Windows 8 Is a Desktop Disaster


Recommended Posts

I have such a great time switching from Metro to Desktop! I just can't understand people who say that Metro is an epic fail on desktops.

I find it bizarre that anyone could suggest they have a "great time" switching between Metro and the desktop. That's like saying you have a "great time" taking out the recycling or you have a "great time" towel drying your hair after a shower - there's nothing wrong with those activities but they certainly don't warrant such an emotional response.

As for the Start Screen, I think it's an improvement to the Start Menu (I was never a fan of the Vista-era Start Menu) but it introduces some significant usability issues - moving the shut down / restart functionality to the Charm bar being one of them. Others include the inability to rename applications, the inability to change shortcut icons, the inability to access properties for shortcuts, backgrounds that clash with labels, the awkwardness and unintuitive method of zooming out with mouse (Ctrl-Wheel or click the tiny '-' icon), the inability to change user via the user tile, the screen going blank when you side-snap a Metro app, the wasted space around tiles for desktop apps, the inability to move multiple tiles, etc.

It is arrogant for people to dismiss criticism of the Start Screen as people refusing to adapt. The development of Windows 8 seemed very rushed, with considerable changes being made after the Release Preview (something not typically seen). Microsoft's design decisions came across as very reactionary (the hot-corners, the mini tutorial, the change of the user theme, the way Metro apps operate with multiple monitors, etc). The last point is a particularly good example. Open a Metro app on a monitor, then snap it to the side - you end up with the main screen blank and the side-snapped apps; then launch the Start Screen on another monitor and the app disappears from the original monitor and is hidden on the second monitor, only appearing once you exit the Start Screen. Multi-monitor support was thrown together at the last minute and it's completely unusable, unintuitive and fundamentally broken.

I find it bizarre that anyone could suggest they have a "great time" switching between Metro and the desktop. That's like saying you have a "great time" taking out the recycling or you have a "great time" towel drying your hair after a shower - there's nothing wrong with those activities but they certainly don't warrant such an emotional response.

As for the Start Screen, I think it's an improvement to the Start Menu (I was never a fan of the Vista-era Start Menu) but it introduces some significant usability issues - moving the shut down / restart functionality to the Charm bar being one of them. Others include the inability to rename applications, the inability to change shortcut icons, the inability to access properties for shortcuts, backgrounds that clash with labels, the awkwardness and unintuitive method of zooming out with mouse (Ctrl-Wheel or click the tiny '-' icon), the inability to change user via the user tile, the screen going blank when you side-snap a Metro app, the wasted space around tiles for desktop apps, the inability to move multiple tiles, etc.

It is arrogant for people to dismiss criticism of the Start Screen as people refusing to adapt. The development of Windows 8 seemed very rushed, with considerable changes being made after the Release Preview (something not typically seen). Microsoft's design decisions came across as very reactionary (the hot-corners, the mini tutorial, the change of the user theme, the way Metro apps operate with multiple monitors, etc). The last point is a particularly good example. Open a Metro app on a monitor, then snap it to the side - you end up with the main screen blank and the side-snapped apps; then launch the Start Screen on another monitor and the app disappears from the original monitor and is hidden on the second monitor, only appearing once you exit the Start Screen. Multi-monitor support was thrown together at the last minute and it's completely unusable, unintuitive and fundamentally broken.

If my trash can is styled after a yellow Ferrari, I assure you I'll have emotional response when taking out the garbage, darling.

As for the other part, in my lonely and tiny opinion, the changes in Start Screen in having to use the charm bar and going over your screen with the mouse are not a usability problem -- and I'll stress it: IN MY OPINION.

Anyway, discussing is pointless. If you're not impressed with the way Windows 8 is designed and shipped, Apple's arms are WIDE OPEN to receive a new OSX adept. Linux is good, too.

If you're not impressed with the way Windows 8 is designed and shipped, Apple's arms are WIDE OPEN to receive a new OSX adept. Linux is good, too.

Just because I dislike aspects of Windows 8 does not mean I don't think it's a decent operating system overall - otherwise I wouldn't have upgraded. More importantly, I couldn't switch over to OSX or Linux without losing access to the majority of the 550+ games I have on Steam - a trade-off I'm simply not willing to make at this point.

man this is the stupidest post ever and WHY is it that no one here can press the windows KEY that brings u to the desktop

just pin the fn program to the desktop it isn't fn hard but that this 2 hard for u go back to fn 7 stop ur bitching because once website hates 8 we have this place going nuts over nutting at all u want a start install a start and stop ur fn complaining about 8 please

if 8 doesn't speed up your PC at all go back to 7

With decent metro apps, Windows will be better than OSX. This is coming from someone who owns only apple computers.

That said... they aren't there yet. As such, the start screen is still sort of tacked on. That said, OSX still has dashboard tacked on (never looked at it, except by accident), and multi-monitor support on both is about equally broken.

