Recommended Posts

Wow. Notch explained why he said what he said and still the Neowinian Windows 8 fanboys don't understand.

Can't speak for everybody, but it's not that his comment isn't understood.. but it just doesn't make any sense and contradicts itself. First, he says he likes some closed platforms. Then, he likes the PC because it's an open platform. Then he says he hates the Modern UI because it's closed (likes the rest, just not this one).. but forgets to mention where exactly Microsoft put a gun to his head forcing him to use it, never mind completely disregarding the fact that Windows is still an open platform.. namely he doesn't have to certify, he doesn't have to use the app store, he doesn't have to pay Microsoft a cent, he doesn't have to do a single God damned thing that he wasn't doing before. You want to work in the Windows app store ecosystem then yes, you're playing by their rules, just like you got to follow Apple's, Google's, Canonical's, etc rules when you want to work with theirs. Nobody is forcing him to do so.

Free web hosting exists, as does google code, sourceforge, github, and they all allow free hosting.

yes, and on this service you can upload and have for download Win32 apps that will work on Win8 and win9 and so on untill win32 is deprecated as ancient sometime in the 22nd century.

your point was ?

What an interesting drama.

I personally don't think theres any debate as to the benefits of microsoft aiming to further control the OOTBE for Windows. Truth is due to the scope of windows its always going to be circumventable and customisable just the regular peeps who will appreciate it MS is taking a handle on things rather then washing their hands of the OS once its out the door and the consumer being subjected to any number of poor OOTB experiences.

If Markus has such a problem with single entities having too much power perhaps he should look around at the state of the world and the encroachment of privacy and liberities being undertaken across most western nations at the moment. Yes two different kettles of fish but were I passionate against power consolidation MS wouldn't be on my list of worries.

Wow. Notch explained why he said what he said and still the Neowinian Windows 8 fanboys don't understand.

BEcause his reasoning doesn't make sense, and all he does is come across as a crybaby with attention needs.

Minecraft is Notch's creation, he has every right to do what he damn well pleases with it. I know this thought doesn't sit well with the Microsoft shills at this forum but people are in software development for themselves, not to appease Microsoft.

Windows is Microsoft's creation, they have every right to do what they damn well please with it.

BEcause his reasoning doesn't make sense, and all he does is come across as a crybaby with attention needs.

How could he dare to post a tweet with his opinion on anything... he should have just published an editorial article on the front page of his website.

Is it DEFCON1 already at the W8 defense brigade?

How could he dare to post a tweet with his opinion on anything... he should have just published an editorial article on the front page of his website.

Is it DEFCON1 already at the W8 defense brigade?

Are you implying that because he tweeted about something, he's free from being criticized? It has nothing to do with defending Windows 8. I don't agree with what Markus Persson said and I strongly dislike Windows 8. The issue here is that his statements are contradictory.

  • Like 3

I don't want either of those, but having all my apps fully hardware accelerated, properly sandboxed, kept to one directory and so on would be fantastic.

Given that I have more than one hard disk in my computer, that's the last thing I want ;) I'm perfectly capable of managing those matters myself.

Err. yes there is, or you have to run your own repo, or put it on one of the third party repos with no quality control

Given the kind of crap I've seen in a lot of Linux software repositories I doubt their quality control is all that stringent. Certainly nothing like the ridiculous limits Microsoft and Apple place. Besides adding your own repositories to Linux is easy, how do you do it with Windows?

Are you implying that because he tweeted about something, he's free from being criticized? It has nothing to do with defending Windows 8. I don't agree with what Markus Persson said and I strongly dislike Windows 8. The issue here is that his statements are contradictory.

Sure, everyone can criticize anything, but two FPN articles because of an opinion on a tweet is a bit excesive, more so when one of them goes all the way to call Notch an hypocrite right on the headline.

So much passion over one single guy's opinion about not wanting to certify his app.

And anyway, the post I was replying to was talking about a "crybaby with attention needs", which is why I said that it was just a tweet. If he was seeking attention he'd have far wider audience on minecraft.net's front page.

