Windows 8: The Boldest, Biggest Redesign in MS's History


Recommended Posts

Touchscreens are found on more than just tablets.

Fixed..

Ah. Sacrifice and accept suffering for the greater good. I cannot have a better experience on my computer using my mouse! ALL input methods must be regarded as EQUALS! NONE shall be better than any other. And after you overthrow all of the bourgeois KB+ mouse users, we shall have a leadership of the 10'' proletariat. We must sacrifice for the mother UI! We are all soldiers of the touchscreen army!

Again, usable is defined by the end user. If the user doesn't think the software is usable then it isn't usable. Since what is usable is defined by the user you have a sliding scale of what constitutes usable software.

Well that just sounds ridiculous to me then, for the reason I've stated: Following your belief, someone could state that Windows 8 isn't usable because it doesn't make them breakfast in bed and because it doesn't feed their cat, and you'd have to agree with them that it isn't usable. That just sounds absurd to me.

If Windows 8 can be used for its intended purpose, it's usable, to me. Other people can state what they'd like, but I'll continue to defend its usability, considering it's perfectly usable for what the developers intended.

Fixed..

Ah. Sacrifice and accept suffering for the greater good. I cannot have a better experience on my computer using my mouse! ALL input methods must be regarded as EQUALS! NONE shall be better than any other. And after you overthrow all of the bourgeois KB+ mouse users, we shall have a leadership of the 10'' proletariat. We must sacrifice for the mother UI! We are all soldiers of the touchscreen army!

Ok, So you admit there are new technologies on the market? So why should Microsoft continue to ignore them?

Well that just sounds ridiculous to me then.

If Windows 8 can be used for its intended purpose, it's usable, to me. Other people can state what they'd like, but I'll continue to defend its usability, considering it's perfectly usable for what the developers intended.

I made an OS called Phail OS.??Its sole use is to use electricity, though not quite as fast as some of those stress testing programs.??It's just as usable as windows 8.??I also made a programming language called WTHCode, based off of LOLCode, brainf*ck, and malebolge.??It's perfectly useable for what I intended it for.

Ok, So you admit there are new technologies on the market? So why should Microsoft continue to ignore them?

That does not change the fact that Metro is unusable. Yes, MS should pursue new technologies. That does not change the fact that said pursuit led to the release of something known as "metro" which is utterly unusable.

I made an OS called Phail OS. Its sole use is to use electricity, though not quite as fast as some of those stress testing programs. It's just as usable as windows 8. I also made a programming language called WTHCode, based off of LOLCode, brainf*ck, and malebolge. It's perfectly useable for what I intended it for.

They're usable, but they're perhaps not suitable for the user, considering what the user is after.

People seem to be confusing usability with suitability, in my opinion.

Going off what LogicalApex is saying, nothing is usable. A shopping trolley isn't usable because it doesn't allow one to fly. A television isn't usable because it doesn't allow one to teleport. A door handle isn't usable because it doesn't make the room on the other side look like Narnia. . . .

They're usable, but they're perhaps not suitable for the user, considering what the user is after.

People seem to be confusing usability with suitability, in my opinion.

Going off what LogicalApex is saying, nothing is usable. A shopping trolley isn't usable because it doesn't allow one to fly. A television isn't usable because it doesn't allow one to teleport. A door handle isn't usable because it doesn't make the room on the other side look like Narnia. . . .

Noted.??How about we say that when we say "usability," we mean "useability for the intended purpose of allowing a user to launch applications, multitask, produce and consume content, and communicate with others"?

Noted. How about we say that when we say "usability," we mean "useability for the intended purpose of allowing a user to launch applications, multitask, produce and consume content, and communicate with others"?

That makes sense to me. But all of that can easily be done in the "Metro" experience of Windows 8, which means it's usable :)

Noted. How about we say that when we say "usability," we mean "useability for the intended purpose of allowing a user to launch applications, multitask, produce and consume content, and communicate with others"?

