Recommended Posts

Budget is about $2500

I am currently looking at:

Panasonic VIERA TC-P55VT50 (currently $2300 @ Amazon.com)

http://www.amazon.com/Panasonic-VIERA-TC-P55VT50-55-Inch-Plasma/dp/B00752VKTG/ref=sr_1_1?s=electronics&ie=UTF8&qid=1355770070&sr=1-1&keywords=TC-P55VT50

Samsung UN55ES8000 (currently $2300 @ Amazon.com)

http://www.amazon.com/Samsung-UN55ES8000-55-Inch-1080p-Silver/dp/B00752NJMC/ref=sr_1_2?s=electronics&ie=UTF8&qid=1355770044&sr=1-2&keywords=samsung+es8000

Sony BRAVIA KDL55HX850 (currently $2278 @ Amazon.com)

http://www.amazon.com/Sony-BRAVIA-KDL55HX850-55-Inch-Internet/dp/B006U1VGNS/ref=sr_1_3?s=electronics&ie=UTF8&qid=1355764394&sr=1-3&keywords=sony+55+inch+led+tv

This TV will replace a Samsung LN-52A650, its the main living room so light cannot be controlled 100% during the day. My first choice is the Panasonic as I have never owned a plasma and would love to experience the "true colors" I always read about. I don't have any real feature requirements as I havent used any of the "apps" built into my bluray player (netflix, youtube, hulu, etc). Am I missing anything in the decision process? Going again today to Bestbuy to look at them but I always feel like showrooms dont do any justice to actual home use picture..

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1126320-purchasing-a-new-tv/
Share on other sites

noticed the first one is a plasma... I've had plasma before, and it makes a good bit of heat and uses drastically more electric then LCD take that into consideration also and I've had plasma and better quality LCD side by side, the color difference isn't really noticable

I've had plasma before, and it makes a good bit of heat and uses drastically more electric then LCD

Agreed, Plasma always had me worried about heat (its hot where I live), and I definitely 'felt' the electricity bill go abnormal after my purchase, sold as second hand after 2 months, got a Bravia, cant be more happy, but do look at its remote, its a very bad design and hurts the thumb if you like holding the remote like me.

Agreed, Plasma always had me worried about heat (its hot where I live), and I definitely 'felt' the electricity bill go abnormal after my purchase, sold as second hand after 2 months, got a Bravia, cant be more happy, but do look at its remote, its a very bad design and hurts the thumb if you like holding the remote like me.

my first plasma used almost 500 watts with the screen changing quickly, and got very hot, they got the wattage down some but its still a lot compared to a LED backlit LCD screen, my largest LCD screen only uses 80 Watts

LED is the way to go, but if you're on a budget, then go Plasma, but LCD is no good.

Plasma is a really nice picture for the price that's for sure. You can pretty much get 2 Plasmas for the price of 1 LED.

And like someone stated, Plasma is really hard on electricity.

Going better to worst would be... 4K, LED, Plasma, LCD.

But it also depends on the size you want. You could get a pretty big Plasma for the budget you stated, so if you want size over quality, get the Plasma.

Well I am pretty much limited to 55" due to my entertainment center, possibly 60" if it has little to no bezel.

The "Enery Guide" tag from Amazon says it costs $24 yearly

http://g-ecx.images-...PDFs/55VT50.pdf

not sure how accurate that is.

I dont think I am too concerned with electricity... I do hate the heat (I have my AC going as soon as temps hit high 70s/low 80s) so that may be a drawback for me.

So for right now I am most interested in picture quality above all else.

LED is the way to go, but if you're on a budget, then go Plasma, but LCD is no good.

Plasma is a really nice picture for the price that's for sure. You can pretty much get 2 Plasmas for the price of 1 LED.

And like someone stated, Plasma is really hard on electricity.

Going better to worst would be... 4K, LED, Plasma, LCD.

But it also depends on the size you want. You could get a pretty big Plasma for the budget you stated, so if you want size over quality, get the Plasma.

