[BREAKING] Apple V. Samsung Jury reaches verdict.


Recommended Posts

This is about a ruling that was influenced by a single juror. I don't see how you can't see a problem.

I assume that you've never been on a jury? I have (legal requirement in the UK for every citizen over the age of 18 is available for jury duty) and that's the way it works - in fact in any gathering of any description, natural leaders emerge - it's just a fact of life.

Yep, Samsung lost the way we expected them to. By Apple using dirty tactics.

Look, from the reports, Samsung was dirty, as a business and in this court case, they are not innocent, you can't complain about bias, when you're up to your neck in it.

I assume that you've never been on a jury? I have (legal requirement in the UK for every citizen over the age of 18 is available for jury duty) and that's the way it works - in fact in any gathering of any description, natural leaders emerge - it's just a fact of life.

listen.. I'm 36 (you are younger judging from your profile so it's ironic you teaching me anything).. and yes in the states we have jury duty too. It's not a fact of life that one guy takes over and tells the jury what to vote and has clear cut conflict of interest. Jury lead by foreman wasn't even listening to Samsung's evidence because they have already decided from the start they were guilty. There was PLENTY of evidence that showed prior art and they just didn't register it at all. And this is not an opinion. It's the quotes of the jurors and the foreman.

That fact of life you call, in a legal case is called mistrial.

This thing is ripe for mistrial. Let's hope Samsung takes all of these statements at influenced jury and conflict of self-interest in appeal and invalidates this whole theatrical show called a trial where there was zero objectivity and was decided by one guy who had vested interest in upholding Apple's patents.

listen.. I'm 36 (you are much much younger judging from your profile so it's ironic you teaching me anything).. and yes in the states we have jury duty too. It's not a fact of life that one guy takes over and tells the jury what to vote and has clear cut conflict of interest. Jury lead by foreman wasn't even listening to Samsung's evidence because they have already decided from the start they were guilty.

That fact of life you call, in a legal case is called mistrial.

This thing is ripe for mistrial.

I wouldn't say 2 years is much older than me. Now, enough of the I'm older therefore wiser tone that you seem to be carrying.

Secondly, I'd be very surprised if every jury in the world didn't work like this. My experience of jury duty suggests this is exactly how they work.

You may have jury duty in that US, but have you ever been? I want to know because you seem to display a utopian view of how juries should work, rather than a realistic view of how they DO actually work.

I got a question. How is it that BF Goodrich, Yokohama, Dunlop, Hankook, etc...can all make a round...16/17/18/19/20 inch object that is black in color, has a tread, fits on another round object, and from 4 feet away cannot be told apart from another, and yet they don't get sued?

Simple, there is only one way to make a tyre. The only variable they can change is the tread pattern and the rest is an industry standard that they must comply with. Mobile phones do not need to be rectangular with rounded corners, it's not an industry standard. There are no design guidelines or rules that must be followed by the companies wanting to make mobile phones. So is different, not the same situation.

Samsung lost quite rightly Boz, get over it.

Not if even one of those claims are true, they didn't.

And there IS clear prior art. I can't fathom just how that was ignored unless there was a bias.

EDIT: This trial should never have been held in a region dependant on Apple. They were NEVER going to be an impartial jury.

Samsung lost quite rightly Boz, get over it.

From the facts that are popping up, that doesn't seem to be the case at all.

This is Samsung's problem though. I don't think this trial will stop Android innovating and outdoing Apple/iPhone in any case. Most of the things in this trial are already differentiated in Android.

This is more about having an objective and proper courts and justice system that admits prior art and not have one biased juror who leads everyone else on a sole crusade to protect his own patents.

I guess we will see what happens in appeals because with all the facts that are popping up from the blunt admissions from the foreman and other jurors and how they reached the verdict Samsung has a great case in appeals and will most likely take it all the way to the Supreme Court.

And btw, can't wait for Google / Apple trial for the 7 + 1 patents Apple stole. Curious to see how "rightly" you will feel about Apple stealing those if their products get banned in US.

EDIT: This trial should never have been held in a region dependant on Apple. They were NEVER going to be an impartial jury.

This is also something that boggles the mind. How in the hell is a jury going to impartial from Cupertino where this whole region depends on Apple. It's mind boggling but I guess that's why Apple filed the lawsuit there.

