Recommended Posts

Dr. Eben Alexander has taught at Harvard Medical School and has earned a strong reputation as a neurosurgeon. And while Alexander says he's long called himself a Christian, he never held deeply religious beliefs or a pronounced faith in the afterlife.

But after a week in a coma during the fall of 2008, during which his neocortex ceased to function, Alexander claims he experienced a life-changing visit to the afterlife, specifically heaven.

"According to current medical understanding of the brain and mind, there is absolutely no way that I could have experienced even a dim and limited consciousness during my time in the coma, much less the hyper-vivid and completely coherent odyssey I underwent," Alexander writes in the cover story of this week's edition of Newsweek.

So what exactly does heaven look like?

Alexander says he first found himself floating above clouds before witnessing, "transparent, shimmering beings arced across the sky, leaving long, streamer like lines behind them."

He claims to have been escorted by an unknown female companion and says he communicated with these beings through a method of correspondence that transcended language. Alexander says the messages he received from those beings loosely translated as:

"You are loved and cherished, dearly, forever."

"You have nothing to fear."

"There is nothing you can do wrong."

From there, Alexander claims to have traveled to "an immense void, completely dark, infinite in size, yet also infinitely comforting." He believes this void was the home of God.

After recovering from his meningitis-induced coma, Alexander says he was reluctant to share his experience with his colleagues but found comfort inside the walls of his church. He's chronicled his experience in a new book, "Proof of Heaven: A neurosurgeon's journey into the afterlife," which will be published in late October.

"I'm still a doctor, and still a man of science every bit as much as I was before I had my experience," Alexander writes. "But on a deep level I'm very different from the person I was before, because I've caught a glimpse of this emerging picture of reality. And you can believe me when I tell you that it will be worth every bit of the work it will take us, and those who come after us, to get it right." :happy:

source

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1112187-doctor-heaven-is-real/
Share on other sites

I have yet to come across an afterlife experience, where a person visited hell.

I would agree, if you look at the bible you don't go to heaven or hell until judgement day(this is common amongst all the major religions), so the only factual thing I could say is if your going to hell you don't get a experience like this.

I have yet to come across an afterlife experience, where a person visited hell.

I'd assume if they were visiting hell whilst in their coma they'd probably die of shock, and hence never wake up to tell the story :p

Granted his story is more of a general afterlife rather than a particularly "Christian" heaven.

And yet not a single shred of evidence was provided; thus, it still makes sense to not believe it is real or unreal. After all, would this god punish us for using logic and reason (not believing Heaven exists while we await evidence)?

  • Like 3

I don't know what's more idiotic the fact that this drivel was printed or the fact that people actually believe this crap.

Standard of evidence has plummeted to "he said it" :rofl:

  • Like 2

So this guy claims to have been admitted into heaven, despite not actually being dead?

This guy is either lying, dreaming, or saying that God made a clerical error and allowed a non-dead guy into heaven, in which case there's a good chance that God's not going to be happy about making a mistake and punish him accordingly.

I have yet to come across an afterlife experience, where a person visited hell.

There are a few hellish experiences.

Hell is the result of deep beliefs that a person is 'evil' and deserves the worst of punishments.

These experiences are quite temporary, however.

An individual 'wakes up' to the true conditions when exposed to such a shock.

And there are some great variations to Heaven-like conditions.

Individuals do not necessarily go to the same 'place'.

These are not simply 'dreams' -- an individual spirit leaves the body for a while.

You each do in fact leave your bodies each night -- whether you block out recall of the experience or not.

It is necessary for your physical survival.

As for proof, the only proof you can experience is to develop your natural abilities to go out-of-body, at a conscious level.

No one can do this for you.

You existed as a spirit before life and shall continue to exist after 'death'.

You are as dead now as you will ever be.

You are now with 'God' as you will ever be.

You are more than the physical body that you think is YOU.

Seek the truth and ye shall find -- claim the freedom that is yours.

Only your Beliefs stand in the way. ;)

As for proof, the only proof you can experience is to develop your natural abilities to go out-of-body, at a conscious level.

http://www.randi.org/site/index.php/1m-challenge.html

Only your Reality stands in the way. ;)

The thing is, as long as there is any sort of life left in your brain you're not dead. Everything that's happening is just happening in your brain. That doesn't make it any less real, but it does mean it'll end completely when you're really dead and that it's probably not the same for everyone.

If the proof was there to get how would you prove it?

Come up with an experiment in which:

  1. The results can be reproduced consistently.
  2. The results can be reproduced in a controlled environment, and cannot be falsified through other evidence (i.e. brain scans indicating dream activity) or experiments (i.e. testing the drugs used on the test subjects)
  3. Resulting testimony from test subjects matches the original hypothesis.
  4. The initial theory can be modified as necessary when new evidence is presented.

What?

If you could prove heaven was real right now how would you do it? Bring a piece of heavens clouds back with you?

I am all for science but with the very real possibility that our understanding of the universe may be turned up side down on its head at any moment doesn't make heaven any less real if we can't prove it exists by our scientific standards.

Come up with an experiment in which:

  • The results can be reproduced consistently.
  • The results can be reproduced in a controlled environment, and cannot be falsified through other evidence (i.e. brain scans indicating dream activity) or experiments (i.e. testing the drugs used on the test subjects)
  • Resulting testimony from test subjects matches the original hypothesis.
  • The initial theory can be modified as necessary when new evidence is presented.

This is a serious question, all joking aside, what kind of experiment would you purpose?

Last night I promise I saw god and was in heaven. Now I know I cannot prove it, but I was there. It happened, I'm not joking! There was this big dude with a beard, who welcomed me with open arms. Nothing I have ever experienced before was quite like it. I know there is no proof, but take my word for it, I was in Heaven.

