Windows 8 sales dissapointing


Recommended Posts

I still don't understand why so many people have an issue with the new start screen. I just don't get it.

It's a little different but you launch apps still the same way.

I definitely don't get it's a deal breaker to not upgrade, when you have all those start menu options

I don't like all that switching back and forth between the start screen and the desktop, especially since I use mostly desktop apps. I don't care for Metro apps.

And yes, I have my favorites pinned on the taskbar. But still, it's annoying when you do have to switch.

I don't like all that switching back and forth between the start screen and the desktop, especially since I use mostly desktop apps. I don't care for Metro apps.

And yes, I have my favorites pinned on the taskbar. But still, it's annoying when you do have to switch.

I understand that, all I'm saying is that for me it's really not a big deal, I don't mind the switching.

I only use the start screen when I would have used the start menu in Win 7 which was barely ever.

At that point I don't mind it being full screen, I organized my start screen nicely so everything is pretty much only 2 clicks away ever.

I can see that some people find it a bit annoying to switch the whole time, but to despise it as some do over such a small thing just seems kinda silly

I don't like all that switching back and forth between the start screen and the desktop, especially since I use mostly desktop apps. I don't care for Metro apps.

And yes, I have my favorites pinned on the taskbar. But still, it's annoying when you do have to switch.

You still had to open the start menu to launch things...so you had to switch away from the current task to launch the new one.

The old start menu used a folder hieracrchy that required digging through levels of folders sometimes to get to the actual program. The new start screen gives a 'flat' approach to the hierarchy which means less digging.

I think what has people upset is purely the fact that it's a change. Instead of a small menu on the bottom left it's a full-screen menu. Functionally it's not really different...aesthetically it is.

I can see that some people find it a bit annoying to switch the whole time, but to despise it as some do over such a small thing just seems kinda silly

I agree with you on that. I use 8 and like it very much. I use a start menu replacement and am very happy with the entire experience.

  • Like 2

Yet while sticking with vanilla is safe, if MICROSOFT sticks with *vanilla*, it gets whacked for it.

That is the real issue with Microsoft - while it can't play it safe, its customers and users can.

Actually MS has no choice in this. The Explorer UI will not work on a tablet. That is how they got in this hole I the first place. They had really good concepts back in the day, but they just never saw the light of day.

At this point, it just wasn't easy. They couldn't "really" only implement Metro when a tablet was detected. Well actually they could have. To be honest, I'm not sure MS really ahd time to think this through. Full screen non-windowed apps on a desktop? Not gonna be successful, so either they thing the desktop really will fade away or Windows 9 will be another major UI/UX change. Now allowing windows Metro apps would fix, I don't see the point as for Windowing the Explorer UI is superior to an MDI Metro.

Someone like me doesn't mind the hybrid, and with great apps, it can be exciting. I have an issue with the lack of quality of the finished products at this point. Also, Metro Search and UI just has usability weaknesses on a desktop. File management, context menus ...

Others just don't like it.

I don't think Windows 7 is vanilla in the sense you are implying, and Windows 8 isn't tutti fruiti. It's a quite simple touch oriented UI. What's funny, the most complete and stable part of it right now? Yep, the good old vanilla Windows 8 Desktop environment :).

Microsoft has failed to execute in a timely manner (their own schedule) due to urgency and their internal culture didn't help. If their internal divisions can't communicate and work together, is it any surprise different parts of the OS and apps seem to be speaking different languages?

As two people who actually kinda like Windows 8, and really like the Surface (minus the missing media management that you can get on the desktop using Windows Media Player, is their any excuse for:

The kludge that is Windows 8 Search and the limited ability to do much with the results from the results list, the lack of unified search, the search input doesn't even clear itself with a new search or at the least, highlight the existing search keyword(s) so you can just start typing the new search.

Windows 8 OS and Windows Phone 8 released to retail with no meaningful Media Management resulting in the only solution being the "vanilla" (gotcha) classic Windows Media Player.

With Windows RT and Windows 8 OS being released to retail, no meaningful way to sync files between the Windows 8 RT Surface and Windows 8 Desktop?

The Music App and it's syncing/matching service is simply not really working. Synced playlists don't even look for the files locally 90% of the time.

That's not even counting the bugs. That's just the unfinished stuff Microsoft released. I couldn't be a Windows 8 evangelist if I wanted to. I wouldn't disrespect myself that much. There are too many things just not up to shareware quality. Microsoft needs a kick in the rear and all the criticism. And they need to be working to fix this mess with a sense of urgency. If there aren't major updates by Christmas, I predict a disaster when all the new Windows 8 hardware gets unwrapped and within a week falls apart for people who just want stuff to work. Things they've become accustomed to like music and videos, and iPad/iPhone apps working and not randomly quitting, etc. etc.