But, Metro can easily do all those things. I can pin and launch my apps from Start, I can multitask by quickly tabbing through open apps either by mousing to them on the right side, or by the classic ALT-TAB, I can produce notes with Evernote, and OneNote MX, I can draw using Fresh Paint, I can make appointments using Calendar, I can send an e-mail using Mail, I can upload an app using SkyDrive, I can compose a tweet using MetroTwit, talk on Skype, etc.... and I can easily consume content using any app you wish to name here.

So where's your proof you can't do these things?

But, Metro can easily do all those things. I can pin and launch my apps from Start, I can multitask by quickly tabbing through open apps either by mousing to them on the right side, or by the classic ALT-TAB, I can produce notes with Evernote, and OneNote MX, I can draw using Fresh Paint, I can make appointments using Calendar, I can send an e-mail using Mail, I can upload an app using SkyDrive, I can compose a tweet using MetroTwit, talk on Skype, etc.... and I can easily consume content using any app you wish to name here.

So where's your proof you can't do these things?

No true multitasking-cannot run things in the background(except for MS approved things built into the Runtime APIs).??Example:video encoding in background

Hidden controls-cannot quickly perform different manipulations on content.??Example:Photoshop

2-visible app limit-only one actually gets enough space to be useful

Well, that's about it, not mentioning mouse specific issues.??If MS fixed these issues, I would be on board.??Maybe they should try putting the apps into rectangles that the user can resize and move around, and add some sort of "minimize" feature so that an app can run something in the background without getting in the way....

No true multitasking-cannot run things in the background(except for MS approved things built into the Runtime APIs). Example:video encoding in background

Hidden controls-cannot quickly perform different manipulations on content. Example:Photoshop

Give it time, and Metro will be able to do those. That'll be after the desktop is done away with, and devices adapt to the new Windows paradigm.

People attempting serious discussion with Dot Matrix... :laugh:

Just take a look at this thread. Enough said. :laugh:

Give it time, and Metro will be able to do those. That'll be after the desktop is done away with, and devices adapt to the new Windows paradigm.

Give it time, and Phail OS will feature creep into being able to do all of those things too.

People attempting serious discussion with Dot Matrix... :laugh:

Just take a look at this thread. Enough said. :laugh:

And? What's your point? When the right click menu disappears in the future, what are you going to do?

Well that just sounds ridiculous to me then, for the reason I've stated: Following your belief, someone could state that Windows 8 isn't usable because it doesn't make them breakfast in bed and because it doesn't feed their cat, and you'd have to agree with them that it isn't usable. That just sounds absurd to me.

If Windows 8 can be used for its intended purpose, it's usable, to me. Other people can state what they'd like, but I'll continue to defend its usability, considering it's perfectly usable for what the developers intended.

Yes someone could say that and it would be true. Microsoft would then respond that they aren't a target user... Why is this hard to understand?

The needle for usability is pushed by both the intended user and the developer. This is why feedback is so important to developers! They have a view of their target user and what they will find easy to use and they adjust it as the users tell them their story.

Every application has a target user group and it is intended to be easy for that group.

This is why we have Photoshop CS and Photoshop Elements, for example. Both can manipulate images, but they have different target groups and each group will not find the other's app easy to use.

This really shouldn't be this hard to understand.

And? What's your point? When the right click menu disappears in the future, what are you going to do?

He's gonna explode!!!! RUN FOR YOUR LIVES!!!!

Something tells me you would defend Microsoft to the death even if they made getting to the Control Panel a 15 step process that also involved moving the mouse cursor all over the screen.

Getting to control panel is actually faster in Windows 8. I know that wasn't your point but just saying.

What's your point. For each of the things you described earlier, the metro implementation is inferior to what would be seen on the desktop. It's worse. I can prove it. Do you want me to count exactly how many extra pixels I have to more the mouse, and how many extra clicks I have to make, and then time it to prove that it takes longer? It works. It's worse. Measurably and provably worse.

Sure, I'd like to know that. Please go ahead and provide numbers where metro is "measurably and provably worse".