Boz, you will grasp at anything and everything now, if it had gone Samsung's way you be parroting how it was a perfect legal trial, look things don't always turn out how you want it to.

He might, and then it's up to the facts to prove him wrong. From all the juicy tidbits that are leaking out though, he has a point. If you believe he's so biased and the facts don't back him up, why don't you refute his arguments instead of just slinging ad hominem arguments?

He might, and then it's up to the facts to prove him wrong. From all the juicy tidbits that are leaking out though, he has a point. If you believe he's so biased and the facts don't back him up, why don't you refute his arguments instead of just slinging ad hominem arguments?

You don't think Boz is biased in anyway!! :o :o :o WOW

Wheres the ad hom? You think calling the jurors all idiots and insulting them cause they didn't give him the verdict he wanted is decent?

People are making the facts to be what they want them to be, they was claiming bias by the judge earlier totally ignoring it was Samsungs lawyers that kept screwing up.

You don't think Boz is biased in anyway!! :o :o :o WOW

Wheres the ad hom? You think calling the jurors all idiots and insulting them cause they didn't give him the verdict he wanted is decent?

People are making the facts to be what they want them to be, they was claiming bias by the judge earlier totally ignoring it was Samsungs lawyers that kept screwing up.

I think Boz is biased - but as they say, even a broken clock is right twice a day.

I don't see him insulting the jurors. I see him posting articles and evidence on how the jury didn't do their job as they should have. If you want to call out his bias, try refuting the facts instead of just calling him names. People might take you more seriously if you have any substance to offer; just a suggestion.

  • Like 3

People might take you more seriously if you have any substance to offer; just a suggestion.

I've long stopped taking Boz seriously, there is no point discussing.

You must have missed it then, here is the quote "You can't have important things like this that affect the whole patent system decided on by a bunch of idiots half of which don't even have a smartphone."

How does having or not having a smartphone in anyway be a judge of a person?

I've long stopped taking Boz seriously, there is no point discussing.

You must have missed it then, here is the quote "You can't have important things like this that affect the whole patent system decided on by a bunch of idiots half of which don't even have a smartphone."

How does having or not having a smartphone in anyway be a judge of a person?

HD-DVD is the superior format and you know it! :rofl:

  • Like 2

Everybody needs to stop posting about stuff they have NO CLUE about, you look like idiots.

Nobody here sat through the entire trial and heard all of the evidence, therefore your opinion on the outcome of the trial means diddly squat.

Give it a rest.

This is also something that boggles the mind. How in the hell is a jury going to impartial from Cupertino where this whole region depends on Apple. It's mind boggling but I guess that's why Apple filed the lawsuit there.

Your whole jury system is the only thing that boggles the mind really. Obviously companies are going to exploit it.

Apple really needs to stop this anti-competitive strong arming, unfortunately people are too stupid to NOT buy from Apple, when their products are ****, their business practices are ****, and they overcharge for their ****.

Yes, there are a lot of stupid people using Apple products! /s Tell that to the thousands of engineers and designers working at Apple, Google, Facebook, Twitter, and thousands of startups in silicon valley and many other places. Heck, go to to Google I/O and you'll see tons of engineers using Macbooks. Are they stupid as you claim? You do realize that some people prefer OS X and iOS and prefer Apple's products. Apple can charge whatever price they want because there is demand for their products. Lately prices for phones and tablets are similar with that of Samsung's prices. Regarding business practices, almost all of your beloved hardware companies make their gadgets through the assembly lines in china. You just recently started hearing more about Apple/Foxconn, because Apple bashing has become popular. Even Samsung was recently ridiculed for their bad labor practices. This doesn't make it in anyways alright, but all of the companies are improving their labor practices.

I've long stopped taking Boz seriously, there is no point discussing.

You must have missed it then, here is the quote "You can't have important things like this that affect the whole patent system decided on by a bunch of idiots half of which don't even have a smartphone."

How does having or not having a smartphone in anyway be a judge of a person?

Selective quoting the biased stuff that doesn't make sense while completely ignoring every other single point that does, right? ;)

If you wan't to avoid Boz's bias you can go straight here, read the trial issues and discuss.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Again, this is an irrelevant attempt to attack the messenger. The truth does not require any justification.
    • Removed the blue and underline as you did not post a link. This would also  be considered spamming.
    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!