Customer kills gunman during Jacksonville robbery attempt


Recommended Posts

@KingCracker :It's not worth your breath trying to change their opinions, especially when it comes to firearms. People have differing cultures, and many wouldn't understand living in a nation that you can purchase arms.

I don't fault anyone thinking that using arms for self defense/defense of another is wrong, but it's the law of the land in the States.

This guy stopping those two robbers is completely lawful, and in my eyes moral. If i was an employee working in that store I'd be extremely grateful someone came to my defense, civilian or not.

Once someone attempts a physically illegal act (attempt to cause harm to others), they open themselves to being engaged. Everyone has the right to self defense. Anything other only empowers criminals to continue to do criminal acts without reprise.

Best case scenario would have been to incapacitate the criminals, but depending on the circumstances it might not be completely possible.

In a perfect world the criminals would have dropped their fake guns, and waited for the police to arrive. They made their choice.

Reverting to the wild west? This has been the gun laws forever, and this is how the world works. If you decide to rob someone at gun point, well there's a possibility you're going to get yourself shot first. If they were robbing someone without a weapon, your comments would have some merit, when they have guns as well, they have none. Nothing has changed from how it's ever been, maybe you're just waking up to the world around you.

Simple solution, don't rob someone at gun point and you won't get shot. When you decide to threaten someone else's life, you put your own at risk.

What if the shooter hit the clerk or another by stander and killed them? What if the three people were friends and filming a scene for a video? What if they would have put their guns down and surrendered? There is a reason that laws exist and you cannot go around and shoot suspicious or people that you suspect are doing something wrong.

America is turning into the Wild West, everyone running about with guns shooting each other. Protection is the job of the police, full stop, not vigilantes.

What if the shooter hit the clerk or another by stander and killed them? What if the three people were friends and filming a scene for a video? What if they would have put their guns down and surrendered? There is a reason that laws exist and you cannot go around and shoot suspicious or people that you suspect are doing something wrong.

Congrats on the strawman argument! The old guy told them to drop the guns, they decided not to. No one else was harmed.

So you're equating guns and self defense to pedophilia? Really???

First of all Self defense is protecting your life against a threat that is trying to kill you. Pedophilia is a disease that makes adults sexually abuse a defenseless child that will cause physical and most likely mental harm. Shooting someone to save your life is NO WHERE near pedophilia. They are on two different levels, they aren't even in the same universe.

No I am using an analogy, let me give you another one. I am not a burglar, rapist or murderer yet while at university I did criminal law. Just because I didn't do something doesn't mean I cannot study, inform myself and debate an issue. Prior to doing my degrees I was in the army for 5 years so despite being from the UK I have shot quite a bit (even have a few trophies somewhere) - hopefully you can give me a pass and allow me to discuss weapons or is my experience not enough for you.

I agree with you but you cannot for sure say nothing would have happened. Just because he did not know what was going to happen does not mean he can take action. This guy had no authority to take action and like you said, we just can't have vigilantism.

Florida has the Stand Your Ground law. I wonder if this guy told the other two guys that he was standing his ground before shooting and if he did would that give him a legitimate reason to fire upon the robbers.

So you're in a dangerous situation and its possible you might lose your life. You're just gonna stand there and wait for the cops? What has this world come to. Its not about being a vigilante its about protecting yourself during a time when the cops aren't there.

No I am using an analogy, let me give you another one. I am not a burglar, rapist or murderer yet while at university I did criminal law. Just because I didn't do something doesn't mean I cannot study, inform myself and debate an issue. Prior to doing my degrees I was in the army for 5 years so despite being from the UK I have shot quite a bit (even have a few trophies somewhere) - hopefully you can give me a pass and allow me to discuss weapons or is my experience not enough for you.

mitt-romney-nope-shirt_design.png

So you're in a dangerous situation and its possible you might lose your life. You're just gonna stand there and wait for the cops? What has this world come to. Its not about being a vigilante its about protecting yourself during a time when the cops aren't there.

Woah, don't bring logic into this argument!

  • Like 1

Congrats on the strawman argument! The old guy told them to drop the guns, they decided not to. No one else was harmed.

I am not using a straw man argument. I am suggesting some reasons why someone should not go around and take things into their own hands. If you think that my suggestions are false and is the straw man argument then everyone else here is using the straw man argument when they suggest the robbers could have killed the clerk or the defender.

Complete nonsense. Just because most people have never shot a gun doesn't have any impact on how informed they are or if there views are biased.

What an incredible strawman you created there, he didnt say "you never shot a gun, therefore you know nothing" but good effort.