Here are my points where I think metro is better (without serious thinking)

- Switching between two apps (in focus and last used) is faster

- Metro App switcher is faster than default taskbar for mouse if your cursor resides in upper half of the screen

- Closing apps to free CPU (because you don't need to close apps)

- Pause playback on metro video player (just hit start)

- Apps provide more than just count on their current status

Windows 8 is no less than a major new mobile platform that accomplishes two things. First, it provides the software giant with a platform that's vastly superior, out of the gate, to the two platforms that currently dominate this market: Apple iOS (running on the iPad) and Google Android OS. Second, it brings with it the previous Windows desktop platform and (for the most part) all the compatibility that platform provides: desktop applications, utilities, hardware drivers, and so on.

Windows 8 also brings with it all the problems of the Windows desktop (or what we previously thought of simply as Windows). The complexity. The insecurity. The unreliability. The legacy deadwood?software that's still stuck in there because Microsoft has always cared more about backward compatibility than anything else. (No customer left behind!)

- Paul Thurrott

Glad to know I'm not the only Windows fan out there who thinks it needed to change. I agree with the last quoted paragraph above. Also, this:

Change Happens

Windows 8 is the start of a revolution. It's exciting and forward leaning. Yes, it's different, but get over it: We made the transition from keyboard and command line to mouse and GUI. We can make this transition, too. In fact, rather than dread it, we should be embracing it wholeheartedly. With Windows 8?and Windows RT?Microsoft is giving us the best of both worlds.

I'd be interested to see the return rates and downgrade rates for new Windows 8 PC's shipping.

That's not representative of anything. Almost no one "returns" an OS or a PC unless there is a problem with it physically. And businesses downgrading is a part of normal everyday operations, not because they're abandoning ship.

Yes someone could say that and it would be true. Microsoft would then respond that they aren't a target user... Why is this hard to understand?

[. . .]

If they aren't the target user, the problem is that the product is not suitable for the task the user would like to achieve; the problem isn't that the product isn't usable. This is what I've been trying to communicate to you. It isn't hard for me to understand; please don't try to misrepresent my ability to understand, by terribly trying to suggest that I can't understand something simple, just because you don't seem to understand the situation. Please, let's be civil here and have a polite discussion until we come to a conclusion.

[. . .]

The needle for usability is pushed by both the intended user and the developer. This is why feedback is so important to developers! They have a view of their target user and what they will find easy to use and they adjust it as the users tell them their story.

[. . .]

That isn't usability; you're talking about requirements gathering and creating a product that meets users' requirements. This likewise is related to the suitability of the product, but it isn't related to the usability regarding how 'usability' is defined in software terms.

[. . .]

Every application has a target user group and it is intended to be easy for that group.

This is why we have Photoshop CS and Photoshop Elements, for example. Both can manipulate images, but they have different target groups and each group will not find the other's app easy to use.

This really shouldn't be this hard to understand.

You started to touch on usability when you mentioned ease of use. But everything else you've said about usability is wrong. It isn't hard for me to understand at all, and I ask you again to please not be so terrible as to suggest I have a problem understanding simple concepts just because you're misunderstood yourself. It isn't hard to be courteous and polite in discussion until a conclusion is reached.

Dictionary.com's Computing Dictionary backs up exactly what I have been saying from the outset. This is their software-related definition of 'usability', which you can find by scrolling down the page:

programming

The effectiveness, efficiency, and satisfaction with which users can achieve tasks in a particular environment of a product. High usability means a system is: easy to learn and remember; efficient, visually pleasing and fun to use; and quick to recover from errors.

As implied above, usability is only concerned with the actual features that exist within the product; it is not concerned with features that are out of scope for the product to include. You're thinking of suitability, not usability; a product may be usable (as defined in the quote above), but not suitable. Here's a clear example: If someone would like to heat up some food, they might use a microwave because a desk would not be suitable for that task; however, that doesn't mean that the desk is not usable for the tasks the manufacturer intended it to be used for. The desk is usable because the user is able to use it for the tasks that the manufacturer intended, and it is easy for them to use. The desk manufacturer did not intend for the user to use the desk to heat up food.