Given the kind of crap I've seen in a lot of Linux software repositories I doubt their quality control is all that stringent. Certainly nothing like the ridiculous limits Microsoft and Apple place. Besides adding your own repositories to Linux is easy, how do you do it with Windows?

One mans junk is another man's treasure. Feel free for example to look at my recent W7 RDP problem - works FINE from ALL linux clients but doesn't work at all from microsoft's official clients! You might think rdesktop is rubbish compared to mstsc but I find it great.

Given the way Neowin's staff almost to a T completely reamed any members that were critical of the 'need to be shot' article I'd say the attitudes of a lot here strike me as being highly hypocritical. It seems there's a general attitude of butthurt around anyone in the industry that doesn't have anything positive to say about Windows 8, and it's starting to make Neowin's editors and staff look just as childish as they claim everyone else is being. These silly wars do no good for anyone.

Given the way Neowin's staff almost to a T completely reamed any members that were critical of the 'need to be shot' article I'd say the attitudes of a lot here strike me as being highly hypocritical. It seems there's a general attitude of butthurt around anyone in the industry that doesn't have anything positive to say about Windows 8, and it's starting to make Neowin's editors and staff look just as childish as they claim everyone else is being. These silly wars do no good for anyone.

Kind of ironic of you calling others butthurt. :rolleyes:

Kind of ironic of you calling others butthurt. :rolleyes:

Even more ironic that you assume that you know me when you don't. I don't have much love for Windows 8 but I don't really care that much, I just find the bitching funny. Asking before assuming makes one look less foolish ;)

Given the kind of crap I've seen in a lot of Linux software repositories I doubt their quality control is all that stringent. Certainly nothing like the ridiculous limits Microsoft and Apple place. Besides adding your own repositories to Linux is easy, how do you do it with Windows?

So, a central app place with actual quality control should be a welcome change then, so you know the apps don't come with spyware or viruses or backdoors or crap like that.

And what ridiculous limits are you talking about anyway.

I like Windows 8 as an operating system and will be upgrading to it but I think that Notch was completely on the ball about his criticism of the Windows Store and the amount of power it gives Microsoft. We're talking about a company that has historically abused its monopoly position and now they're making a power play to control the entire platform. They'll get to decide what apps appear and get a cut of the profits of every app sold on the Windows Store. We're talking about a company that is being investigated by the EU for breaching an anti-trust agreement - and which has prevented any competing browser engine from running on Windows RT - yet people are suggesting there's nothing to worry about regarding Microsoft's attempt to close off the platform. How long will it be before Microsoft considers traditional X86-64 applications to be a security risk and to start placing more and more restrictions on them? How long until X86-64 apps will be required to be signed and distributed through the Windows Store?

Neowin's original article was way off base and it is sad that so many people agreed with it. Notch is concerned about the future of the platform and he's not the only one.

So, a central app place with actual quality control should be a welcome change then, so you know the apps don't come with spyware or viruses or backdoors or crap like that.

And what ridiculous limits are you talking about anyway.

Just ignore him. He has no clue what he's talking about.

So, a central app place with actual quality control should be a welcome change then, so you know the apps don't come with spyware or viruses or backdoors or crap like that.

Perhaps people should be equally accepting of a government placing cameras in your house for your own protection? I mean, nobody likes getting assaulted or burgled. It obviously wouldn't be abused by the police or the government.

We're talking about a company with a history of anti-trust abuses and they're making a power play to control the entire market and get a percentage of the revenue from every app sold. Even Android allows you to use competing stores, yet Microsoft has blocked that option with Metro apps. Notch is bang on with his criticism.

What makes Notch so special? I played a lots of games by people I dont even know but somehow Notch is a driving force in the gameworld because of Minecraft.

Nothing really special, but he achieved the kind of success most indie game devs would want (both in mindshare and $$$).

Sure, everyone can criticize anything, but two FPN articles because of an opinion on a tweet is a bit excesive, more so when one of them goes all the way to call Notch an hypocrite right on the headline.

So much passion over one single guy's opinion about not wanting to certify his app.