But besides that obvious attempt to discredit him based on nothing, your statement as a standalone is pure hogwash, of course firing a gun is going to have an impact and SOME kind of bias, once you take the time to actually shoot a firearm, like every other action you perform in your life, it makes you more informed.

I would agree with his sentiment, the general public's interest in firearms extends only in so far as what they see in movies, and what the news tells them. Most people have no inclination to learn more, or even enough knowledge or curiosity to realize what the MSM usually touts is wrong, or even that everything the anti-gun talking heads spout is wrong.

To say someone not involved with firearms more intimately is ignorant to the facts is being generous to be honest.

I am not using a straw man argument. I am suggesting some reasons why someone should not go around and take things into their own hands. If you think that my suggestions are false and is the straw man argument then everyone else here is using the straw man argument when they suggest the robbers could have killed the clerk or the defender.

Ah, but its all about the moral high ground.

Are you suggesting its perfectly fine for robbers to go around burglarizing, but defending yourself and others is wrong?

Edit:

In addition are you suggesting police can do no wrong, and that's why we would wait for them before we act?

I am not using a straw man argument. I am suggesting some reasons why someone should not go around and take things into their own hands. If you think that my suggestions are false and is the straw man argument then everyone else here is using the straw man argument when they suggest the robbers could have killed the clerk or the defender.

If you're talking about shooting someone for mugging someone then no. But if you're in a robbery where the person has a deadly weapon drawn then all bets are off. Taking things into your own hands is perfectly acceptable because you don't know that they might use the deadly weapon on you and if you think that's wrong then be my guest, if you're ever in a situation like that then hopefully they wont use the weapon on you, if they do then the police will be there to take pictures of your dead body instead of the criminals.

I agree with you but you cannot for sure say nothing would have happened. Just because he did not know what was going to happen does not mean he can take action. This guy had no authority to take action and like you said, we just can't have vigilantism.

Florida has the Stand Your Ground law. I wonder if this guy told the other two guys that he was standing his ground before shooting and if he did would that give him a legitimate reason to fire upon the robbers.

I think its clear you have no idea what the stand your ground law is.

Also as a concealed carrier, it IS in fact his duty to take action to defend life and limb, the law is 100% on his side, this is as far from Vigilantism as can be.

I think its clear you have no idea what the stand your ground law is.

Also as a concealed carrier, it IS in fact his duty to take action to defend life and limb, the law is 100% on his side, this is as far from Vigilantism as can be.

Bingo.

618px-Intellectual_Checkmate.jpg

So you're in a dangerous situation and its possible you might lose your life. You're just gonna stand there and wait for the cops? What has this world come to. Its not about being a vigilante its about protecting yourself during a time when the cops aren't there.

No I am not saying that. I for one would definitely be the person who would defend themselves. If I walked into that situation as this guy did I would more likely react too. I do not carry or use guns so I cannot say how I would react if I had a gun. If I did not have a gun and I walked right in front of this happening I cannot say how I would react at the moment too. If I walked into the situation from behind and there was only two guys I would probably take cover. If I walked into the situation from behind and there was only one guy I would try to disarm the guy.

There needs to be a law in place for good reasons otherwise people can go around and shoot or kill others and claim self defense.

What gives this guy's judgment the right? He might think and react but can be wrong. Why couldn't he try to resolve the situations without force? I think the best answer for this would be to ask an actual cop what they are trained to do in this situation. Are they trained to shoot instantly, warn then shoot, or are they trained to resolve the issue? They are more likely all trained differently. They also might not execute their training accurately in the situation. I guess you want us to all react with eye for eye and finger for finger mentality.

Ah, but its all about the moral high ground.

Are you suggesting its perfectly fine for robbers to go around burglarizing, but defending yourself and others is wrong?

Edit:

In addition are you suggesting police can do no wrong, and that's why we would wait for them before we act?

I am not suggesting either.

I am not saying police are perfect either, but policed are trained and know how to handle and trained to react in this situation. They are also given authority. Cops are held accountable for their actions and are present during the trial.

No I am not saying that. I for one would definitely be the person who would defend themselves. If I walked into that situation as this guy did I would more likely react too. I do not carry or use guns so I cannot say how I would react if I had a gun. If I did not have a gun and I walked right in front of this happening I cannot say how I would react at the moment too. If I walked into the situation from behind and there was only two guys I would probably take cover. If I walked into the situation from behind and there was only one guy I would try to disarm the guy.

There needs to be a law in place for good reasons otherwise people can go around and shoot or kill others and claim self defense.