The statement, from the definition, that usability is how well the user can achieve tasks in a particular environment of a product should be taken to mean the features that exist in the product, rather than the features that don't exist and are out of scope.

I've pointed out why you're wrong pretty effectively by using a ludicrous example. Further, going off your understanding, absolutely no product ever created has been usable, and that idea is simply ridiculous.

I can just see it now:

*Start Screen appears*

"What the hell is this ****? Where's the Start button?"

*Clicks around for 2 minutes (on empty space)*

"Where's the damn number to Best Buy? I want my Start button back!"

*clicks furiously (on random programs that have nothing to do with what they want)*

"I can't shut this damn thing down now either?!"

Aaaaaand cue the endless returns.

I can just see it now:

*Start Screen appears*

"What the hell is this ****? Where's the Start button?"

*Clicks around for 2 minutes (on empty space)*

"Where's the damn number to Best Buy? I want my Start button back!"

*clicks furiously (on random programs that have nothing to do with what they want)*

"I can't shut this damn thing down now either?!"

Aaaaaand cue the endless returns.

Then, they'll be happy to know the Start Button was never removed!

Getting to control panel is actually faster in Windows 8. I know that wasn't your point but just saying.

Sure, I'd like to know that. Please go ahead and provide numbers where metro is "measurably and provably worse".

Here are my points where I think metro is better (without serious thinking)

- Switching between two apps (in focus and last used) is faster

Alt tab? Works in dekstop... Also, it's no faster than the taskbar.

- Metro App switcher is faster than default taskbar for mouse if your cursor resides in upper half of the screen

Which is only about 50% of the time. So on average it's not better. It's also worse if you're trying to access an app that is farther in the history.

- Closing apps to free CPU (because you don't need to close apps)

Only really badly written apps waste CPU when idle. I mean realy, really badly written.

- Pause playback on metro video player (just hit start)

Pause playback in WMP-just hit space. There's also the "pause" button.