Yes, if all these things are fixed, anyone wanting to pass on Windows 8 because of the "Start" menu or resistance to change should then be carefully examined. Right now, you can't blame anyone for not wanting to move to Windows 8, or even Windows Phone 8 (if not for Windows Media Player, it would be the equivalent of having an Android only with more, arguably better apps).

BTW, Search will never be fixed. It was made for tablets, and works like it. Same goes for Devices and Sharing on the Charms bar. Have even you had occasion to use either on the desktop?

The worst part for customers? Microsoft can't openly admit how screwed up things are, or reassure us they are working day an night to fix things, if they did either of those they will insure Windows 8's failure. So silence ... and we wait.

PS: I don't actually mind if one day the desktop goes completely away. But based on what I've seen so far in Windows 8, that's a ridiculous thought.

You still had to open the start menu to launch things...so you had to switch away from the current task to launch the new one.

The old start menu used a folder hieracrchy that required digging through levels of folders sometimes to get to the actual program. The new start screen gives a 'flat' approach to the hierarchy which means less digging.

I think what has people upset is purely the fact that it's a change. Instead of a small menu on the bottom left it's a full-screen menu. Functionally it's not really different...aesthetically it is.

No, with the old Start Menu you never lost sight of the entire desktop and whatever was going on it. Everything stayed in front of you. Like the current Start Page, you just type the name of the app and click on it, again, never losing sight of the desktop or having to scroll or survey more than the well defined area of the Start menu to find the result and click on it. Definitely didn't have to click Apps/Files/or Settings.

I'm not saying Metro isn't workable, but the notion that the Windows 7 Start Menu was inefficient or that the Start Page is more efficient is a stretch IMO. So many things are "more" work, whether click, draggin' selectin' or eyeball movin'. Metro works on the desktop but wasn't made for the desktop and we all know that.

There was nothing efficient about the old menu. Familiar, but not efficient. Take a peek through it, and what do you see? Tiny 16x16 icons, subfolders of subfolders, and archaic naming conventions. Dig far enough, and you run out of space. There literally is nothing "efficient" about that at all. Put it on a screen large enough, and the menu appears as this tiny, tiny thing that is just unusable. You're literally targeting such a tiny area on your screen, it's almost claustrophobic.

Funny, because the Win7 desktop is still there...

No it's not. It's a weird hybrid. When using the explorer why do I need to see 'pink' colors when I highlight a certain type of file ?

Why can't I change the background picture without the UI changing into some hideous colors ?

Why does it go into full screen when I want to play some MP3's ?

When I'm on the start screen why does it switch to desktop when I press WIN+E ?

Why does the built in email client go into full screen ?

etc etc etc ....

It's a weird weird hybrid.

There was nothing efficient about the old menu. Familiar, but not efficient. Take a peek through it, and what do you see? Tiny 16x16 icons, subfolders of subfolders, and archaic naming conventions. Dig far enough, and you run out of space. There literally is nothing "efficient" about that at all. Put it on a screen large enough, and the menu appears as this tiny, tiny thing that is just unusable. You're literally targeting such a tiny area on your screen, it's almost claustrophobic.

It's not about the menu. I use RocketDock, simply because I like it that way. But with the new UI you have 2 homescreens ... windows switching between them depending on what you do is ...weird.

No it's not. It's a weird hybrid. When using the explorer why do I need to see 'pink' colors when I highlight a certain type of file ?

Why can't I change the background picture without the UI changing into some hideous colors ?

Why does it go into full screen when I want to play some MP3's ?

When I'm on the start screen why does it switch to desktop when I press WIN+E ?

Why does the built in email client go into full screen ?

etc etc etc ....

It's a weird weird hybrid.

What the frak are you doing? What pink colors? What hideous colors? I see NONE on the desktop. Where are you right clicking to change the desktop wallpaper? 'Personalize' is still in the same spot.

If you want a different MP3 app, use Program Defaults, and change it.

Win+E opens 'Computer'.

Metro apps are full screen. Boo Hoo.

There was nothing efficient about the old menu. Familiar, but not efficient. Take a peek through it, and what do you see? Tiny 16x16 icons, subfolders of subfolders, and archaic naming conventions. Dig far enough, and you run out of space. There literally is nothing "efficient" about that at all. Put it on a screen large enough, and the menu appears as this tiny, tiny thing that is just unusable. You're literally targeting such a tiny area on your screen, it's almost claustrophobic.

We'll have to disagree. When using classic start menu, you don't look for icons. Say to browsed a hard drive you hover over computer and then browse the disk from the flyout from there. Nested folders? I create them if I need them. If browsing your "documents" from the start menu is inefficient, then "you" are inefficient. I can only assume you are talking about Programs on the start menu and I don't think anyone physically goes through the program menu, you simply type the program as you do in Windows 8.

