports, Samsung was dirty, as a business and in this court case, they are not innocent, you can't complain about bias, when you're up to your neck in it.

I assume that you've never been on a jury? I have (legal requirement in the UK for every citizen over the age of 18 is available for jury duty) and that's the way it works - in fact in any gathering of any description, natural leaders emerge - it's just a fact of life.

listen.. I'm 36 (you are younger judging from your profile so it's ironic you teaching me anything).. and yes in the states we have jury duty too. It's not a fact of life that one guy takes over and tells the jury what to vote and has clear cut conflict of interest. Jury lead by foreman wasn't even listening to Samsung's evidence because they have already decided from the start they were guilty. There was PLENTY of evidence that showed prior art and they just didn't register it at all. And this is not an opinion. It's the quotes of the jurors and the foreman.

That fact of life you call, in a legal case is called mistrial.

This thing is ripe for mistrial. Let's hope Samsung takes all of these statements at influenced jury and conflict of self-interest in appeal and invalidates this whole theatrical show called a trial where there was zero objectivity and was decided by one guy who had vested interest in upholding Apple's patents.

listen.. I'm 36 (you are much much younger judging from your profile so it's ironic you teaching me anything).. and yes in the states we have jury duty too. It's not a fact of life that one guy takes over and tells the jury what to vote and has clear cut conflict of interest. Jury lead by foreman wasn't even listening to Samsung's evidence because they have already decided from the start they were guilty.

That fact of life you call, in a legal case is called mistrial.

This thing is ripe for mistrial.

I wouldn't say 2 years is much older than me. Now, enough of the I'm older therefore wiser tone that you seem to be carrying.

Secondly, I'd be very surprised if every jury in the world didn't work like this. My experience of jury duty suggests this is exactly how they work.

You may have jury duty in that US, but have you ever been? I want to know because you seem to display a utopian view of how juries should work, rather than a realistic view of how they DO actually work.

I got a question. How is it that BF Goodrich, Yokohama, Dunlop, Hankook, etc...can all make a round...16/17/18/19/20 inch object that is black in color, has a tread, fits on another round object, and from 4 feet away cannot be told apart from another, and yet they don't get sued?

Simple, there is only one way to make a tyre. The only variable they can change is the tread pattern and the rest is an industry standard that they must comply with. Mobile phones do not need to be rectangular with rounded corners, it's not an industry standard. There are no design guidelines or rules that must be followed by the companies wanting to make mobile phones. So is different, not the same situation.

Samsung lost quite rightly Boz, get over it.

Not if even one of those claims are true, they didn't.

And there IS clear prior art. I can't fathom just how that was ignored unless there was a bias.

EDIT: This trial should never have been held in a region dependant on Apple. They were NEVER going to be an impartial jury.

Samsung lost quite rightly Boz, get over it.

From the facts that are popping up, that doesn't seem to be the case at all.

This is Samsung's problem though. I don't think this trial will stop Android innovating and outdoing Apple/iPhone in any case. Most of the things in this trial are already differentiated in Android.

This is more about having an objective and proper courts and justice system that admits prior art and not have one biased juror who leads everyone else on a sole crusade to protect his own patents.

I guess we will see what happens in appeals because with all the facts that are popping up from the blunt admissions from the foreman and other jurors and how they reached the verdict Samsung has a great case in appeals and will most likely take it all the way to the Supreme Court.

And btw, can't wait for Google / Apple trial for the 7 + 1 patents Apple stole. Curious to see how "rightly" you will feel about Apple stealing those if their products get banned in US.

EDIT: This trial should never have been held in a region dependant on Apple. They were NEVER going to be an impartial jury.

This is also something that boggles the mind. How in the hell is a jury going to impartial from Cupertino where this whole region depends on Apple. It's mind boggling but I guess that's why Apple filed the lawsuit there.

Boz, you will grasp at anything and everything now, if it had gone Samsung's way you be parroting how it was a perfect legal trial, look things don't always turn out how you want it to.

