Recommended Posts

I'd buy a Nokia Lumia 920 if WP OS didn't suck.. IMO.

Don't go slandering me because I have an opinion on it.. WP is just not for me.

Stick iOS6 on a Lumia 920, and i'd probably go for that hardware over the iPhone 5 hardware, mainly because of the screen size. For a big guy, i need a big phone.

AWESOME! I hope you and the other 14 people who use it will be very happy :)

And folks here is what's wrong with iFanboys. You just can NOT argue with them - even if your product is superior in every way, they will make up some BS excuse to justify the iPhone to be the best one. I respect people using what works best for them (believe me), but nothing ****es me off more than uninformed fanboy, and that right there is the majority of iUsers.
  • Like 2

Stick iOS6 on a Lumia 920, and i'd probably go for that hardware over the iPhone 5 hardware, mainly because of the screen size. For a big guy, i need a big phone.

The larger, higher res screen would give you a better view of all the stitched leather :p

  • Like 2

Why would you mark the iPhone down for screen size & resolution?

I mean, maybe you think a bigger screen is better, but obviously the resolution will be bigger if the screen is bigger.

It also has higher PPI though. so it still is a clearer screen even if it's bigger, not that it matter.

They could however have used the Lumia 820, But then the iPhone would have been crushed even worse so ...

It also has higher PPI though. so it still is a clearer screen even if it's bigger, not that it matter.

They could however have used the Lumia 820, But then the iPhone would have been crushed even worse so ...

That's kind of my point. The Lumia has a higher PPI, so of course it's screen res will be a bit bigger, and of course it will be bigger again because the screen is physically bigger, kind of cheap to knock points off for that.

That's kind of my point. The Lumia has a higher PPI, so of course it's screen res will be a bit bigger, and of course it will be bigger again because the screen is physically bigger, kind of cheap to knock points off for that.

Your logic is flawed. Larger screen != larger screen resolution. There have been devices with a 4"+ screen with a resolution of 800x480. The HTC Evo 4G, HTC Titan (4.7" at 800x480)...

That's kind of my point. The Lumia has a higher PPI, so of course it's screen res will be a bit bigger, and of course it will be bigger again because the screen is physically bigger, kind of cheap to knock points off for that.

I don't think you understand what PPI is.

same res, bigger screen, is lower PPI. bigger screen bigger PPI is usuallyt he same PPI. they increased the Resolution MORE than they increased the size of the screen.

SO no, you don't have a point here as you don't even know what your point is or what PPI is.

Besides it's not cheap to knock off points for that when high DPI/PPI was one of Apple's big selling points itself, especially when they claimed to be the frist high PPI screen with retina when they where just a hanger or and the only reason it had higher PPI than other high PPI screens was to simplify scaling by doing an easy x2 increase from before.

I am preeeetty sure I have this right.

PPI is pixel per inch, right?

Lumia has a higher PPI, so even if you resized down to match the iPhone it would still have a slightly bigger resolution. But this chart takes into account it's bigger screen size which naturally allows more pixels..

Or have I got this all wrong?

I believe they are comparing a 920 screen and occasionally a 900 screen if they don't have the required information. Can't wait for iSheep to see this :p

Already showed it to my Apple loving sister and her response back was "But it's Nokia, so it's junk, Apple automatically wins" even with better specs somehow apple still wins by default.... I sware is everyone brain washed

  • Like 2

Already showed it to my Apple loving sister and her response back was "But it's Nokia, so it's junk, Apple automatically wins" even with better specs somehow apple still wins by default.... I sware is everyone brain washed

Ever think it's the operating system..?

Most people don't care if Windows Phone does this better and Android has this and that.. For some people, it's like ditching Windows for Mac OS X or Linux..

It's the most popular phone year after year for a reason.. perhaps its YOU guys that are missing something.

Ever think it's the operating system..?

Most people don't care if Windows Phone does this better and Android has this and that.. For some people, it's like ditching Windows for Mac OS X or Linux..

It's the most popular phone year after year for a reason.. perhaps its YOU guys that are missing something.

we wern't talking about OS's we were talking about hardware spec's, so the OS comparision is mute.. you can't go comparing spec's then override the higher spec device by saying "but our OS is better!" just because your spec's don't exceed or match them... that's just a dumb way out of a debate

I mean comon, I got into a debate with her over how her Intel i5 Mac was somehow superrior to my Intel i7 custom build workstation... it's a spec to spec thing... and a lot of the Mac people are so brainwashed into thinking Mac hardware is somehow better (we are talking hardware, not cases, etc) then the same exact thing on a non-mac... It's still an intel chip, Apple Intel supplied i5's aren't faster then non-apple Intel supplied i7's... comparisions like that just make my head want to explode when I get them from Apple people that are way to into thinking nothings better then their devices...