4K? Seriosuly?.... talk about waste of money right now and for years from now

The Samsung suffers from quite a bit of backlight bleeding/clouding compared to the Sony (in general, every panel is different). Both will do pretty well with the right settings. For the Samsung that'd be the "Movie" preset, for the Bravia you should be using the Cinema1 or Cinema2 preset with the color balance on the Warm2-preset (if you're not calibrating).

Personally, I'd go with the Sony here.

Also, those are some enormous tv's. Everyone in my family has a 32" and a 40" TV would be regarded HUGE :p

Also, those are some enormous tv's. Everyone in my family has a 32" and a 40" TV would be regarded HUGE :p

I think 50" is the average here (at least with friends and family I know). I have a 46" in our bedroom (never used), a 42" in my daughters playroom (finally getting used to watch Elmo and other kids shows) and the 52 Samsung which will be donated to my dad once I get my new TV.

Thanks for the info on backlight bleeding, I was hoping that was a thing of the past as it seemed to be the biggest issue (even on the high end models). Does plasma suffer from any sort of bleeding or halo issues (I am assuming no due to the tech used)?

While I have a Samsung LN55C630, and would recommend another Samsung LCD TV to another, I'd say to go with the Sony. Just because of how much better it can possibly "connect" with future purchases. Get a PS3 or PS4 (when it comes out) and it could have special functions alongside the TV. Same with your receiver and other devices that will all be connected to each other.

Both are great though. Picture quality is amazing on both of those displays, and which ever way you go, you will be happy and it will be a great upgrade. But choose either Sony or Samsung.

I think 50" is the average here (at least with friends and family I know). I have a 46" in our bedroom (never used), a 42" in my daughters playroom (finally getting used to watch Elmo and other kids shows) and the 52 Samsung which will be donated to my dad once I get my new TV.

Thanks for the info on backlight bleeding, I was hoping that was a thing of the past as it seemed to be the biggest issue (even on the high end models). Does plasma suffer from any sort of bleeding or halo issues (I am assuming no due to the tech used)?

Backlight bleeding for the most part should be a thing of the past. If you do get one with some, return it. But most sets now are very very minimal if existant.

Plasma suffers from nothing at the moment, except higher electric bills :p

While I have a Samsung LN55C630, and would recommend another Samsung LCD TV to another, I'd say to go with the Sony. Just because of how much better it can possibly "connect" with future purchases. Get a PS3 or PS4 (when it comes out) and it could have special functions alongside the TV. Same with your receiver and other devices that will all be connected to each other.

Both are great though. Picture quality is amazing on both of those displays, and which ever way you go, you will be happy and it will be a great upgrade. But choose either Sony or Samsung.

Backlight bleeding for the most part should be a thing of the past. If you do get one with some, return it. But most sets now are very very minimal if existant.

Plasma suffers from nothing at the moment, except higher electric bills :p

plasma is drastically easier to break too, the weight of the screen's glass can break itself it not moved right, the larger the screen the easier it can crack itself unfortuniatly... that and the heat.. which can case more wear on the inverters it uses to power the screen... it has to jump the voltage up like a CRT does to power the screen and the inverters that do that can die in heat if it gets to hot

Right now a plasma (unless it's a really high-end one) isn't interesting anymore. The cons outweigh the pros.

I've read reviews of people (in Dutch) moving from a Panasonic plasma to that exact Sony TV saying they were surprised with the excellent colour reproduction and contrast of the Sony.

What Bluray player do you have? Sometimes it's nice to keep those in the same brand to avoid CEC-issues. Sony devices communicate nicely what they are and you can basically use your TV's remote to control everything pretty nicely. It also works across brands, just usually not as good/complete.

I have a plasma and it's true they are power hungry and get pretty warm, but my biggest complaint so far is glare. The glass screen reflects light so badly, every window or light shows up on the screen. It's great at night of course, but that's another thing to consider. I believe they've improved in the last few years with anti-glare coatings though.

I happen to own a Viera, they do get hot, the, power consumption I really haven't noticed the difference in my electric bill, but that's not to say they're low power units, I was warned about that when I bought mine, tho I would like to recommend the panasonic, as it blows my 42 inch Sony Bravia away for picture quality.

I would ask you this tho, out of which ever TV you choose to buy, would you consider doing something similar to what I did...