I've never had Windows 7 on a screen or at a resolution that made it a tiny unusable thing and I'm not aware of this being a major complaint. I'm not arguing for or against the Start Page, but to, in the heat of Windows 8 evangelism, attempt to say the Start Menu was inefficient is ridiculous in my opinion and experience.

It would absolutely not work on touch devices, I buy that, but inefficient, please.

No it's not. It's a weird hybrid. When using the explorer why do I need to see 'pink' colors when I highlight a certain type of file ?

Why can't I change the background picture without the UI changing into some hideous colors ?

Why does it go into full screen when I want to play some MP3's ?

When I'm on the start screen why does it switch to desktop when I press WIN+E ?

Why does the built in email client go into full screen ?

etc etc etc ....

It's a weird weird hybrid.

It's not about the menu. I use RocketDock, simply because I like it that way. But with the new UI you have 2 homescreens ... windows switching between them depending on what you do is ...weird.

I don't know if you were trying to be funny but I do find this post funny.

I do recommend you make Windows Media Player classic your default for MP3s to end launching the full screen music app (you don't want to mess with that anyway :).

And yeah, choose your wallpaper carefully regarding the UI color changing.

too confusing my ass.

people no a days are just too lazy to even bother TRYING to figure out the new system, they'd much rather be spoon fed everything

it's rather despicable how stubborn and stuck in their ways humankind has become

Tens of millions of people buying a Mac, iPhone, iPad and/or Android-based product show they are in fact willing to try and get used to something new. Could it be consumers simply don't like what Microsoft has come up with? Hmmm...

  • Like 2

Tens of millions of people buying a Mac, iPhone, iPad and/or Android-based product show they are in fact willing to try and get used to something new. Could it be consumers simply don't like what Microsoft has come up with? Hmmm...

i'd say that's still slightly different. there's a bit of difference between a completely new and different and a familiar environment that has changed quite a bit.

as far as consumers are concerned they seem to be getting used to it just fine from what i can tell, it's just nerds and such like us that have a problem it seems

Tens of millions of people buying a Mac, iPhone, iPad and/or Android-based product show they are in fact willing to try and get used to something new. Could it be consumers simply don't like what Microsoft has come up with? Hmmm...

Exactly, Microsoft knows this very well. Consumers aren't "stuck in their ways" or "old fashioned" otherwise Apple's biggest problem wouldn't be where to store their endless bundles of cash. Consumers are willing to try and embrace new when it brings tangible benefits to the table for them.

The risks are so high with Windows 8 for them that I feel they just overshot and if this thing goes the way all of their latest shots have went they have a major problem on their hands. They are stoking the coals with developers that mobile is very important, but run the risk of those developers jumping for the existing successful platforms instead. This is why I feel they severely screwed up with Windows 8 in some major and fundamental ways. They are only bringing one real carrot to the table here. They are bringing millions of Windows desktop users to the table for a strong incentive for the developers, but they failed to bring something for the consumers.

Microsoft really needs to break the ecosystem pull of Apple and Google for users. Since Microsoft was willing to radically rethink the PC their primary focus should have been building a strong ecosystem. As it stands now, they have two separate "Stores" with one for Windows 8 Desktop & Tablet and another for Windows Phone. They have a phone which can't sync music with the PC properly. They have a PC littered with "charms" and they failed to deliver any solid vision for developers to be inspired by on how to use it.

It will be hard to pull users from iOS when they have spent thousands on apps, docks, speaker sets, etc... The same is true for Android, at least for apps.

To be honest, the **** poor release by Microsoft shows either arrogance or desperation and I'm not sure which is worse for them at this stage.

It may have been a smarter choice for them to release Windows 8 in a year or two from now when they could have ironed this out, but we're here now.

1) I wouldn't dismiss Paul Thurott; he's among the best writers out there who cover Microsoft. He has no reason to whine about limited access because he's got tons of good connections there. He also has books out on Win8; he has no good reason to bad-mouth Microsoft.

2) My own evidence is anecdotal, but I've tried to convince a number of people to upgrade to Win8. That $40 upgrade deal is fantastic. Almost all of them have replied with some variation on "I can't STAND those #@?!$ tiles!". If this reaction becomes the general public opinion of Win8, I could see this affecting even Windows Phone sales.

3) This reaction shouldn't be taken as any reflection on the technical merits of Win8. The trouble is, many users couldn't care less about "technical merits" if they feel the UI will demand too many changes to the way they've gotten used to working.

I would compare this to the polarized reaction that came with the ribbon UI in Office 2007. I personally liked it, and understood Microsoft reasoning (the ribbon was conceived when the Office team found that 3/4ths of new feature requests were for things that were already there, but buried so deep that users couldn't find them). There's a solid usability case for Win8, too, but when users make up their minds before they even try, what can you do?

