Big amount of written data to ssd (several gigabytes)


Recommended Posts

Before you tell me this is not a Windows 8 issue but the software I use and how I use it, I need to clarify.

When I was using Windows 7, I monitored the written bytes to my SSD drive because I was worried about write cycles. I learned to forget about it and just use the disk and don't bother with stuff like moving the Firefox profile and cache to an HDD, which kind of kills the whole purpose of having an SSD. Anyway, after using the computer for a whole day, both me and my brother, the amount of written bytes to C: wasn't too big - around 1GB, sometimes more, sometimes less. This is without modifications to software - no Mozilla profiles, pagefiles, etc, were moved to HDD.

Now on Windows 8 it's a little weird. After a day of computer use (8 hours or more), I have between 6 and 11GB written to C:! I don't use too much applications - it's pretty much Firefox, an instant messenger, foobar, Gimp... there's just no way anything should write THAT much to the disk.

I tried running procmon, filtering the results by written files or filtering by C:\, but during monitoring there was almost nothing written to the disk. After using Firefox for a while, I check the written bytes and... additional 6GB suddenly have been written. So I moved the profile and cache folders to HDD, to see if it changes anything, but it did not, so I went back to using the SSD for them. My research was fruitless. I could not identify what is writing so much data. Firefox and the People app wrote the most, likely because of storing web cache on the disk, but the amount of these writes is very small and should never reach over 10GB within a few hours.

I use DiskCountersView to monitor the amount of read and written data. For a second, I thought this program might not be compatible with Windows 8 and show weird stuff because of that, but a friend of mine does not have this issue. He has about 1GB written, after a few hours of browsing the web, watching movies, etc.

I have scanned the whole system with the built in Defender, Malwarebytes Antimalware, SpyBot and they didn't even find something suspicious. The system is 100% clean. The situation did not change after reinstalling the whole system from scratch (due to other reasons). I don't use hibernation, only fast boot. System Restore very rarely creates new restore points and I doubt they would be big enough to generate over 10GB's of data.

So I ask here :) Is this normal for Windows 8 to write so much to the C: partition? If so, why? :p If it is not normal, then do you have any recommendations about how should I investigate further? I know this amount of writes won't suddenly kill my SSD (or at least shouldn't ;)) so I could probably forget about it, but putting SSD life expectancy aside... what could possibly be in those tens of gigabytes? :p

Thanks in advance for any tips.

What's your drives sector size? Each sector is usually about 4KB, spread unevenly across a drive, on the drive you also have 'blocks' of a set size, when you read or write to these blocks, you get or write to the WHOLE block so writing where 2 files are storage would require reading the contents, modify one of the files and then write back the new block. Maybe that's why firefox is using a lot?

If you've got an SSD, why have you not set firefox's cache to memory only?

My disk is Kingston V200, 128GB. It has 4kB sector size, the NTFS partition has 4kB cluster size. Firefox is not the cause of the problem. Setting its cache to memory only is interesting and I'll read about that, but it won't eliminate my problem with ~10GB writes on a daily basis... because, as I said, I tested with the cache and profile folders move from the SSD to HDD. The SSD still had many gigabytes written to it on random occasions, usually when idle - say, I see 1GB written in DiskCountersView, I go out of the room for a few minutes, come back to my PC and see 6GB written :p

No, I haven't. That's the most weird thing - at least some of the huge writes occur when the computer is idle.

I also used Task Manager, Details tab, and added the column "I/O write bytes". No running processes ever have more writes than a few hundred megabytes, and after suming them up... it's still a few hundred megabytes, not dozens of gigabytes...

I've noticed that the space used on C:\ varies a lot on Windows 8, I think it's to do with the way the system is shut down as after a reboot it will go back to 74GB available but if it's been running for a few days it goes down to about 70GB. I'm running a 120GB OCZ Agility 3 SSD but I'm not particularly fussed about this. I take the attitude that I bought the device to use it, not to keep thinking about how many write cycles it's doing. It will probably take years before it causes any issues with the drive at which point I would have upgraded anyway.

This seems to be consistent with the Windows 8 install on my netbook which also seems to free up a few gigs of space after being rebooted after being running for a few days.

I don't care about the disk space used. It's pretty much stuck at 89-91GB free.

I disabled the hiberfile, disabled fast boot, disabled the pagefile. After booting and launching a few applications: ~100MB write bytes. That's how it should be. So i start up ARMA2 for 5 minutes. Exit. Writebytes: over 1GB.

The game is *not* saving anything but a few config files in Documents and %appdata% nearly a 1MB total.

So:

- Firefox is not writing gigabytes to disk

- games are not writing gigabytes to disk

- but diskcountersview says gigabytes have been written

I wouldn't care about this, as the SSD drive has been bought to be used and be happy about the speed gains. But, Windows 7 wrote about 1GB of data after a few hours of use. The same kind of use on Windows 8 generates tens of gigabytes of write files. A friend of mine with Windows 8 has a few hundred megabyte write files after a few hours of system and app use.