That is, buy the older model and get the extended warranty, that way if it breaks on you, you get the Newer model of identical size and spec, and save some money.

(as I live in the UK I know UK warranties agencies do that)

While I am getting a warranty, the VT50 has been on the market for a good amount of time so I expect there to be a new model released in the coming months (perhaps shown at CES in Jan?).

Amazon is running a deal right now for $500 gift card with the purchase so that usually means clearing stock.

@ Ambroos - I have a few bluray players... (PS3, 3d Sony, and a 3d Panasonic) - everything goes through a receiver so I havent run into any handshake issues and rarely use the CEC features since my primary remote is the one for my cablebox. Going to read some more reviews on the Samsung/Sony LEDs and also check out some of the plasmas from Samsung before I order.

Thanks everyone for your input so far.

  • 3 weeks later...

Just to update/close out the thread. I ended up purchasing the Panasonic VT50 55". TV was delivered on the 26th by Amazon and it has exceeded my expectations in every way. I think I will def get the calibration done once I have passed my 100 hours of break in. I cant imagine the picture getting that much better but I want to get the most out of this tv. Only bluray I checked out so far was Finding Nemo and it looked incredible, I have yet to check out 3d as I dont feel like shelling out an extra $120 on 2 pairs of glasses (even though I have 30+ 3d blurays).

