How to boot Windows 8 to Desktop without using 3rd party tools


Recommended Posts

There are many "skip metro" applications exists since Windows 8 RP. They run at every Windows 8 startup .

I want to share some hack that can natively boot Windows 8 to the desktop.

The main idea: we will install a system licensing policy which allow the OS to go to the Desktop directly after startup. After installing Windows 8, it is necessary to apply this policy. It is preferable that you apply this tweak before you activate Windows 8. If you have already activated, applying this tweak will require re-activation of the OS. Sounds a bit complex, doesn?t it? Don?t worry, I have prepared ready-to-use files that do all the dirty work for you. All you need is just a product key for your Windows 8, which you probably already have.

Get that ready-to-use files here.

Extract them, edit __wrapper.cmd and insert your key at line 4, then run Install.cmd. You are done.

:)

"4. Navigate to the fourth line and replace the ?YOUR-WINDOWS8-SERIAL-NUMBER-HERE? part with your genuine product key for Windows 8."

Download a program off the internet and give it my Windows product key? I think I'll pass on that.

It is a script, not a compiled program. You can open it in Notepad and SEE what it does. The key is meant to be supplied because without the key the native boot to desktop won't work (if you understand how they have locked down the feature to Windows Server licensing model). If you can read simple batch commands, you can see the script doesn't send anything over the internet or try to steal your key. It offers NATIVE boot to the desktop instead of showing Metro first and simulating Win+D. Lastly, no one is forcing you to use it.

Edited by Intrinsica
Edited out offensive comments.

Totally agree. Bashing other members isn't really a good way to get people to use your utilities/scripts/whatever.

Like I said, no one is holding a gun to anyone's head to use it. Bashing the app as malicious and accusing it of trying to steal your product key when the proof is in the script isn't very friendly either. Can some moderator clean this thread please?

Download a program off the internet and give it my Windows product key? I think I'll pass on that.
It is a script, not a compiled program. You can open it in Notepad and SEE what it does.

MsftGaurav should have left it at that, or at least the offensive remarks could have been left out. You can open the script and read through it to make sure it's safe.

I'll remove the offensive comments, but the rest of the thread can stay as it is relevant to the discussion.

Just put a shortcut to a program (Firefox for example) in the Startup folder.

Does this work if I am resuming my PC from sleep mode? I'm asking because I have this HTPC running XBMC. It's okay on normal boots (goes straight to XBMC and shows the start screen for a second or two). When resuming from sleep, the start screen comes up and blocks the view to XBMC, until I press the Windows key or CTRL+D.

My concern is that the scripts are not just executed, but rather are passed as a parameter to ele.exe

@echo off
cd /d %~dp0
ele %cd%\__wrapper.cmd
exit[/CODE]

So what is ele.exe? I'm not saying I mistrust the OP but the question does need to be asked. The file info states its from winreview.ru. Nothing personal but once again, I start to get a funny feeling when I see my Win8 key in a script being passed to an exe that was created from an .ru domain.

After running through ILSpy we can see that ele.exe simply is a apparently a tool to open an elevated command prompt. Why? Why not just just have the instructions for the user to right click Run as Administrator?

Does this work if I am resuming my PC from sleep mode? I'm asking because I have this HTPC running XBMC. It's okay on normal boots (goes straight to XBMC and shows the start screen for a second or two). When resuming from sleep, the start screen comes up and blocks the view to XBMC, until I press the Windows key or CTRL+D.

I still have to click my user account name after resuming from sleep mode. Don't know if there is another way around that.

The problem with bypassing the new start menu is if you do this on say a work network. People will be calling in if the program doesn't work after say an update and it brings them to the new startmenu.

Having employees having to click on desktop will at least teach them how to get to the desktop from the new start menu. Also personally I don't find it that big of a pain to press desktop to go to the old desktop.

The problem with bypassing the new start menu is if you do this on say a work network. People will be calling in if the program doesn't work after say an update and it brings them to the new startmenu.

Having employees having to click on desktop will at least teach them how to get to the desktop from the new start menu. Also personally I don't find it that big of a pain to press desktop to go to the old desktop.

