Customer kills gunman during Jacksonville robbery attempt


Recommended Posts

?He?s always been a marksman,? his wife said. ?He shoots in competitions, but this is the first time he?s ever killed anyone and I don?t know how he?ll handle that.?

So why did he fire 2 shots?, If he is a so called marksman was the arm/leg too difficult for this marksman to go after? (yes i know moving targets etc)

Like people said before me, center mass is easier to hit than limbs. Plus, why would you want the scumbag to live and pay for him while he rots in prison for 10-15years?

Well I understood the US RoE was based on Graduated Force but correct me if I am wrong. I know that the UK's RoE are that you cannot fire, even when you see a weapon, unless fired upon. Also the idea of Double Tapping is a bit ludicrous and best left in the movies, you have little control where the second shot will go when Double Tapping so it is always best to bring the weapon back to the firing position.

If you cannot fire a controlled grouping with a standard civilian issue firearm then you shouldn't be using that firearm.

Well I understood the US RoE was based on Graduated Force but correct me if I am wrong. I know that the UK's RoE are that you cannot fire, even when you see a weapon, unless fired upon. Also the idea of Double Tapping is a bit ludicrous and best left in the movies, you have little control where the second shot will go when Double Tapping so it is always best to bring the weapon back to the firing position.

If someone is to do bodily harm to another person (ie: rape), or kill someone, you have the right to engage the threat. Double tapping does work, your second shot is more accurate than you think.

Well I understood the US RoE was based on Graduated Force but correct me if I am wrong. I know that the UK's RoE are that you cannot fire, even when you see a weapon, unless fired upon. Also the idea of Double Tapping is a bit ludicrous and best left in the movies, you have little control where the second shot will go when Double Tapping so it is always best to bring the weapon back to the firing position.

There is a difference between just seeing a weapon and having it pointed at someone. Ive seen reports where a US soldier has asked to engage somwone with an AK, but that individual is not deploying the weapon, the soldier was denied pwemission. A firearm pointed AT anyone is a clear and present danger.

A double tap is not a Hollywood invention, its actually a valid technique taught by firearms instructors all over. Dont carry something you cannot control is the bottom line, and most common calibers are very controllable for a follow up shot, im not aware of anyone that carries a 500 Smith or 454 Casull so im not seeing uncontrolled follow ups

I don't see why this is considered a positive outcome by many here. Rather than apprehending the would-be robber and trying him in a court of law he was shot dead. Taking somebody's life is not an appropriate punishment for robbery. From what I can tell from the article the customer wasn't in any direct danger and had he done nothing he would have escaped without injury.

This isn't justice. This is vigilantism. The US is reverting to the Wild West. How long will it be until disputes are settled by duels in the middle of the street?

  • Like 1

I don't see why this is considered a positive outcome by many here. Rather than apprehending the would-be robber and trying him in a court of law he was shot dead. Taking somebody's life is not an appropriate punishment for robbery. From what I can tell from the article the customer wasn't in any direct danger and had he done nothing he would have escaped without injury.

This isn't justice. This is vigilantism. The US is reverting to the Wild West. How long will it be until disputes are settled by duels in the middle of the street?

Once again theyarecomingforyou is the voice of reason.

Once again theyarecomingforyou is the voice of reason.

Sure when someone has a gun out standing there and waiting for the cops to arrive and arrest him is surly the reasonable thing to do. When a gun is drawn, things are serious and its no time to stand there and tell the guy wait till I call the cops. :rolleyes: Secondly no the U.S isn't turning into the wild west and no duels wont happen.

A double tap is not a Hollywood invention, its actually a valid technique taught by firearms instructors all over. Dont carry something you cannot control is the bottom line, and most common calibers are very controllable for a follow up shot, im not aware of anyone that carries a 500 Smith or 454 Casull so im not seeing uncontrolled follow ups

Double Tapping is great on the range and might be a valid method for very close range shooting but I was always taught never to fire unless you have the target in your sight. The idea that, under a stressful situation where your breathing and heartbeat are erratic, that you can drop the gun and have it be in exactly the place needed for the shot isn't realistic in the real world. When I was training we simulated by running the range (400m) with an ammo box over your head to get you knackered. Here the target doesn't move unlike in real life. Now firing twice in quick secession, yes and this guy knew how to handle a gun but I doubt very much he double tapped.