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • A 13 billion year old secret about our Universe's origin was revealed by Sayan Sen Image by Pascal Küffer via Pexels Researchers at the Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik (MPIK) in Heidelberg had recreated a key chemical reaction from the early universe, producing results that could change scientists' understanding of how the first stars formed. The study focused on the helium hydride ion (HeH⁺), which is widely regarded as the first molecule to form in the universe. Scientists believe HeH⁺ appeared around 380,000 years after the Big Bang, when the universe had cooled enough for electrons and atomic nuclei to combine into neutral atoms in a period known as recombination. This marked the beginning of chemistry in the cosmos. Immediately after the Big Bang about 13.8 billion years ago, the universe was extremely hot and dense. As it expanded and cooled, hydrogen and helium became the dominant elements. Once neutral helium atoms formed, they could react with ionised hydrogen nuclei, or protons, to create helium hydride ions. Although simple in structure, HeH⁺ played an important role in the young universe. It was the first step in a chain of reactions that eventually produced molecular hydrogen (H₂), a molecule made up of two hydrogen atoms and now the most abundant molecule in the universe. Molecular hydrogen later became a key ingredient in the formation of the first stars. At the time, the universe had entered a phase often called the cosmological "dark age." Matter had become transparent to light following recombination, but there were still no stars or galaxies producing visible light. Several hundred million years would pass before the first stars appeared. For those first stars to form, large clouds of gas had to collapse under their own gravity. To do that, the gas needed to cool by releasing energy. While hydrogen atoms can help with this process at high temperatures, they become less effective below about 10,000 degrees Celsius. Molecules can continue the cooling process by releasing energy through rotational and vibrational motions. Scientists have long considered HeH⁺ a potentially important coolant because of its comparatively large dipole moment, a property that describes how electric charge is distributed within a molecule and allows it to release energy efficiently. The amount of helium hydride present in the early universe may therefore have influenced how easily the first stars could form. At the same time, HeH⁺ was constantly being destroyed. Under primordial conditions, its main destruction mechanisms were recombination with free electrons and chemical reactions with hydrogen atoms. These reactions ultimately helped produce molecular hydrogen, linking the formation and destruction of HeH⁺ to the chemistry that shaped the early universe. For many years, theoretical studies suggested that reactions between HeH⁺ and hydrogen atoms would become much slower at low temperatures. Scientists believed there was an energy barrier along the reaction pathway that reduced the chances of the reaction taking place in the cold conditions of the early universe. The new study suggests otherwise. To investigate the process, researchers recreated a closely related reaction using deuterium, a naturally occurring isotope of hydrogen that contains one proton and one neutron in its nucleus. When HeH⁺ collides with deuterium, it forms an HD⁺ ion and a neutral helium atom. This allows scientists to study the reaction in a controlled way while closely mimicking the behaviour of the original reaction involving hydrogen. The experiments were carried out at the Cryogenic Storage Ring (CSR) at MPIK, a specialised facility designed to recreate conditions similar to those found in space. Researchers stored HeH⁺ ions in the 35-metre storage ring for up to 60 seconds at temperatures just a few kelvins above absolute zero and merged them with a beam of neutral deuterium atoms. By adjusting the speeds of the two particle beams, the team measured how the reaction rate changed with collision energy, which is directly related to temperature. The researchers found that the reaction rate remains almost constant as temperatures decrease. In other words, the reaction does not slow down at low temperatures as earlier models predicted. “Previous theories predicted a significant decrease in the reaction probability at low temperatures, but we were unable to verify this in either the experiment or new theoretical calculations by our colleagues,” explained Dr Holger Kreckel of MPIK. “The reactions of HeH⁺ with neutral hydrogen and deuterium therefore appear to have been far more important for chemistry in the early universe than previously assumed,” he continued. According to the researchers, the reaction appears to be barrierless, meaning there is no energy obstacle preventing it from taking place efficiently even at very low temperatures. The findings support recent theoretical work led by physicist Yohann Scribano, whose group identified an error in a widely used potential energy surface, a mathematical model used to describe how the energy of a system changes during a chemical reaction. The error appears to have caused previous studies to significantly underestimate reaction rates under primordial conditions. The new calculations closely match the experimental results. Together, they suggest that helium chemistry in the early universe may need to be re-evaluated. Because molecules such as HeH⁺ and molecular hydrogen played an important role in cooling primordial gas clouds, the findings could help scientists build more accurate models of how the first stars formed. By showing that helium hydride was likely destroyed more efficiently than previously thought, the study offers new insight into the chemical processes that shaped the universe during its earliest stages and helped set the conditions for the emergence of the first stars. Source: Max-Planck Institute, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "What an interesting smell you've discovered"
    • It could EASILY be 70 for the base game BUT + lots of FOMO to make it up to 100-120, like a few days Early Access, online money, pre-order bonus cars, weapons, missions, clothing, avatars or profile stuff, etc... And still WAY TOO MANY people would buy those and make Rockstar insane money.
    • Just to understand: your solution to getting rid of an online password manager is...another online password manager?
    • Cjam 2.5.0.0 by Razvan Serea Cjam is a lightweight and fast MP3 editor for Windows that lets you cut, join, and edit MP3 files without re-encoding. This means your audio quality remains untouched, and edits happen instantly. Cjam is ideal for quick, lossless edits—whether you're trimming music, combining tracks, or preparing audio for learning tools or podcasts. It features batch processing, scripting support, cue and playlist file handling, and a simple interface. Cjam is perfect for anyone who needs efficient MP3 editing without the complexity of full audio suites. Cjam requires a PC running Windows 10 or later and Microsoft .NET 6.0 or later. Key features for Cjam: No Re-encoding: Edit MP3 files without losing quality. Cut and Join MP3: Easily cut, trim, and combine MP3 tracks. Batch Processing: Edit multiple files at once for faster workflows. Scriptable Interface: Automate tasks with a custom command language. Cue and Playlist Support: Handle CUE and playlist files for seamless audio management. Fast and Lightweight: Quick processing with minimal system resources. Lossless Audio Editing: Ensure your edits don't affect audio quality. Simple User Interface: Clean, intuitive design for easy navigation. File Format Support: Works with MP3, Cjam-specific file formats (CJAMC, CJAMJ, CJAM). Cjam 2.5.0.0 changelog: Added clipboard-based import/export support for mp3DirectCut Added clipboard-based export support for REAPER Added support for naming IMP3 elements Changed the Reset behavior to preserve Undo/Redo history; use Shift key + Reset button to clear it Added a new command parameter (qcp) Added 8 new entries to lang.txt (main_c124-126, main_d150-151, main_m082, vme_c014, vme_d005) Fixed a bug where the il parameter was incorrectly applied when pasting VMP3s into the main list Fixed several other minor bugs Download: Cjam 2.5.0.0 | 1.4 MB (Freeware) Links: Cjam Home Page | Cjam Manual | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      91
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!