What gives this guy's judgment the right? He might think and react but can be wrong. Why couldn't he try to resolve the situations without force? I think the best answer for this would be to ask an actual cop what they are trained to do in this situation. Are they trained to shoot instantly, warn then shoot, or are they trained to resolve the issue? They are more likely all trained differently. They also might not execute their training accurately in the situation. I guess you want us to all react with eye for eye and finger for finger mentality.

What gives this guy the right to shoot someone? Well first of all the guy was in danger and i'm pretty sure there's camera's around if he did murder these guys and claimed self defense he would be in trouble right now but he isn't so right there tells you he was in the right. There's enough evidence pointing that what he did was right.

There was a case a few months ago where a guy claimed self defense and claimed stand your ground. He had an audio recorder. He went out to confront some noisy neighbors, he got into an argument with them and the neighbors got a little rowdy and then the guy goes back off or i'll have to defend myself and told them he had a gun. Well the neighbors got a little more rowdy and the guy I think shot and killed two of them if I remember correctly. Well needless to say it didn't go well for him and hes serving time in prison for murder right now.

Laws are already in place to stop such things and that case is proof that laws are in place to punish murder.

I am not suggesting either.

I am not saying police are perfect either, but policed are trained and know how to handle and trained to react in this situation. They are also given authority. Cops are held accountable for their actions and are present during the trial.

Um. Civilians are held accountable too. If the justice system thinks that a person acted improperly, they will charge them with a crime.

I'd like to think its everyone's duty to uphold the authority of law. You do know its completely legal to make citizen's arrest, right?

I am not suggesting either.

I am not saying police are perfect either, but policed are trained and know how to handle and trained to react in this situation. They are also given authority. Cops are held accountable for their actions and are present during the trial.

Citizens can be trained too but i'm not saying they have the authority of cops, just saying they can get training in how to deal with situations.

It seems like some people on this forum are so worried about the loss of life that they would give up their life lol. A good person dies while the bad person lives lol wow.

You have to laugh at some of the comments from the europeans in here, especially when they consider a persons life to be worth only 47 days of jail time. (Breivik to serve minimum 10 years for killing 77 - works out to be 47 days per person and he could get out after just 10 years). That's justice?

You have to laugh at some of the comments from the europeans in here, especially when they consider a persons life to be worth only 47 days of jail time. (Breivik to serve minimum 10 years for killing 77 - works out to be 47 days per person and he could get out after just 10 years). That's justice?

What?!?!?! That's insane! And they want us to be like them lol wow.

You have to laugh at some of the comments from the europeans in here, especially when they consider a persons life to be worth only 47 days of jail time. (Breivik to serve minimum 10 years for killing 77 - works out to be 47 days per person and he could get out after just 10 years). That's justice?

What?!?!?! That's insane! And they want us to be like them lol wow.

It's not 10 years at all as once the 10 years is up it's completely in the Judge's power to say he's too much of a risk for the population and detain him again and it was a detainment of 21 years, 10 minimum. It's the maximum in Norway and he'll most likely never be released.

You know, just facts but don't let them get in the way. :/

It's not 10 years at all as once the 10 years is up it's completely in the Judge's power to say he's too much of a risk for the population and detain him again.

You know, just facts but don't let them get in the way. :/

Um i'd say killing 77 people is to much of a risk now or 10 years from now, its silly to have him reevaluated in 10 years.

?He?s always been a marksman,? his wife said. ?He shoots in competitions, but this is the first time he?s ever killed anyone and I don?t know how he?ll handle that.?

So why did he fire 2 shots?, If he is a so called marksman was the arm/leg too difficult for this marksman to go after? (yes i know moving targets etc)

