Recommended Posts

Honestly, I wouldn't let the two live either. when someone breaks into your home you can always expect that they would not let you live. I would not have shot them at close range and then make a stupid statement. The guy deserves to go to jail for being stupid. I have no sympathy for the two. They got what they deserved.

Yeah I shoot to kill not wound.

So if someone broke into YOUR house and you found out later who it was, would you go shoot them in the head?

(as tempting as it sounds you have to see some extremism there)

I do see what you mean ... but from what I understand they never managed to leave the house and I still think it was within the heat of the moment ...plus if anyone broke into my house and I found out who it was ... they would wish that they were dead ..... but your right I wouldnt kill them

This definitely crossed the line to murder, no doubt about it.

I support being able to defend your home.. no doubt.. but seriously a wounding is all it takes to incapacitate them. To hold a gun to their head and 'finish them off' is sickening. This guy will spend the rest of his life in jail and deservedly so.

Yeah, he's screwed. The execution style of this is beyond self-defense as most people have pointed out. Personally, I have no issue with anyone being killed for attempted burglary, as long as you are defending yourself or your home. I would happily wrap a steel bar around a burglar(s) cranium, but only enough to incapacitate said burglar(s), and if that means manslaughter, that's what it is.

One thing is for sure; I'd definitely not let any burglar get away. I wouldn't kill them (unlike a British Farmer a few years ago who shot two burglars as they were fleeing - think he killed one and crippled another with a shotgun, was it?), but I'd definitely give chase and be sat on the back of their head until Police showed up.

I have to agree here.. This guy went to far.. if someone was in my house and I felt threaten and shot them to a point they couldn't walk or no longer a threat, I would just call the cops and let them pick them up..

This definitely crossed the line to murder, no doubt about it.

I support being able to defend your home.. no doubt.. but seriously a wounding is all it takes to incapacitate them. To hold a gun to their head and 'finish them off' is sickening. This guy will spend the rest of his life in jail and deservedly so.

[And anyone else who shared similar views]

I'm not definitely condoning allowing people to execute criminals (although, it may be fine in such a case, considering the criminals chose to intrude on the victim's property and they chose to harm or even ruin his or her life), as I don't yet know what is right in this regard, but it's important we consider all points and all sides: If these criminals weren't put down, they would remain alive, so there would always be that fear that they may come back for revenge. These people have already attempted to harm the victim once or even ruin their life, so if the victim hurts them in self-defence (especially in such a painful/disfiguring manner), it's likely they could try to harm the victim again or even worse. Hasn't the victim already suffered enough by having to experience someone breaking into their home, their feeling of security being compromised, possibly being threatened with their life, probably feeling as if they may end up dead etc, for us to then force them to spend the rest of their life fearing the criminals enacting revenge?

[. . .]

Honestly, the lesson depends on the person. If I felt threatened and in fear for my life or my family's lives, you would bet I would attempt to shoot to kill. Assuming I had shot someone, saw the person was unarmed and clearly in no position to threaten me, I'd get the police. Whatever happens, and whether or not this guy faces charges, I wouldn't want to be him. He'll probably have to find a different place of residence

The problem with that view is that they will always be in a position to threaten you. Always. You may incapacitate them today or stop them from what they're doing today, but there's always another day for them to come back (with weapons or more people) with revenge in mind. Even if they go to prison for however many years, they will definitely be allowed out again at some point (probably quite soon after the crime), and having to spend time in prison might even make them more likely to want to enact revenge.

It looked like to me it was just two kids goofing off.. which they should not have been doing.. but I don't think these two where career criminals.. If you someone breaks into someone elses house and gets shot, and dies.. then so be it.. but to have shot them, and do one last "clean shot".. it had to get close enough to them to do this so his life was no longer at risk..

So people that break laws.. we just need to kill them all?.. No.. don't think so

This has been a pretty big story up here. Talk radio has said that the one female burglar laughed at him after getting shot, so he took it personally and finished her off under the chin. That in itself was one reason why he finished her off. Of course, knowing this country, if the two weren't killed they might have sued him....

  • Like 1

From the movie, Lair Lair..

Mr. Reede. Several years ago, a friend had a burglar on her roof.

He fell through the skylight, landed on a butcher's knife, cutting his leg.

The burglar sued my friend. He sued my friend!

Because of guys like you, he won!

My friend had to pay the burglar $6,000. Is that justice?

No. I'd have got him ten.

Good-bye, Mr. Reede.

Such a lovely photo of two scum bags. Sure he shouldn't have gone that far but they shouldn't ha ve broke in either. Probably looking for prescription drugs. When you break into someones house you risk losing your life, dont want to be potentionally shot? Don't break in. Sometimes the doors are locked for other reasons like protecing you from me. If you break in there will be a 12ga waiting on the other side..