- Apps provide more than just count on their current status

What?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • WhatsApp is getting usernames, and you can reserve your preferred one now by Fiza Ali Sharing your phone number isn't always something you want to do, especially with people you've just met. Whether it's someone from a class, a local community group, or a sports team chat, handing over your number can feel like giving away more personal information than necessary. That's exactly the problem WhatsApp is trying to solve with its upcoming usernames feature. The company has announced that users can now reserve a unique WhatsApp username ahead of the feature's wider rollout later this year. Once usernames become available, they'll let people connect without revealing their phone numbers. It's a change that makes a lot of sense for group chats. Right now, everyone in the group can see your phone number. With usernames enabled, that won't necessarily be the case when someone contacts you for the first time. WhatsApp says it's opening username reservations early because more than three billion people use the app, meaning plenty of people are likely to want the same usernames. Reserving one now gives users a better chance of securing the name they actually want before the feature launches more broadly. If your preferred username is already taken, WhatsApp will also offer a built-in username generator to suggest available alternatives. The feature isn't only aimed at individual users. Creators, businesses, and organisations will be able to claim the same username they already use on Instagram or Facebook, making it easier to keep a consistent identity across Meta's apps. Furthermore, privacy is a big part of how WhatsApp is introducing usernames. There won't be a public directory where people can browse or search for usernames. Instead, people will need to know your exact username before they can start a conversation with you. Additionally, users can also choose to enable a username key, which adds another layer of control by requiring people to enter that key before sending a message. Once the feature rolls out, people who choose to use a username will no longer have their phone number shown when messaging a person or business for the first time. If you want to reserve a username, make sure you're running the latest version of WhatsApp, then head to Settings > Account > Username. The tech giant says usernames will roll out gradually over the coming months, and users will receive an in-app notification when the feature becomes available in their country.
    • When I think about a network, there are really two aspects, the hardware and the wiring. So here is what I would do for both. Wiring: Use Cat6A for the patch panel, outlets, and all structured cables (cables installed in walls). Run plenty of Wireless Access Point (WAP) cables, as a general rule, assume a signal can only pass through 2-3 walls and can't pass through a floor (that is conservative, but trust me on this if you want strong WiFi)  Cat6 patch cables are fine for now if you don't plan to run 10gig, those are easy to replace later if needed. Run OS2 single-mode fiber to anywhere you think you may have a server or sub-switch. (yes, single-mode for everything on a small network, don't mess with multimode unless you have entire racks of servers and that minor module cost and power savings will matter). If you really want to future proof, also run fiber to any high density WAP locations, it is likely that WiFi 8 WAPs will push the limits of 10g. Run 6-12 pairs of single-mode fiber between your MDF and the building's MDF, even if you only need 1 or 2 pairs now, those extra pairs will pay off down the road. Hardware: (its easy to say "get all the features incase you need them", so instead of futureproofing, I am going to take approach of suggesting areas worth investing in, and areas you can save money). Don't overspend thinking you need every feature on every port. You don't need 10g on every port, you don't need PoE on every port. Don't overspend on redundancy either, unless you are ready to buy two of everything, don't waste money buying two of some things and not others. Dual power supplies are worthwhile, but probably not HA or multi-path redundancy.  Get 1 "distribution layer" switch that your router/firewall will connect to as well as all your access layer switches below. This should be a fully managed 10g+ switch with a combination of copper and SPF ports, a few 25g uplink ports are nice for this switch. Given that you said it is a small network, I suggest also using that distribution layer switch for servers and WAPs, meaning it will need PoE. Speaking of wireless, get good professional tri-band WAPs, and either turn on the band stirring options, or limit 2.4 to an IoT only SSID. This will provide a solid WiFi capable nearly everything but the highest of bandwidth clients...you could even consider skipping wiring workstations depending on usage. Access layer switch for workstations and printers can be cheaper switches, 2.5g is a good sweet spot between price and future proofing, but even 1g is fine for most individual clients (the kind that could probably be fine on WiFi). You can consider saving a little on access layer switches by only getting 1 PoE switch for whatever needs it (remember your WAPs are connecting to the distribution switch, not here), and non-PoE for your workstations, because desk phones are falling out of favor. You can also save money here by not buying managed switches if you don't need them--but really do some soul searching there, if you go this route, then anything that isn't on your workstation VLAN would either need to be connected to the distribution switch, or its own access layer switch. Also, don't feel like you need a fancy fabric