Beyond all this though, Windows 8 boots up insanely fast on my Macbook, and runs flawlessly. It's actually easier now, with Mountain Lion and W8 to reboot into which ever operating system I want than running a VM.

  • Like 2

You right click all the time at various points in the OS. You have to right click invoke hidden menus in Metro apps. The start screen is no different. It doesn't take a rocket scientist...

Most people I know don't ever use right-click in Win7 or anything before.

man this is the stupidest post ever and WHY is it that no one here can press the windows KEY that brings u to the desktop

just pin the fn program to the desktop it isn't fn hard but that this 2 hard for u go back to fn 7 stop ur bitching because once website hates 8 we have this place going nuts over nutting at all u want a start install a start and stop ur fn complaining about 8 please

if 8 doesn't speed up your PC at all go back to 7

Maybe they can't be bothered to learn it, just like you can't be bothered to add periods and commas to your sentences so they actually make sense.

Just because I dislike aspects of Windows 8 does not mean I don't think it's a decent operating system overall - otherwise I wouldn't have upgraded. More importantly, I couldn't switch over to OSX or Linux without losing access to the majority of the 550+ games I have on Steam - a trade-off I'm simply not willing to make at this point.

a lot of people on here seem too 0_o

there are way too many people complaining just because the start menu is full screen now, and saying they won't touch windows 8 and will push other people away as well (this last point really ****es me off because they should let other people decide if they like it themselves)

anyway back to what i was saying, i find it sad that so many people are complaining and saying they won't use it when it's so easy to install a start menu that's just like 7s. there are so many options for it now, and most of them allow you to bypass the start screen as well. Start8 is my favorite option but there are many good free ones as well

Just because I dislike aspects of Windows 8 does not mean I don't think it's a decent operating system overall - otherwise I wouldn't have upgraded. More importantly, I couldn't switch over to OSX or Linux without losing access to the majority of the 550+ games I have on Steam - a trade-off I'm simply not willing to make at this point.

Smart move! ;)

I installed the Win8 RTM a few days ago, I find it looks subtly nicer and performs subtly nicer than the Release Preview.

I have been using Win8 as my primary OS since the Consumer Preview, the only thing that I'm struggling to get used to with a mouse is the close gesture for metro apps. I don't use many of them currently so it's not a huge issue.

The Start screen is a huge improvement over the start menu for those who like uncluttered Desktops, it's out of site until you press the Windows key. The number of apps that have appeared in the RTM version is quite good, only tablet/phone apps I don't have replacements for are Facebook and my Netbanking.

There are several Metro apps that are better to use than the equivalent website, i.e. the Dell store app.

I wasn't impressed with the Start Screen when I first used the Developer Preview but I instantly noticed the potential of it, and of Live Tiles. Now the RTM version is out I will stick with it, when I use Windows 7 now it feels like something is missing.. it is a smidge slower and not as smooth. I have well and truly moved on from Windows 7 now.

Personaly I'm using it on my MacBook Pro Retina + desktop (i7 4.5GHz + 12Gb RAM, etc.) and I find the desktop part to be quite enjoyable, fast, slick and beautiful in general.

I still think "Metro" is useless on a desktop/laptop and I'm not using it at all (Thanx Start8), but I love the new desktop enhancements.

It's a grower! I didn't like it at first. I think it's fantastic now. I'd get a touch mouse too if they didn't cost the equivalent of a small country.

Once you get used to it, it just flows much better. I upgraded to windows 8 pro and very glad i did

I just installed Start8 by Stardock. Essentially the app reverse the process. I now how a normal operating system with the perk of looking at the tiles when I want. I highly recommend it and it is going for $4.99 if you buy it now.

I agree. Start8 is great.

I have been using Win8 as my primary OS since the Consumer Preview, the only thing that I'm struggling to get used to with a mouse is the close gesture for metro apps. I don't use many of them currently so it's not a huge issue.

Why are you even concerning yourself with manually closing metro apps? They're designed to tombstone themselves when not in the foreground, so they use almost no resources. Just leave it in the background where it should be, then when you want that app again it launches much more quickly than opening it from scratch, and at the same point that you left it.

Like everything... I refuse to accept someone else opinion as fact. I used the Developer preview, the consumer preview, and now the final release and I love Windows 8. Looking forward to seeing it's integration with WP8 and xbox. People should actually try things and give them a month to get accustomed. If you still hate it, then you can move on and complain about it.

  • Like 2

I actually enjoy 8 quite a bit, didn't have any issues getting used to the new start screen or figuring out how to pin apps to where I want them. Now with that being said, I really dislike the start screen just from an aesthetics point of view. I really hate the look of tiles, same reason I dislike WP8. But it won't stop me from using a newer, faster OS.

Lol people are spending money to get their beloved Start menu back? *facepalm*

Modern UI isn't THAT bad. It's called learning something new, but most of the detractors act like 5 years olds and go "WELL I DON'T WANNA, HMPH!".