If you have two armed assailants threatening everyone with guns, you don't aim to wound one. You aim to kill so you don't leave a possible threat. If a guy's threatening to punch you, you punch him back. If a guy's threatening to kill you, you kill him before he has the opportunity to carry out the threat.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • US citizens are paying to their government, who could use that to fund healthcare and tuition and relieve the costs of these for citizens instead of making tax breaks that overwhelmingly favor the rich. I'm not saying that tariffs are the correct solution, but what else would they be used for? What else could Trump have in mind for wanting them, if he hasn't figured out that labor costs are higher in the US?
    • I’m in need of a new chair and it sounds like the backrest cannot be locked? I also sat on a Herman miller and was devastated that it couldn’t be locked also, what is going on with chairs. I want to be able to lock the backrest into any position but not even the Herman’s do that
    • Sihoo Doro C300 Pro V2 Ergonomic Office Chair review: The Ikea of chairs by Steven Parker I've reviewed a few gaming chairs over the past three years or so and generally found them to score well in our reviews. SIHOO reached out asking if I was interested in taking a look at their flagship chair, the Doro C300 Pro V2. I never got the chance to check out its predecessor, but the V2 is described as an "Adaptive Ergonomic Chair." It became available to buy in April of this year. Let's get things rolling with a closer look at the specifications and features. Specifications Doro C300 Pro V2 Model Ergonomic Materials Mesh Back and Seat; Soft PU Coated Armrests Height adjustability 45.5 - 53 cm / 17.5" - 20.9" Seat (w+d) 52 x 43 - 47 cm / 20.5" x 16.9" - 18.5" (adjustable) Backrest 52 – 60 cm / 20.5" - 23.6" (adjustable) Lumbar support Mesh built-in (adjustable) Armrest adjustability 8D Bionic Armrests Rocking angle 105°, 120°, 135° (fixed) Neck support Mesh built-in (adjustable) Net weight 27.3 kg / 59.64 lbs Weight support 150 kg / 330 lbs Colors Black, White Warranty 5 years (upon registering) Price $499.99, $539.99 Introduction At first glance, it looks like a chair that in another life wants to be a Herman Miller; It certainly looks like my Aeron Remastered, but the Doro C300 Pro V2 has quite a few more features and costs quite a bit less. SIHOO says that it is made up of a "DynaCore" system that tracks your movement and synchronizes the headrest, backrest, lumbar support, and armrests as you shift, twist, or recline. They also say that the "SyncroFlex Backrest" molds to your spine, which kind of describes how the mesh fabric works in most ergonomic chairs, but anyway. Below are the meat and potatoes measurements for the chair. Here is the same tech sheet, but in inches. Durability I would be remiss to not talk about the various durability testing this chair underwent before coming to market, as this is claimed on the product page. First of all, the chair is BIFMA-, SGS-, and TÜV-certified. As for durability, the tests undergone were: 100,000 Castor cycles tested 120,000 Armrest cycles tested 120,000 Recline cycles tested 120,000 Gas lift cycles tested 60,000 Armrest durability cycles tested 120,000 Rotation cycles tested Nothing about weights testing, though. Now that's all disclosed, now onto my own personal findings. Assembly The Doro C300 Pro V2 came in two large boxes (1) (2), and everything was packed very well, protecting the different parts of the chair. In the box, there is a folded sheet that explains the 12 steps to assemble it; they are: Remove the bottom cover on the aluminum base; Insert the five legs into the aluminum base and use ten screws to fasten them; Insert the castors into the legs; Replace the bottom cover on the bottom of the aluminum base; Place the Class 4 Hydraulics gas cylinder into the aluminum base; Screw the bottom part of the arm rests, taking care of the orientation using two screws on each side; Use three torx screws to fasten the footrest to the bottom of the seat; Fasten the backrest to the seat using four torx bolts; Fasten the armrests to the backrest using four Torx bolts (two on each side), taking care to note the orientation; Place the chair onto the Class 4 Hydraulics gas cylinder; Insert the headrest into the top of the backrest; Use two torx screws to fasten the headrest to the backrest. There's also an online guide you can refer to. Carefully unpacking the two boxes took around 15 minutes because almost everything is wrapped in plastic and protective foam; the chair assembly itself took around an hour. I say in the above assembly steps to take note of the orientation, because it's not obvious which way around the bottom portion of the armrests go, and although there is an L and R on the bottom of the armrests, it also wasn't clear from the instructions which was actually left or right, facing the chair, or in the seated down orientation? Anyway, I ended up putting the bottom portions on the wrong sides, and after securing one of the armrests, I discovered that although it was on the correct side, the armrest base could rotate a full 360°, but not when bolted to the chair, so I had to remove it, rotate it, and then bolt it back on. Truly an Ikea experience! Also, to complicate things further, although all the parts are labeled from A to X (yes, that's 24 parts) unhelpfully, these letters do not appear on the parts themselves or the package with the bolts, screws, and washers. There's also a pair of protective gloves in the box, but I think they were made for much smaller hands than I have. Even my friend, who is 5.1, had difficulty putting them on. Once assembled, I needed to sit down. Anyway, as I said, it looks quite similar to my Herman Miller. And here is the back of it. If you look at the product page and on Amazon, it seems like a lot of thought has gone into the chair itself and what it's capable of, but there is no mention at all about the castors, and