Customer kills gunman during Jacksonville robbery attempt


Recommended Posts

So by your logic the best action to take would have been wait and see if the robbers decided to kill someone? Only then do you "retaliate"? No, I don't think that is a good solution. Better that the robbers be shot, even if it did result in the death of the person doing wrong rather than wait to find out the true intentions. I understand where you are coming from with regard to preserving life but if I was one of the people the robber's gun was being pointed at I would certainly want someone else to deal with the gun wielding robber rather than wait and see what the robber actually did to me. In my opinion, the citizen did what was right.

It's not only about preserving the life of the robbers but only the clients of the store.

One day or another someone innocent will accidentally get shot.

I wont pretend to know how things are in the USA. I go there once in a while to visite family. But here it's really really really rare that someone gets shot by an armed robber. I mean i can't even recall the last time it happened. So from my Canadian pov it's better in an armed robbery to actually do nothing and let the police does its job.

Now maybe in USA armed robberies result in a worker or client being killed by a robber on a regular basis. So maybe it's a good idea in USA to actually intervene. I dunno.

  • Like 1

Armed. Robbery.

They presented a deadly threat, and the man was well within his rights to react to that threat with deadly force.

He was within his rights according to US law; that wasn't my contention. However, it is my opinion that such behaviour is unacceptable in a modern society and certainly shouldn't be praised. Criminals should be apprehended alive and face the criminal justice system - if that means letting them escape with the money during the robbery then so be it. The police and civilian use of weapons against suspects / would-be criminals is excessive and is bypassing the criminal justice system, hence the comparison to the Wild West.

How long will it be until the police force becomes like Judge Dredd where they can execute criminals on the spot? It's not far off that now. If you're happy with that sort of "justice" then that's great but I think it is reprehensible.

He was within his rights according to US law; that wasn't my contention. However, it is my opinion that such behaviour is unacceptable in a modern society and certainly shouldn't be praised. Criminals should be apprehended alive and face the criminal justice system - if that means letting them escape with the money during the robbery then so be it. The police and civilian use of weapons against suspects / would-be criminals is excessive and is bypassing the criminal justice system, hence the comparison to the Wild West.

How long will it be until the police force becomes like Judge Dredd where they can execute criminals on the spot? It's not far off that now. If you're happy with that sort of "justice" then that's great but I think it is reprehensible.

Actualyl police are trained to aim at center of mass and empty pistol. So uh yeah we pretty much have Judge Dredd here in Texas. Honestly I'm ok with it.

What's your point?

The reason people are trained to shoot for centrer of mass is because it avoids ricochets like this one. That's why you don't aim for the head, legs. arm. Aim for the chest and double tap. Texas law actually permits you to shoot someone in the chest twice if you deem them a threat to you, family, or a stranger. If the person still continues to be a threat afterwards you are allowed by texas law one shot to the head.

He was within his rights according to US law; that wasn't my contention. However, it is my opinion that such behaviour is unacceptable in a modern society and certainly shouldn't be praised. Criminals should be apprehended alive and face the criminal justice system - if that means letting them escape with the money during the robbery then so be it. The police and civilian use of weapons against suspects / would-be criminals is excessive and is bypassing the criminal justice system, hence the comparison to the Wild West.

How long will it be until the police force becomes like Judge Dredd where they can execute criminals on the spot? It's not far off that now. If you're happy with that sort of "justice" then that's great but I think it is reprehensible.

So how exactly do you propose capturing these armed suspects when police or other civilians shouldn't use weapons? Are you just going to ask really nice? See, here's the issue, once they are in the act of committing the crime, they are a criminal. There need not be a justice system to prove to me that they are standing there, with a gun, asking for money from a register. Once they are a criminal, they lose the rights that most people have in my eyes. Yes, we have a justice system and people are innocent until proven guilty by that system, but tape and multiple witnesses will guarantee they are proven guilty in court as well, but they put someone else's life in danger, so they aren't necessarily going to get that chance to weasel their way out of the charges.

There are a lot of things about guns that can be controversial or up for debate, but arguing legitimate use by a law abiding citizen against a criminal in the process of breaking the law is a pretty silly one to try to debate.