I am preeeetty sure I have this right.

PPI is pixel per inch, right?

Lumia has a higher PPI, so even if you resized down to match the iPhone it would still have a slightly bigger resolution. But this chart takes into account it's bigger screen size which naturally allows more pixels..

Or have I got this all wrong?

No, you're right. The Lumia has a larger screen size AND a higher PPI AND more total pixels. But it's not cheap to knock off points because of that. After all, everyone has been going crazy of retina screens lately, and Apple is claiming that the iPhone 5 has the world's greatest screen.

Remember, we're talking about two measures of resolution. Total pixels, and pixels per inch. The Lumia wins both. It's a higher resolution screen in all ways.

The fact that the larger screen naturally allows more pixels is meaningless. That just makes it a more expensive screen.

Wow! Fandriods call Apple fanboys iSheep :pinch:

Why does it matter to you what phone the other guy has? why do you need to have a bash. Must feel real mature doing it I suppose?

Considering we're touting the Lumia 920, I highly doubt there's too many fandroids in this thread. You need to work on your reading comprehension.

we wern't talking about OS's we were talking about hardware spec's, so the OS comparision is mute.. you can't go comparing spec's then override the higher spec device by saying "but our OS is better!" just because your spec's don't exceed or match them... that's just a dumb way out of a debate

I mean comon, I got into a debate with her over how her Intel i5 Mac was somehow superrior to my Intel i7 custom build workstation... it's a spec to spec thing... and a lot of the Mac people are so brainwashed into thinking Mac hardware is somehow better (we are talking hardware, not cases, etc) then the same exact thing on a non-mac... It's still an intel chip, Apple Intel supplied i5's aren't faster then non-apple Intel supplied i7's... comparisions like that just make my head want to explode when I get them from Apple people that are way to into thinking nothings better then their devices...

Yes, that's just it. Most of these "idiots" (to quote a certain Neowin news story :p) are so brainwashed, they just sound arrogant when they talk about anything technology, since most of them praise Apple to any extent. I've had an Apple friend that made the same exact comparison between an i5 vs i7 (both Sandy Bridge!), and said the i5 was the better chip. No matter how hard I explained and showed him benchmarks, they wouldn't listen - this is the mentality of Apple fanboys. Way to go Apple - you dumbed down technology (in such a bad way).

Yes, that's just it. Most of these "idiots" (to quote a certain Neowin news story :p) are so brainwashed, they just sound arrogant when they talk about anything technology, since most of them praise Apple to any extent. I've had an Apple friend that made the same exact comparison between an i5 vs i7 (both Sandy Bridge!), and said the i5 was the better chip. No matter how hard I explained and showed him benchmarks, they wouldn't listen - this is the mentality of Apple fanboys. Way to go Apple - you dumbed down technology (in such a bad way).

mine was worse, she had the sandybridge one I have an Ivy Bridge... yet somehow the Apple sold one was special.. you start argueing down to gems like "it's not how powerful it is, its how you use it!" well great, but I can install windows on that slower mac, still less powerful... I've even heard gems like "The Intel processors apple uses are custom designed for Apple with special instructions to make them faster"... really? you mean the same exact part number is somehow different? *scratches head*

I just have such a hard time talking to the average person anymore about tech, use to be they knew nothing about it and now they all think they know everything because they have an iPad or iPhone...

even a quote like the number of instructions per second is higher on this device, gets berated with "you anti-apple zelot!" when in fact it was probably true...

Why would you mark the iPhone down for screen size & resolution?

I mean, maybe you think a bigger screen is better, but obviously the resolution will be bigger if the screen is bigger.

PPI - Pixels Per Inch is pretty much the factor in that, the more pixels per inch the better it will look at higher resolution. Bigger screen does not mean a higher PPI as it could mean bigger pixels.

No, you're right. The Lumia has a larger screen size AND a higher PPI AND more total pixels. But it's not cheap to knock off points because of that. After all, everyone has been going crazy of retina screens lately, and Apple is claiming that the iPhone 5 has the world's greatest screen.

