Valve: Linux More Viable Than Windows 8 for Gaming


Recommended Posts

I searched for steam on my android device, and all I found was a steam community app that let's me chat and see what's on th store, not download stuff...

So steam on this open platform can only do the same things they are allowed to do if they did a steam metro app...

So you think Steam is just a way to chat? LOL!

Already covered that in my edit, and that's just BS. Tablets today can run the ancient source games just fine, even on high settings.

Some of them can still tax the hardware I use in parts, at 1080p, so I'd love to see that happen, especially with full AA and AF

I suggest you take a look at the Tegra 3 chipset sometime. It's easily on par with consoles and mid-range PC GPU's, and there are plenty of quality FPS's on the platform already.

If Gabe's going to port Valve's games over to Linux, I would expect him to make sure they run on Android and iOS/OSX too, as they're all unix based.

You'll have to ask them why they haven't. Point is, if they had wanted to they could have made Steam do those things on Android, the crux of the original argument is that Android is closed off which is false, not whether they have the technical capacity to make those games work on Android.

Given that someone brought up the Greenlight fee to try and say that Valve are just as greedy as Microsoft, i'd say plenty

"Microsoft employees gave $96 million to charity in 2010, the company said Friday... (also) Microsoft matches charitable donations dollar for dollar up to $12,000 per employee annually" Source: http://www.onlinecar...ws/archives/147

That's just donations that Microsoft matched... not the total the company donated. The $100 per "Greenlight Project" seems awful small now doesnt it?

Already covered that in my edit, and that's just BS. Tablets today can run the ancient source games just fine, even on high settings.

Ancient!?! Just because it came out in 2004 does not mean it's crappy. It's modular--they add and remove things constantly to update the graphics and what not. Please google and do your research before you post ignorance. And no, a tablet could not handle source. LOL! I have a 1GB GDDR3 card and I'm stressing my system with Portal 2 on ultra with some antialiasing and filtering tweaks.

Valve turn over substantially less money than Microsoft, and work on much tighter lines. As I stated I'm interested in % of turnover not raw amounts.

Ancient!?! Just because it came out in 2004 does not mean it's crappy. It's modular--they add and remove things and constantly update the graphics and what not. Please google and do your research before you post ignorance. And no, a tablet could not handle source. LOL! I have a 1GB GDDR3 card and I'm stressing my system with Portal 2 on ultra with some antialiasing and filtering tweaks.

They also updated HL2 to bring HDR lightmaps and threaded rendering to it, now it's in line with the functionality of newer source games.

  • Like 2

Apple, Google, and Microsoft (the newest), are creating their wall gardens, Microsoft just late to the game.

Windows 8 sends a clear signal MS is started going in this direction of a closed system.

This is why people are being really vocal about it now.

Bull ****.

The whole point of the store is to get apps to work across different devices (Windows, Phone, xbox, etc). MS has never mandated that you need to use the store for any desktop apps.

I suggest you take a look at the Tegra 3 chipset sometime. It's easily on par with consoles and mid-range PC GPU's, and there are plenty of quality FPS's on the platform already.

If Gabe's going to port Valve's games over to Linux, I would expect him to make sure they run on Android and iOS/OSX too, as they're all unix based.

http://timothylottes.blogspot.com/2012/09/please-people-iphone5-xbox360.html

I really doubt Tegra 3 matches up either. It's a lot of talk and not much to back it up.

Re-read what he said... spend two seconds trying to comprehend it... then edit your post to reflect that you didnt bother to do those things first time around.

I did. He thinks It's a chat client and is confused as to why it won't let him download "crappy" source apps because they can "easily" be ran on tablets when my mid-range machine can barely handle it on ultra. My point is he's ignorant and doesn't know what he's talking about. Maybe you're the one that should stop skimming. ;)

Bull ****.

The whole point of the store is to get apps to work across different devices (Windows, Phone, xbox, etc). MS has never mandated that you need to use the store for any desktop apps.