And anyway, the post I was replying to was talking about a "crybaby with attention needs", which is why I said that it was just a tweet. If he was seeking attention he'd have far wider audience on minecraft.net's front page.

Surely you're aware of Markus Persson's notability in today's gaming industry. His opinion carries more weight than the lead developer of Garshasp: Temple of the Dragon. It may have started off with a couple of tweets about certifying Minecraft for Windows 8 but it has grown into something bigger. And this isn't the first time he expressed his seemingly negative views about Windows 8.

Given the way Neowin's staff almost to a T completely reamed any members that were critical of the 'need to be shot' article I'd say the attitudes of a lot here strike me as being highly hypocritical. It seems there's a general attitude of butthurt around anyone in the industry that doesn't have anything positive to say about Windows 8, and it's starting to make Neowin's editors and staff look just as childish as they claim everyone else is being. These silly wars do no good for anyone.

Please don't derail this thread with baseless claims. This isn't about being "butthurt" because someone, who happens to be quite popular in the gaming industry, doesn't like Windows 8. This is about that same person making contradictory statements and pretending to be on a mission to maintain the openness of the PC platform.

There isn't anything particularly redeeming about this kind of response. It is a personal attack hiding behind the fa?ade of some sort of ideological argument that...doesn't really make much sense.

No respect.

Agreed.

