Recommended Posts

They used to, but that's changing (with exception to games like Borderlands 2)... console ports have become terrible.

Ironic, since Borderlands 2 is practically the console version with some extra tweaks.

I played Revelations on PC, it was nowhere near a console port.

My theory on why the PC ports are always a month or so out, especially being Ubisoft, who we know recently got rid of their terrible DRM, is because: The people who own both a PC and Xbox/PS3 will more than likely buy it on their console, due to sheer impatience, thereby ruling out any chance of piracy for the PC. Honestly, it isn't a bad business move, and I am betting anything that is why they do it.

Anyway, I am loving this game. Back to playing!

My theory on why the PC ports are always a month or so out, especially being Ubisoft, who we know recently got rid of their terrible DRM, is because: The people who own both a PC and Xbox/PS3 will more than likely buy it on their console, due to sheer impatience, thereby ruling out any chance of piracy for the PC. Honestly, it isn't a bad business move, and I am betting anything that is why they do it.

People would be less inclined to pirate their games if didn't resort to methods such as crappy DRM (that, as you said, they dropped) or delayed releases. It makes them look bad as a company, which lowers the amount of people willing to pay them for a product.

A very large majority of people who are going to pirate the game are not going to buy it on a console to play it now, they will wait until the PC version releases and then pirate it. Ubisoft might as well release it at the same time as the console version.....delaying the release is hardly going to affect (if at all) the amount of piracy that happens.

The freedom edition just arrived. Thank god for me being impatient. Saw the van pull up outside and take the package to a neighbours. Idiots. It has the number clearly printed on the box.

Anyone who is interested. Here is an upclose shot of the statue.

Sorry about the quality. I thought the S3 camera was decent :laugh:

post-26705-0-55108100-1351702981.jpg

Oh, well that's a twist.

Warning: after saving the Mohawk woman, don't read her backstory unless you want a giant spoiler.

F***ing retards, I swear. That pretty much spoils and ruins the "big twist" in the beginning of the game. That p***es me off. I can't help but read every character's biography.

As he said: DO NOT READ Ziio's Biography!

I want to punch whoever did that, at Ubisoft.

Just finished it. Was good till about halfway and then I just got bored. I finished it anyways but I stopped trying to 100% each mission and eventually stopped caring about the game. I finished it cause I didn't want another half done game like dead island.

I've seen a lot of people complaining online that it is too "difficult" to get money in this game. My brother even whines about it.

I'm 100% sure the game shows you how to use the Stockpile/Crafting/Trading system via convoys. Digging around in that for more than 5 minutes should give you the idea of how it is used, at least it did for me. After doing naval missions and upgrading your homestead, of course, you will allow yourself to make more money. Specifically, Naval Convoys rather than land.

Anyway, I make around ?60,000 every half hour or so I actively bother with it. I've pretty much stopped because I have a ridiculous amount of money. Just send off all of your convoys with a ton of pelts. Wolf, Beaver, and Bear pelts are the best. Here is an example of one Naval Convoy load with Bear and Beaver Pelts that I send out:

(The 0% tax is from completing all of the forts in game. The lowered risk is from doing Naval mission routes.)

m2HiI.jpg

I just upgraded all my convoys and even with a 10% risk factor i still find myself running to the frontier to defend my convoy!

Loving the game so far, only just made it to

New York (jail)

. I've been doing side missions and everything else.

I do agree with some reviews though. Connor is a bore. Maybe because we were spoilt before with Ezio.

I just upgraded all my convoys and even with a 10% risk factor i still find myself running to the frontier to defend my convoy!

Loving the game so far, only just made it to

New York (jail)

. I've been doing side missions and everything else.

I do agree with some reviews though. Connor is a bore. Maybe because we were spoilt before with Ezio.

I don't think Connor is a bore per-say I think the game writing and passage of time is what is making it lackluster. It seems like after every sequence you see (not really a big spoiler, but just in case people don't want to know this information yet)

"6 months later," and this happens about 4 or 5 times. So it is hard to build a connection with the character, when you don't get to see the passage of time. This game starts at 1755, and in the end is at 1786 I believe. 31 Years crammed into 20 hours of story-gameplay makes it hard to build anything. I like Connor, though, nowhere near as much as Altair, and Ezio. He is never sure of anything he does, and acts on emotions rather than being smart like our past characters. He does seem disconnected at times.

Big spoiler:

The end ****ed me off though. That was the lamest ending of any of the games. All the build up throughout the game with Juno, and it ends like that. It makes me upset about the rest of the games. The worst part was at the Abstergo facility. You basically just go in, and completely walk over what was supposed to be this big scary company that had you hiding in a cave for god's sake and had you running all over the world to get away from them... Then you waltz back into the building where it all started, and mow everyone down without a hiccup. That was the worst writing I have seen yet. The game feels so rushed, especially with the ridiculous amount of bugs in the game. But the fact that is shines through on the storytelling, this franchises supposed strong point, just let me down so bad.

I don't know if there will be another game after this. I am hoping not though. This feels like Mass Effect 3; the ending needs a damn rewrite, then just cap the series off and be done with it. The ending sequence was about 5 minutes. Considering we have been following Desmond spanning 5 games, I expected something more, a lot more.