?He?s always been a marksman,? his wife said. ?He shoots in competitions, but this is the first time he?s ever killed anyone and I don?t know how he?ll handle that.?

So why did he fire 2 shots?, If he is a so called marksman was the arm/leg too difficult for this marksman to go after? (yes i know moving targets etc)

You ALWAYS double tap to the chest, makes sure the perp is dead

One of the first things you learn is to never pull out your gun unless you need to, and then you use the weapon to it's fullest potential

I salute Grandpa for a job well done, I'm fairly sure that at 57 turning to get the other perp would have been hard and might have endangered innocent people

There need not be a justice system to prove to me that they are standing there, with a gun, asking for money from a register. Once they are a criminal, they lose the rights that most people have in my eyes.

Then we fundamentally disagree. We have very different ideas of what constitutes justice.

It's hardly about justice as much as it's about ensuring an innocent life is secured.

...by allowing somebody who isn't "innocent" to die, which I don't consider to be acceptable. But that's obviously a cultural difference, as the US is the only western country to still have the death penalty.

So why did he fire 2 shots?, If he is a so called marksman was the arm/leg too difficult for this marksman to go after? (yes i know moving targets etc)

The truth: a single bullet wound doesn't always drop people. Acutally, it's quite common for people to get shot in a limb then return fire.

Then we fundamentally disagree. We have very different ideas of what constitutes justice.

That's fine because laws will back me up in case the situation ever arises, such as this one.

...by allowing somebody who isn't "innocent" to die, which I don't consider to be acceptable. But that's obviously a cultural difference, as the US is the only western country to still have the death penalty.

In a scenario like this one there is one person (or two in this specific case) that is disregarding all respect of life and law. The other person is a bystander. The criminal has made his choice to endanger an innocent life. No one can know the future, all anyone would know is that a completely innocent man is having his life threatened. It is plain as day to me who deserves to have assurance of his next breath. You say that is a cultural difference, to me, it would seem correct as universal.

I was waiting for those replies - your talking about an outdated ROE from when we were invading. Considering the fact we are now nation building that is no longer the ROE.

Being someone in the military - no having a gun pointed at you is NOT a direct threat to life. If i'm in a standoff with a guy holding a gun I cannot fire at him, unless my life is in immediate danger. If that guy turns tail and runs away I still cannot shoot him. It's all judgemental at that point - but a gun pointing at you is not a threat to life.

He was within his rights according to US law; that wasn't my contention. However, it is my opinion that such behaviour is unacceptable in a modern society and certainly shouldn't be praised. Criminals should be apprehended alive and face the criminal justice system - if that means letting them escape with the money during the robbery then so be it. The police and civilian use of weapons against suspects / would-be criminals is excessive and is bypassing the criminal justice system, hence the comparison to the Wild West.

How long will it be until the police force becomes like Judge Dredd where they can execute criminals on the spot? It's not far off that now. If you're happy with that sort of "justice" then that's great but I think it is reprehensible.

That would be fine if a modern society were a utopia of peace love and happiness, where no crime was ever committed, we all have joy-joy days, wish each other "be wells" and used the 3 seashells to wipe our butts.

Real life dictates otherwise, a modern society is rife with criminal elements, we must defend ourselves from them. Heroism and bravery in the face of criminals, protecting inoocents must ABSOLUTELY be praised, society needs to know that its OK to NOT be prey anymore.

If its possible to easily apprehend criminals alive, sure why not, but the justice system has let everyone down, punishments are not nearly severe enough, or are madly disproportionate to the crime. Attack someone, you get maybe a few weeks in jail, copy a music CD and you are fined tens of thousands of dollars and spend months in jail.

If a criminal does something lethally threatenting, violent or deadly to an innocent they deserve summary execution, end of story.

I was waiting for those replies - your talking about an outdated ROE from when we were invading. Considering the fact we are now nation building that is no longer the ROE.

Being someone in the military - no having a gun pointed at you is NOT a direct threat to life. If i'm in a standoff with a guy holding a gun I cannot fire at him, unless my life is in immediate danger. If that guy turns tail and runs away I still cannot shoot him. It's all judgemental at that point - but a gun pointing at you is not a threat to life.