Now as far as him pretty much executing them, thats to far, once he had them under his control he should of called the police, also i'd tell them that if they make any sudden movenents they will be shot.

The problem with that view is that they will always be in a position to threaten you. Always. You may incapacitate them today or stop them from what they're doing today, but there's always another day for them to come back (with weapons or more people) with revenge in mind. Even if they go to prison for however many years, they will definitely be allowed out again at some point (probably quite soon after the crime), and having to spend time in prison might even make them more likely to want to enact revenge.

While I see that logic, you could also consider the opposite. Robbers got shot, they know not to rob you while you're home because you're packing. They'll just burgle you while you're away instead :p

Such a lovely photo of two scum bags. Sure he shouldn't have gone that far but they shouldn't ha ve broke in either. Probably looking for prescription drugs. When you break into someones house you risk losing your life, dont want to be potentionally shot? Don't break in. Sometimes the doors are locked for other reasons like protecing you from me. If you break in there will be a 12ga waiting on the other side..

Now as far as him pretty much executing them, thats to far, once he had them under his control he should of called the police, also i'd tell them that if they make any sudden movenents they will be shot.

Quick to jump to conclusions about their motive.. we'll just have to wait for official police reports. Other than that, I generally agree with what you've said

  • Like 1

Well, if someone decides to break into my house, and I notice they are there, I DO have a license to kill them, contrary to what you believe. He should have just kept his mouth shut.

Forensics would have determined that the girl was executed after she was no longer a threat.

I will answer it for him, YES IT DOES. YOU decide to pretty much do wtf you feel like doing to someone else, YOU should be able to take whatever punishment is handed to you, be it being tortured or cut limb from limb. Your ****ing rights ended when you decided to try to harm or STEAL something from someone else.

Not according to the LAW it doesn't.

The kind of sick comments being made in this thread are a shining testament to why I find it impossible to trust so called "sensible" gun owners. Reality is US culture places an unhealthy obsession upon violence and retribution.

  • Like 1

The problem with that view is that they will always be in a position to threaten you. Always. You may incapacitate them today or stop them from what they're doing today, but there's always another day for them to come back (with weapons or more people) with revenge in mind. Even if they go to prison for however many years, they will definitely be allowed out again at some point (probably quite soon after the crime), and having to spend time in prison might even make them more likely to want to enact revenge.

This is the real world. Not a movie. Once caught and shot, these kids would have been tried as adults and put away for a very long time.

This is the real world. Not a movie. Once caught and shot, these kids would have been tried as adults and put away for a very long time.

Exactly?this is the real world. There have been cases of criminals coming back for revenge after they served their prison sentence. They may not be put away for a long time?it depends on how tough the laws are in that place. In the UK, these people wouldn't be in prison for a long time.

He's done society a favor... Good riddance. Hopefully other burglars will look at this and think twice about robbing somebody.

As sad as I find it that people had to die and others had to lose friends and loved ones, I do completely agree with you. These criminals would have always been a threat to innocent people in society, for as long as they lived. It's the unfortunate, sad truth?innocent people in society are better off without some people (those who intentionally harm others).

Actually, by being violent to criminals all you're doing is sending the message that violence is an acceptable way to deal with those that we dislike.

  • Like 2

Home owner's response went beyond self defense, will definitely be going away for a while thanks to the "clean finishing shot."

However I'm not mourning the loss of the two maggots who invaded his home. Society is better off with them gone.

To be fair maybe he did call the police first. If you check out online, even in bigger cities. There are 911 calls where it took the police 10+ Mins to even get there. One 911 call, a womans husband and daughter were shot and killed, it took Phoenix PD 18 MINS TO MAKE ENTRY.

One of the articles linked above your post says he left their bodies in his basement for a day before police discovered them. That doesn't help his self-defense case...