What the frak are you doing? What pink colors? What hideous colors? I see NONE on the desktop. Where are you right clicking to change the desktop wallpaper? 'Personalize' is still in the same spot.

If you want a different MP3 app, use Program Defaults, and change it.

Win+E opens 'Computer'.

Metro apps are full screen. Boo Hoo.

I know metro apps are full screen. :rofl:

This is what I'm talking about

Win8_pink.png

Now compare that to win 7

win7_pure.png

True, but the decision to go ahead with Julie's plans was Sinofskys.

And then interestingly she wasn't given Sinofsky's job directly. I read the position was split over two people and structured differently.

I don't think this is an admission of metro failure though it is interesting.

No, with the old Start Menu you never lost sight of the entire desktop and whatever was going on it. Everything stayed in front of you. Like the current Start Page, you just type the name of the app and click on it, again, never losing sight of the desktop or having to scroll or survey more than the well defined area of the Start menu to find the result and click on it. Definitely didn't have to click Apps/Files/or Settings.

I'm not saying Metro isn't workable, but the notion that the Windows 7 Start Menu was inefficient or that the Start Page is more efficient is a stretch IMO. So many things are "more" work, whether click, draggin' selectin' or eyeball movin'. Metro works on the desktop but wasn't made for the desktop and we all know that.

I didn't say lost sight. I said lost focus. As in the start menu was now the active item...which means it had focus. It's a term that refers to the active work item.

So in order to use the start menu, you have to actively disengage from working on something else. You also have to do that with the start screen.

The difference again is in aesthetics...the visual presentation.

Also it's not a stretch. What is better...clicking through a hierarchical folder structure down multiple levels...or having it presented to you directly without having to dig?

Efficiency wise? The way they present things now as flat is better.

True, but the decision to go ahead with Julie's plans was Sinofskys.

I understand your point, but things don't quite work that way in the corporate world. If you hate something you don't fire the guy who said 'ok' and put the person who designed it in charge of everything for the next version...since you are likely to get more of the same.

Think about it from a logical standpoint...not from a top-down standpoint.

Grr...getting so ticked off that I can't mention practical examples since it will bring down the 'he thinks he is superior to us with his hidden knowledge' brigade.

Grr...getting so ticked off that I can't mention practical examples since it will bring down the 'he thinks he is superior to us with his hidden knowledge' brigade.

Not your fault you think everyone else is wrong and you are always right. Its just your personality. People tend to not like people like that.

Not your fault you think everyone else is wrong and you are always right. Its just your personality. People tend to not like people like that.

I don't even feel that way. :p

If I know something I prefer being able to share what I know. I also like being able to provide a perspective that comes from direct experience.

People here don't like that it seems. So now I'm stuck having to read my posts multiple times to make sure I don't upset anyone due to an example or mention of a project or group.

Heck the only reason I spend time here is that I like providing info. It is also why I'm highly selective about what teams I choose to work with. I like jobs with high customer impact, even if it means never being a stock option billionaire everyone knows. :p

I'd rather have the job with impact and geek 'cred' over the high visibility gig any day of the week. :)

Exactly, Microsoft knows this very well. Consumers aren't "stuck in their ways" or "old fashioned" otherwise Apple's biggest problem wouldn't be where to store their endless bundles of cash. Consumers are willing to try and embrace new when it brings tangible benefits to the table for them.

The risks are so high with Windows 8 for them that I feel they just overshot and if this thing goes the way all of their latest shots have went they have a major problem on their hands. They are stoking the coals with developers that mobile is very important, but run the risk of those developers jumping for the existing successful platforms instead. This is why I feel they severely screwed up with Windows 8 in some major and fundamental ways. They are only bringing one real carrot to the table here. They are bringing millions of Windows desktop users to the table for a strong incentive for the developers, but they failed to bring something for the consumers.

Microsoft really needs to break the ecosystem pull of Apple and Google for users. Since Microsoft was willing to radically rethink the PC their primary focus should have been building a strong ecosystem. As it stands now, they have two separate "Stores" with one for Windows 8 Desktop & Tablet and another for Windows Phone. They have a phone which can't sync music with the PC properly. They have a PC littered with "charms" and they failed to deliver any solid vision for developers to be inspired by on how to use it.

It will be hard to pull users from iOS when they have spent thousands on apps, docks, speaker sets, etc... The same is true for Android, at least for apps.

To be honest, the **** poor release by Microsoft shows either arrogance or desperation and I'm not sure which is worse for them at this stage.

It may have been a smarter choice for them to release Windows 8 in a year or two from now when they could have ironed this out, but we're here now.

The problem is that waiting was not an option for the very reason you pointed out.

There is an impatience being shown - egged on by the punditocracy that loves anything not Microsoft.

Microsoft - plain and simply - did not have the extra time.