Of course, Ubisoft throws you back in the Animus with absolutely no explanation (and in this case, an explanation is impossible). But first, 17 minutes of credits.

End rant.

Finished the game and i can't believe i actually managed to finish it. The game was buggy, some missions were ridiculous, i would just randomly fail them for no reason. The supposed side missions were rubbish. I was hoping for more in depth side missions that flesh out the era a bit more and make Connor more likeable. Ok i admit towards the end he did grow on me but up until then, i could care less about him.

The worst thing about this game is the ending.

Pretty much agree with everything Perfect72 said.

It felt rushed, it was like they spent all the time developing the systems that they forgot about the story. The ending for Desmond was definitive and i had a feeling it was going to end that way but i hoped there would be some smart writing like earlier games that ended his arc but gave you a big idea where the story is going next. It only hints that Juno is going to be involved.

The fighting system while they said it was completely redesigned. It was almost the same as other games except the collision detection and camera are worse. Which ultimately made it a chore sometimes.

I love the AC series but this game was a massive let down and not even close to game of the year. I would even put it close to worst game of the year, mainly because of how much i loved the other games. While Revelations was regarded a weak, i still thought it was good. Interesting story and it worked.

They said ages ago that they know where the story is going and how Desmond's story ends, seriously is this how they wanted his story to end. Past games at the end of each game i had a load of questions and was interested where it was going next. Now i really could care less.

arghhh it is actually making me angry thinking about the game.

Of course, Ubisoft throws you back in the Animus with absolutely no explanation (and in this case, an explanation is impossible). But first, 17 minutes of credits.

The ability to be thrown back in the Animus is tied to the multiplayer, sort of.  You're no longer Desmond living his ancestory, his own memories have been downloaded by Abstergo and hacked so that anyone can play.

  • 1 month later...

I absolutely hate the chase sequence at the end of the game. Just wanted to complain, good day all :)

I agree, i wanted to throw my controller so much. It also got to the point where i considered switching the game off and not playing it again. The game had pi**ed me off enough to that point but this took the biscuit.

I wish i did because the ending was well... and people complained about Mass Effect 3.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • This got me thinking, would you rather a self driving car prioritise protecting its passengers or everyone else? I'd choose the one that keeps me and my kids safest. At some point, these cars have to make those choices already, don't they? Wonder if we have a way to find out what way they lean.
    • The proportion (or number of iterations) has nothing to with this aspect of Copyright I am describing. In short, it doesn't matter how many times the manager tells you to change something or how. Your work product is always YOURS until and unless you then assign that to the person representing the client/company, usually for financial compensation -- either in salary or as a subcontract work for hire payment. if iterations determined copyright, then businesses would have learned to just keep making changes until they could claim they owned the copyright, without having to compensate the artist for their work. And that would be BAD. The only place where the amount of changes does have a role is in how much does a human modify a previous public domain work (from any source) before it is considered fair use or their own work, etc. For example, if a human makes substantial changes to a public domain (re: AI, by definition) work, then they can then claim that derivative work as their own...but NEVER the original version, of course. That's why anyone can make a movie about Dracula, for example, as long as it is based on the public domain novel, but not if they take new ideas from copyrighted movies made afterwards. As one of the people who personally advised the US Copyright Office on their recent ruling on these very issues, be assured that I specifically used the terminology precisely -- though I made it simple enough for laymen to understand it. If I made this confusing by doing so, I apologize. But, to be clear regarding your assumption that I would agree to your second statement that I quoted above -- the answer is NO. If AI does the work, no matter how much "direction" you give it, it cannot be copyrighted. All AI generated content is in the Public Domain and therefore the copyright cannot be assigned to ANYONE, even you -- until and unless substantial modifications are made to it BY A HUMAN BEING (yourself or a contracted artist/writer/etc.) and then that copyright on the derivative work is legally (in writing) transferred to you. This is a critical distinction. And it is important that people, especially AI sloppers, understand this. For example, YouTube is not paying AI slop generators for the copyright, etc. of their AI slop. What YouTube is doing is sharing AD REVENUE for permission to publish your AI slop. Copyright/ownership/rights never come into it. Importantly, that means that anyone can copy any AI slopware on YouTube, etc. and rehost it anywhere they want, even back on YouTube, and there is nothing legal that YouTube can do about it with regards to copyright protections, ownership, DMCA, etc. Anyone is legally free to use any AI slopware in any way they want. When this ruling was pending, I warned Disney legal of all of this before they did their OpenAI deal -- that it would literally dilute their entire IP portfolio forever. They ignored that warning for the PR and stock bump. But that is why, when the ruling came down last year, Disney quickly extricated themselves from that OpenAI deal, even eating the initial upfront fees -- followed closely by OpenAI ending their entire AI video generating business model. They adjusted their PR release dates to make this less obvious to shareholders, of course. Phew. I hope that this clears up the key distinctions for you and anyone reading. If you have any additional questions or even hypotheticals about AI and Copyright, please feel free to ask.
    • Each of the devices displayed on this page now has a little volume meter next to it to show if there is audio actively playing. About time.
    • Owing to the nature of Windows feature enablement updates, it was distributed over Windows Update services as a complete system upgrade rather than as an ordinary cumulative update
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      565
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      79
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      74
    5. 5
      neufuse
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!