Jacksonville robbery suspect charged with accomplice's death

A customer who shot and killed an armed robber inside a Jacksonville discount store Monday reacted with calm and precision in an extreme situation, police said Wednesday at a briefing on the arrest of a second suspect.

?He put himself in harm?s way by getting involved,? homicide Lt. Rob Schoonover said. ?To me, that is an extraordinary person to do that.?

The two men who came into the Dollar General at 1921 Dunn Ave. were holding CO2 BB pistols that resembled handguns and were threatening the two employees in the store, police said.

Police are not identifying the man who shot Rakeem Deveal Odoms, 22, at the counter where Odoms was holding the store manager at gunpoint. Odoms died at the scene from .45-caliber wounds to his head, chest and shoulder.

On Tuesday, police arrested Aundre Krishna Campbell, 19, of the 12300 block of Kiwi Court, as Odoms? accomplice. He was picked up on an unrelated burglary warrant after a family member contacted police. He was later charged with robbery and felony murder because Odoms died during the crime.

?To us, he prevented any other violence from happening,? Schoonover said of the man who was picking up groceries at the store when the attempted robbery unfolded just after 9 p.m. The manager and clerk in the store could have been harmed, he said.

The man, described by his family as a 57-year-old business owner and grandfather, was at the rear of the store and walked to the front where he pulled his concealed handgun about 5 feet from the suspects.

?He produced his weapon, [and] ordered both suspects to drop their guns,? Schoonover said. ?Rakeem Odoms did not. He fired three times, striking him, killing him at the scene.?

The suspect later identified as Campbell dropped his gun and ran, jumping into a white sport-utility vehicle and heading east.

?The citizen used good restraint in not firing at him,? Schoonover said.

Schoonover said store surveillance was helpful in determining what happened at the scene.

The two CO2 guns were recovered at the store.

Campbell and Odoms are being investigated for several other robberies in Jacksonville, Schoonover said.

The man?s family told the Times-Union he did not want to comment.

?He unfortunately got put in a situation,? his son said Wednesday.

And while his father understands he may have stopped something from escalating, there are consequences.

?He?s got to deal with taking someone else?s life.?

Source

Double Tapping is great on the range and might be a valid method for very close range shooting but I was always taught never to fire unless you have the target in your sight. The idea that, under a stressful situation where your breathing and heartbeat are erratic, that you can drop the gun and have it be in exactly the place needed for the shot isn't realistic in the real world. When I was training we simulated by running the range (400m) with an ammo box over your head to get you knackered. Here the target doesn't move unlike in real life. Now firing twice in quick secession, yes and this guy knew how to handle a gun but I doubt very much he double tapped.

Most self defense situations ARE very close range shooting, average distance no more than 7 yards.

People who are serious about self defense train, and train often, often even tactically where stress comes into play. While it may only be at the range, I can fire 2 shots, center mass (about a 2.5 inch group), with less than a half second between shots at 7 yards, I'd bet someone like DocM blows me into the weeds. Thats more than good enough even with stress and a moving target.

This gentleman fired and hit the felon at least 3 times at close range, sounds like it may have been a typical 2 center mass "double tap" and 1 to the head after a quick assessment that the felon had not ceased to be a threat after the first 2 shots.

Most self defense situations ARE very close range shooting, average distance no more than 7 yards.

People who are serious about self defense train, and train often, often even tactically where stress comes into play. While it may only be at the range, I can fire 2 shots, center mass (about a 2.5 inch group), with less than a half second between shots at 7 yards, I'd bet someone like DocM blows me into the weeds. Thats more than good enough even with stress and a moving target.

This gentleman fired and hit the felon at least 3 times at close range, sounds like it may have been a typical 2 center mass "double tap" and 1 to the head after a quick assessment that the felon had not ceased to be a threat after the first 2 shots.

Well from the post 2 up he shot from 5 feet away and from the linked article "Odoms died at the scene from .45-caliber wounds to his head, chest and shoulder"

He seems to have done everything right, but still wouldn't call that a double tap.

Well from the post 2 up he shot from 5 feet away and from the linked article "Odoms died at the scene from .45-caliber wounds to his head, chest and shoulder"

He seems to have done everything right, but still wouldn't call that a double tap.

At this point Im just going to assume we aren't on the same page as to what a double tap is, and thats cool with me.

Ukers really have no right to discuss anything in this thread like some of them are. After all, their own government tells them to let themselves get robbed and defending yourself gets you put in jail.