Google got away with it because they had NO legacy infrastructure. Apple, compared to Microsoft, is a niche.

As I've been posting for the past several months, the rise of devices caught Microsoft flat-footed.

If Microsoft waited, they risked not being able to counter that rise at all (the user base would be too ingrained in Android and iOS for Microsoft to make ANY inroads).

We as tech users and developers know it; we aren't stupid.

However, that means that if we want to do something about it, we have to accept a change in what Windows itself is and what it is about.

THAT is where we're balking.

Windows has been where it is for almost two decades - a desktop and workstation-focussed OS - its own niche. (It's a rather LARGE niche; however, it's still a niche.)

We, as users, have balked at any and every attempt to expand Windows out of that box we've caged it in. (The only thing that has succeeded is Azure.)

Look at any and every attempt Microsoft has made to expand Windows out of the "computing" niche - other than Azure (which succeeded by being obscure), we as users have done our darndest to force Windows back into the box.

Even though we're quite aware that unless Windows breaks OUT of that box, devices will encroach and start eating its lunch, we're still trying to keep Windows (and thus Microsoft) in that cage.

Are we, as users, THAT nihilistic?

Microsoft has sold 40 million copies of Windows 8 to date. All you naysayers can shut up now k thxbai :)

http://www.winsyde.c...s-of-windows-8/

Yay! 4% of the entire install base of Windows has upgraded! Break out the champagne folks.

I would venture to guess a large chunk of that are developers, corporate evaluators, and reporters.