No, the purpose of the store is to ensure MS gets the chance to siphon money out of the Windows ecosystem in the way Apple does in mobile. 30% of all of the app sales for Windows is a lions share of revenue that they see themselves as leaving on the table. To argue anything else is either delusional or intentionally misleading.

The potential for this is the reason the Desktop is made into an "app" on Windows 8 and the strong push for Metro apps even when they represent a tiny fraction of applications available on the Windows platform.

Microsoft has shown that they want Windows to be a closed platform and this policy will show itself more and more between Windows 9 and later as the Desktop becomes less and less emphasized.

Even Steve Ballmer has admitted this... He now calls Microsoft a "Device and Services" company, not a software company. This is a big deal... Microsoft is no longer the software company that we all knew them as up until Windows 7.

They're wasting their money with Steam on Linux. BTW, Why isn't Valve ripping on OSX/Apple with the same hostility?

I don't think they are wasting their money, a lot of gamers are linux users. Apple has a tiny market share on the desktop which is where valve games are played. Hardly any games are available on osx atm too.

I think valve has made a wise decision making steam available on linux, it is a long-term bet and i think it is a good bet. A lot of people like me hate metro and would therefore have to buy a copy of windows 7 or install linux if we bought a new computer with windows 8 pre-installed. Therefore i suspect ubuntu will increase in popularity over the next 12 months.

Microsoft has shown that they want Windows to be a closed platform and this policy will show itself more and more between Windows 9 and later as the Desktop becomes less and less emphasized.

Agree 100%. I wouldn't be surprised if Microsoft cuts functionality even more from the desktop in Windows 9. 100 bucks says they'll take out the super bar.

I don't think they are wasting their money, a lot of gamers are linux users. Apple has a tiny market share on the desktop which is where valve games are played. Hardly any games are available on osx atm too.

I think valve has made a wise decision making steam available on linux, it is a long-term bet and i think it is a good bet. A lot of people like me hate metro and would therefore have to buy a copy of windows 7 or install linux if we bought a new computer with windows 8 pre-installed. Therefore i suspect ubuntu will increase in popularity over the next 12 months.

You sir, just stated my entire point. +1 and kudos to you.

They also updated HL2 to bring HDR lightmaps and threaded rendering to it, now it's in line with the functionality of newer source games.

Don't forget Phong shading, updated shadowing and the soft particle system.

Admittedly now even the updated HL2 is somewhat outdated compared to current Source releases, Dota 2 has ambient occlusion and cloth simulation, CS:GO has cascaded shadow maps, Portal 2 has the "blobulator" system for the gels.

No, the purpose of the store is to ensure MS gets the chance to siphon money out of the Windows ecosystem in the way Apple does in mobile. 30% of all of the app sales for Windows is a lions share of revenue that they see themselves as leaving on the table. To argue anything else is either delusional or intentionally misleading.

http://blogs.msdn.co...dows-store.aspx

The revenue share base is 70%, but when an app achieves $25k USD in revenue?aggregated across all sales in every market?that app moves to 80% revenue share for the lifetime of that app.

Better than Valves take last I heard.

So you think Steam is just a way to chat? LOL!

WOW

:facepalm:

WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH!

That's the sound of the point flying supersonic high above your head. Reading comprehension not a strong suit?

http://blogs.msdn.co...dows-store.aspx

Better than Valves take last I heard.

Not sure the point of quoting me. My point is the same.

I don't think they are wasting their money, a lot of gamers are linux users. Apple has a tiny market share on the desktop which is where valve games are played. Hardly any games are available on osx atm too.

I think valve has made a wise decision making steam available on linux, it is a long-term bet and i think it is a good bet. A lot of people like me hate metro and would therefore have to buy a copy of windows 7 or install linux if we bought a new computer with windows 8 pre-installed. Therefore i suspect ubuntu will increase in popularity over the next 12 months.

No. An insignificant minority of gamers are Linux users, just like an insignificant minority of computer users are Linux users. Also, the vast majority of Linux users expect to get their gaming on for free.