You are comparing rules of engagement in Afghanistan to a civilian corner store.

I was waiting for those replies - your talking about an outdated ROE from when we were invading. Considering the fact we are now nation building that is no longer the ROE.

Being someone in the military - no having a gun pointed at you is NOT a direct threat to life. If i'm in a standoff with a guy holding a gun I cannot fire at him, unless my life is in immediate danger. If that guy turns tail and runs away I still cannot shoot him. It's all judgemental at that point - but a gun pointing at you is not a threat to life.

That's interesting. Albeit in a robbery, the pointing of a gun at a person is a threat on their life. If it wasn't recognized as a threat on their life then people wouldn't react to it.

Good thing Florida at least has sensible carry laws.

Another scumbag chlorinated out of the gene-pool

Exactly! More states should have laws like Florida - I have my permit and carry cause you never know what you end up against!! This is why we as law biding citizens have the right to carry and protect ourselves!

That would be fine if a modern society were a utopia of peace love and happiness, where no crime was ever committed, we all have joy-joy days, wish each other "be wells" and used the 3 seashells to wipe our butts.

Real life dictates otherwise, a modern society is rife with criminal elements, we must defend ourselves from them.

That might be true in the US but it's thankfully not something I have to worry about in the UK.

However, I would like to point out that my opinion changes when it comes to defending one's property. If somebody breaks into your home I believe a person should have the right to use deadly - but not excessive - force to defend against it. That didn't use to be the case legally in the UK but is something that has changed over recent years, particularly after the high profile conviction of Tony Martin. I'm just opposed to people carrying weapons and being allowed to kill people, regardless of whether they're in the process of committing a crime. That isn't allowed in the UK and I'm very grateful that is the case.

You are comparing rules of engagement in Afghanistan to a civilian corner store.

Not only that, but he's wrong about the ROE. I'm in Afghanistan right now and I can tell you, you most certainly can and will shoot to kill if a local was pointing a gun at you. The government may be telling the public that we're "rebuilding", but I can tell you that the insurgents are worse than ever this time around. This is my third time here since 2007.

That might be true in the US but it's thankfully not something I have to worry about in the UK.

By what definition do you not have to worry..........in the vast majority of cases its only the crminal that is armed since do gooders virtually removed the possibility of legally owning anything other than a shot gun in the UK.In one foul swoop they drove many people to sell their legally licensed and locked up guns to ner do wells just to recoup their loses.It drove many a gun club and armoury buisnesses to the wall for what,there are more guns on the street now than there ever was before such legislation came in to power.

However, I would like to point out that my opinion changes when it comes to defending one's property. If somebody breaks into your home I believe a person should have the right to use deadly - but not excessive - force to defend against it. That didn't use to be the case legally in the UK but is something that has changed over recent years, particularly after the high profile conviction of Tony Martin. I'm just opposed to people carrying weapons and being allowed to kill people, regardless of whether they're in the process of committing a crime. That isn't allowed in the UK and I'm very grateful that is the case.

Deadly but not excessive.....what are you in a Batman movie or something.

You are legally allowed to use resonable force to subdue the perp until the point an officer of the law arrives on the scene, at which point the perp will say you used excessive force and have you arrested.

Tony Martin willfully,purposfully and with intent waited for and shot an intruder thats why he got such a stiff sentence.

I don't see why this is considered a positive outcome by many here. Rather than apprehending the would-be robber and trying him in a court of law he was shot dead. Taking somebody's life is not an appropriate punishment for robbery. From what I can tell from the article the customer wasn't in any direct danger and had he done nothing he would have escaped without injury.

This isn't justice. This is vigilantism. The US is reverting to the Wild West. How long will it be until disputes are settled by duels in the middle of the street?

Another case of somebody from the UK protecting the criminal. If you point a gun at somebody, you should expect yourself to be killed the the very least. Somebody threatening another life for any reason other than self defense deserves to be killed.