stacking switches for your access layer, that is the point of the higher-end distribution layer, to remove the need for things like that at this level. Home Hardware: I'm realizing the above assumed an office setting, if this if for your house and home lab then the above still applies, but you'll probably want everything managed and PoE, just because, but you probably also don't need multiple access layer switches. If your total port count is below 24, just skip separating distribution layer and access layer and just get one nice switch with the features you want. If you are at the point of considering a 48-port switch, I would instead get a nice high-end distribution switch for things that need it, and cheaper access layer switches with specs based on the needs of connected devices. For home use, don't worry about home running every device to the main switch, there is nothing wrong with running sub-switches for your media areas and office, those essentially become your access layer, just look for sub-switches with a 10g uplink so sharing bandwidth isn't an issue. Just make sure you always connect them to your distribution/main switch, don't daisy chain, the path should never have more steps than Client>Access>Distribution>Firewall>Internet.
    • Google Meet brings Gemini note-taking to AI Pro and Ultra subscribers by Karthik Mudaliar Google's Gemini-powered "Take notes for me" feature inside Google Meet is now available to Google AI Pro and Ultra subscribers. The features work on Google Meet for web as well as on mobile, and Google says that subscribers can use it for meetings they host in many supported languages. As the name suggests, "Take notes for me" allows Gemini to listen to a meeting, generate a summary, identify action items, and save the notes as a Google Doc in the user’s Drive. After the meeting, the organizer receives an email recap with the summary and action items, while the notes can also be attached to the related Calendar event depending on the meeting setup and sharing settings. The feature isn't automatically turned on for everyone, though. Google says that all meeting participants are notified when note-taking is turned on, and users can start it from the pencil icon in Meet or enable it for future calls through Meet’s meeting records settings. For work or school accounts, administrators can also control whether the feature is available and may require explicit participant consent for note-taking, recording, or transcription features. The feature first launched back in 2024, when it was available just for selected Workspace users. Over the years, Google added refinements and more options, including the ability to enable it when scheduling meetings via Google Calendar. Google's support docs say that the feature currently supports English, French, German, Italian, Japanese, Korean, Portuguese, and Spanish, but only one language at a time. Meetings with multiple spoken languages are not currently supported, and Google recommends using the tool for meetings between 15 minutes and eight hours. The new feature makes Google Meet closer to its rivals that have AI tools already built in. Microsoft Teams has recently started offering Copilot and intelligent recap features that summarize meetings, surface highlights, and help with follow-ups, while Zoom’s AI Companion can also generate meeting summaries from desktop and mobile meetings.
    • GnuCash 5.16 by Razvan Serea GnuCash is a personal and small business finance application, freely licensed under the GNU GPL and available for GNU/Linux, BSD, Solaris, Mac OS X and Microsoft Windows. It’s designed to be easy to use, yet powerful and flexible. GnuCash allows you to track your income and expenses, reconcile bank accounts, monitor stock portfolios and manage your small business finances. It is based on professional accounting principles to ensure balanced books and accurate reports. GnuCash can keep track of your personal finances in as much detail as you prefer. If you are just starting out, use GnuCash to keep track of your checkbook. You may then decide to track cash as well as credit card purchases to better determine where your money is being spent. When you start investing, you can use GnuCash to help monitor your portfolio. Buying a vehicle or a home? GnuCash will help you plan the investment and track loan payments. If your financial records span the globe, GnuCash provides all the multiple-currency support you need. Between 5.15 and 5.16, the following bugfixes were accomplished: Bug 421610 - RFE: Include logical dates for View->Filter by "date range"The Select Range section of the Date tab of the register's Filter By dialog box is changed to provide relative, specific date, or days ago options for the start and end of the filter range. The Show number of days item label is changed to Show from days ago to better reflect what it does. Bug 436105 - esc key not working as expected in register: Enable the escape key to cancel a field edit. Bug 797384 - Gnucash doesn't handle commodity prices with big numerator/denominator properly. Bug 798004 - Next gen UI for stock transactions Bug 799314 - Add "enter now" option in scheduled transaction editor. tab to allow users to select the scheduled transactions to be included in a “Since Last Run…” window. If there are no instances of a selected transaction triggered by today’s date, the next instance is triggered. Bug 799751 - autocomplete crash Bug 799759 - Users can't Enable entries via Checkboxes on Scheduled Transactions PageAllow the Enabled box in the list of scheduled transactions to be operated instead of having to open the transaction editor dialog and change the Enabled checkbox. Also added use of the Name column as the secondary column sort for all the other columns. Bug 799762 - Poor handling of cases where hidden/placeholder