Ancient!?! Just because it came out in 2004 does not mean it's crappy. It's modular--they add and remove things constantly to update the graphics and what not. Please google and do your research before you post ignorance. And no, a tablet could not handle source. LOL! I have a 1GB GDDR3 card and I'm stressing my system with Portal 2 on ultra with some antialiasing and filtering tweaks.

So.. What is it, is it modular or is it only capable of running on high end hardware? You need to make up your mind.

Also yeah sure it's modular. But you can only go so far before you need to revise the core engine. That's why there isn't one unreal engine or one cry engine, they're both modular. And why they're constantly being updated with new versions that support the new core rendering engines and features that can't just be slapped on in a module.

WOW

:facepalm:

WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH!

That's the sound of the point flying supersonic high above your head. Reading comprehension not a strong suit?

No it's actually not. Writing and making your point clear isn't yours--that's for sure. Care to elaborate on your point?

I did. He thinks It's a chat client and is confused as to why it won't let him download "crappy" source apps because they can "easily" be ran on tablets when my mid-range machine can barely handle it on ultra. My point is he's ignorant and doesn't know what he's talking about. Maybe you're the one that should stop skimming. ;)

Nope, you're still not getting it, but I suspect you're just being purposely dim. Or we'll I hope so, otherwise it'd be kinda sad.

Yes, but your numbers aren't.

:huh: MS is doing 30% with the ability to drop it 10% if you meet some sales target for the application. My numbers were accurate, though thanks for mentioning the discount over a certain threshold, as all apps would be sliced at 30% (the discount only applies to revenue exceeding $25K).

Even still, this does nothing to change my point. That Microsoft sees a large amount of revenue sitting on the table with an open Windows platform and they desire to close it off so they can maximize their revenue by siphoning money off the top of app sales.

There is a reason this is the cheapest version of Windows so far...