I don't see why this is considered a positive outcome by many here. Rather than apprehending the would-be robber and trying him in a court of law he was shot dead. Taking somebody's life is not an appropriate punishment for robbery. From what I can tell from the article the customer wasn't in any direct danger and had he done nothing he would have escaped without injury.
This isn't justice. This is vigilantism. The US is reverting to the Wild West. How long will it be until disputes are settled by duels in the middle of the street?

|

I don't see why this is considered a positive outcome by many here. Rather than apprehending the would-be robber and trying him in a court of law he was shot dead. Taking somebody's life is not an appropriate punishment for robbery. From what I can tell from the article the customer wasn't in any direct danger and had he done nothing he would have escaped without injury.
However, I would like to point out that my opinion changes when it comes to defending one's property. If somebody breaks into your home I believe a person should have the right to use deadly - but not excessive - force to defend against it. That didn't use to be the case legally in the UK but is something that has changed over recent years, particularly after the high profile conviction of Tony Martin. I'm just opposed to people carrying weapons and being allowed to kill people, regardless of whether they're in the process of committing a crime. That isn't allowed in the UK and I'm very grateful that is the case.

Going by the above post you made, I think you should go back to watching My Little Pony.

1. Apprehending the robber(you start the robbery, then you are the robber, not the would-be robber), doesn't work. A bullet to the head stops the life of crime right there.

2. It isn't vigilantism, it is the law in the US, where people are allowed to carry weapons - and even use them.

3. Don't see the positive outcome of some scumbag getting shot? Seriously? You don't see the positive outcome in this? (Clue - A SCUMBAG DIED - Therefore 1 less scumbag to worry about).

4. And is there a difference between a home/shop owner defending his/her property, and a person who happens across a robbery and shoots the robber?

  • Like 1

Not only that, but he's wrong about the ROE. I'm in Afghanistan right now and I can tell you, you most certainly can and will shoot to kill if a local was pointing a gun at you. The government may be telling the public that we're "rebuilding", but I can tell you that the insurgents are worse than ever this time around. This is my third time here since 2007.

