Recommended Posts

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spider-Man_in_film#Cast_and_characters

according to this, if both hary and norma are mention as both the green goblin and hobgoblin, what are the odds? Rhino and electro confirmed, two goons oscorp created and "hired" . Eddy brock doesn't appear as cast so :/

  • 3 weeks later...
give it a shot man, I think you would enjoy it.

I did end up checking it out and was actually surprised by it. The trailers looked absolutely awful but the film was pretty decent, minus a few ridiculous scenes and the ending. However, I still think it was a mistake to reboot the franchise and not simply start from a later point (what with everyone already being familiar with the origin story).

On one side I'm hoping those lights won't be on the hoodie when seeing those photos. Than it will just look like his skin really is glowing from electricity. And to be honest, I think that's how it'll be because those lights look really odd.

Though after having typed this, it feels stupid to even say it. Like it's obvious those lights won't be seen in the movie, and it's just to create the effect of a glowing skin, haha :p

still no sign or hint of venom :(

Why do you think he'll be in the movie? Venom isn't a character that needs to be a part of Spidey's movies every time :p Now, something that would be more awesome is a Venom stand-alone movie. If they'd put Venom into this series though, they'll have to pull it off way better than in Spider-Man 3, which I bet everyone will agree with. He should be the main villain though so that they can flesh the character out more than in Spider-Man 3. He shouldn't be just a symbiote that drops onto Eddy after having been part of Peter and then wanting to kill Spider-Man. He deserves a more meaningful role in the movies.

Also, it would be too many enemies if they did turn the Osborns into the Goblins. If anything, I bet they're going to setup the 3rd movie with the Osborns at the end of this one.

Yeah using the blue LED's will save a lot of time in post processing anyway, as they will give off a nice blue aura and reflect off other things without needing to do loads of extra effects.

I don't think I'll be seeing this any of the Amazing Spidermans till they actually have Venom/Symbiote Spidey in it. (Cause he's my favourite). Electro looks alright, just wondering how Rhino will look like.

^You're missing out on a lot (backstory, etc) in that case. They might not even put Venom into this series of movies.

Yeah using the blue LED's will save a lot of time in post processing anyway, as they will give off a nice blue aura and reflect off other things without needing to do loads of extra effects.

That's exactly what I was thinking. Plus it looks more real as well. Less CG is sometimes better and this is a case in point.

On one side I'm hoping those lights won't be on the hoodie when seeing those photos. Than it will just look like his skin really is glowing from electricity. And to be honest, I think that's how it'll be because those lights look really odd.

Though after having typed this, it feels stupid to even say it. Like it's obvious those lights won't be seen in the movie, and it's just to create the effect of a glowing skin, haha :p

Why do you think he'll be in the movie? Venom isn't a character that needs to be a part of Spidey's movies every time :p Now, something that would be more awesome is a Venom stand-alone movie. If they'd put Venom into this series though, they'll have to pull it off way better than in Spider-Man 3, which I bet everyone will agree with. He should be the main villain though so that they can flesh the character out more than in Spider-Man 3. He shouldn't be just a symbiote that drops onto Eddy after having been part of Peter and then wanting to kill Spider-Man. He deserves a more meaningful role in the movies.

Also, it would be too many enemies if they did turn the Osborns into the Goblins. If anything, I bet they're going to setup the 3rd movie with the Osborns at the end of this one.

^You're missing out on a lot (backstory, etc) in that case. They might not even put Venom into this series of movies.

That's exactly what I was thinking. Plus it looks more real as well. Less CG is sometimes better and this is a case in point.

That's my point exactly.

Venom in Spiderman 3 sucked balls so hard, they've the potential to make a better venom, to give him a movie just for himself (plus a couple of sideline wackos) as they did in the comics! the real archenemy! (and while we're at it, carnage would be too much :p ?? )

They have to release one every 3 years or they lose the license.

By releasing the same movie every 3 years they will destroy the license anyway. It's probably better to lose it and let someone else exploit it to its full potential.

After the Not So Amazing Spiderman i lost all interest in any new spider man movie. It was basically a cut and paste of Sam Raimi's Spider man. I rarely consider myself robbed after watching a movie even if it is bad but after watching The Not So Amazing Spiderman i really wanted a refund of my time.

i miss the classic spiderman where his 'web' was a special devices that sometimes failed giving a comedy effect.

in recent spiderman the web was a part of himself that always works.

I think you are referring to the trilogy years ago - even then it failed for him when he was stressed out. Remember him falling and hitting a car? Didn't Peter have to build a device in The Amazing Spiderman in order to use a web?

I think you are referring to the trilogy years ago - even then it failed for him when he was stressed out. Remember him falling and hitting a car? Didn't Peter have to build a device in The Amazing Spiderman in order to use a web?

Yes he built his web device in the Amazing Spiderman movie.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • I'm content with my dual charger for now, but this actually sounds quite nice - and it's less expensive than I was expecting. As for the company, they can name themselves "Nazirapist" for all I care.
    • While I miss Outlook for a couple of small things, I use Thunderbird now because I don't like how MS wants to force you to change things.
    • Chrome has history of being the browser everyone uses because Internet Explorer sucks, not realizing that Edge changed that, but people got into the habit of using Chrome. I use Brave and I've never been happier with a browser. It does what it is meant to do and gets out of the way.
    • Wino Mail -> Microsoft Outlook (the new one). Link: https://github.com/bkaankose/Wino-Mail Just sayin.
    • Microsoft launches Godot Sample to streamline Xbox PC game development on the engine by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe Microsoft today announced a new endeavor that aims to make it simpler for Godot developers to get their products into the Xbox PC ecosystem. Dubbed the "XBOX Godot Sample," this is a new public reference for developers using the open-source engine. This is set to serve as an example of how Microsoft GDK, Xbox Services, and PlayFab can be integrated into their projects. The sample is available now on GitHub as a working example. This covers key features in gaming projects that developers may need to release their projects on Xbox PC, with everything from matchmaking and game sign-in to gamepad compatibility with Godot being covered. This release is being called the first step in giving Godot developers the tools to bring their games over to Xbox PC, with more changes to come based on feedback and issue reports. However, the company was clear that this is not related to bringing Godot projects to Xbox consoles. The engine's open development model stops it from accessing console SDKs due to the requirement of NDAs and legal contracts. Here's how it explained this Godot sample project's focus: This is a source-only sample, not a product. It's MIT-licensed at the wrapper layer; the GDK and PlayFab dependencies still require their own installs and license acceptance, consistent with our other XBOX samples. There is no set update cadence for support or maintenance. We’ll watch the repo, monitor issues, and iterate where it makes sense, but this isn't a commercial release. That said, we’re excited to hear your feedback and see any community PRs, as we evolve this together. This is the first step in bringing Godot for XBOX on PC. We plan to evolve it over time based on what the community tells us is most valuable. This sample is built specifically for XBOX on PC. It doesn’t include support for XBOX Series X|S or XBOX One. If you’re already building for XBOX Series X|S or XBOX One, please talk with your XBOX representative. If not, you can get started by signing up here. Game developers can find the XBOX Godot Sample by heading to GitHub over here. Documentation on how to get started with Godot for building an Xbox PC project can be seen here.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      Asgardi earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Conversation Starter
      mobandz earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Apprentice
      fernan99 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • One Month Later
      nothanks earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      B2Proxy earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      468
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      243
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      79
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      73
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      60
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!