Note it also does not count people who downgrade, nor does it separate OEM preinstallations.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I gave the tool a chance the other day to make a USB. An hour later it was stuck at 0% downloaded. I downloaded the official ISO, downloaded Rufus, and made the USB myself in 15 min.
    • <Moved to software discussion and support> I've got fond memories of Winamp. Changing the skins, the different visualisations etc. But now I just need a simple music player. MSN messenger would be another one, MSN Messenger Plus (I think?) offered so many different plugins. But again, it probably wouldn't work for me these days. And then there is miRC. i think it's still going these days, but lord i had fun with that back in the day. Now it's mostly stuff like Discord, WhatsApp group chats, Signal, Telegram... /me is showing his age...
    • ive always been fascinated by old software this is an old video player for windows from apple
    • In the way that you framed it incorrectly. You wrote: "The constant need to close all browser sessions and wait for a new version to install" There's no "constant need to close all browser sessions". That's factually incorrect. The browser downloads its updates in the background and installs them when you open it again. Silently. And there's no "wait for a new version to install", updates are small and take 2-3 extra seconds AT MOST, if any. If you have an SSD, there's zero extra time. Also, every mainstream browser operates this way. Firefox, the FOSS go-to browser, the default on almost every Linux distro, does exactly the same. Also, you don't need to constantly restart Edge for updates to install, you can completely ignore them and it doesn't even ask you to handle them, it's all silent and automatic. So I don't understand what else do you want.
    • DuRoBo Krono Review: Portable E-Ink reader with great ideas that need a bit of improvement by Taras Buria Phone-sized e-readers are gaining traction these days, with more people treating them as a getaway device to cure phone addiction (or at least they are trying to) or having a more pocket-friendly reader that is easier to carry and hold. The market now has plenty of such readers to choose from, and DuRoBo is the latest addition, a new player that offers a more interesting approach to the idea. The Krono is a $279 e-reader with an interesting twist, which tries to make the device more fun and ergonomic. Here is my review. Disclaimer: DuRoBo provided the review sample without any editorial input or pre-approval. The Krono comes in a phone-sized box with pink accents. Inside, you get the device itself, a short user manual, and a USB cable. The cable is a bit old-fashioned, Type-A to Type-C, which is a bit disappointing. Hot take: I would rather have no cable in the box rather than another Type-A cable that gets immediately thrown into my box full of similar cables I never use. The Krono also has no charger in the box, as it relies on accessories you already own, which is fine with me. Here are the specs: Dimensions 154 x 80 x 9.0 mm or 6.06" x 3.15" x 0.35" 173 g or 6.10 oz Materials Black or White plastic Display 6.13-inch E-Ink Carta 1200, 1,648 x 824 pixels, 300 ppi Touch-capacitive. Dual-tone frontlight. Processor 8-core Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 (QTI SM6350) 2 performance cores at 2.07 GHz 4 efficiency cores at 1.71 GHz Memory 6 GB Storage 128GB, non-expandable ~104GB available out-of-the-box Operating system Android 15 with a custom launcher Connectivity Wi-Fi and Bluetooth Battery 3,950 mAh battery Buttons and port USB Type-C port Power button, Volume button, Smart Dial Breathing Lights Audio Mono Speaker and Dual microphones In the box The Krono, a Type-A to Type-C cable, user manual Price $279 on Amazon First impressions Right off the bat, no, this is not a phone replacement. Do not approach this device thinking it can serve you as a dumb phone to cure your TikTok addiction. In addition to the fact that the Krono has no cellular connectivity, I strongly believe that no amount of extra devices can fix your phone addiction until you put some serious effort into it. The Krono is a phone-sized e-reader, a companion for your phone dedicated to reading without distractions. The DuRoBo Krono is made of plastic with a very fine texture. It is hardly premium, but I also cannot say it feels cheap. The device is also a bit thick, quite dense, and well-built without rattling or cracking. You get to choose between two colors: white and black. The front has quite thick bezels, which is hardly surprising for an e-ink device. These things use front light, with LEDs usually placed on the screen perimeter. While I do not mind thicker bezels, the notably larger chin cheapens the look a little. What I mind is a notable seam between the display and the main case, which, after just two days of use, collected plenty of dust and specks. The back of the Krono is what makes the device stand out. There is a cylinder (DuRoBo calls it the Axis) embedded in the back of the reader, housing three elements: a power button on the right edge, a Smart Dial on the left edge, and "Breathing Lights" on the back. An etched DuRoBo logo sits below the cylinder, and it is the only piece of branding you can find on the device. Overall, the design and materials are very unassuming, but the cylinder with additional control elements certainly elevates the look and makes it more interesting. Other physical elements include two microphones (one on the top edge and one on the bottom edge), a USB Type-C port, a volume rocker, and a single mono speaker. There is no fingerprint reader, so if you want to protect your device, a PIN is your only option. The official TPU case is not the most premium-looking Display The Krono has a 6.1-inch E-Ink Carta 1200 touchscreen display with a resolution of 1,648 x 824 pixels (300 ppi). The display is front-lit, and you can adjust the brightness and temperature from cool to warm. Unfortunately, the Krono lacks automatic brightness and temperature adjustments, and you cannot set a custom schedule for the frontlight. However, you can set it to always enable frontlight so that you can see what is happening on the screen when turning it on in a dark environment. On the bright side (get it?), the front light can get extremely dim so that the screen is barely readable in a pitch-dark room. The front light is also uniform across the screen, with no noticeable temperature gradients. I am very susceptible to uneven front light, and it is very easy for me to notice it, but the Krono is doing a very good job in this area. I also like that the edge shadow is not very prominent and barely visible in the black variant. E-Ink Carta 1200 is not the newest generation (there are Carta 1250 and 1300), but it is still a good display. It supports three modes: Clarity, Speed, and Quality. In Clarity mode, text is very sharp and easy to read, but you trade that for more ghosting, a slower refresh rate, and more artifacts when the display changes images. Speed mode, as the name suggests, boosts refresh rate and reduces ghosting, but fine print and text become more jagged. Finally, Quality mode is only available in