Metro/Modern UI & shorter mouseways


Recommended Posts

Microsoft explained that the Mouseways (is this the correct english word? :$ ) should be shorter in the new startscreen than in the startmenu.

I don't get it.

4qrdo.gif?1

Can samebody explain me the new shorter mouseways again? This should not be a pro/contra startmenu discussion.

But the argument from Microsoft is just... wrong. You could say a cheek.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1115237-metromodern-ui-shorter-mouseways/
Share on other sites

but is makes it less clear. Maybe not in my case because I just have a few icons there.

Larger targets make things easier to see, and click with the mouse, while not having to be as precise.

I have problems to find easier the big icons than the small. Because at the small icons I can read more rows to the same time. At the big I can just focus one and have to search.

Apart from larger hit area vs. actual mouse travel, I think one more reason is them wanting an interface both for touch and mouse|keyboard as well (I'm not saying 'designed exclusively for touch'). Whether reading or just 'seeing' the icons is better for the user, at least by the Start Screen, it will be usable to both touch and keyboardmouse users. Now whether users will get used to a full screen menu, it's almost split, the way I see it (based on reactions here on the forum). I personally don't mind the new one since I'm more used to launching my programs using the keyboard.

I have problems to find easier the big icons than the small. Because at the small icons I can read more rows to the same time. At the big I can just focus one and have to search.

With the Start Screen it's designed to be highly customisable, so most users will group together apps as they wish (as the screenshot in fact shows) - it makes it much quicker to locate them once you're used to it. As with everything, it does take a while to adapt to the new system and it will seem more awkward at first, just as the Office ribbon UI did. The advantage of the Start Screen if you have have 80-90 apps on screen at a time, which simply wasn't possible/practical with the Start Menu. If you're only using a handful of apps - like the Start Menu in the picture - you're better off pinning them to your taskbar or adding shortcuts to the desktop.

That said, I wish the icons for non-Metro apps were larger. Sure they're much larger than the initial Developer Preview but there's still a lot of wasted space and the icons are one of the most easily identifiable features when locating a program. It would also be nice if there were addition options, like being able to colour code the backgrounds of groups and leaving gaps.

but is makes it less clear. Maybe not in my case because I just have a few icons there.

I have problems to find easier the big icons than the small. Because at the small icons I can read more rows to the same time. At the big I can just focus one and have to search.

Once you've customized your start screen, you should be able to mentally adjust (in a day or so):

- do I have to click my mousewheel down once or twice to put the item into view?

- how much force should I put into the mouse to make it land on the tile of the program I want to start?

That is, you can make the Start Screen work off muscle memory.

This is arguably much faster than the old start menu, which requires you go to All Programs, then scan through a list (or open a program group), then target, EVERY TIME.

One tweak you can do is for the Close gesture using the "Close Threshold for Metro Apps" tool from Winaero: http://winaero.com/comment.php?comment.news.101 Then you don't have to drag the mouse pointer all the way to the bottom to close an app, if you adjust it to somewhere along the middle of the screen.

There is of course Alt+F4.

Once you've customized your start screen, you should be able to mentally adjust (in a day or so):

- do I have to click my mousewheel down once or twice to put the item into view?

- how much force should I put into the mouse to make it land on the tile of the program I want to start?

That is, you can make the Start Screen work off muscle memory.

This is arguably much faster than the old start menu, which requires you go to All Programs, then scan through a list (or open a program group), then target, EVERY TIME.

The most used apps I pined to the front so I actually never use the "all programs" and scroll.

Fitts law is not just about "distance."

http://en.wikipedia....i/Fitts%27s_law

Quite, Fitt's law is more about speed / ease - and things being small and close together can negatively effect that.

To the OP: the argument is is that it's quicker / easier to hit more larger hit targets on the start screen with a lower error rate (even if they're further away), then it is to hit specific smaller, closer together targets on the start menu. They had a picture on one of the building Windows 8 blogs that colour coded how the calculations worked out wih respect to how easy / quick accurate it is to get to a specific buttons.

The most used apps I pined to the front so I actually never use the "all programs" and scroll.

Still applicable. Simply pin the larger format icons to the left side of the Start Screen.