  • Like 2
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8, Flip 8, Z Fold Wide: Everything you need to know The ONLY thing I need to know is the price, which I know will be way higher than I (and most people) are willing to pay for a phone... so basically nothing here I need to know. PS: Nice job getting that Apple reference to a non-existent and unrevealed product as "competition" in there. Cheque is in the mail.
    • Well I really think the repasting helped if your higher clocks have returned, maybe the next thing to look at is if there is a problem with your case airflow? I guess this because your 3080 has returned to optimal state, but is still staying too warm, which might suggest it was thermal throttling before you repasted, of which the only logical conclusion could be outside factors.
    • Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8, Flip 8, Z Fold Wide: Everything you need to know by Hamid Ganji Galaxy Z Fold 7 - Image via Samsung The next generation of Samsung foldables is set to be unveiled next month at the second Unpacked event of the year. Samsung’s 2026 foldables are not expected to offer significant upgrades over their predecessors, with the Korean firm instead focusing on design refinements and conventional upgrades such as faster processors and better cameras. However, Samsung is reportedly planning to unveil an all-new passport-style foldable this year to rival Apple’s first foldable iPhone, which is expected to debut this September. Here’s a roundup of everything we know about Samsung’s upcoming foldable devices ahead of their official debut. When can we expect Samsung’s new foldables? The Galaxy Z Fold 7 and Z Flip 7 series were unveiled in July, and Samsung is expected to maintain this timeframe in 2026. Based on previous reports from Korean sources, Samsung will hold its Unpacked event on July 22 in London, UK, to pull back the curtain on the Galaxy Z Fold 8 series. The devices are also expected to hit the shelves a few weeks after launch. However, Samsung has yet to announce an official date. A new naming scheme? One of the most interesting changes we might see this year is a new naming scheme for Samsung’s latest foldables. SamMobile reported that since Samsung is expected to unveil three foldables this year, it has adopted a new naming strategy to simplify product identification for customers. Accordingly, the standard Galaxy Z Fold 8 will reportedly be called the Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra and will serve as the direct successor to last year’s Galaxy Z Fold 7. The “Ultra” suffix suggests the phone could feature higher-end specifications, such as additional rear camera modules. Samsung’s new passport-style foldable is expected to carry the Galaxy Z Fold 8 name without any suffix. This model is reportedly equipped with two rear cameras. No major changes are expected for the Flip model. Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra and Z Flip 8 anticipated specs Rumors over the past few months suggest Samsung is preparing several upgrades for its upcoming foldables, although the devices may continue to rely on larger batteries and faster charging speeds rather than dramatic design changes. The primary focus this year is expected to be the Galaxy Z Fold 8 and its wide-screen design. Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra official CAD renders - Image via AndroidHeadlines Here are the anticipated specifications for the Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra based on previous leaks: 6.5-inch outer display and 8-inch inner display, 120Hz refresh rate, and 2,600 nits peak brightness Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 processor, paired with 12GB or 16GB of RAM and 256GB, 512GB, or 1TB of storage 4.1mm thickness when unfolded and a weight of 210g 200MP main camera, 50MP ultrawide camera, 10MP or 12MP telephoto camera, 10MP cover camera, and 10MP selfie camera 5,000mAh battery with 45W wired charging Android 17 and One UI 9 As for the Galaxy Z Flip 8, the device is not expected to be a major departure from its predecessor, although it could become slightly slimmer. Expected specifications include: Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 or Exynos 2600 processor 12GB of RAM with 256GB and 512GB storage options 6.9-inch Dynamic AMOLED 2X inner dispaly and 4.1-inch Super AMOLED outer dispaly 50MP main camera, 12MP ultrawide camera, and 10MP selfie camera 4,300mAh battery with 25W wired charging Android 17 and One UI 9 Samsung’s foldables are also expected to launch with Gemini Intelligence, Google’s AI suite for automating tasks in Android ecosystem. Moreover, given current memory and component costs, some Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra and Z Flip 8 variants could see a price hike. Galaxy Z Fold 8 adopts a wide-screen design The centerpiece of the upcoming Unpacked event could be the Galaxy Z Fold 8, previously rumored as the Galaxy Z Fold Wide. This model adopts a passport-style form factor and is expected to compete directly with Apple’s iPhone Fold. Galaxy Z Fold 8 official CAD renders - Image via AndroidHeadlines Here’s what to expect: 7.6-inch primary OLED display and 5.4-inch cover display, 120Hz refresh rate, 2,600 nits peak brightness, and 4:3 aspect ratio Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 processor, 12GB or 16GB of RAM, and 256GB, 512GB, or 1TB storage options 4,800mAh battery with 45W wired charging 50MP main camera, 50MP ultrawide camera, and 10MP selfie camera Android 17 and One UI 9 The three new foldable phones are unlikely to be the only devices unveiled at Samsung’s Unpacked event. The company is also expected to introduce the Galaxy Watch Ultra 2 and the Galaxy Watch 9 series.
    • Thanks
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      505
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      140
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      89
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      81
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!