Android apps. It has the lowest refresh rate, but in return, you get much better visuals, improved gradients, and more. Like brightness and temperature, you can toggle modes from the control center. It is available when swiping from the top-right corner of the screen (the top-left is for notifications). I also like that the Krono can work as a desk clock when not in use. It has a bunch of screensavers, including horizontal clocks with time, date, and current battery level. The screen refreshes once per minute, and battery drain is extremely low (not even 1% in 24 hours). It is a great use of the technology, and another thing I wish more e-ink devices featured. Smart Dial The Smart Dial is Krono's main party trick. It sits on the left side of the device and serves multiple purposes. You can twist or press it to perform various actions, depending on the current use case scenario. When reading books, twisting the dial flips through pages, and pressing it refreshes the screen. On the home screen, the dial adjusts the brightness, and holding the dial pressed launches voice note recording. Finally, a quick double press launches the DuRoBo AI chatbot. While the dial scroll is not notched, it is very smooth and has haptic feedback that confirms your actions, which feels very nice. As a long-term Apple Watch user, I love the idea behind the dial. It feels very natural and oddly satisfying to use, especially with that subtle haptic feedback. I never liked flipping pages with touch input, and I strongly believe each e-reader should come with some sort of physical controls for turning pages. The Krono has both volume buttons (which also work as page turners) and the dial, so you are free to use whichever you prefer. With that said, the dial is not perfect. For one, it sticks out of the case way too far for my liking, raising concerns about durability and longevity when carrying the Krono around in a pocket (it is a pocket-sized device after all). Also, it has too much wobble, which cheapens the experience and makes it feel a bit flimsy and unsecured. While there are two plastic guards on the Krono's case, they are way too small for any kind of protection. I also think DuRoBo should let users customize dial actions (the only available customization is scroll direction), particularly for long and double presses. Not everyone needs voice notes, and DuRoBo AI does not work without an active internet connection, leaving the long press essentially useless when offline. I do not mind these features, and I genuinely think they are useful, but I would rather have the ability to toggle between screen modes, turn the frontlight on/off, or launch my favorite app. I also agree with people on Reddit asking developers to let users adjust the dial sensitivity. I hope this is something DuRoBo can implement with a software update to make the experience more personalized (it is a Smart Dial, after all) and incentivize users to fiddle with the Dial more often. The Dial is a fantastic idea, so please, guys, improve it a little. As for ergonomics, they are mostly fine, but the dial's position may feel a little awkward and way too high. When I use a phone or a phone-sized gadget, I tend to rest one of its corners on my palm for a more secure grip. With the Krono, such a grip is impossible because you cannot reach the dial even with big hands. You have to lower the reader a bit and hold it like a bottle without any extra support for the bottom edge. Such a grip is not necessarily uncomfortable (the Krono is also light enough for it), but it requires a bit of muscle retraining. Sometimes, I do not bother with the dial and hold the Krono like my phone, flipping through pages with volume buttons, as they are perfectly positioned for my right-hand thumb. Interestingly, when testing the Krono, I would often find myself thinking that a roller embedded in the long plastic cylinder on the back of the device would have been a much more comfortable solution. There is a free idea for you, guys. Software The Krono runs Android 15 with a very minimal launcher on top. The home screen presents you with a list of apps, a scrollable list of widgets, and your user profile. Widgets can display time, calendar, or recent books for quick access. You can also add or remove apps from the home screen to keep the most useful stuff around without tapping "Apps." I like this minimalistic approach; it looks clean, easy to understand, and light. I understand that some may find the list of all apps way too clean, but fortunately, DuRoBo lets you switch to traditional icons. The reader also has a bunch of preinstalled apps: Read: The default app for reading. Browser: A Chromium-based browser. Files: A simple file manager. Music: A simple music player. Spark: A voice recorder with transcription support and AI summarization DuRoBo AI: A built-in AI chatbot. Transfer: An app for file transfer over Wi-Fi. If that is not enough, there is the Google Play Store, where you can download all the extra apps you need, alternative readers, podcast apps, chatbots, and more. DuRoBo is not trying to give you an all-in-one device. The standard software experience is quite minimal, which makes it easy to approach and learn. The standard reader supports EPUB, EPUB3, AZW3, MOBI, PDF, TXT, DOC, and DOCX, which is more than enough to let you read most books without third-party software. As for customizing the reading experience, you can select one of five built-in fonts, adjust size and thickness, adjust margins and spacing (only three variants for each), change text alignment and direction, toggle the reading status bar, and switch to dark mode. There is also text-to-speech, which utilizes Android's default TTS tech. While I like the simplistic approach, I cannot help but feel DuRoBo could have made the built-in reader a bit more customizable. However, I am not going to bog down on this, as you can always install any other reader you prefer using the Play Store or by sideloading an APK. Getting books to the Krono is very simple. Given that the device is an Android smartphone without cellular connectivity, you can transfer files via a USB Type-C cable, download them using the built-in browser, share them over Bluetooth, or use cloud storage. My favorite was the built-in Transfer app. It is simple, reliable, and very well-designed. I was surprised by how well-designed the web portal is. It is fast, pretty, and properly categorized. Well done! Once you have your books loaded, you can highlight or underline text, add annotations, bookmark pages, check the table of contents, and ask AI about the selected text. Unfortunately, the Krono has no built-in vocabulary, but again, that is something a third-party reader could fix. Overall, the built-in reader is light and snappy, with just the minimum amount of features for a regular user to enjoy reading books. The Krono has no built-in reading tracking, so stat nerds will have to look for third-party reading apps. However, you can set a daily reading goal, and the reader will notify you when you reach it (for example, one hour). You can also set a reminder to read at a certain time, and when the time comes, the Krono will light up its back LEDs and unlock itself to nudge