I'm pretty sure people from countries other than the US are allowed to discuss this and no, you're allowed to defend yourself in the UK.

It's odd you think people from other countries shouldn't be able to talk about it.. strange.

Also another shooting in the US - Fatal US shooting at New Jersey supermarket

I'm pretty sure people from countries other than the US are allowed to discuss this and no, you're allowed to defend yourself in the UK.

It's odd you think people from other countries shouldn't be able to talk about it.. strange.

Also another shooting in the US - Fatal US shooting at New Jersey supermarket

You can talk about it but it doesn't mean you're right. Especially coming from a country where firearms are so restricted and very few people have experience with firearms. Most of what U.K people know about firearms is from the media and movies. Combine those two and it will form biased and uninformed views towards firearms.

Rather an odd statement give the US has its hand and opnion in everybody elses going on

Does it have a hand in the U.K's domestic issues? Does it tell them how to live in their countries? You might have a point if we're taking 3rd world countries but as far as western developed countries, no we don't have a hand in the domestic goings on of western developed nations.

You can talk about it but it doesn't mean you're right. Especially coming from a country where firearms are so restricted and very few people have experience with firearms. Most of what U.K people know about firearms is from the media and movies. Combine those two and it will form biased and uninformed views towards firearms.

Does it have a hand in the U.K's domestic issues? Does it tell them how to live in their countries?

Complete nonsense. Just because most people have never shot a gun doesn't have any impact on how informed they are or if there views are biased.

And yes It seems it's ingrained in the US Gov. to dictate how other countries should operate.

Ukers really have no right to discuss anything in this thread like some of them are. After all, their own government tells them to let themselves get robbed and defending yourself gets you put in jail.

Yes, so please stop discussing anything about Syria, Iraq, Pakistan, China, etc..etc... Americans really have no right to discuss anything about other countries.

Complete nonsense. Just because most people have never shot a gun doesn't have any impact on how informed they are or if there views are biased.

And yes It seems it's ingrained in the US Gov. to dictate how other countries should operate.

Does it tell yours how to operate domestically? And its not nonsense those that aren't used to firearms or raised around them or even touched them tend to not have favorable views towards them and lack general knowledge of them.

?He?s always been a marksman,? his wife said. ?He shoots in competitions, but this is the first time he?s ever killed anyone and I don?t know how he?ll handle that.?

So why did he fire 2 shots?, If he is a so called marksman was the arm/leg too difficult for this marksman to go after? (yes i know moving targets etc)

It's apparent from your ignorant reply that you know nothing about firearms and self-defense. If I'm in that situation, I'll keep shooting until the armed intruder is down and I know he isn't going to get back up. It's extremely easy for someone like yourself to be an arm chair quarterback, I'd love to see someone like yourself in that situation. Great job by the customer!

Does it tell yours how to operate domestically? And its not nonsense those that aren't used to firearms or raised around them or even touched them tend to not have favorable views towards them and lack general knowledge of them.

I've never had sex with an 8 year old boy but I know it's wrong and can discuss it rationally without reverting to stereotypes.

I've never had sex with an 8 year old boy but I know it's wrong and can discuss it rationally without reverting to stereotypes.

So you're equating guns and self defense to pedophilia? Really???

First of all Self defense is protecting your life against a threat that is trying to kill you. Pedophilia is a disease that makes adults sexually abuse a defenseless child that will cause physical and most likely mental harm. Shooting someone to save your life is NO WHERE near pedophilia. They are on two different levels, they aren't even in the same universe.

I don't see why this is considered a positive outcome by many here. Rather than apprehending the would-be robber and trying him in a court of law he was shot dead. Taking somebody's life is not an appropriate punishment for robbery. From what I can tell from the article the customer wasn't in any direct danger and had he done nothing he would have escaped without injury.

This isn't justice. This is vigilantism. The US is reverting to the Wild West. How long will it be until disputes are settled by duels in the middle of the street?

I agree with you but you cannot for sure say nothing would have happened. Just because he did not know what was going to happen does not mean he can take action. This guy had no authority to take action and like you said, we just can't have vigilantism.

Florida has the Stand Your Ground law. I wonder if this guy told the other two guys that he was standing his ground before shooting and if he did would that give him a legitimate reason to fire upon the robbers.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Removed the blue and underline as you did not post a link. This would also  be considered spamming.
    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
    • Cheers everyone for the replies. It's been very useful. 👍
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!