Remember, we're talking about two measures of resolution. Total pixels, and pixels per inch. The Lumia wins both. It's a higher resolution screen in all ways.

The fact that the larger screen naturally allows more pixels is meaningless. That just makes it a more expensive screen.

Well to be fair, it won't be humanly possible to distinguish the PPI difference between the two anyway. So the best you could say is that they are completely equal in realistic terms. Somebody could make a 500 PPI screen, but it won't be any better than one that's 250 PPI. But I do agree that saying it's the world's greatest screen is stretching it. But that's Apple's marketing tactic for ya.

Honestly it will come down to color correctness and saturation. The 4S won in that aspect over the Galaxy, so we'll have to see how this Lumia stacks up once somebody can give it a physical test.

I love how people say the WP8 is a crappy OS, at least try it. I know every UI isn't for every person, but at this point in time I think it's hard for any consumer or journalist to say the OS sucks, since MS isn't letting any one see every feature of it.

At this point in time Apple is doing what they did to themselves when they almost went under 15+ years ago, rather than being innovative and ahead of the competition they're suing and dumping a ton of money in to marketing. While plenty of companies do that latter, and it does work for a certain period of time, at some point you have to give consumers a reason to buy your product vs someone else's.

Whether you're an Android fan, Apple fan, or hopeful WP8 fan when it comes to saying the iPhone5 is the best I think Apple is fighting an uphill battle against anybody who's not a die hard Apple fan. While a screen that's larger that n4 inches isn't for everyone, at this point you'd think there'd be iPhone's with different screen sizes. This would allow them to satisfy the CONSUMER that wants a smaller screen and those who want a larger screen. Heck Android and WP8 at this point have both shown that having the OS scale to different screen sizes can be done and done very well.

It seems the most innovative spec in the iPhone 5 is the new CPU. But, the main feature of that is the battery life. While many are saying that there's a noticeable performance difference, the "selling" feature seems to be it's ability to extend the battery life. My argument is that while most smart phones users complain about battery life, they are happy if they can get close to a days worth out of the battery. If you can get through the day and plug it in when you go to bed, why do you need more than that? To me this isn't a good enough feature to convince me to move to Apple's ecosystem.

The UI hasn't changed in 5+ yrs, while the changes in Android from 1.5/1.6 aren't hugely noticeable to the average consumer they have changed it to make it smoother, add features, such as shaking to perform certain functions, touching to other phones for file transfers, etc. Apple needs to keep the UI moving forward, not necessarily in huge steps but it has to keep moving. Maybe it's me but I've never been able to get comfortable with iOS. My 6 yr. old daughter has had an iPod touch for three years and to this day I would prefer not to have to put more music, pictures, videos on it. Apple has simply forced you to do things "their" way and there's no flexibility. I know MS has done the same with WP7.5 and most liekly with WP8 with the Zune software, but at least that automatically updates my pictures and music libraries without me having to run some third party app or having to remember what I already added.

In case you're wondering this is coming from a Moto Droid X users, who is up for renewal and is just waiting for the right phone to come out. Honestly I was expecting to make the jump to the iPhone, but needed that one feature to sell me on it, Apple didn't provide that. Android I think is falling into the trap the MS did with Windows. They're building an OS that needs to support massive amounts of hardware configurations and not every manufacturer ends up implementing it in a good way and Google has no recourse. At this point I'm leaning towards going to WP8, a Lumia 920 as long as f***** Verizon picks it up.

What MS and Nokia have done is:

1. Give a customizable interface that dynamically updates the tiles so you don't have to open 3 or 4 apps to see if they have updates

2. It's snappy and responsive, this is where Android falls behind on some phones.

3. MS is controlling the hardware specs in a reasonable fashion, this allows for completion within the platform, ends up being good for the consumer

4. On the Lumia 920, Nokia has built a version of the PureView that should make it one of the best cameras in a smartphone, if nothing else blurry photos should be a thing of the past.