Well I understood the US RoE was based on Graduated Force but correct me if I am wrong. I know that the UK's RoE are that you cannot fire, even when you see a weapon, unless fired upon. Also the idea of Double Tapping is a bit ludicrous and best left in the movies, you have little control where the second shot will go when Double Tapping so it is always best to bring the weapon back to the firing position.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • US citizens are paying to their government, who could use that to fund healthcare and tuition and relieve the costs of these for citizens instead of making tax breaks that overwhelmingly favor the rich. I'm not saying that tariffs are the correct solution, but what else would they be used for? What else could Trump have in mind for wanting them, if he hasn't figured out that labor costs are higher in the US?
    • I’m in need of a new chair and it sounds like the backrest cannot be locked? I also sat on a Herman miller and was devastated that it couldn’t be locked also, what is going on with chairs. I want to be able to lock the backrest into any position but not even the Herman’s do that
    • Sihoo Doro C300 Pro V2 Ergonomic Office Chair review: The Ikea of chairs by Steven Parker I've reviewed a few gaming chairs over the past three years or so and generally found them to score well in our reviews. SIHOO reached out asking if I was interested in taking a look at their flagship chair, the Doro C300 Pro V2. I never got the chance to check out its predecessor, but the V2 is described as an "Adaptive Ergonomic Chair." It became available to buy in April of this year. Let's get things rolling with a closer look at the specifications and features. Specifications Doro C300 Pro V2 Model Ergonomic Materials Mesh Back and Seat; Soft PU Coated Armrests Height adjustability 45.5 - 53 cm / 17.5" - 20.9" Seat (w+d) 52 x 43 - 47 cm / 20.5" x 16.9" - 18.5" (adjustable) Backrest 52 – 60 cm / 20.5" - 23.6" (adjustable) Lumbar support Mesh built-in (adjustable) Armrest adjustability 8D Bionic Armrests Rocking angle 105°, 120°, 135° (fixed) Neck support Mesh built-in (adjustable) Net weight 27.3 kg / 59.64 lbs Weight support 150 kg / 330 lbs Colors Black, White Warranty 5 years (upon registering) Price $499.99, $539.99 Introduction At first glance, it looks like a chair that in another life wants to be a Herman Miller; It certainly looks like my Aeron Remastered, but the Doro C300 Pro V2 has quite a few more features and costs quite a bit less. SIHOO says that it is made up of a "DynaCore" system that tracks your movement and synchronizes the headrest, backrest, lumbar support, and armrests as you shift, twist, or recline. They also say that the "SyncroFlex Backrest" molds to your spine, which kind of describes how the mesh fabric works in most ergonomic chairs, but anyway. Below are the meat and potatoes measurements for the chair. Here is the same tech sheet, but in inches. Durability I would be remiss to not talk about the various durability testing this chair underwent before coming to market, as this is claimed on the product page. First of all, the chair is BIFMA-, SGS-, and TÜV-certified. As for durability, the tests undergone were: 100,000 Castor cycles tested 120,000 Armrest cycles tested 120,000 Recline cycles tested 120,000 Gas lift cycles tested 60,000 Armrest durability cycles tested 120,000 Rotation cycles tested Nothing about weights testing, though. Now that's all disclosed, now onto my own personal findings. Assembly The Doro C300 Pro V2 came in two large boxes (1) (2), and everything was packed very well, protecting the different parts of the chair. In the box, there is a folded sheet that explains the 12 steps to assemble it; they are: Remove the bottom cover on the aluminum base; Insert the five legs into the aluminum base and use ten screws to fasten them; Insert the castors into the legs; Replace the bottom cover on the bottom of the aluminum base; Place the Class 4 Hydraulics gas cylinder into the aluminum base; Screw the bottom part of the arm rests, taking care of the orientation using two screws on each side; Use three torx screws to fasten the footrest to the bottom of the seat; Fasten the backrest to the seat using four torx bolts; Fasten the armrests to the backrest using four Torx bolts (two on each side), taking care to note the orientation; Place the chair onto the Class 4 Hydraulics gas cylinder; Insert the headrest into the top of the backrest; Use two torx screws to fasten the headrest to the backrest. There's also an online guide you can refer to. Carefully unpacking the two boxes took around 15 minutes because almost everything is wrapped in plastic and protective foam; the chair assembly itself took around an hour. I say in the above assembly steps to take note of the orientation, because it's not obvious which way around the bottom portion of the armrests go, and although there is an L and R on the bottom of the armrests, it also wasn't clear from the instructions which was actually left or right, facing the chair, or in the seated down orientation? Anyway, I ended up putting the bottom portions on the wrong sides, and after securing one of the armrests, I discovered that although it was on the correct side, the armrest base could rotate a full 360°, but not when bolted to the chair, so I had to remove it, rotate it, and then bolt it back on. Truly an Ikea experience! Also, to complicate things further, although all the parts are labeled from A to X (yes, that's 24 parts) unhelpfully, these letters do not appear on the parts themselves or the package with the bolts, screws, and washers. There's also a pair of protective gloves in the box, but I think they were made for much smaller hands than I have. Even my friend, who is 5.1, had difficulty putting them on. Once assembled, I needed to sit down. Anyway, as I said, it looks quite similar to my Herman Miller. And here is the back of it. If you look at the product page and on Amazon, it seems like a lot of thought has gone into the chair itself and what it's capable of, but