Remember, people are lazy and don't like change

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • The quantum search for Time's origin had an equally mind-boggling conclusion by Sayan Sen Image by Steve Johnson via Pexels A theoretical study from researchers at the University of Surrey suggested that the direction of time may not be fundamentally fixed in certain quantum systems. The work, published in Scientific Reports, examined how the “arrow of time” could emerge from microscopic physics and found that time-reversal symmetry can remain intact even in models used to describe processes such as energy loss and thermalisation. The arrow of time refers to the observed one-way direction from past to future in everyday life. In macroscopic processes, this is easy to see. Spilled milk spreads across a table and does not gather back into a glass, and heat flows from hotter objects to colder ones. These processes shape the common sense idea that time moves in a single direction. However, at the level of fundamental physics, many equations do not prefer a direction of time. Time-reversal symmetry means that the same physical laws can describe a system whether time moves forward or backward. This has made it difficult to explain why irreversible behaviour appears in the large-scale world even when the underlying rules do not require it. Dr Andrea Rocco, Associate Professor in Physics and Mathematical Biology at the University of Surrey, described this contrast: "One way to explain this is when you look at a process like spilt milk spreading across a table, it's clear that time is moving forward. But if you were to play that in reverse, like a movie, you'd immediately know something was wrong – it would be hard to believe milk could just gather back into a glass. However, there are processes, such as the motion of a pendulum, that look just as believable in reverse. The puzzle is that, at the most fundamental level, the laws of physics resemble the pendulum; they do not account for irreversible processes. Our findings suggest that while our common experience tells us that time only moves one way, we are just unaware that the opposite direction would have been equally possible." The study focused on open quantum systems, which are quantum systems that interact with a surrounding environment. This environment, often described as a heat bath, can exchange energy and information with the system. The researchers used this framework to study how a direction of time might appear even when the underlying physics does not enforce one. A key part of the analysis involved the Markov approximation. This is a simplification used in many models where the system is assumed not to retain memory of its past states. The idea is that changes depend only on the current state, not on earlier history. This is commonly used when studying thermalisation, which is the process where a system settles into equilibrium with its environment. The study also used concepts such as master equations, including the Lindblad and Pauli equations, which describe how probabilities of different quantum states change over time. Another related model discussed was quantum Brownian motion, which describes the random-like movement of a quantum particle interacting continuously with its environment. In these descriptions, a “memory kernel” can appear, which is a mathematical term that accounts for how past states influence current behaviour. The researchers found that applying the Markov approximation did not break time-reversal symmetry. Even when the system interacted with an effectively infinite heat bath, the resulting equations of motion remained symmetric in time. This meant that the same mathematical description could, in principle, run forward or backward in time without contradiction. The study further showed that standard frameworks used in open quantum systems, including quantum Brownian motion and master equations like the Lindblad and Pauli forms, could be written in a time-symmetric way. These equations are typically used to describe processes that look irreversible, such as dissipation and thermalisation, but the results suggested they can also be interpreted as allowing evolution in both time directions. Thomas Guff, Research Fellow in Quantum Thermodynamics, said: "The surprising part of this project was that even after making the standard simplifying assumption to our equations describing open quantum systems, the equations still behaved the same way whether the system was moving forwards or backwards in time. When we carefully worked through the maths, we found that this behaviour had to be the case because a key part of the equation, the "memory kernel," is symmetrical in time. We also found a small but important detail which is usually overlooked – a time discontinuous factor emerged that kept the time-symmetry property intact. It’s unusual to see such a mathematical mechanism in a physics equation because it's not continuous, and it was very surprising to see it appear so naturally." The researchers also noted that deriving a one-way arrow of time from time-reversal symmetric microscopic dynamics remains an open problem across fields such as thermodynamics, statistical mechanics, particle physics, and cosmology. Their results suggested that some standard descriptions of irreversible behaviour in open quantum systems may be better understood using a time-symmetric formulation of Markovianity. According to the study, processes such as thermalisation, which are usually treated as irreversible, could in theory be described in a way that allows evolution in either time direction under the same rules. This does not imply that time reversal occurs in everyday life, but rather that the underlying equations do not strictly enforce a single direction. Overall, the findings suggested that the perceived direction of time may emerge from how physical systems are modelled and approximated, rather than from a fundamental asymmetry in the laws themselves. The researchers noted that this perspective could have implications for ongoing work in quantum mechanics, thermodynamics, and cosmology on the origin of time’s arrow. Source: University of Surrey, Nature This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing
    • A bit premature... 100% Marketing. Bizarre.
    • A $300 price hike is insane! No one is going to want to pay that much!
    • Since the 1st one flopped, there is really no reason to make another one. It's just losing money left and right.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      581
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      75
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      73
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!