Byron Smith, 64, a retired federal employee, is charged with second-degree murder in the two deaths. Smith, whose brother said he had endured numerous break-ins in recent years, remained in the Morrison County jail Wednesday night after earlier admitting that he repeatedly shot the intruders, including final shots at close range, then left their bodies in his basement for a full day until deputies arrived to check on a neighbor's concerns that he might have killed somebody.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • For a guy who claims to hate Farage and the ignorant, gullible, rightwing racist skinheads sponsored by Putin that his lies represent, you sure are quoting them time and time and time again, mate. I guess you're conveniently ignoring the fact that your country and commonwealth just happened to work much better when it was still part of the E.U.? Denial isn't just a river in Egypt.
    • Do you live in the U.K? Do any of the people here that are against the UK leaving the E.U, live in the U.K? If not then why are you bothered? If you do live here then it is a different thing . Brexit was a good idea, should have done it years before, it was done badly, but the idea was good. You are saying the same thing as remainers do, oh we did what Putin wanted, we listened to the lies and Farage. I hate Farage and never believed most of what he said, certainly did not believe the £350m a week for the NHS. But we did pay a lot of money to the E.U and yes some of it came back, but what is the point of paying it out for only some of it to come back? Get out of the E.U, no money to them and in theory we can use the money to do things in the country. I said in theory, but our governments are a total and complete waste of space. No matter what colour rosette they wear. You and others say it was a mistake and yet the two main parties in the U.K are not looking at rejoining the EU, I wonder why that is? I was not tricked by anyone. Makes no odds now, we are out and have been for 10 years, what we need is a decent government to run the country. All they do is shout at each other like a load of kids and seems to do nothing and make this country more into a police and nanny state. Getting more like China all the time.
    • 4TB TEAMGROUP MP44Q, 2TB T-Force G50, and 2TB WD My Passport SSDs drop to great prices by Fiza Ali Prime Day may be over, but there are still worthwhile storage deals available, including discounts on SSDs for shoppers who missed the event or are looking to upgrade their storage solution. Particularly, 2TB Western Digital My Passport, 2TB TEAMGROUP T-Force G50, and 4TB TEAMGROUP MP44Q SSD are selling at great prices with up to 23% off. The 2TB TEAMGROUP T-Force G50 is an M.2 2280 PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe SSD with sequential read speeds of up to 5,000MB/s and sequential write speeds of up to 4,500MB/s. The drive has an endurance rating of 1,300 TBW (terabytes written) and features a DRAM-less design. The company specifies a mean time between failures (MTBF) of 3 million hours. The drive includes an "ultra-thin" graphene heat spreader that helps dissipate heat without significantly increasing the drive's thickness. It also supports S.M.A.R.T. monitoring, allowing compatible software to monitor drive health and operating status. The SSD is rated for operating temperatures from 0°C to 70°C, with a storage temperature range of -40°C to 85°C. The drive is backed by a five-year limited warranty as well. 2TB TEAMGROUP T-Force G50 SSD: $269.99 (Amazon US) The TEAMGROUP MP44Q is an M.2 2280 PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe SSD that delivers sequential read speeds of up to 7,000MB/s and sequential write speeds of up to 5,900MB/s. It uses 3D QLC NAND flash memory to provide 4TB of storage capacity for games, applications, media files, and other data. The drive has an endurance rating of 2,000 TBW and an MTBF of 1.6 million hours. The SSD features a DRAM-less design and supports TEAMGROUP's S.M.A.R.T. monitoring software, allowing users to monitor drive health, temperature, and remaining lifespan. For thermal management, the MP44Q also includes an "ultra-thin" graphene heat spreader. It is designed to operate at temperatures between 0°C and 70°C and can be stored at temperatures ranging from -40°C to 85°C. The SSD is also backed by a five-year limited warranty. 4TB TEAMGROUP MP44Q SSD: $478.99 (Amazon US) The 2TB WD My Passport SSD connects via a USB-C port using the USB 3.2 Gen 2 interface. It delivers sequential read speeds of up to 1,050MB/s and sequential write speeds of up to 1,000MB/s through NVMe technology. In terms of security features, the drive includes password protection with 256-bit AES hardware encryption. The SSD is also designed to resist shock and vibration and is rated to withstand drops from heights of up to 6.5 feet. The recommended operating temperature range is 5°C to 35°C, while the non-operating temperature range is -20°C to 65°C. This drive is also backed by a five-year limited warranty. 2TB Western Digital My Passport SSD: $279.99 (Amazon US) Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Yeah... The root of my comment, ostensibly, is how to spin the story via the actual technical merits of the solution! * Decentralized (aka federated) solution with built-in encrypted ephemeral message transport, * Transport via Relays (intermediary servers) with no message archival, * Second configurable pathway are actual email servers (if DNS records are programmed accordingly) via IMAP protocols carriage, * "Chat-over-Email" is the design pattern adopted; it can either leverage full-blown Email Server (must use the INBOX folder) to exchange all received messages/edits/reactions (so be weary of notifications overloads) [best practice is creating a separate email acct used explicitly for federated chat purposes!] or leverage its built-in Relay Server mechanism which actually resides on-device (by default but can be configured otherwise), * By virtue of be a decentralized/federated model, all other intermediary servers who may pass-along messages (while the recipient's final relay/device is inaccessible) cannot snoop on the messages due to the encrypted nature of contents. The intermediaries may, however, analyze the metadata due to the simple fact that routing mechanisms require hints for relay destinations. Unfortunately, whomever is posting about DeltaChat across socials are misleading with "zero metadata" claims -- especially when the Relays (according to their own technical documents) mandate the addition of chat-version metadata and other decorations in order to actually transport any message. -- Based on this summary, I'd prefer if they'd better dual-path message transport (email server add-in, federated relay engine) rather than patch-on email protocols to existing federated social media frameworks. They're frankensteining something rather than extending widely-deployed technology stacks.
    • Decentralized search result anonymization...
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      493
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      225
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      148
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!