So, I don't really have a problem with SSD wear. I don't care, I'll buy a new one when this one dies. The thing that troubles me is what the hell is being written to the disk so much, to generate ~10GB of write files. Interesting thing is, my free hard disk space doesn't go below 89-91GB, ever. So it's also not my complaint, that I'm suddenly 10GB of disk space less. I am not. The total amount of disk write operations sums up to ~10GB per day, which is ~10 times more than on Windows 7. Is this how Windows 8 works?

I thought about it too, that DiskCountersView is somehow not compatible with Windows 8, similarly to how LatencyMon and other DPC monitoring software are, and is simply reporting wrong.

But a friend of mine is also using Windows 8. His computer usage is similar to mine, too - 99% of the time is spent in Firefox. Default configurations on both computers. He tells me DiskCountersView is reporting several hundred gigabytes of write file operations.

As I said, I'm not paranoid about SSD wear. It just bothers me what the hell is going on :p

edit - could you run this program http://www.nirsoft.n...nters_view.html and tell me how much bytes you have in the Write bytes column, on the C: drive? Also, how long is your system running since the last restart. One more thing - due to how fast boot operates, shutting down the system and starting again, does not reset the counters. So the amount of write bytes can be huge if you have not restarted the system recently.

  • 2 months later...

I have bad experience with Firefox - even with prefetch off and disk cache off, it writes over 2 GB of data per day with not heavy browsing. It seems it is because of permanent rewrite of approx 10 MB places.sqlite file. Every new web page or link open adds about 11 MB in Process Explorer I/O write bytes, the datetime of the file is changed but the total size is almost constant.

Anyway, rewriting of file consumes the same amount of work from SSD and it eats from its life...

If this is true assumption, thanks a lot mozilla & sqlite. It does not mean Chrome is much better :-) Try to watch process explorer for a while when browsing.