Summary

In my opinion the iPhone 5 will do very good and will be a good product, just nothing new and for those that aren't faithful to the brand it may make them start looking towards Android and WP8. Android like I said is a good OS and I think Google is trying to stay ahead of the curve with adding new features or functionality with each "treat." Their downfall is having to support the many number of hardware configurations and leaving some things in the hands of the manufacturer. A consumer can get one Android device that is a low end model and hate it because it's slow/sluggish, but in their eyes that means Android as a whole is bad, not the device. To me new phone needs at least one feature to draw consumers to that product. Technology moves and changes too quickly nowadays and in order to keep consumers happy companies need to give consumers a reason to stick with their product and not move to someone else. Being complacent and providing the same UI for 5+ years, not using standard connectivity/plugs, and suing competition when you see there market share growing isn't good for the consumer.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • On the topic of being locked out of a service. Recently two different friends of mine got locked out of their Google accounts. Both were hack attempts and one of them is waiting 30 days before he can get back in. He had backup codes and MFA but not a passkey. It was a browser token hack. Anyhow he has to wait 30 days for the dispute or whatever to end. The other person only had a password and is screwed losing all of the email, docs and years of photos. Google won’t help her at all. Her fault because she had no backup/recovery setup. Enable passkeys if possible. Also do NOT use browser based password managers. If using a cloud service make sure it is one you can fully sync to one of your devices so you can back it up. Like a PC or Mac with some backup drive plugged into it. Google is the worst to use IMHO. You can’t sync your photos at all. You have to use the “Take Out” service which is manual and takes days. That service strips the meta data from your photos. Also Google Docs synced to a device are useless without a Google accounts. MS Office/Libre Office is not going to open a link to a Google doc to a dead account.
    • Why you need to take back control of your synced passwords and how to go about doing that by Paul Hill Credit: Pixabay Last month, when Google decided to introduce daily and weekly caps for Gemini, it reignited an anxiety of mine, that you can’t really depend on service providers to maintain features forever, and it got me looking into free software (as in freedom) in other areas too. One app I quickly came across was KeePassXC on desktop and KeePassDX on Android as an alternative to password manager lock-in within the Chrome or Firefox ecosystems. I personally like to switch around with browsers, and using either password manager is inconvenient, so something like KeePassXC was interesting to me. The main issue with it now is syncing; I was not sure how to do that. After a bit of research, I came across Syncthing, a tool I was vaguely familiar with but had never used because it seemed complicated. However, I was completely wrong, and honestly, I think everyone should use it if they use multiple devices. It essentially lets you share folders peer to peer across all of your devices, no cloud services that you don’t control necessary! And it was fairly simple to set up, if not a bit clunky. Since setting it up, I’ve also started using Syncthing to back up other apps too, so don’t think it’s limited to just saving password databases. You can use it for pretty much anything you use Dropbox or Google Drive for. Before continuing to talk about those apps a bit more, let’s walk back a bit and talk about browser sync. Ever since the late 2000s and early 2010s, really, since we have been using smartphones, browser sync has been a necessity of life. I don’t know about you, but I have hundreds of passwords saved. For the most part, they’re all unique, so I don’t remember them and rely on software to manage them for me. Until recently, I’ve relied on password managers in Chrome and Firefox, but what I always found annoying was that it can be hard to transfer them between browsers. Sure, on Windows it is simple enough, but on Linux, exporting bookmarks has been temperamental. It works OK nowadays, but not too long ago, Chrome required you to enable exporting passwords in chrome://flags. The situation is even worse on mobile; there is no exporting or importing of passwords of any kind. You literally have to do it on a desktop, which is incredibly annoying in our mobile-first world. Sync also lets us take out bookmarks, history, tabs, and autofill data easily. To enable sync, it’s just a matter of signing into the browser once, and it handles the rest. It’s nice and easy. Obviously, all this has some issues, including those I’ve outlined above about it being hard to transfer data between browsers, but also things such as account suspension, lost account passwords, and other lock-in mechanisms, such as passkeys, being tied to a specific browser. On a sidenote, I have just removed all of my passkeys because they can make it harder to move browsers. I think the biggest threat to your synced passwords, especially if doing this with Google, is having your account suspended. I don’t ever expect mine to be suspended, but you do hear horror stories on Reddit where people lose access to their Google accounts. Imagine if you have hundreds of passwords, then suddenly lose access to them because Google froze your account, what would you do? So yes, it can be nice to use these syncing services for their convenience, but they also have risks. You may have seen me going on about free software quite a bit in my editorials. It’s essentially a concept championed by the Free Software Foundation. It’s software under particular licenses that grant you four freedoms: run the program for