He might, and then it's up to the facts to prove him wrong. From all the juicy tidbits that are leaking out though, he has a point. If you believe he's so biased and the facts don't back him up, why don't you refute his arguments instead of just slinging ad hominem arguments?

He might, and then it's up to the facts to prove him wrong. From all the juicy tidbits that are leaking out though, he has a point. If you believe he's so biased and the facts don't back him up, why don't you refute his arguments instead of just slinging ad hominem arguments?

You don't think Boz is biased in anyway!! :o :o :o WOW

Wheres the ad hom? You think calling the jurors all idiots and insulting them cause they didn't give him the verdict he wanted is decent?

People are making the facts to be what they want them to be, they was claiming bias by the judge earlier totally ignoring it was Samsungs lawyers that kept screwing up.

You don't think Boz is biased in anyway!! :o :o :o WOW

Wheres the ad hom? You think calling the jurors all idiots and insulting them cause they didn't give him the verdict he wanted is decent?

People are making the facts to be what they want them to be, they was claiming bias by the judge earlier totally ignoring it was Samsungs lawyers that kept screwing up.

I think Boz is biased - but as they say, even a broken clock is right twice a day.

I don't see him insulting the jurors. I see him posting articles and evidence on how the jury didn't do their job as they should have. If you want to call out his bias, try refuting the facts instead of just calling him names. People might take you more seriously if you have any substance to offer; just a suggestion.

  • Like 3

People might take you more seriously if you have any substance to offer; just a suggestion.

I've long stopped taking Boz seriously, there is no point discussing.

You must have missed it then, here is the quote "You can't have important things like this that affect the whole patent system decided on by a bunch of idiots half of which don't even have a smartphone."

How does having or not having a smartphone in anyway be a judge of a person?

I've long stopped taking Boz seriously, there is no point discussing.

You must have missed it then, here is the quote "You can't have important things like this that affect the whole patent system decided on by a bunch of idiots half of which don't even have a smartphone."

How does having or not having a smartphone in anyway be a judge of a person?

HD-DVD is the superior format and you know it! :rofl:

  • Like 2

Everybody needs to stop posting about stuff they have NO CLUE about, you look like idiots.

Nobody here sat through the entire trial and heard all of the evidence, therefore your opinion on the outcome of the trial means diddly squat.

Give it a rest.

This is also something that boggles the mind. How in the hell is a jury going to impartial from Cupertino where this whole region depends on Apple. It's mind boggling but I guess that's why Apple filed the lawsuit there.

Your whole jury system is the only thing that boggles the mind really. Obviously companies are going to exploit it.

Apple really needs to stop this anti-competitive strong arming, unfortunately people are too stupid to NOT buy from Apple, when their products are ****, their business practices are ****, and they overcharge for their ****.

Yes, there are a lot of stupid people using Apple products! /s Tell that to the thousands of engineers and designers working at Apple, Google, Facebook, Twitter, and thousands of startups in silicon valley and many other places. Heck, go to to Google I/O and you'll see tons of engineers using Macbooks. Are they stupid as you claim? You do realize that some people prefer OS X and iOS and prefer Apple's products. Apple can charge whatever price they want because there is demand for their products. Lately prices for phones and tablets are similar with that of Samsung's prices. Regarding business practices, almost all of your beloved hardware companies make their gadgets through the assembly lines in china. You just recently started hearing more about Apple/Foxconn, because Apple bashing has become popular. Even Samsung was recently ridiculed for their bad labor practices. This doesn't make it in anyways alright, but all of the companies are improving their labor practices.

I've long stopped taking Boz seriously, there is no point discussing.

You must have missed it then, here is the quote "You can't have important things like this that affect the whole patent system decided on by a bunch of idiots half of which don't even have a smartphone."

How does having or not having a smartphone in anyway be a judge of a person?