If I am ever in coma, I am going to have so much fun when I wake up and start telling people some ludicrous story about how I was in Heaven. This guy is probably at home laughing his ass off as to how many people believed his story. I really don't see how anyone can see any truth in these things.

This is a serious question, all joking aside, what kind of experiment would you purpose?

It was a serious answer. The four criteria above are a simplified version of scientific theory. An amount of evidence that can fulfil all those criteria without disproving it can make it a scientific theory, anything less is an anecdote, or faith. Incidentally this is also why Creationism isn't a scientific theory.

If it was me, I'd get several people into an experiment under the premise of "simulating a near death experience" or something similar, and then drugging them up to match the conditions the doctor was in when he claimed to see heaven. Then, do the same thing for a placebo group. Send them into a medically induced coma, and then get them to report their findings without telling them anything about the doctor's findings, and see what correlates about their stories. All subjects would be brain scanned throughout the coma to eliminate the possibility of dreams. Drugs would be extensively tested for side effects, particularly hallucinogenic effects.

Assuming complete correlation between the subjects (>80% had an afterlife experience with similar observations to the doctor), no possible side effects from the drugs, no possible dream recollection, and no possible tainting from outside sources (i.e. someone telling them what they might see), and no other possible alternate causes, I could be inclined to agree that heaven is real, but unfortunately the ethics behind such an experiment would likely prevent us from doing it. For now we'll just have to take it on faith and be nice people who get into heaven when our time is up.


But even before that, how did GOD make a clerical error and admit someone into heaven who wasn't actually dead? Is there any historical evidence in any existing scriptures that could explain how an omnipotent being can mistake a coma patient with a dead guy, while us mortals back on earth can easily differentiate?

But even before that, how did GOD make a clerical error and admit someone into heaven who wasn't actually dead? Is there any historical evidence in any existing scriptures that could explain how an omnipotent being can mistake a coma patient with a dead guy, while us mortals back on earth can easily differentiate?

We know for a fact there is some type of death gene that get's inacted when we are about to die, which is actually fueled by oxygen e.g. if you are about to die, and we could put you in a "statis" mode, it would have to be a oxygen free environment. There could "possibly" be something similar that happens when the brain doesn't send some needed data some place(kind of like a network packet timeout), that triggers you cousousness to go to heaven.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Apple Watch Series 11 GPS just crashed to 30% off in this fast-moving Prime Day deal by Karthik Mudaliar The Apple Watch Series 11 is available for $279, down from its $399 list price, saving buyers $120, or 30%. Amazon labels the offer as selling fast, so the current price may not remain available for long. This GPS model features a 42mm aluminum case, an Always-On Retina LTPO3 OLED display capable of reaching up to 2,000 nits, and an Ion-X glass surface with improved scratch resistance. Apple rates Series 11 for up to 24 hours of normal use or up to 38 hours in Low Power Mode, with fast charging providing up to eight hours of use from a 15-minute charge. Health and fitness tools include sleep scoring, temperature sensing, ECG support, heart-rate alerts, workout tracking, sleep apnea notifications, and hypertension notifications, where available. The watch also carries IP6X dust resistance and 50-meter water resistance. This configuration is best suited to iPhone owners who want comprehensive health tracking, notifications, contactless payments, and workout data without stepping up to a larger or cellular-equipped model. The smaller case should also appeal to buyers who prefer a lighter watch, while the S/M band fits wrists measuring 130mm to 180mm. With the current generation now significantly below its usual retail price, this is a strong time to replace an aging Apple Watch or buy a first model without compromising on Apple’s newest health and display features. Grab the discounted Apple Watch Series 11 (sold and shipped by Amazon) Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • The laptop in the bedroom is an Acer with i7-10510U CPU. Acer's website states they will not be upgrading it so I had little choice other than disable secure boot. I know next to nothing on these matters so hopefully it will be fine.
    • GitHub removes manual model selection from Copilot free and student plans by Karthik Mudaliar GitHub is removing the ability to manually select an AI model from its Copilot Free and Student plans, making its automatic routing system the default and only way to choose a model. This means users on these tiers will no longer be able to deliberately select a particular OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, or Microsoft model for a task. In its announcement, GitHub said Copilot Auto will dynamically choose what it considers the best model for each request. Free and Student accounts will retain access to models from multiple families, although the available selection will continue to depend on the restrictions attached to each plan. GitHub did not identify a fixed pool of models that Auto will always use, and its documentation warns that model availability can change over time. GitHub describes Auto as more than a random fallback system. On supported surfaces, its task-optimization technology evaluates the complexity of a request alongside real-time information about model health and availability. Straightforward prompts can be routed to faster and less expensive models, while more demanding coding tasks may be sent to higher-cost reasoning models. The company says this approach should reduce rate limiting, latency, and failed requests. Auto generally selects one model along natural prompt-caching boundaries rather than repeatedly switching models during a session, as GitHub found that mid-session changes increased costs without producing sufficient improvements in output quality. Users can still check which model generated a response. In Copilot Chat, the information appears when hovering over an answer, while Copilot CLI and the Copilot cloud agent display the selected model alongside their output. Auto is available in Copilot Chat, Copilot CLI, and the cloud agent, with the exact implementation and release status varying between supported development environments. The latest restriction follows several months of adjustments to Copilot’s individual plans. GitHub temporarily halted new Pro, Pro+, and Student subscriptions in April as it sought to manage demand and service reliability. It later introduced token-based billing and began gradually reopening individual-plan registrations on June 17. Alongside the picker change, GitHub is retiring the “Preview” label from Microsoft-developed models. It argues that the label is no longer necessary because Auto handles model routing and models are continuously updated behind the scenes.
    • Look up 'inflation' kid. Ask an AI for the numbers between both games.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      461
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!