  • Like 2
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • AMD RX 9070 GRE AI, Blender benchmarks vs 9070 XT, 7800XT, Nvidia RTX 5070, 4070 by Sayan Sen Earlier this week, we shared the first part of our review of AMD's new RX 9070 GRE. It was about the gaming performance of the GPU, and we gave it an 8 out of 10. As a follow-up, similar to how we did with the 9070 XT and non-XT, we are doing a dedicated productivity review for the RX 9070 GRE as well, where we compare it against the 9070 XT, 9070, 7800 XT, as well as Nvidia's 5070 and 4070. This will include AI, rendering, compute, and more benchmarks. AI performance, especially, is a very important metric in today's world, and AMD also promised big improvements thanks to its underlying architectural improvements. We will be pitching it against the data we already have for the RX 9070, and RX 9070 XT, but also the Nvidia 5070 FE, MSI GeForce RTX 4070 VENTUS 2X 12G, and Gigabyte Radeon RX 7800 XT GAMING OC 16G as they are in a similar price class, but also because we do not have a comparable 5060 Ti card lying around here that we can compare it against. Before we get underway, this is a collaboration between Sayan Sen and Steven Parker, who lent me his test bed. Also, there was no editorial input from AMD. First up, the specs of the RX 9070, 9070 XT, and 9070 GRE, which were given to us by AMD: Radeon RX 9070 GRE Radeon RX 9070 Radeon RX 9070 XT Boost Clock: Game Clock: up to 2.79GHz up to 2.20GHz up to 2.52GHz up to 2.07GHz up to 2.97GHz up to 2.40GHz Stream Processors 3,072 (48 CU) 3,584 (56 CU) 4,096 (64 CU) Ray Accelerator 48 56 64 AI Accelerator 96 112 128 ROPs 96 128 Texture Mapping Units 192 224 256 Memory 12 GB GDDR6, 18Gbps Clock, 192-bit Bus 432 GB/s 16 GB GDDR6, 20Gbps Clock, 256-bit Bus Effective Memory Bandwidth: 640 GB/s Infinity Cache 48 MB (3rd Gen) 64 MB (3rd Gen) Card Bus PCI-E 5.0 X16 Output 2x HDMI 2.1b 2x DisplayPort 2.1a Power consumption 220W 304W Recommended PSU 650W 750W Slot width 2x 3x Price (SEP) $549 $599 As you can see from the specs above, it is less than the standard RX 9070 in every way that counts, except for slightly higher Boost and Game clock speed. Design Moving on, the RX 9070 GRE we were given is an XFX Swift triple-fan, dual-slot design with two 8-pin connectors. At 30cm (self-measured), it will fit in most systems easily. There is no RGB either. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE by XFX from all angles. Test system Our test system consists of the following: Lian Li O11 Dynamic Mini V2 Flow (Amazon|Newegg) ASUS Z890 ProArt Creator WiFi (Amazon|Newegg) Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus (Amazon|Newegg) Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet - 44x37 (Amazon|Newegg) 2x 16GB G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB (7200 MT/s in XMP) (Amazon|Newegg) Sabrent Rocket4 Plus 2TB SSD (Amazon) Windows 11 25H2 (Build 26200.8246) AMD shared a press driver based on the recently released Adrenaline 26.5.2 that we were required to use. We now move on to our benchmarks. First up, we have Geekbench AI running on ONNX. For some reason, the 9070 GRE does exceptionally well here in both half-precision (FP16) and single-precision (FP32). It manages to beat the RTX 5070 and RX 9070 non-XT, and is only behind the 9070 XT. Since Geekbench runs in short bursts instead of continuously hammering the graphics card, it seems the GRE's faster boost clocks are helping here. Next up, we move to the UL Procyon AI test suite, starting with the image generation benchmark. We chose the Stable Diffusion XL FP16 test since it is the most intense workload available on Procyon. The Nvidia cards do very well here, as even the 4070 out-muscles AMD's best fairy easily. The positive thing about the GRE is that it gets quite close to the 9070 non-XT in this test; this indicates that the VRAM does not play a very big role here, as SD XL relies on float16 (FP16). So this is something to keep in mind again. If you wish to work with float32 AI workloads, graphics cards with larger than 12 GB buffers would likely emerge as victors. Regardless, the gains are still massive on AMD's 9000 series compared to the 7000 series. Following image generation, we move to the text generation benchmark. This is one test where the 9070 GRE struggled, quite a lot. It seems that the 12 GB VRAM and lower memory bandwidth of the new Radeon 9070 GRE are hurting it quite a bit; the split is massive, especially in a test like Llama2, which packs 13 billion parameters. As such, in all the tests, the 9070 GRE is the slowest of the lot. Next, we tried Blender, and here the AMD GPUs were beaten by Nvidia. Rendering is something the Green team has always had a lead over the Red side, and it has not changed so far. On the positive side, though, the 9070 GRE shows significantly better results than the 7800 XT, which means AMD is on the right path. Catching up to Nvidia, though, will require a lot more effort. And we hope HIP and ROCm can keep improving. Wrapping up AI testing, we measured OpenCL throughput in the Geekbench compute benchmark. The RX 9070 GRE alongside the 9070 did not fare well here at all, even falling behind the 7800 XT. Interestingly, even the RTX 5070 could not beat the 4070 on OpenCL, so perhaps this suggests that OpenCL optimization may not have been a priority for either AMD or Nvidia in the modern era. Conclusion We reached the end of our productivity performance review of the 9070 GRE, and we have to say it's a mixed bag. Unlike the 9070 and 9070 XT, the GRE excels in some areas while losing ground fairly easily in others. Similar to how it happened in gaming, any time the card's memory subsystem gets hammered, it tends to fall behind the others. This was the case with text generation, wherein we saw the VRAM sometimes hit its maximum available 12 GB of usage with larger model sizes. So what do we make of the RX 9070 as a productivity hardware? It can certainly be used, but you have to know it has its limitations. For those looking for a GPU that can deal with more, AMD recently unveiled the Radeon AI PRO R9700, which is essentially a 32 GB refresh of the 9070 XT with some additional workstation-based optimizations. On a similar note, the new Ryzen AI Halo platform is something you can consider if you want to set up a local AI processing station. Considering everything, we rate AMD's Radeon RX 9070 GRE a 7.5 out of 10 for its productivity performance. Price is less of a factor for those looking at productivity cases compared to those considering the GPU for gaming, and as such, we felt it did quite decently on many occasions and can be handy if you need a 12 GB GPU and, for some reason, don't want to get Nvidia. Purchase links: RX 9070 / XT / GRE (Amazon US) As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Does anyone here know if these updates are integrated into the UUP dump isos?