Remember, the action in the old start menu is targeting. With the new start screen you just have to remember to "throw" your mouse in the general vicinity and click. Because the targets are larger, you can afford to move your cursor faster to make up for the distance.

Here's a small test:

Install 50+ applications in W7 and W8.

Try to find random apps in W7 start menu and CLICK it.

Do the same in W8.

Assuming W8 start screen is organized, you will ALWAYS be able to find and click it faster than W7.

Still applicable. Simply pin the larger format icons to the left side of the Start Screen.

Remember, the action in the old start menu is targeting. With the new start screen you just have to remember to "throw" your mouse in the general vicinity and click. Because the targets are larger, you can afford to move your cursor faster to make up for the distance.

I'm a lot faster to use the list from the menu instead of the screen. I have to move the mouse about the entire screen, I waste a lot of time (time is relative ^^)with it, In this time I would have the program started with the list in the menu.

I'm a lot faster to use the list from the menu instead of the screen. I have to move the mouse about the entire screen, I waste a lot of time (time is relative ^^)with it, In this time I would have the program started with the list in the menu.

No, you can not except some pinned apps in start menu. There is taskbar for that.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • I used a Pixel 10 Pro XL when it first came out for about 8 months. When I first got it, it was using Google assistant and that was fast, when asking it to call somone etc. Then it automatically switched with some update to Gemini. Doing even the simplist of things like asking it to call someone in my contacts was soooooo slow compared to Google assistant. I guess it had to go out to the cloud to do that? Back on iPhone and while Siri is dumb right now, it does do those simple things, like call someone, set a timer, star the stop watch etc, really fast. That an while I like Google Material Design 3 over iOS 26, they Pixel 10 Pro XL was so slow in comparison to the iPhone 17 Pro I am using.
    • I use Gemini in my rotation of AI clients...that work pays for. It is good at most things, better than copilot for imgage searching and making images, worse at writing vs Claude and way worse at hadling technical issues when it comes to Azure stuff. I also use YT premium and maps. Anything else Google is a pass for me. I have now seen multiple people locked out of their Google accounts for reasons that are just very vauge.
    • Microsoft is building an AI datacenter that "uses less water than a fast food restaurant" by Ivan Jenic Image: Microsoft Microsoft has announced plans to build a new datacenter campus in Pecos, Texas, as the company continues to invest billions in AI infrastructure. The new facility, called project Kilby, will reportedly have a capacity of 2 gigawatts and will be one of the largest single capacity additions in the company’s history. To power the campus, Microsoft signed a 20-year deal with Chevron to supply natural gas from the Permian Basin, America's largest oil field. This deal is set to become the largest collaboration to date between a U.S. oil and gas giant and Big Tech. It’s no secret that Big Tech has often been criticized for exploiting natural resources for its AI developments. Microsoft is trying to mitigate some of that negative consensus by promising to build its own power supply for the new datacenter, independent of the public grid. The Pecos datacenter will be powered by a power plant hub, built by Chevron, with up to 2.5 gigawatts of gas-fired capacity, with potential to scale to up to 5 gigawatts. The facility will include at least seven GE Vernova turbines, with first power potentially coming online as early as late 2027 or early 2028. The power plant hub is part of an approximately $7 billion investment by Chevron, making it one of the largest dedicated energy projects tied to a single datacenter campus in the U.S. Microsoft hasn’t publicly disclosed the amount it’s investing in the new datacenter. Microsoft has also committed to implementing a closed-loop cooling system that will only require an initial water charge to operate. The company said that “the total lifecycle water use of this datacenter is only a fraction of that consumed annually by a typical fast-food restaurant.” What the press release doesn’t mention, however, is how much water the natural gas plant itself will consume, or how a 20-year fossil fuel commitment squares with the company's pledge to be carbon negative by 2030. The construction of the new datacenter should provide over 6,000 construction jobs at peak build-out, and create hundreds of operational job roles once the facility is built. Via: Reuters
    • A lot of uncertainty in this story. Might. Could. Maybe. The truth is we don't know what will happen to the universe in the end, or if it will end. Our own Milky Way galaxy will merge with the Andromeda galaxy in about 2.5 billion years, with our solar system as part of a new, larger cluster. I guess we'll have to and see how it goes down.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      tuben earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      mnsgroup earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      523
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      195
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      94
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      82
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      67
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!