any purpose (0), study and change the source code (1), redistribute copies to others (2), and the freedom to distribute modified copies to others (3). For example, if there is an app I use and one day it gets abandoned by the developer, I can keep running it or even clone the software and continue developing it. Look at the myriad of cool services Google has run over the years before killing them. You can’t take the source code for those because they are proprietary, for the most part. Both KeePassXC and Syncthing are free software, so I get the freedoms listed above. In my use case where I’m syncing a database full of my passwords, I also get proper ownership over my data, there is no losing access to the database due to a frozen account, I can access the code of the tools I’m using, and I can get support from real people online if I run into issues, rather than having to consult a vague help page from an opaque company. With the KeePassXC password manager, you create a .kdbx file, which is what will be synced between devices. KeePassXC has cross-platform apps and also has browser extensions so that the browser can fetch passwords from the database once it is unlocked. Meanwhile, Syncthing is a peer-to-peer file sync tool where you can select folders to sync between your devices. Just pop files in the folders you choose, and then they will be available across your other devices whenever they come online. Syncthing is resilient as it works over both LAN and the internet and only ever sends content between your devices, never to a third-party server somewhere else. By combining these two pieces of software, you can essentially replicate the browser sync functionality. I have had a weird, conflicting issue where a new file is appearing, but it doesn’t seem to be impacting my main password database, which is updating between devices just fine. If you want to get a setup similar to what I have, you will need to go here to download KeePassXC for your computer. Once you have that, you will need to download your passwords from your web browser to a CSV file. In Chrome, you can type chrome://password-manager/settings into the URL bar, and you should see an option to download your passwords under Export Passwords. This will give you the CSV file you need for importing into KeePassXC. If you use a different browser, just use a search engine and type “browser-name export passwords” and muddle along. In KeePassXC, you’ll want to press Import File from the home screen, select the CSV file, and create a new database from it. On one of the screens of the wizard, there will be a Title field with a drop-down selected to none. Change this to Title and continue. You’ll select a name for the database, the encryption level (the defaults are fine), and then you will pick a password. I would choose four unrelated words that are easy for you to remember, as you’ll be typing them fairly often to access your passwords. When you have all your passwords in your new database, you will want to set up the browser extension so that your browser can fetch passwords from KeePassXC. Rather than explain how to do that here, refer to KeePassXC’s guide on how to set it up properly. Once you’ve got that set up, you want to install KeePassDX on Android. You can grab it on the F-Droid store and the Google Play Store. For iPhone users, there are other .kdbx-supporting apps, but I haven’t tried any of them, so have a look around and use what suits you. Once you have that done, you will want to install Syncthing on your computer and find a third-party app for your mobile device. On Android, I use an app called BasicSync; there are also options for iOS, but again, I’ve not tried these. Once you’ve got SyncThing, you’ll want to set it up and connect all of your devices together and share a folder between your gadgets. PCWorld has a good tutorial on setting up a synchronized file between your devices using SyncThing. Once you’ve set it up, congrats, you’ll never have to touch that stuff again except for adding or removing devices. I’ll be honest, I didn’t particularly like setting up Syncthing. It didn’t take me a massive amount of time, but I think I had to check online because I found it a bit confusing. That said, I’ve had it running for several weeks now and never need to touch the Syncthing settings, so that’s very nice. I also mentioned a conflicting file. I’m not sure why this is appearing, but the main .kdbx file seems to be updating and syncing just fine. What’s nice is that both KeePassXC and Syncthing are free software, so they won’t just vanish one day; you can take the code and fork the project or use a range of alternative implementations that others have made. It’s also nice that it works over LAN, so even if your ISP is having problems, your passwords will still sync. One area where you will want to be a bit more careful with this setup is if you only have one device. I am OK because I have a computer and two phones, all synced up. If you just have one device, you will probably want to store a backup of your .kdbx file somewhere else. Obviously, you’ll also want to remember your password really well, too. If you get locked out, it's game over. Overall, if you want to take back control of your computing from big tech, taking control of your passwords is an important part of this. You don’t need to immediately clear out your browser’s password manager; try running KeePassXC and the password manager concurrently for a while to see if you run into any problems. If you do try this out, let us know some other creative ways to use Syncthing. I haven’t really come up with a solution about what to do with my bookmarks, for example.
    • If the price was a dollar, someone would complain "Why isn't it free?" If it was free, someone would complain they weren't being paid to play it.
    • That lens of history will burn if you hold it at the right angle... Warn users too late: Shame, Microsoft! That extremely minor update to an obscure Control Panel widget required 2 years of warning. Warn users too early: Shame, Microsoft! We've got better things to do. Pipeline and process be damned, we'll just always be disappointed, eh?