    • Motrix Next 3.9.4 by Razvan Serea Motrix Next is a modern, open-source cross-platform download manager built as the official next-generation successor to the original Motrix project. It has been completely rewritten using Tauri 2, Vue 3, TypeScript, and Rust, while still relying on the powerful Aria2 download engine for high-speed multi-protocol transfers. The app supports HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, BitTorrent, ED2K and magnet links, offering advanced features like multi-connection acceleration, task scheduling, bandwidth control, and batch download management. With a significantly reduced install size (around 20MB), it focuses on being lightweight, fast, and resource-efficient compared to traditional Electron-based download tools. Designed for Windows, macOS, and Linux, Motrix Next delivers a clean, modern UI inspired by Material Design 3 principles, with smooth animations and a minimal workflow. It improves usability through better download organization, system tray integration, and enhanced torrent handling including selective file downloads and tracker management. Motrix Next features: Multi-protocol downloads — HTTP, FTP, BitTorrent, Magnet, .torrent, ED2K, and Metalink tasks BitTorrent — Selective file download, DHT, peer exchange, encryption controls, metadata caching, GeoIP peer flags, and tracker probing Browser extension integration — Embedded Extension API with independent authentication, download confirmation, smart auto-submit, filename hints, referer/cookie forwarding, and real-time controls (Chrome Web Store · Edge Add-ons) Safe filename handling — Content-Disposition, RFC 2047, non-UTF-8, percent-encoded, and extensionless URL resolution with path traversal sanitization Download organization — Favorite and recent folders, optional file-type categorization, stale-record cleanup, and completed history backed by SQLite Concurrent downloads — Independent controls for active tasks, HTTP connections per server, segments per file, and BT peer limits Speed control — Global and per-task upload/download limits with day-of-week and time-of-day scheduling System integration — Tray operation, optional tray speed display, macOS Dock badge/progress, protocol handlers for magnet://, thunder://, and motrixnext:// Lightweight mode — Destroys the WebView on minimize-to-tray while Rust keeps the engine, task monitor, notifications, history, and extension routing alive Notifications and power options — Native task start/complete/failure notifications, keep-awake during downloads, and optional shutdown after completion Network controls — Scoped proxy support for downloads, app updates, and tracker updates, plus system proxy detection Auto-update channels — Stable, Beta, and Latest Across Channels policies with separate download and install phases Diagnostics — Structured logs, exportable diagnostic ZIPs, database integrity checks, automatic DB rebuild, and Linux GPU rendering fallback Personalization — Light/dark/system theme, 10 color schemes, 26 languages, and first-launch system language detection Motrix Next 3.9.4 changelog: Motrix Next 3.9.4 promotes the 3.9.4 beta cycle to stable. This release refreshes bundled engine binaries, improves task detail readability and copy actions, expands link handling for magnet and ED2K workflows, polishes responsive navigation and text wrapping, updates browser extension documentation, and refines network preference controls. New Features Task Detail copy actions — Added copyable values for task metadata and reusable render functions for long text fields. Magnet and ED2K lifecycle support — Added task lifecycle handling for magnet and ED2K links. History cleanup for deleted tasks — Deleted tasks can now remove matching history records. User-Agent management — Added user-agent management and improved related network preference controls. Browser extension documentation — Added the Firefox Add-ons link for the Motrix Next extension. Improvements Engine binaries — Updated bundled binaries for supported architectures. Task Detail readability — Long task names, URLs, tracker values, and copyable metadata now render more clearly. Deletion messaging — Refined localized task deletion text for clarity and consistency. Text wrapping — Improved URI input wrapping and task name multiline display. Navigation layout — Improved sub-navigation responsiveness. Disk allocation default — Changed the default file allocation method to trunc. Proxy controls — Improved proxy button styling in network preferences. Download: Motrix Next 64-bit | ARM64 | macOS ~20.0 MB (Open Source) Links: Website | macOS / Linux | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • NVIDIA officially supports Ubuntu, as linked above with the GeForce NOW Hands on I did in collaboration with Paul Hill.
    • TO be clear I am not running linux today, however I keep thinking about it. And I want to make sure there are minimal obstacles if I decide to make that switch in the coming months.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      479
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      250
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      69
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      67
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!