accounts are used in the account register Bug 799766 - Double line preference not respected in search register Bug 799767 - POST /accounts in bindings/python/example_scripts/rest-api is broken Bug 799777 - `xaccSplitSetParent`: reparenting a committed split silently drops its KVP slots (online_id, cap-gains links) Other changes & improvements: Numeric values may now be selected to copy in the Accounts page. Add new Finance::Quote source Finnhub.io: Free API key (personal/non-professional use) available at https://finnhub.io. Set FINNHUB_API_KEY environment variable to API key to use this source. As of June 2026, free tier API limit is 60 API calls/minute. The Investment Lots report has new optional columns for Computed Annual Growth Rate. Python Bindings: Improved translation of primary object (Account, Transaction, Split, etc.) so that they can be treated as normal Python objects. This is accomplished with SWIG magic so no existing code is obsoleted. Python Bindings: Better conversion of GLists to Python lists. Python Bindings: Destroy the QofSession in the Python Session dtor to prevent leaving the database locked. [engine] Add first-class online_id accessors for Split and Account and make them available to Python bindings, removing the unused Transaction online_id property. Improve C++ implementation of QofBook. Correct the Doxygen doc for qof_instance_get/set_kvp. [gnc-log-replay.cpp] fix incorrect guid dump Add some Boost library requirements needed by libgnucash-guile to CMakeLists.txt so that missing feature will fail at configure time. Use Compile-time Regular Expressions instead of std::regex in gnc-filepath-utils.cpp and instead of boost::regex in the CSV importer, with the CTRE v3.11.1 header added to borrowed [gnc-filepath-utils.cpp] null check char* arguments Add ChartJS licenses. Removed AEX from list of commodities. euronext.com is now using JS based anti-webscraping. [report-core] always offer options summary in reports. This is useful to debug reports. The Add options summary option is removed because it's no longer optional. Remove remaining obsolete IMContext from sheet Fix blurry text in HiDPI offscreen-rendered widgets Add port field to database connection dialog: The convention of appending the port number after the host isn't obvious. When editing a split in the register treat the account as being changed only if it isn't the one selected before editing instead of if the user performed an edit Return immediately from qof_book_destroy if hash_of_collections is null. If qof_book_destroy is called on a QofBook* freshly created with qof_book_new (usually because it was used to create a session that now must be destroyed) it would try to empty the non-existent hash tables, crashing. Clean up Flathub metadata to solve warnings at flatpak build time. Be consistent in naming GncPluginPage and GncPluginPageRegister HTML: Remove unimplemented function declarations. [gnc-html.cpp] remove unused buggy string conversion functions Convert libgnc-html to C++ Apply -Wall -Werr -Wmissing-prototypes to C++ compilation on Windows and fix the resulting errors. New and Updated Translations: Arabic, Croatian, Danish, Dutch, German, Finnish, Hungarian, Korean, Norwegian-Bokmal, Spanish Download: GnuCash 5.16 | 176.0 MB (Open Source) Links: GnuCash Home page | Other Operating Systems | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Microsoft finally launches WSL Containers in public preview by David Uzondu Microsoft has announced that WSL containers, a feature that allows developers to run Linux containers natively inside Windows without the need for Docker Desktop, is now available in public preview several weeks after Microsoft previewed it at Build 2026. To use the new container feature, you first have to install the latest pre-release version of the Windows Subsystem for Linux by running a quick update command in your terminal: wsl --update --pre-release After installing, you'd get access to the new Linux container CLI (wslc.exe) and the programmable API. Microsoft said that the CLI has a "familiar format" that matches the toolsets developers already use every day. If you know standard Docker commands, your muscle memory will translate directly to wslc.exe, which even features a built-in alias called container.exe. You can quickly run a full Ubuntu KDE desktop container by exposing ports, or pass your graphics card straight into a machine learning environment to run PyTorch workloads. Passing the --gpus all flag inside the run command instantly links your hardware. Image via Microsoft As for the API, developers can now embed Linux container operations directly inside native Windows applications without exposing the command line to users. The team integrated the API directly into MSBuild and CMake, so developers can define container steps directly in project files. Apart from bringing the CLI and API into public preview, Microsoft also said that it's working on a new default file system called virtiofs to speed up file transfer rates between Windows and Linux. Microsoft also introduced an experimental networking mode named consomme, which resolves compatibility issues with corporate VPNs by routing Linux network traffic straight through Windows. One thing to note about WSL containers is that they don't run in your standard WSL distributions; instead, every application and CLI session spawns its own lightweight Hyper-V utility VM in the background. This basically reduces the chances of one app snooping on the container of another app.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      535
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      269
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      150
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      98
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!