    • Microsoft Paint used to be my favorite Windows app as a kid, and it's still pretty good by Usama Jawad I have been using Windows since the early 2000s, when I was around 10 years old or so. I vaguely remember playing around with Windows 98 and Windows 2000, but that may have been on school PCs which had old operating systems installed. My main OS on the home PC, and the one I recall spending most time with, was Windows XP. At that time, I used the home PC to create Word and PowerPoint documents for school, but a lot of the time, I simply used it to play games. My dad would bring game discs which we would try and install on the PC, sometimes unsuccessfully, and sometimes, we would rely on flash games in the browser, like Bubble Trouble on Miniclip. However, the problem with the latter approach was the internet speed. On a good day, our dial-up internet would offer us speeds of 56 kbps, but on most days, it was closer to 33 kbps. This did not facilitate online gaming as I would often have to wait minutes for a game to load or "draw" on the screen, and trying to download pirated games wasn't simple either. I remember getting tired of waiting for online games to load and just downloading simulator games from the Big Fish Games website instead, only to be disappointed after finding out that I was just being given access to trial versions of the title, and I needed to fork out money to pay for the full version. All of this is to say that it wasn't very easy to find entertainment options on the home PC when I was a kid, due to a number of reasons, mostly outside of my control. This situation pushed me towards a rather unconventional ally: Microsoft Paint. Whenever the internet wasn't working as good as I expected, I would simply spin up Paint and draw complete rubbish on the canvas. Of course, that wasn't always the intention, but it usually happened when I messed up drawing a straight line or something, and then I would give up on that particular piece and simply draw a random collection of objects. Microsoft Paint was extremely accessible and easy to use. Even if you weren't an artist, you could quickly understand the tools at your disposal and how to leverage them on a canvas. The absolute breadth on offer ensured that each painting was truly unique, as you could utilize various combinations of tools like the pencil, paint, spray paint, and more to truly personalize your creation. Since I wasn't particularly good at drawing both on digital screen or a physical screen, I remember that my main style of art would be to insert a bunch of randomly intersecting lines and then fill them with random colors through the paint can. I have trying to replicate that art style in the latest version of Paint below, and as you can see, it's truly Pablo Picasso-esque. The human imagination truly knows no bounds Microsoft Paint kept me occupied for hours and was my best friend when video games on the home PC were inaccessible for one reason or the other. There was no academic or professional reason for which I would need to use Paint, but I still loved using it in my personal time, even if what I created wasn't worth being shown to anyone. It was simply fun. Fast-forward to today, and the situation is mostly the same. Now that I am almost 29 years old, and I still have no reason to use Microsoft Paint in a professional capacity. In fact, I don't even use it in a personal capacity, except to dabble with it from time to time, just to see if core functionalities are still intact. And I'm happy to say that I think Microsoft Paint still offers the same accessibility and inviting experience that it did to me a couple of decades ago, even though its UX has been refreshed and it's been integrated with Copilot features. Interestingly, things could have been a lot different, had Microsoft had its way. Microsoft Paint was marked for deprecation with the Windows 10 Fall Creators Update in 2017, and even began displaying a product retirement alert, urging customers to shift to Paint 3D instead. Fortunately, after consumer backlash, Microsoft reversed course on this decision, and Paint continues to be a native app inside Windows installations that can also be updated quite frequently through the Microsoft Store. Instead, Paint 3D ended up on the chopping block, which is for the better, I think. I have intermittently played around with Microsoft's refreshed Paint experience in the past few years, and I do think it has received worthwhile upgrades. the UI and the UX has been modernized while retaining core functionality, and the app is still fairly easy to use. It doesn't meet any of my use-cases, but I've never really had any use-cases ever, as described previously. Of course, the elephant in the room is the Copilot integration. Personally, I believe that this is one place where Copilot does make sense, environmental concerns aside. I know that a lot of creatives use AI to generate images, and while some may be using professional alternatives, Paint still offers a decent casual experience, with the power of Copilot. Of course, you do need to have a valid Microsoft 365 Copilot license and available credits to use it, but even if you don't, you still get the big Copilot button in the toolbar, unfortunately. All in all, I am glad that Microsoft Paint continues to be a native feature in Windows 11, and a piece of software that has evolved to meet modern needs without cutting off its own roots. It's just an iconic piece of Windows history that was an essential part of my childhood, and while I don't use it anymore, I'm just glad it is still there.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      hhgygy earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      513
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      88
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!