this is an area where I think the chair trips up quite quickly. I found it difficult to move the chair in any direction. I asked a friend who came to visit me earlier this week to test my findings, and she said that the wheels were "no good," so it definitely isn't just me. I am 6'2 myself and a big guy, I work from home and gained a few pounds from mostly staying in and the hell away from other people. However, the Doro C300 Pro V2 is rated for up to 150kg (330lbs), which in my case is used well within its max rating. Ergonomics The number of adjustments you can make, right up to setting it in nap mode — which I haven't fully tested yet — is what you'd expect from a premium chair. Yes, you can go up and down (max 7.5 cm adjustment), rock back and forth (with tilt adjustment), and lock the chair between three stages of 105°, 120°, 135°, which is not quite as flat as the AndaSeat I tested at 160°. Some thought has also gone into the "8D" armrests, too, which are cushioned but quite firm; you'll only know it if you press hard into the PU-covered tops, which give about half a centimeter, but it's enough to ensure your skin won't get awkwardly stuck to it in warmer (or sweatier) conditions. It almost feels like plastic and is very easy to keep clean. However, the armrest positions move far too easily, and I am not sure what that "elbow" function is. Maybe it is good for a short person with short arms, anyway, I never used it and kept it flat at all times. There are eight levels of adjustment for the armrests, they are: backwards, forwards, swing left/right, height up and down, tilt, and 360° rotation, which can be handy for desk clearance. As I said, the armrest pads shift far too easily, which could give off an ergonomic vibe, but who wants the armrest sliding when you are shifting weight? The height adjustability does lock into place when lifting and adjusting. Comfort This is ultimately what it boils down to at the end of the day, right? Quite a lot of reviews praise the comfort of this chair, and I don't disagree that the mesh seating is quite comfortable. I am used to the material from my daily Herman Miller. However, the backrest cannot be locked into place, and this is actually a feature; as you shift or recline yourself on the chair, the backrest moves with your body. It took some getting used to. The lumbar gives ample support, but I would have preferred an adjustable one built into the seat base, as this causes the backrest to move up and down at will. Again, as with my previous chair review, this chair is also rated for tall people, but nowhere in the product documentation does it say how tall. Being 6'2 myself, I'm happy to say that the backrest is tall and wide enough, and thought has been given to being able to adjust the neck rest, but as others have mentioned in their reviews, people as tall as 6.2ft is about the limit for the neckrest. Conclusion What I didn't like The footrest is rated for 15kg (33 lbs), which to me seems a bit light, and after looking online, it seems like a chair footrest for adults must be at least twice that rating. In all honesty, they are just hollow metal tubes, so it is not recommended to let a kid sit on them. I also feel like it doesn't really go out far enough for my height, so that kind of puts the dampener on me being able to use it regularly. I'll just have to continue to use my subwoofer as a footrest! I do not like the armrests being able to shift around as easily as they can, and they are a little too forward-positioned in the chair to comfortably sit close to my desk, because even in the lowest height position, they don't allow me to go under the desk like is possible with my Herman Miller. I also feel like this chair could have been delivered partially constructed, especially the armrests on the seat, and why the aluminum base wasn't already pre-constructed (without the castors) is baffling, considering it would have fit in one of the two boxes that way. The instructions also need to be clearer. On the pamphlet, there's an A to X listing (which is also used in the steps), but none of the physical parts use this lettering system! What I did like I'll be honest, I haven't used it for very long, just one week, and seating comfort is subjective after all! Any spills wiped straight off it, the stitching, and the lines look great, not a fray to be seen or stitch out of place. It looks kind of cool, too. My favorite feature of these seats is the nap mode. While you're not lying completely flat, it leans far back enough to make you easily doze off after a heavy gaming or working session. Overall, this chair offers plenty of comfort features. The MSRP does vary quite a bit depending on the region, at £549.99 in the UK, and €580 in Europe, and $599 before tax in the U.S. However, shipping is free, which is a bonus for such a heavy item. Is it worth it, though? At three years' warranty, I think it's a decent deal. Another firm out of Germany sent me a free replacement hydraulic gas spring for a chair that failed after almost four years, so it was well outside its two-year warranty. My advice is to always try, as you might have the same luck I did. If I could fault it at all, it would be the constant shifting of the armrests and backrest. Where to buy Although the footrest variant normally costs $539.99, it has been discounted to $469.99 on the official website in Black or White. In fact, the non-footrest variant is only $40 cheaper. On Amazon, it currently costs more at $499.99 links below. Sihoo Doro C300 Pro V2 for $469.99 (official website) Sihoo Doro C300 Pro V2 for $499.99 at Amazon US SIHOO provided a free sample without any review or pre-approval. Good to know This Amazon link is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Making US citizens pay is a prominent tool? Joke of the week…
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      207
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      73
    5. 5
      macoman
      62
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!