Selective quoting the biased stuff that doesn't make sense while completely ignoring every other single point that does, right? ;)

If you wan't to avoid Boz's bias you can go straight here, read the trial issues and discuss.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I am not a US citizen nor a Trump fan. Respect to both left and right. But I will, for the sake of fun, predict something for my own. There will come a day when the US and China will collide like titans ( over Taiwan or anything else ). Then, on that day, some people in this comment section will realize how good an idea it was to become independent in areas like that. ( Or atleast try )
    • Microsoft Edge gets tons of security features, including AI model that can see your screen by Usama Jawad Microsoft Edge may not be the most popular browser out there, but it does receive quite frequent updates that sometimes bring surprising new features and axe others that are not as popular. Now, Microsoft has detailed some of the new security enhancements that it has introduced in Edge for Business, typically used by commercial customers. Microsoft has emphasized that security features are baked into Edge for Business and offer native integration with security and governance tools like Defender and Purview. Browser sessions are governed by default on managed devices but can also be governed through dedicated work profiles on unmanaged devices. An important aspect in this area is controlling the use of shadow AI. We have talked about this before, but it essentially restricts employees from using unsanctioned AI apps through data loss prevention (DLP) policies, with Edge redirecting them to trusted AI services like Microsoft 365 Copilot. This feature, available as a pay-as-you-go (PAYG) license, ensures that confidential data never exits AI boundaries set by your organization in Purview. Additionally, Microsoft also has strong DLP policies for contractors. Contractors leveraging a Entra ID-joined work profile provisioned by their contracting company on a device managed by their actual employer can be restricted from downloading files locally. In such scenarios, the file is saved on the contracting firm's OneDrive rather than being downloaded locally. Another useful Edge security feature disallows copying and pasting from unmanaged locations and apps. Similarly, DLP policies can be configured at a granular level to restrict screenshots or downloading of files from certain locations. In the same vein, IT admins can block the installation of extensions, hosted apps, themes and scripts, and control if users can install extensions from external locations. They can also enable the installation of specific extensions and allow users to request access to certain extensions, so that they can be managed on a case-by-case basis. Finally, Edge for Business now has an on-device AI model that uses computer vision to see what's on your screen and block potentially malicious content immediately. This does not rely on site reputation, as it simply monitors what is being displayed on your screen, which means that it is effective against malicious content that takes over your screen and employs scareware tactics. Since this is an on-device AI model, it does use your system's resources, so it's enabled by default only on devices with at least 2GB of RAM and four CPU cores. You can find more details in the Microsoft Mechanics video here.
    • Could you come up with a slightly less depressing background for Tux instead of that gray gradient? Doesn't have to be cheerful, just less of a downer...
    • Linux 7.2's first release candidate gets off to a good start by Paul Hill Credit: Larry Ewing It has been a few weeks since the release of Linux 7.1, and in that time, the Linux 7.2 merge window has been open, where developers can submit their features and patches ready for the upcoming release. That window is now shut, and the release candidate phase has begun so that new features can be tested and further fixes applied. According to the founder of Linux, Linus Torvalds, this week’s release candidate looks “reasonably normal”. Although we are super early in the release candidates, this is a good sign as it makes it more likely that an eighth release candidate will not be needed. Torvalds even mentioned that the update’s stats are only larger than they really are because there was another AMD header drop with a third of the patch just being AMD GPU register definitions, which aren’t big changes but make the code contributed look larger overall. In addition to this, he noted that just over half the patch is drivers, even when excluding the AMD register dump. The rest of the changes are spread out over architecture updates, tooling, documentation, and core kernel updates. In the next week, Torvalds says that he will be chilling out, taking the week “mostly off”. Despite this, he will be reading emails and keeping up with things, so if he is slow responding, now you know why. He said he is hoping for a calm week, but we will just have to see if the second release candidate is actually like that. We should expect seven or eight release candidates before Linux 7.2 is released, so expect it around the end of August. If you missed it a few weeks ago, be sure to check out our coverage of Linux 7.1's release.
    • Ridiculous claim that the labor cost difference of $6000 annually would increase cost per phone by $200. The employees produce 3 phones per month or what?
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Zeynel earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      JKR earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Dedicated
      Asgardi earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      496
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      248
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      154
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      86
    5. 5
      macoman
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!