you. Other than that, the rear LEDs do nothing, not even showing charging progress, which is an unfortunate misopportunity if you ask me. Quirks aside, Krono's Android runs quite snappily and bug-free. Early reviews of the Krono criticized its Android 13-based software quite a lot, but now, the reader runs Android 15, and its software has fixed plenty of initial complaints. I never experienced any issues with built-in apps. AI attempts The DuRoBo Krono comes with a built-in AI chatbot. There is no information on what model powers this thing, but the system says it was "trained by Google." You can launch the bot from the app list or by double-pressing the dial. It works just like any other chatbot, and you can ask it anything by typing or using voice input. The AI saves your chats, and you can rename, export, or delete them. DuRoBo AI requires an active internet connection, and it does not work offline. Its reach and capabilities are also limited. You can only chat in the app and use it in the reader app as a makeshift vocabulary. However, the implementation is kinda awkward. You can only send a selected portion of text to AI without giving it any requests or instructions. I highlighted the word "dumb," and it apologized to me for not being useful. You also cannot ask follow-up questions or send the generated response to a separate chat. The chatbot is also slow, even with fast Wi-Fi, making the overall experience quite frustrating, which makes me again wish for the ability to remap the double press to something else. Spark, the standard voice recording app, also uses AI for note summarization and transcribing. Neither feature works offline, unfortunately. Spark records notes up to 30 minutes using Krono's dual microphones, and you can rename or export notes. Transcription quality is decent, and the speed is alright, but you can find much better solutions in the Google Play Store. What I like about Spark is that transcribed notes are not locked, and you can always type more to elaborate on your ideas, which is handy. Overall, I like that the Krono is not shoving AI down my throat, but to be honest, there is really not that much to shove. AI features here feel raw and need improvements to be more useful. Battery Life Like most E-Ink readers, the Krono has fantastic battery life. Even with a clock as a screensaver, its standby power consumption is incredibly low. And when in use, you can get weeks of reading on a single charge. Without the front light, my unit never sipped more than one or two percent of battery during a one-hour reading session. It was nice to see plenty of battery-related settings. You can limit charging at 80% to protect battery health long-term, check the number of charging cycles, manufacturing/first-time use date, battery health, and the maximum capacity. Additionally, the Krono lets you select what hardware remains enabled when sleeping. This lets you keep Wi-Fi and Bluetooth on (say, if you want to receive notifications, for some reason) and keep audio playing when locked. Turning these features off effectively eliminates any standby battery drain. I left my Krono sitting for 24 hours with a clock screensaver on, and it did not drop a single percent. The pretty big 3,950 mAh battery justifies the device's thickness and ensures you do not have to charge it for long periods. Speaking of charging, it is capped at only 10W, which is a bit disappointing, as getting such a big battery to 100% takes a notably long time in the era of super-fast charging smartphones. DuRoBo Moodi The Moodi is a standalone, optional accessory for your Krono. It is a wireless remote with two customizable buttons that you can use to flip pages, control media, or scroll webpages. The accessory connects via Bluetooth. Despite having a built-in rechargeable battery, it is extremely light. While the Moodi's shape and form factor is not what I would call particularly ergonomic, it is not uncomfortable to hold and use. The Moodi comes with six removable magnetic buttons with various smiley faces. Buttons sit securely, and they have nice-feeling, albeit a little loud, clicks. It is a cute touch that adds a little more fun and character to the device. There is also an accented power button and a single status LED. The latter displays charging status and connection mode. The Moodi supports three modes: Reading: Buttons work as volume buttons, allowing you to flip pages in the built-in reader or other apps that support page turning with volume buttons. Media: Buttons work as skip forward/backward, which is useful when listening to audiobooks, podcasts, or music. Scroll: The third mode lets you scroll pages in the web browser or any other application The Krono properly detects the Moodi and presents you with an on-screen guide when you connect it for the first time (it also displays the battery level). However, you can only change modes by holding both buttons for a few seconds. It is also worth noting that the Moodi works with other devices. I connected it to my iPhone and it let me adjust volume or control media playback. Sadly, the scroll did not work, so you cannot use it to waste time scrolling TikToks. Overall, the Moodi is a cute little accessory, which I can recommend for those who read a lot. It is very useful for remote page flipping when you do not want to burden your hands by holding the Krono all the time. I only wish DuRoBo included a lanyard for the built-in loop. As for the battery life, after using the Moodi for a few days, I only managed to drop several percent of its 90 mAh battery. Despite the small size, it is rated for weeks of use, which is pretty impressive. At $35.99, I cannot say the Moodi is a must-have accessory, but I see the appeal. I prefer using the Krono with its Smart Dial, as I rarely read for more than 40-60 minutes in one sitting. However, if you have a stand and like reading for long periods, the Moodi is the right thing to have. It is a bit more expensive than regular page flippers on Amazon, but it is on par with similar products from Kobo or BOOX. Plus, it has a little more fun to it with removable buttons and better integration into the Krono. Conclusion At the end of the day, DuRoBo Krono is a nice pocket-sized e-reader. Its software focuses on the main things without trying to be everything at once. The smart dial idea is unique and great, and I wish more manufacturers had something similar in their devices. The display is also good, with an even frontlight and "always-on" support. I did not notice any deal-breaking issues with the Krono. However, you can feel that the idea needs some improvements, such as a slightly stiffer dial in a more ergonomic location, perhaps a little more premium materials, and better software customization. I hope the company won't give up on the idea and improve the dial and ergonomics in the second generation. Buy DuRoBo Krono Black - $279.99 on Amazon Buy DuRoBo Krono White - $279.99 on Amazon Buy DuRoBo Moodi - $35.99 on Amazon As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      ssd21345 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      195
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      94
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!