I can understand if you want to figure this out to know what is going on, but I would not worry about the SSD and its' life. The life of that SSD will outlast that computer and you are going to buy a new SSD for a new computer build before that drive ever looses space or performance. Get some sleep :)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Amazon Prime Day 2026: Best Dolby soundbar deals from Sony, Samsung, JBL, Polk, and more by Sayan Sen Yesterday we covered the JBL BAR 800 which is a 5.1.2 Dolby Atmos/Vision soundbar. The unit is on sale for its lowest ever price of just $800 making it a solid offer. However, there are many more options to choose from and in this article, we have made a compilation of the best deals including from Sony, Polk, Yamaha, Denon, Samsung and more. Sony's BAR models are currently at their lowest prices which makes them solid offerings. The company's BRAVIA Theatre Bar lineup is designed to suit different home cinema needs. The Bar 5 is an entry-level 3.1-channel soundbar with a wireless subwoofer, supporting Dolby Atmos®, DTS:X, S-Force PRO Front Surround, and Vertical Surround Engine for immersive audio with clear dialogue. The Bar 6 upgrades to a 3.1.2-channel configuration by adding dedicated up-firing speakers for more convincing overhead Atmos effects while retaining the wireless subwoofer. At the premium end, the Bar 7, Bar 8, and flagship Bar 9 are single-soundbar solutions featuring Sony’s 360 Spatial Sound Mapping technology, which creates phantom speakers for a wider surround field. Bar 7 includes nine speaker units, Bar 8 increases this to eleven, and Bar 9 offers thirteen speaker driver units promising the most expansive soundstage and acoustic performance. All models should integrate seamlessly with compatible BRAVIA TVs and support the BRAVIA Connect app for setup and control. Get them at the links below: Sony BRAVIA Theater Bar 9 Soundbar (HT-A9000): $998.00 (Amazon US) (Was: $1498) Sony BRAVIA Theater Bar 8 Soundbar (HT-A9000): $798.00 (Amazon US) (Was: $998) Sony BRAVIA Theater Bar 7 Soundbar (HT-A7100): $618.00 (Amazon US) (Was: $768) Sony BRAVIA Theater System 6: $548.00 | Sony BRAVIA Theater Bar 6: $448.00 Sony BRAVIA Theater Bar 5 (HT-B500): $278.00 (Amazon US) (Was: $348) Sony HT-S400 2.1 soundbar: $198.00 (Amazon US) (Was: $248) Aside from those, we also have more discounts including from Samsung, Polk Audio, and more: Samsung Q-Series Soundbar HW-QS90H 7.1.2: $797.99 (Amazon US) (Was: $998) Polk Audio Signa S4: $336.00 (Amazon US) (Was: $449) Hisense AX3120Q: $229.00 (Amazon US) (Was: $259) Check out more soundbar deals that you may like at this link. Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Stellarium 26.2 by Razvan Serea Stellarium is a free open source planetarium for your computer. It shows a realistic sky in 3D, just like what you see with the naked eye, binoculars or a telescope. It is being used in planetarium projectors. Just set your coordinates and go. Stellarium key features: Realistic simulation of the sky, sunrise and sunset Default catalogue of over 600,000 stars Downloadable additional catalogues for up to 210 million stars Catalog data for all New General Catalogue (NGC) objects Images of almost all Messier objects and the Milky Way Artistic illustrations for all 88 modern constellations More than a dozen different cultures with their constellations Solar and lunar eclipse simulation Photorealistic landscapes (more are available on the website) Scripting support with ECMAScript (a few demo scripts are included) Extendable with plug-ins: 8 plug-ins installed by default, including: artificial satellites plug-in (updated from an on-line TLE database) ocular simulation plug-in (shows how objects look like in a given ocular) Solar System editor plug-in (imports comet and asteroid data from the MPC) telescope control plug-in (Meade LX200 and Celestron NexStar compatible) The major changes of this version: Added new sky culture Added new plugin: Planes Many improvements in plugins Many improvements in Core and GUI Many updates in sky cultures. [full release notes] Download: Stellarium 26.2 (64-bit) | 456.0 MB (Open Source) View: Stellarium Home Page | Other Operating Systems | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • NASA: This asteroid may not kill us but it probably won't be far off either by Sayan Sen Image by Zelch Csaba via Pexels New observations by NASA's James Webb Space Telescope have eliminated the last remaining impact threat posed by asteroid 2024 YR4, ruling out the possibility that the near-Earth object could strike the Moon in December 2032. NASA said observations collected by Webb on February 18 and 26, 2026, enabled scientists to refine the asteroid's orbit enough to "rule out a chance of lunar impact on Dec. 22, 2032." Instead, asteroid 2024 YR4 is now expected to pass the Moon at a distance of about 13,200 miles (21,200 km). The agency stressed that the update "reflects improved precision in our understanding of where the asteroid is expected to be in 2032 rather than a shift in its orbital path." The announcement closes a remarkable chapter in planetary defence that began in late 2024, when the approximately 60-metre-wide asteroid briefly became the most closely watched near-Earth object in the world. Discovered on December 27, 2024, by the ATLAS telescope in Chile, 2024 YR4 initially appeared to have a small chance of colliding with Earth on December 22, 2032. As astronomers gathered more observations, the impact probability briefly climbed to around 3%—the highest ever recorded for an asteroid of its size—before steadily falling as its orbit became better understood. By early 2025, international observations had ruled out any significant risk to Earth. However, astronomers were left with another possibility: a roughly 4% chance that the asteroid could instead strike the Moon. "The probability that asteroid 2024 YR4 will strike the Moon on 22 December 2032 is now approximately 4%," the European Space Agency (ESA) had said last year, noting that "there is a 96% chance that the asteroid will not impact the Moon." ESA said such an impact, while unlikely, would have presented an extraordinary scientific opportunity. "It is a very rare event for an asteroid this large to impact the Moon – and it is rarer still that we know about it in advance. The impact would likely be visible from Earth, and so scientists will be very excited by the prospect of observing and analysing it," said Richard Moissl, Head of ESA's Planetary Defence Office. "It would certainly leave a new crater on the surface. However, we wouldn't be able to accurately predict in advance how much material would be thrown into space, or whether any would reach Earth," he added. The asteroid also exposed an important blind spot in planetary defence. Because 2024 YR4 approached Earth from the direction of the Sun, it remained hidden from ground-based telescopes until after its closest approach. "We looked into how Neomir would have performed in this situation, and the simulations surprised even us," Moissl said. "Neomir would have detected asteroid 2024 YR4 about a month earlier than ground-based telescopes did. This would have given astronomers more time to study the asteroid's trajectory and allowed them to much sooner rule out any chance of Earth impact in 2032." He added, "As an infrared telescope, like Webb, Neomir would have also immediately given us a much better estimate for the asteroid's size, which is very important for assessing the significance of the hazard." The latest NASA observations underscore the value of space-based infrared telescopes in tracking faint asteroids. According to NASA, Webb made "among the faintest ever observations of an asteroid," extending the object's observational record by nearly eight months at a time when it had become too faint for other telescopes. That additional data allowed scientists to eliminate the remaining uncertainty surrounding its 2032 flyby. Although asteroid 2024 YR4 is now confirmed to pose no threat to either Earth or the Moon, scientists say its discovery remains one of the most significant real-world tests of the international planetary defence system, demonstrating how continued observations can rapidly transform an object once considered hazardous into one whose future path is known with high confidence. Source: NASA, ESA This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      Admir earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      First Post
    • Apprentice
      daryld went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Contributor
      Carltonbar went up a rank
      Contributor
    • One Month Later
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      418
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      130
    4. 4
      Xenon
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!