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Google is opening the world's first AI museum in Los Angeles by Ivan Jenic Image via: Google Ever since AI image generators went mainstream, the debate over whether AI-generated art is real art hasn't let up. Those who don’t consider AI to be art say that if a machine does the creating and anyone can prompt it, there’s no skill involved, and therefore no art is produced. The counter-argument is equally persistent, as defenders of AI-generated artworks often claim that AI is just a tool, and that every major technological breakthrough, like the camera or the computer, was met with the same skepticism before eventually being accepted as a legitimate creative medium. Google’s position in this debate is clear. Which is no surprise, as the company is investing billions in AI infrastructure. And now, in efforts to encourage people to use its AI even more, Google is opening Dataland on June 20, which it's calling the world's first AI arts museum. Located inside The Grand LA, a Frank Gehry-designed building in Los Angeles, the museum spans 25,000 square feet. The museum is built around a collaboration with media artist Refik Anadol, who has worked with Google since 2016. The inaugural exhibition is called Machine Dreams: Rainforest, and is powered by an AI model trained on “an extensive dataset of the natural world.” It generates 1.2 billion pixels of visuals in real time and reacts to visitors dynamically. The space also generates soundscapes, real-time emotion sensing, and algorithmically produced scents. Image via: Refik Anadol Studio / Google Google says that the museum is powered by its Gemini models, which run on Google Cloud. So, everything is generated inside one of Google’s AI data centers and is streamed to the museum. Alongside the museum opening, Google Arts & Culture is funding an AI Artist Residency, giving four artists $25,000 grants each, along with mentorship from Refik Anadol Studio and access to Google's machine learning tools. Their work will be shown at Dataland and on the Google Arts & Culture website later this year. Google’s AI museum will undoubtedly initiate a fired-up debate on social media, and we can’t wait to see the first reactions. Via: Smithsonian Magazine
    • Calling GTA 6 overhyped crap doesn’t make you edgy, it just makes you sound like someone who hasn’t enjoyed anything since the PS2 era.
    • I’m not arguing whether Rockstar likes money. Obviously, they do, they’re a business. I’m saying this isn’t new. They’ve always launched console first. This is just how Rockstar operates.
    • I'm not sure how old the school is, but they've been doing this since GTA 3. Back in those days we'd be lucky for game companies to release on the PC at all. And with the current state of Sony (or Microsoft) their gaming wing won't be getting a penny from me.
    • We now know when and how the Universe may truly end by Sayan Sen Image by Marek Pavlík via Pexels| Not representative A study by physicist Henry Tye of Cornell University suggests that the universe may not expand forever. Instead, it could eventually stop expanding, begin contracting and end in a "Big Crunch" roughly 20 billion years from now. The research, published in the Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, was conducted by Tye, Horace White Professor of Physics Emeritus at Cornell University. Using recent observations from major dark-energy surveys, Tye and his collaborators developed a cosmological model that predicts the universe could have a total lifespan of about 33 billion years. Since the universe is currently estimated to be 13.8 billion years old, the model places it near the midpoint of its existence. According to Cornell University's summary of the research, the study centers on the cosmological constant, a term introduced by Albert Einstein in his theory of general relativity. In modern cosmology, the cosmological constant is commonly used to describe the simplest form of dark energy, the unknown phenomenon believed to be driving the accelerating expansion of the universe. "For the last 20 years, people believed that the cosmological constant is positive, and the universe will expand forever," Tye said in a Cornell University news release. "The new data seem to indicate that the cosmological constant is negative, and that the universe will end in a big crunch." The study draws on data from the Dark Energy Survey (DES) and the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI), two major projects designed to investigate the nature of dark energy. According to Tye, recent observations suggest that dark energy may not behave exactly like a simple cosmological constant. To account for those observations, Tye and his collaborators proposed a model involving an extremely light hypothetical particle that evolves over time. In their calculations, this produces a negative cosmological constant and leads to a future collapse of the universe. The model predicts that cosmic expansion would continue for approximately another 11 billion years before reaching a maximum size, after which the universe would begin contracting and eventually collapse. Scientists have long debated how the universe might end. As explained in an article published in The Conversation by Stephen DiKerby of Michigan State University, several possibilities have been proposed. If dark energy remains constant and positive, the universe could continue expanding indefinitely, gradually becoming colder, darker and more diffuse in a scenario often called the "heat death" of the universe. Other theoretical possibilities include a Big Rip, in which cosmic expansion accelerates so dramatically that galaxies, stars and even atoms are torn apart, or a Big Crunch, in which expansion reverses and the universe collapses back into an extremely dense state. DiKerby notes that the Big Crunch idea itself is not new. What distinguishes Tye's work is that it attempts to use current observational data to estimate when such a collapse might occur and how it could unfold. Much of the universe's long-term evolution remains uncertain. According to current astrophysical understanding, stars will continue to form and die for billions of years. The Sun, for example, is about halfway through its expected lifespan. Galaxies are also expected to continue merging; the Milky Way and Andromeda galaxies are projected to collide several billion years from now. At the same time, the nature of dark energy remains one of the biggest unanswered questions in cosmology. While observations indicate that the universe's expansion is accelerating, scientists still do not know what is causing that acceleration. Future observations may therefore alter current predictions about the cosmos's ultimate fate. Tye emphasized that additional evidence will be needed before firm conclusions can be drawn. DESI continues to collect data, while upcoming observations from missions and observatories including Euclid, SPHEREx and the Vera C. Rubin Observatory are expected to provide more precise measurements of dark energy. "People have said before that if the cosmological constant is negative, then the universe will collapse eventually. That's not new," Tye said. "However, here the model tells you when the universe collapses and how it collapses." For now, the study presents one possible future for the cosmos rather than a settled prediction. Whether the universe ultimately ends in a Big Crunch, expands forever, or follows another path entirely remains an open question that future observations will help answer. Source: Cornell University, The Conversation This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      With What earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      570
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      175
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      73
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      68
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!