there is no mention at all about the castors, and this is an area where I think the chair trips up quite quickly. I found it difficult to move the chair in any direction. I asked a friend who came to visit me earlier this week to test my findings, and she said that the wheels were "no good," so it definitely isn't just me. I am 6'2 myself and a big guy, I work from home and gained a few pounds from mostly staying in and the hell away from other people. However, the Doro C300 Pro V2 is rated for up to 150kg (330lbs), which in my case is used well within its max rating. Ergonomics The number of adjustments you can make, right up to setting it in nap mode — which I haven't fully tested yet — is what you'd expect from a premium chair. Yes, you can go up and down (max 7.5 cm adjustment), rock back and forth (with tilt adjustment), and lock the chair between three stages of 105°, 120°, 135°, which is not quite as flat as the AndaSeat I tested at 160°. Some thought has also gone into the "8D" armrests, too, which are cushioned but quite firm; you'll only know it if you press hard into the PU-covered tops, which give about half a centimeter, but it's enough to ensure your skin won't get awkwardly stuck to it in warmer (or sweatier) conditions. It almost feels like plastic and is very easy to keep clean. However, the armrest positions move far too easily, and I am not sure what that "elbow" function is. Maybe it is good for a short person with short arms, anyway, I never used it and kept it flat at all times. There are eight levels of adjustment for the armrests, they are: backwards, forwards, swing left/right, height up and down, tilt, and 360° rotation, which can be handy for desk clearance. As I said, the armrest pads shift far too easily, which could give off an ergonomic vibe, but who wants the armrest sliding when you are shifting weight? The height adjustability does lock into place when lifting and adjusting. Comfort This is ultimately what it boils down to at the end of the day, right? Quite a lot of reviews praise the comfort of this chair, and I don't disagree that the mesh seating is quite comfortable. I am used to the material from my daily Herman Miller. However, the backrest cannot be locked into place, and this is actually a feature; as you shift or recline yourself on the chair, the backrest moves with your body. It took some getting used to. The lumbar gives ample support, but I would have preferred an adjustable one built into the seat base, as this causes the backrest to move up and down at will. Again, as with my previous chair review, this chair is also rated for tall people, but nowhere in the product documentation does it say how tall. Being 6'2 myself, I'm happy to say that the backrest is tall and wide enough, and thought has been given to being able to adjust the neck rest, but as others have mentioned in their reviews, people as tall as 6.2ft is about the limit for the neckrest. Conclusion What I didn't like The footrest is rated for 15kg (33 lbs), which to me seems a bit light, and after looking online, it seems like a chair footrest for adults must be at least twice that rating. In all honesty, they are just hollow metal tubes, so it is not recommended to let a kid sit on them. I also feel like it doesn't really go out far enough for my height, so that kind of puts the dampener on me being able to use it regularly. I'll just have to continue to use my subwoofer as a footrest! I do not like the armrests being able to shift around as easily as they can, and they are a little too forward-positioned in the chair to comfortably sit close to my desk, because even in the lowest height position, they don't allow me to go under the desk like is possible with my Herman Miller. I also feel like this chair could have been delivered partially constructed, especially the armrests on the seat, and why the aluminum base wasn't already pre-constructed (without the castors) is baffling, considering it would have fit in one of the two boxes that way. The instructions also need to be clearer. On the pamphlet, there's an A to X listing (which is also used in the steps), but none of the physical parts use this lettering system! What I did like I'll be honest, I haven't used it for very long, just one week, and seating comfort is subjective after all! Any spills wiped straight off it, the stitching, and the lines look great, not a fray to be seen or stitch out of place. It looks kind of cool, too. My favorite feature of these seats is the nap mode. While you're not lying completely flat, it leans far back enough to make you easily doze off after a heavy gaming or working session. Overall, this chair offers plenty of comfort features. The MSRP does vary quite a bit depending on the region, at £549.99 in the UK, and €580 in Europe, and $599 before tax in the U.S. However, shipping is free, which is a bonus for such a heavy item. Is it worth it, though? At three years' warranty, I think it's a decent deal. Another firm out of Germany sent me a free replacement hydraulic gas spring for a chair that failed after almost four years, so it was well outside its two-year warranty. My advice is to always try, as you might have the same luck I did. If I could fault it at all, it would be the constant shifting of the armrests and backrest. Where to buy Although the footrest variant normally costs $539.99, it has been discounted to $469.99 on the official website in Black or White. In fact, the non-footrest variant is only $40 cheaper. On Amazon, it currently costs more at $499.99 links below. Sihoo Doro C300 Pro V2 for $469.99 (official website) Sihoo Doro C300 Pro V2 for $499.99 at Amazon US SIHOO provided a free sample without any review or pre-approval. Good to know This Amazon link is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Making US citizens pay is a prominent tool? Joke of the week…
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      207
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      73
    5. 5
      macoman
      62
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!